Home Blog Page 24

To Separate A People: – Are you invited to God’s feast? (ARMAGEDDON)

2
39260902 - large group of people in the form of the church. isolated, white background.

Are you wondering if you should go?

How does something become holy?

Two thing are like glue in a society. Common holy days and similar food traditions. Food unite people. It was not uncommon in ancient times that accepting a meal invitation at someones house was a confirmation of a covenant between the two.
In the Biblical ritual laws there were food-sacrifices. By eating they took part in God’s covenant. Christ also placed the symbols of His covenant in food and drinks. «And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body. And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.» (Mat 26:26-28)

In the book of Daniel chapter 12 we learn that God will in the end time sanctify a people, or cleanse them. In the book of Revelation the last church is described very far from a sanctified state. They risk being eternally lost. The solution to their falling away is described to let Jesus in their door so they can «sup with him» (Rev.3:20) The meal is symbolic of course and it’s about letting Jesus cleanse and save us. A renewal of His covenant with us. Christ introduced the Lord’s supper at a feast day. Every Biblical feast day was filled with symbols tied to the salvation Christ would provide and His plan to sanctify and deliver His people. Throughout the Bible we are told that He desires to deliver us from our sins and the hold our sins have on our lives.

The word «holy» means to set aside something for a special service. In the Bible the word is used to describe something that has been cleansed in order to be set aside. If it’s not cleansed it cannot be set aside for God’s service, whether it was an item, day or a man. One of God’s set times, the weekly sabbath, was called holy. Two of the reasons it was called holy is revealed. One is that it was set aside from the other days to be specially dedicated to the spiritual bond between God and man. The other reason is it’s divine significance. Anything tied to God’s divinity was to be regarded as holy.
When Moses came close to a burning bush where God was manifesting Himself he is told:
«And he said, Draw not nigh hither: put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.» (Exo 3:5)
The ground he was standing was considered holy purely because of the presence of the Lord. In the same way God has a presence, an authority in the Sabbath that requires us to sanctify it. The fourth commandment says: «Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates» (Exo 20:8-10)
In Genesis during creation week it says: «And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.» (Gen.2:3) Here we are informed of something important. The day was sanctified by God because of it’s meaning to Him and we are told to keep it holy. It says the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God, which means it is the bond the day has with the Lord that is what makes it holy. So in the same way that Moses was required to take off his shoes when he stood on holy ground, we are asked to consider the sabbath, Gods set time, as holy too.

Separation and Unity
If you want to create a division between two groups of people, regardless the size, the best way to do it is to give them separate food laws, food traditions and holy days. God knows this. So does God’s enemy. God’s holy times was removed or changed in Roman times.They tried to unite the Christian church with the pagan religion. The end consequence was that Christians were lead away from their faithfulness toward God. Rome first tried to break the new christian movement, spite that they were tolerant towards different beliefs in their kingdom. Rome never expressed a need for a group of people to convert to the Roman religion. A good example is the Jews. They respected their religion, it was when they rebelled against the state that they suffered. But Jews never tried to covert pagans. The christian movement was converting many pagans and they refused to take part in the pagan feasts and food offerings. The anger from family, friends and society towards the people now rejecting their tradition lead to what would later become a severe persecution. They were viewed as people who was breaking the unity and the peace of the people. And this lead to them being persecuted. But the Christians increased in both number and power. They could not be destroyed. Rome then changed tactics and tried to unite the religiously divided kingdom into one. Having the nation split in two different cultures only weakened it and it’s unity. So an attempt to unity the empire was made by compromise. It’s a bit like if a city was half Muslim and half christian today and the ruler decided to unify the citizens by making a religion that was half Muslim and half Christian. This is what actually happened in the Roman Empire with Christianity and the pagan roman religion. They were merged.
People would not easily give up on their traditions, their feasts and food, and so they were allowed to keep all of it but it was given a christian meaning and a christian name. Only because they did this compromise did the people slowly unify with the Christian Church. It didn’t always go well. Some pagan temples were destroyed and made into a church. But many of the pagan gods they worshiped was made into saints and so they could continue to pray to them and their images, only in a new setting. The merge of the religions also meant that the Christians had to give up on their God’s requirements. However it was seen as a victory for the church to get in the position they did. And to convert this powerful empire to Christianity and have the state advance their agendas was so tempting that the Christians in power felt it was a sacrifice worth making. And many of the pagan converts preferred to continue their old feasts and traditions and be Christians at the same time.

The same can be said about today, Gods people take part in pagan customs with Christian names that the rest of the world keeps and this make them feel like one with the world. It is the bond that keeps different people together, that keeps society together. Everyone wants to feel they are a part of a bigger society. No one likes being an outcast.
But God’s children are told not to be unequally yoked together with unbelievers: «Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?» (2Co 6:14-15)
God’s people know what happens when they don’t take part, they are pushed away by society. Most think that this cannot possibly be God’s will. They avoid persecution and stigmatization by having common feast days and traditions with the world. Many Christians during the Roman empire would rather die before taking part in the heathen customs and they were killed in large numbers. Many Christians today avoid being set aside from society and just go with the flow. They have chosen the opposite of their forefathers.

Why doesn’t God want us to keep the traditions of the world? Because being yoked together with the world hinders our sanctification.

When Israel was in Egypt it had in many ways been corrupted by Egyptian culture. The sabbath was sanctified at creation but God had to teach them all over again how to sanctify it. And this happened before they even came to Sinai and was given the law there. It says that God tested them to see if they would keep the sabbath holy by giving them manna six days a week. So this law pre-existed the law at Sinai. They were tested in the sabbath question before they had entered into the covenant with God at Sinai. We can also see how they were instructed to rest one day on their journey towards the Red Sea. This must have been the sabbath because God had sanctified it and would not have had them carry heavy on their journey on this day according to His own rules set at creation.
God said Israel was an elected priesthood, they were to be sanctified and spiritually separated from the world. «Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and a holy nation.» (Exo 19:5-6)
When God taught them about His holy times, feast days and food-laws He gave them what would create a natural separation between them and other people. It was regarded an insult if they would not eat the food offered by the pagans and it would prevent a union between the two. If God’s people and the pagans didn’t unite God’s people would remain sanctified and cleansed. Their religion were more likely to not be corrupted by compromise.
In the Bible we see two examples on how keeping the food-laws and the feast days was both tied to the term of being «holy»
«For I am the LORD your God: ye shall therefore sanctify yourselves, and ye shall be holy; for I am holy: neither shall ye defile yourselves with any manner of creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. For I am the LORD that bringeth you up out of the land of Egypt, to be your God: ye shall therefore be holy, for I am holy.» (Lev 11:44-45)

And the sabbath: «Moreover also I gave them my sabbaths, to be a sign between me and them, that they might know that I am the LORD that sanctify them.» (Eze 20:12)

Again, remember, sanctification is to set something aside, or to separate something for a divine purpose. God’s people were not to be at one with the world in practice.
Now this was misunderstood in the time of Jesus and the Jews would not even enter the house of someone who wasn’t Jewish. And even those pagans that had converted was regarded as unclean. So God gives the apostle Peter a vision where both clean and unclean animals was together. All kinds of animals. Peter refuses to eat of even the clean food just because it was together with the unclean and he was worried it was contaminated by just association. Peter never said he learned to eat unclean food from the vision. He said that what God wanted to teach him was tied to man: «And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.» (Act 10:28) 
So Peter said the vision was about people not food.
The problem we see then and today is that God’s requirement are misunderstood and exaggerated. The Jews exaggerated all of God’s requirements and gave them a wrongful meaning. God never wanted them to be prejudice to pagans or others with other nationality, or to decline their hospitality. God repeatedly told them to be kind to strangers, it was part of the law.
They were to be in the world but not of the world. Their separation was to be spiritual not physical. Or else they would not be a witness to the world. God’s law was to keep their religion clean, not their physical bodies. They could communicate and be together with people in the world, but not take part in their religious practices. Like Jesus said to the Pharisees, it wasn’t what was eaten that made man unclean but what came our of his heart. The command against unclean food had a deeper meaning and purpose and didn’t make a man sinful itself.

In Ezekiel we are told that the rejection of God’s sabbath and holy times is tied to idol worship. We are told that the land became unclean or sacrilegious when they broke these laws. They were to keep Gods times as a means to protect them from the practices of idol worship or the then worldly religion. «Her priests have violated my law, and have profaned mine holy things: they have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shewed difference between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths, and I am profaned among them.» (Eze 22:26)
«..up mine hand unto the seed of the house of Jacob, and made myself known unto them in the land of Egypt, when I lifted up mine hand unto them, saying, I am the LORD your God; In the day that I lifted up mine hand unto them, to bring them forth of the land of Egypt into a land that I had espied for them, flowing with milk and honey, which is the glory of all lands: Then said I unto them, Cast ye away every man the abominations of his eyes, and defile not yourselves with the idols of Egypt: I am the LORD your God. But they rebelled against me, and would not hearken unto me: they did not every man cast away the abominations of their eyes, neither did they forsake the idols of Egypt: then I said, I will pour out my fury upon them, to accomplish my anger against them in the midst of the land of Egypt.» (Eze 20:5-8)

So in the Torah we are told that the first thing God did to spiritually separate them as a people from spiritual Egypt was to re-introduce the sabbath. And in Ezekiel chapter 20 we are told that to violate the sabbath and not break with the Egyptian religion is tied to each other.

What feast days does for a society
Feast days and food is what keeps people unified as a people. Even though people are different, with different interests, personalities and views, they find a feeling of unity and harmony by keeping the same feast days and eating together. By sharing the same traditions. This is often why we see that special feast days always come together with distinct food-traditions. People eat the same food on the chosen time year after year. Every holy-day has it’s own food tradition to separate them from the other holy-days. When residents in a country are preparing for a holiday, differences are often blurred and the people feel a belonging in the society they are in. Strangers that would never talk together wish each other a happy holiday. Being a part of something that everyone else is a part of, traditions, often give people a sense of security. Weather they want to admit it or not, people are herd animals, sheep. When everyone does something similar it gives a feeling of safety. There is no denying that.

This safety and belonging is broken when someone refuses to take part in it. If someone doesn’t want to eat of the food on our table or refuse to keep the same or similar holy-day, people start feeling distant to the other and sometimes also hostility. It was what lead to the first real hard persecution towards Christians by the Roman empire, they were hated because they would not take part in the roman feasts.
It doesn’t matter where you are in the world or what holidays that are kept. Whether it is in Asia, Muslim countries or Christian. The different traditions has the same effect on the country and the people that keep them.
Because holidays and food creates so much unity and safety for different groups it is also the same that makes them vulnerable for deceptive influence.

In Biblical times the hole world had a similar religion. We know the gods under different names in the different states and kingdoms, but a closer study of the religion show they are very similar to each other. The gods was the same, only with different names and each separate community created their own traditions and distinct differences. These differences and traditions today works the same way. They make a natural invisible split between cultures and countries. It is what makes Germans identify as Germans and it is why the French identifies as French. It’s not tied to just land area. Germany and France have in different order had control over some of the same areas. The borders in Europe have been changed many times. We see that it’s not the area itself that inspire people to whom they belong, it’s the culture. So different people can for instance live in Germany and speak the language but still feel unconnected to German society. It makes no difference for the feeling of belonging when immigrants come to Europe if they keep their own identity and culture in the land they now are in. They are often despised and considered foreigners no matter how long they have lived in the country. But those immigrants that come and adopt the new countries traditions, eat what they eat and keep holy the days they keep holy, are considered countrymen no matter what color of skin they have or no matter what country they came from. They are called success stories.
The threat for most people are those that keep eating after their own rules and keep their own feasts.
The Jews was spread throughout Europe for many centuries. Other groups that have suffered the same has in time lost their identify and adopted the traditions of the land they were in. This also happened to Jews who left their identity. Today their descendants don’t even know about their Jewish background. But the Jewish groups that did kept their food-laws and their traditions was preserved no matter what culture or country they lived in. They were despised and displaced, sometimes refused to own property in the land they lived. But the traditions that they kept was the glue or the bond that helped them keep their own identity no matter the inhuman pressure they were under for centuries. Many Muslims keep their feasts and food-requirements, and they too are able to secure their belief system from generation to generation in a non Muslim country.

Christmas has become one of the most influential holidays in the west. And it has spread throughout the entire world by the help of media. The unity of this holiday is stronger then even countries own traditions. For example southern countries that celebrate Christmas make fake snow on their Christmas trees even though snow is not part of their country’s tradition. They once celebrated Christmas before even the north did. The introduction of Santa Claus on the north pole has become part of the tradition. And so the Christmas tradition has changed from it’s beginning south in Europe and gotten a new content. The new content is accepted everywhere. In this way we can get a little glint of the influence common tradition have on those who follow it. A Jew would never introduce Santa to it’s Feast Of Tabernacle celebration, because the two feasts are separated. But those who share the same holiday are open for changes. Borders are not important when there is common celebration. Why does the Greek listen to American 40-50s music at Christmas? Because holidays create a bond between groups of people and this bond gives the sense of safety when adopting new traditions from who ever has the most influence. Holidays and food are among the most important elements in religious practice. This was also the case in Biblical times where all the pagan religions had this as their main unifying religious practice. Feast-days and rituals was the most important factor in pagan worship.

Holy days, weather it’s Gods times or worldly or pagan, functions as a place of gathering. Not necessarily a gathering in a room, but a gathering in practices and thought. It gathers people for instruction. Even if it’s worldly or pagan holidays they all contain instruction. This is why we will see the same stories told over and over again on the specific holiday. Ordinary music is replaced with traditional music, every day food replaced with traditional food. The same stories you heard last year you will hear again. Differences is gathered into a unity for a short time, and we are instructed in an ideology, no matter how silly. It doesn’t matter if the story that is told is about a reindeer with a red nose or if it’s a story with a deeper meaning. It has the same effect. The stories contribute in making different people uniting in a common heritage. And this help to give people the sense of an identity which again keeps the people gathered. And why is it a need to gather people? For the sake of peace. The government who has to enforce authority are depended on people feeling a belonging and responsibility towards each other. If a people don’t feel a belonging in a society, and are not gathered in that way, they won’t subordinate and respect an authority as easily. Those leaders that don’t represent the peoples values are often rejected are rebelled against. An authority needs something that binds people together and give them a sense of identity and unity in order to accept an authority over them. Holy days and food culture is therefore closely tied to loyalty and authority. When Obama wouldn’t single out christian tradition during Christmas it lead to rebellious feelings among the christian people who got together to elect Trump as the next President. Trump promised to unite them under common culture and values and chose to make Jesus the main focus in the white house during Christmas.
The presidents pardon a turkey every thanksgiving, an American feast day. Why a turkey, why eat turkey that day? Again this feast day is not tied to the food they eat, logically it should not make a difference. But food is important to create a sense of belonging and the feeling of being a part of a community. That’s why charitable institutions hand out turkey to the poor at thanksgiving and not some other food. It’s to make them feel like they are part of society.
In the west, Christmas is that time of year were most people feel lonely and depressed. This is because the feeling of being an outsider is enlarged at these times because feast days is tied to the feeling of being part of society.

Israel changes feast days
Israel was one united kingdom under King Solomon. But Solomon’s son behaved so badly that ten of Israels 12 tribes rebelled and refused to be under the King of Judah’s authority. The kingdom was divided in two and the North kingdom got their own king while Solomon’s son continued to rule the tribe of Judah.
But the temple was in Judah and three times a year the law said that the people had to gather there for the feasts. The new king in the northern kingdom feared for his kingdom’s future if this was to continue. That is why he, as part of a plan, created a new feast that was a month after God’s feast. And he asked the people to come to two different places he had chosen, that was closer, to gather and worship there. By introducing a new feast the king succeeded in separating the two groups of people and prevent them to become united under one kingdom again. If the Judean king didn’t represent their traditions they were less likely to want him to rule over them. This again would secure his position and the future separation of the northern kingdom. The moment the north kingdom got their own feasts and traditions with the feast a natural split took place between them and the tribe of Judah. The reason for their gathering as a people was removed. In this story we are told how the king of the North kingdom knew that feast days are power. And in the first verse, were it’s mentioned the three times a year it’s referring to the Lord’s feast days according to the Torah. So the king fear that the feasts will lead them to Jerusalem and that the influence from these gatherings will inspire their loyalty to the king there. «And Jeroboam said in his heart, Now shall the kingdom return to the house of David: If this people go up to do sacrifice in the house of the LORD at Jerusalem, then shall the heart of this people turn again unto their lord, even unto Rehoboam king of Judah, and they shall kill me, and go again to Rehoboam king of Judah.  Whereupon the king took counsel, and made two calves of gold, and said unto them, It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem: behold thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt. And he set the one in Bethel, and the other put he in Dan.  And this thing became a sin: for the people went to worship before the one, even unto Dan. And he made an house of high places, and made priests of the lowest of the people, which were not of the sons of Levi. And Jeroboam ordained a feast in the eighth month, on the fifteenth day of the month, like unto the feast that is in Judah, and he offered upon the altar. So did he in Bethel, sacrificing unto the calves that he had made: and he placed in Bethel the priests of the high places which he had made. So he offered upon the altar which he had made in Bethel the fifteenth day of the eighth month, even in the month which he had devised of his own heart; and ordained a feast unto the children of Israel: and he offered upon the altar, and burnt incense.» (1Ki 12:26-33)

God lets us know this is one of the main reasons He lets the north kingdom perish. When the North-kingdom no longer was connected to Gods times and laws, and when these divine institutions were no longer considered holy, they were vulnerable for influence from the world. In not long they took part in the rest of the worlds religious practices, while still continuing a halfhearted belief in the God of Israel. The Bible says the sin that king Jeroboam did when he created a new gathering place, new traditions and feasts, was the very reason the kingdom was later destroyed. Jeroboam made his own feast to strengthen his position and gather the people under his leadership. But this separated. them from God’s leadership.
«Therefore the LORD was very angry with Israel, and removed them out of his sight: there was none left but the tribe of Judah only.  Also Judah kept not the commandments of the LORD their God, but walked in the statutes of Israel which they made. And the LORD rejected all the seed of Israel, and afflicted them, and delivered them into the hand of spoilers, until he had cast them out of his sight. For he rent Israel from the house of David; and they made Jeroboam the son of Nebat king: and Jeroboam drave Israel from following the LORD, and made them sin a great sin. For the children of Israel walked in all the sins of Jeroboam which he did; they departed not from them; Until the LORD removed Israel out of his sight, as he had said by all his servants the prophets. So was Israel carried away out of their own land to Assyria unto this day.» (2Ki 17:18-23)

ARMAGEDDON/ HAR-MOED
Armageddon is a famous name tied to the Biblical end-time battle.
«Several Bible scholars have concluded that this battle is far from a war of armies, tanks, planes, ships and nuclear weapons, and moreover, the plain of Megiddo has nothing to do with the place named Armageddon. Instead, the word in verse 16 commonly translated as “Armageddon” should be translated from Greek as Har-Magedon, which in Hebrew is shown to mean “the Mount of Gathering” or “Mount of Assembly.” 2
How did they come up with this conclusion? Here are a few. First, the Hebrew word for mountain is har, and magedon is derived from moed, another Hebrew word that means “assembly” or “gathering.” In fact, in Isaiah 14:13“mount of assembly” is Har-moed. Since Megiddo is a plain and there is no mountain there, Har-Magedon could not possibly refer to Megiddo. Second, it is common in Greek and Hebrew literature to name a person, a place or an event according to its significance.» 1

So an area is given a nickname after what takes place there. It happened over and over again in the Bible history. In the Bible there were only one mountain that was chosen for repeated gathering.. It was Jerusalem and the temple mount. Armageddon can therefore speak of a physical war in Jerusalem, which I think it probably is. But The Book of Revelation has throughout the book a double meaning, a physical and a symbolic that are tied together. For instance a beast with symbolical attributes is a real power.
The gathering at the mount only took place at Gods holy feast days. It was the feast days that was the gathering or the assembly. The expression MOED is directly tied to Gods feast days. The word means both holy times or set times and gathering at the same time. This isn’t without reason when we find out what Gods holy times really are. We see the term MOED used during creation:
«And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons (MOED), and for days, and years:» (Gen 1:14)
Again Moed is a word used for both times and gathering. Here it is a gathering in time. Gods gathering and the time cannot be set apart.

We see the expression used again when God teaches Israel to keep His holy days. This time the weekly sabbath is included in the term. «And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, Concerning the feasts of the LORD, which ye shall proclaim to be holy convocations, even these are my feasts ( MOED ).» (Lev 23:1-2)
The time that then are listed after this word is first the weekly sabbath and then the different feasts throughout the year. The biblical Passover, the biblical Pentecost, the Feast of Trumpets, the Day of Atonement and then the Feast of Tabernacles.
Gods times is His gathering or assembly. Today its popular to say that we don’t need to go to a church to worship God. God doesn’t live in a building. And this is right. God’s spirit can come to a building, but we are not dependent on going to a building to take part. «But Solomon built him an house. Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet,2» (Act 7:47-48)
Many think that God’s times could only be held in Jerusalem. But when the sanctuary stood in Shiloh they came there to keep the feasts like we see in the story of Samuel. They came where God was, represented by His throne, the Ark of the Covenant. They also kept the feasts by the Jordan river when the Lord was represented there. They also kept the feast in Egypt and also later in Arabia. Gods place of gathering was therefore not first and foremost tied to a physical place, the place changed, but it was always tied to TIME. The time didn’t change, it was the time that was the point of gathering or assembly no matter where they were. God also showed an expectation that they were to keep His appointed time even when they were on a journey far away: «Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If any man of you or of your posterity shall be unclean by reason of a dead body, or be in a journey afar off, yet he shall keep the Passover unto the LORD.» (Num 9:10) They were still to assembly, even if they were alone.

Right now God does not dwell over His throne in Jerusalem like He once did, but we know that the Lord is in the sanctuary in heaven. A place God’s people can’t enter except through prayer, as we learn our prayers are represented at the alter of incense in the sanctuary. «And another angel came and stood at the altar, having a golden censer; and there was given unto him much incense, that he should offer it with the prayers of all saints upon the golden altar which was before the throne. And the smoke of the incense, which came with the prayers of the saints, ascended up before God out of the angel’s hand.» (Rev.8:3-4)
In the Bible horns are a symbol of power. The alter of incense had four horns in each corner and these horns was sprinkled with blood from the sacrifices. In the heavenly sanctuary “with better blood than this”. The power of prayer was therefore in the blood. And it’s through this that Gods people get a symbolic access into the sanctuary in heaven.

So Gods’ presence is now in the sanctuary in heaven and through prayer we come before God’s sanctuary today. God’s place of gathering, according to the Bible, is not in a physical house but in time. And even though we should worship God every day, His place of gathering is His times. This is what is to gather us as a people under the banner of God. This is God’s assembly. The true place of gathering is the time and the people are the church. If we don’t gather with the Lord on the times that He has invited us to we exclude ourselves from God’s community. God said He would sanctify those who kept His sabbaths. To be sanctified is to separate us from sin but also to separate us from anything that influence us to sin. God tells us Himself that his sanctification is tied to His holy times. And don’t confuse this with justification, we are justified through Christ blood. But God tells us His time is a sign of sanctification and it’s interesting considering that many Christians today teaches that it’s a sin to keep Gods times and Sabbath and many who feel called to gather with Him on those days are scared to follow the calling.
Gods times and sabbaths was what identified them as a people gathered under God’s authority. God also explains in the fourth commandment that the Sabbath is a sign of His leadership. Gods times didn’t just make a bond between the Father and the people but it also worked as a bond between Gods’ people uniting them. It gathered them.
When they rejected this bond and rejected Gods sabbaths and took part in the feasts and holy days of the world, they became a part of the ways of the world and united with the world. And God let them go. One place it says that if they had only kept Gods sabbath holy He would have allowed Jerusalem to continue as a kingdom forever. This doesn’t give any meaning unless we understand the significance of Gods times. «And it shall come to pass, if ye diligently hearken unto me, saith the LORD, to bring in no burden through the gates of this city on the sabbath day, but hallow the sabbath day, to do no work therein; Then shall there enter into the gates of this city kings and princes sitting upon the throne of David, riding in chariots and on horses, they, and their princes, the men of Judah, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem: and this city shall remain for ever.» (Jer 17:24-25)

The sabbath blessing was not only offered Judah, but all who wished to come close to the Lord and be part of His gathering: «Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to serve him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, every one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant;  even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of prayer for all people. The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him.» (Isa 56:6-8)

So everyone that wanted to keep the sabbath became part of God’s congregation or His assembly.
HAR-MEGIDDO doesn’t just refer to a physical mountain but to the gathering itself. Because MOED first time used in the Bible refers to Gods gathering in appointed time and HAR, a mountain, in Biblical symbolism means a kingdom. We see this for instance in Daniel 2 when God’s kingdom is symbolized as a mountain.

 

Where is God’s mountain and Sanctuary?
Jesus had a conversation with a Samaritan woman: «Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.» (Joh 4:20-21)
Gods gathering is therefore not always tied to a physical mountain but consistent throughout the Bible it is tied to a gathering in time.

In the book of Daniel we are told how the truth would be trampled upon for a long time, for 2300 prophetic mornings and evenings or 2300 years. It says that the sanctuary has been trodden under foot. In the time of Moses we see how God’s sanctuary is desecrated by Aaron’s two sons when they brought strange fire into the sanctuary. The sanctuary was also desecrated when idol worship was mixed with God’s religious service during the first temple period. The idol worship was strongly connected to pagan feasts. We see that God tells us that His sanctuary is desecrated when His times are ignored. Because Gods times and the sanctuary was tied together. «Thou hast despised mine holy things, and hast profaned my sabbaths.» (Eze 22:8) If to sanctify something is to set it aside for a holy purpose for God, profane the Sabbath is to not separate this time from the other days. To not set it aside for it’s purpose. We profane the Sabbath by ignoring it.
Not only was the sanctuary and Gods times tied together because God’s people were to gather by the sanctuary at the feast days, but the holy bread inside the sanctuary were to be renewed every sabbath. So the priest replaced the old bread with new ones on the table of Showbread every single sabbath.
In the bible bread is a symbol of how we take part in Christ who was the bread from heaven. In the sanctuary there were twelve bread one for each of Israels twelve tribes. This represented the renewal of Gods word among His people, it represented a renewal of Gods covenant with us. So the sanctuary and Gods times and His weekly sabbath was tied together in a bond. Their meaning was tied together. The sanctuary witnessed of Christ plan of salvation and the feast days witnessed the same in cooperation with the sanctuary. Many think that the old sanctuary service was removed and everything that came with it. But the sanctuary service wasn’t destroyed it was transferred to Christ. The earthly sanctuary service was replaced by a heavenly, the original. The animal blood that was a type of Christ sacrifice was replaced with Christ blood. So we are still saved through blood sacrifice, we still get access to the tabernacle by blood. There is still a sanctuary service. The priestly titles was taken from Aron’s sons and given to Christ whom they belonged to. The sanctuary service was not taken away from the new covenant, it was replaced by the original that the earthly had been mealy a symbol of. The old sanctuary was a symbol of the one true covenant. They pointed to the covenant of Christ after His death. That means that all the symbols that belonged to it, the fulfillment of these symbols, really, actually belonged to the new covenant. And that included the feasts. «Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens; A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man. For every high priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices: wherefore it is of necessity that this man have somewhat also to offer. For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law:  Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.  But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.» (Heb 8:1-6)

Today Christ serve in a sanctuary in heaven, a copy of the one on earth. The one on earth was a representative of Christ mission, the symbols in the sanctuary represents what Christ is doing for us. Only He need not die over and over again like the animal sacrifices, His one death is enough to serve us there. And if the priests served as a shadow of Christ mission and they renewed the bread every sabbath then Christ is doing what this symbolizes every sabbath. He renew his covenant and word with us every sabbath. Now how can we serve Christ and at the same time not show up for this event?

What happened to Gods times?
The book of Daniel tells us that the truth would be suppressed and even forgotten.
«And an host was given him against the daily sacrifice by reason of transgression, and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it practiced, and prospered.  Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot?» (Dan 8:12-14) 

For a long time God’s people stopped gathering at Gods holy times nor were they educated in their meaning. Most didn’t even understand that Christ was in a sanctuary in heaven as priest there, even though the Bible said so. Had the feasts been preserved their faces would have been towards the sanctuary in heaven and the teaching coming from there. Only by understanding the sanctuary service can we understand why Christ has waited before coming back for His people. It tells of His mission both on the cross and all He had to do in preparation before He could come for us.
God tells us why the truth was trampled on and about God’s greatest enemy. Just like Jeroboam, the northern king, another strong leader feared he would loose authority if he wasn’t also king of holy times. In order to gather the Christians and pagans under a united leadership and in order to continue to have the roman people’s trust, God’s times was either changed or removed.
«And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.» (Dan 7:25)
In the beginning Gods congregation was pure, it was Jews that was elected to first spread the gospel with the truth that it contained. Even the apostle sent to share the gospel with the heathen was a jew, Paul. Even though Jesus said that the mountain in Jerusalem was of significance for true worship he did say who had the truth: «Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.  Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.» (Joh 4:21-22)
So even though the mountain would not be the place of gathering in the nearest future, the truth that came from the Jews still had authority. The Samaritan that Jesus spoke to had a similar belief as the Jews, they claimed to worship the same God. They even had the same hope of the coming Messiah. Jesus even revealed herself as their Messiah to her before the Jewish leaders.
The Samaritans was the descendants of the northern kingdom of Israel that fell away and the pagans. They had mixed false teaching into their religious practice and still didn’t represent God’s times and law. So when Jesus tells her that salvation comes from the Jews He said that even though the feud over which mountain to gather at for assembly with God, the Jews was those who had the truth because they had the law and Gods times. And the Messiah. Jesus said about the Pharisees: «Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.» (Mat 23:1-3) Stephen said after Christ death and resurrection: «Who have received the law by the disposition of angels, and have not kept it.» (Act 7:53) Jesus did keep the law: «If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.» (Joh 15:10)
If the Jews had kept Gods law the same way that Jesus did their character would have resembled Christ character. But their religious worship was filled with hypocrisy and even though they represented the right teachings they didn’t live it out correctly. When the first Jews became followers of Christ they understood the law correctly and practiced it correctly. The truth, the actions was united with the word.
Jesus tells the Samaritan woman that it’s the Jews who are in the right. Because that is what she argued on by bringing up the two mountains.
The head of the church in Rome needed influence and power in his position and if he was to succeed to become leader over Christ congregation he had to remove that mind-set that the Jewish-christian foundation was the truth. Because it was not that truth he represented. The religious head in Rome started therefore to forbid Christians to sanctify the sabbath as this created a natural bond to Judaism. Instead he commanded the Christians to adopt the old pagan holy day, Sunday, in it’s place. He convinced them by saying Christ rose on that day and changing the day to Christ resurrection day was in God’s honor. The result was that the Christians was gathered with the pagans and their mindset rather gathered with the Jews and their mind-set.
Christ showed a different belief. Rome was the new Samaria, the new North Kingdom, in the sense that they claimed to believe to have the same Messiah and God while they rejected Gods times and laws and introduced new practices and new times and places for gathering. They rejected the authority that God had set, and His chosen representatives, with their own. Jesus clearly show that they are not the ones who lead man to salvation.
When Jesus warned his apostles that Jerusalem would be destroyed we see another interesting detail. Jesus says: «When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:  Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes. And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.» (Mat 24:15- 21)

Here we see Christ speak of the army of Rome as the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel. The same power that would later change or evolve and then think to change times and laws. They would physical destroy the temple at the Mount of Gathering as well as the symbolic value. Rome placed their own building where the temple once stood, at the same happened with Gods spiritual truth. They stepped on Gods truth and replaced it with their own. Ironically the triumph arch that depicts Rome plunder the temple in Jerusalem has the Roman pagan emperor mentioned on one side of it and the pope on the other, both with the same titles.
Notice that Jesus says “But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day.” Why pray that the escape would not happen on the sabbath day? What is wrong with fleeing on that day? They would be tempted or even pressured to desecrate the day in order to save their lives. Jesus told them to pray to not end in such a situation for it would make it harder for them to stay true to God. Here Jesus demonstrate that the sabbath were to be kept holy even 40 years after his death and resurrection. God’s people would still be identified by keeping God’s times as well as the faith in Jesus. Daniel tells us that the Roman empire would divide and change which it did when the kingdom divided, then become christian and the pope later took the old emperors priestly titles and reigned over the christian church. Not having power over all the areas himself his army was replaced with fornication with the kings and queens in the divided kingdom and have them do his bidding. For 1260 years God’s people would be suppressed under this deceptive power. And again we see that one of the reasons for their suppression is tied to Gods times and laws: «And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.» (Dan 7:25)
Do you remember when God said they would get to have their own kings in Jerusalem forever if they only preserved and honored His sabbath? They didn’t and ended up under Babylon. Again we see a leader changing God’s times and laws in order to get to a position were he can suppress them.
And the word «times» used in Daniel is the Armenian word for the same expression as MOED.
To sanctify God’s times is tied to God’s peoples FREEDOM and independence under God’s kingdom. To break Gods times and laws are tied to being suppressed by foreign powers.
If we gather at times appointed by another king it’s his law we are keeping and him we are giving our loyalty, it’s his land we are citizens of. But if we gather at God’s times we openly before angels and men demonstrate that God is our lawgiver and King. Because it is Him that has ordained the gathering. And if He is our King He will also fight for us if someone tries to take our freedom to serve Him away from us.
In the New Testament Christ blood is our only means to salvation, our only hope to be accepted in Christ kingdom after we have sinned. But even though the blood has gone before us into the sanctuary and is the only reason we are invited to God’s gathering, this doesn’t change when God’s gathering is. During the earthly sanctuary there was always animal sacrifices during the feasts, this illustrated that without the blood they had nothing that would give them right to be part of the gathering. The blood and the time of gathering worked together. One, the blood, was our access card to the Lords congregation, the other, Gods times, was the appointed time for his gathering of the congregation. The same is now, but the blood is replaced by what they symbolized that is Christ blood. And the sanctuary is replaced by the heavenly sanctuary. Gods times are now tied to the sanctuary in heaven and not a house on a mountain on earth.
«But I said unto their children in the wilderness, Walk ye not in the statutes of your fathers, neither observe their judgments, nor defile yourselves with their idols:  I am the LORD your God; walk in my statutes, and keep my judgments, and do them; And hallow my sabbaths; and they shall be a sign between me and you, that ye may know that I am the LORD your God.» (Eze 20:18-20) 
We just saw how Jesus had an expectation that this sign, the sabbath, were to be sanctified even when they had to escape the Roman army. In this story we can see a double meaning. It was physical Rome that attacked the psychical «mountain of gathering». While it was Rome and continued by Papal Rome that attacked the spiritual mount of gathering by changing times and laws. In both cases God’s people were to flee, weather from a physical army with physical swords or from a spiritual army with false teachings.

We are told that God’s sabbaths are important to make a separation between what is unclean and what is clean or holy. «Her priests have violated my law, and have profaned mine holy things: they have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shewed difference between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths, and I am profaned among them. » (Eze 22:26)

The Biblical definition of a harlot.
A congregation that claim to worship God and sacrifices to Him, but at the same time breaks His times and laws are called a harlot in the Bible.
This is a long chapter in the Bible so I will try and shorten it down a little.
«The word of the LORD came again unto me, saying,  Son of man, there were two women, the daughters of one mother:» (Eze 23:1-2) 
«And the names of them were Aholah the elder, and Aholibah her sister: and they were mine, and they bare sons and daughters. Thus were their names; Samaria is Aholah, and Jerusalem Aholibah.  And Aholah played the harlot when she was mine; and she doted on her lovers, on the Assyrians her neighbors, …Neither left she her whoredoms brought from Egypt: for in her youth they lay with her, and they bruised the breasts of her virginity, and poured their whoredom upon her.» (Eze 23:4-8)
«And the Babylonians came to her into the bed of love, and they defiled her with their whoredom, and she was polluted with them, and her mind was alienated from them.» (Eze 23:17)
«…Therefore, O Aholibah, thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will raise up thy lovers against thee, from whom thy mind is alienated, and I will bring them against thee on every side;
The Babylonians, and all the Chaldeans, Pekod, and Shoa, and Koa, and all the Assyrians with them: all of them desirable young men, captains and rulers, great lords and renowned, all of them riding upon horses.» (Eze 23:22-23)
…. «For thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will deliver thee into the hand of them whom thou hatest, into the hand of them from whom thy mind is alienated: And they shall deal with thee hatefully, and shall take away all thy labour, and shall leave thee naked and bare: and the nakedness of thy whoredoms shall be discovered, both thy lewdness and thy whoredoms.
I will do these things unto thee, because thou hast gone a whoring after the heathen, and because thou art polluted with their idols.
Thou hast walked in the way of thy sister; therefore will I give her cup into thine hand. Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou shalt drink of thy sister’s cup deep and large: thou shalt be laughed to scorn and had in derision; it containeth much. Thou shalt be filled with drunkenness and sorrow, with the cup of astonishment and desolation, with the cup of thy sister Samaria.
Thou shalt even drink it and suck it out, and thou shalt break the sherds thereof, and pluck off thine own breasts: for I have spoken it, saith the Lord GOD. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Because thou hast forgotten me, and cast me behind thy back, therefore bear thou also thy lewdness and thy whoredoms. The LORD said moreover unto me; Son of man, wilt thou judge Aholah and Aholibah? yea, declare unto them their abominations;
That they have committed adultery, and blood is in their hands, and with their idols have they committed adultery, and have also caused their sons, whom they bare unto me, to pass for them through the fire, to devour them.
Moreover this they have done unto me: they have defiled my sanctuary in the same day, and have profaned my sabbaths.» (Eze 23:28-38)
«Then said I unto her that was old in adulteries, Will they now commit whoredoms with her, and she with them?
Yet they went in unto her, as they go in unto a woman that playeth the harlot: so went they in unto Aholah and unto Aholibah, the lewd women. (Eze 23:43-44)   

In the book of Revelation we see a new church, a woman, who has fornicated with Babylon just like we saw in the story we just read where God spoke of the falling away of Israel and Judah. I 1.Peter 5,13 we see that Peter calls Rom Babylon like it often were in those days. The old city of Babylon didn’t exist at that time. «So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet colored beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet color, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.» (Rev 17:3-6)
This woman represent the roman papal church, the largest church denomination in the world. For many centuries they claimed to be rightfully leader over the Christian church at the same time as they mixed idol worship and practices with the truth. They had influenced God’s people to reject Gods times and law and instead keep their own ordained feast and practices. It this way they made themselves guilty in the same sin as Samaria once did when they were called a harlot.
First the corrupted congregation is called a fornicater, meaning she is lying with another man while with her husband. But when she evolve into a deceiver who lure others to fornicate, she becomes a harlot. Although comparing it to the northern kingdom this power were to be much, much worse, and by their influence they would give birth to harlot children. Meaning a lot of unclean churches and congregations would be inspired and influenced by this mother church, even reform churches, to also reject God’s times and law. This harlot would commit fornication with the kings of the earth. This means that this church would have powers and governments recognize them as the one true church leadership. But God tells us i Revelation 18 that she will be judged, not just her but all who take part in her fornication. Everyone who continue the rebellion against Gods leadership, His times and laws.

God will separate and cleanse a people in the end times.
In Daniel 12 we are told that in the last days God has a plan to again separate His people from the rest of the world and from corrupt religious practices. He will cleanse our a people from all the spiritual corruption: «And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.  Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.» (Dan 12:9-10)

This is confirmed in the last book of the Bible. At the end times, right before Christ second coming, a message comes from God to His people to separate themselves from Babylon, or from corrupt and worldly religion and then especially the harlot and her harlot daughters.
«And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.» (Rev.18:4-5) 

God’s people have taken part or been contaminated by corrupt religious leadership. God wants to cleanse them and separate them from the rest. One of the first things God did to separate Israel from Egypt and have the judgment falling on the Egyptians, was to institute His feasts among them. Then after leaving He re-introduced the Sabbath and gave them His times and laws. This became a natural division. Rather being gathered with the rest of the world in their feasts and worship they were now separated and made separate by rejecting their appointed times and replacing them with God’s times. The same happened after their captivity in Babylon. They had lost their kingdom partly because they rejected His sabbath. Now the priest Ezra was sent to them to teach them about Gods times and laws all over again. «For upon the first day of the first month began he to go up from Babylon, and on the first day of the fifth month came he to Jerusalem, according to the good hand of his God upon him.  For Ezra had prepared his heart to seek the law of the LORD, and to do it, and to teach in Israel statutes and judgments.» (Ezr 7:9-10)

We see the same in the book of Nehemiah how they re-instituted the Lord’s feast days and how this now are bringing the people together. It’s gathering them.
«And on the second day were gathered together the chief of the fathers of all the people, the priests, and the Levites, unto Ezra the scribe, even to understand the words of the law. And they found written in the law which the LORD had commanded by Moses, that the children of Israel should dwell in booths in the feast of the seventh month: And that they should publish and proclaim in all their cities, and in Jerusalem, saying, Go forth unto the mount, and fetch olive branches, and pine branches, and myrtle branches, and palm branches, and branches of thick trees, to make booths, as it is written. So the people went forth, and brought them, and made themselves booths, every one upon the roof of his house, and in their courts, and in the courts of the house of God, and in the street of the water gate, and in the street of the gate of Ephraim. And all the congregation of them that were come again out of the captivity made booths, and sat under the booths: for since the days of Jeshua the son of Nun unto that day had not the children of Israel done so. And there was very great gladness.  Also day by day, from the first day unto the last day, he read in the book of the law of God. And they kept the feast seven days; and on the eighth day was a solemn assembly, according unto the manner.» (Neh.8:13-18)

Actually before they were conquered by Babylon every time a king realized they had fallen away from God, the first thing they did as part of the cleansing of the land was to remove idols and re-institute the feasts. Josiah did it when they found the book of the covenant and it lead to reformation. And it started with re-instituting God’s feasts. The same in the time of Hezekiah, as part of the reformation and cleansing of the land they re-instituted God’s feasts and called on God’s people both in the north kingdom and in the south to gather at the mount of gathering. Not long after they were under siege but God showed Himself powerful and slayed the hole army for the sake of his people. They had chosen God as king and this time He delivered them by a miracle.
Reformation and cleansing is in the Bible always tied to the re-institution of His holy times.
In the time of Solomon the sanctuary service had for a long time been incomplete. The Ark had stood in one place and the rest of the sanctuary furniture stood another place. The law and throne was separated from the rest of the sanctuary. And God’s people went up to the incomplete sanctuary. Not since Shiloh had the sanctuary service been complete. But when Solomon’s temple was finished and everything was put in place, it was dedicated on Gods appointed feast in the seventh month. Solomon actually waited by moving the Ark until this day, and on this day the Lord filled the temple with His Shekinah. Again restoration and God’s feast is here tied together.
The same after the captivity of God’s people in Babylon. When they re-built the temple after it had been desecrated and destroyed, it was finally restored and dedicated on the first month. The first they do is to keep God’s holy feast in the first month.
Remember in Daniel where it said that the sanctuary would be trodden under foot and then restored?
If we follow the pattern, restoring the sanctuary for the people, means also to restore Gods times.
Part of the reformation and cleansing of God’s people has to contain God’s times.

When God separates the people of the world from His people, they are not gathered in a physical place. They are gathered in time, for God’s gathering is tied to His times and laws. And Christ blood is our admission-card to this holy gathering. When Jesus comes back it too will take place at one of God’s appointed times.


What the Devil is up to

It’s not just the book of Daniel where we are told that God’s enemy seek to change God’s times and laws. But also in this scripture many interpret to be about the Devil himself:
«How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.  Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.» (Isa.14:12-15) 
I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation it says, but in the original language it says HAR-MOED. The same that the expression ARMAGEDDON comes from. God’s gathering in time. MOED, gathering tied to time and HAR – mountain. And again remember a mountain is in Daniel 2 a symbol of a kingdom. Gods enemy wants to be king over God’s gathering. Meaning he wants to rule over God’s people. Because God’s times in the Bible is tied together with God’s assembly under a leadership, it’s crucial who’s times we are gather at. The laws that are kept, the times for gathering is tied to loyalty towards one leader or another. Those rules we keep over the other, reveal who our highest Authority is. That is why God said that they should keep the sabbath as a sign that it was He that was their God. But the Devil has the same sign, his worldly feasts are packed with fun, false sense of security and togetherness. And it’s filled with everything man would desire, gifts and good food, good entertainment and good company. And his weekly sabbath-counterfeit is filled with majestic rituals and spiritual manifestation to lure people to come back week after week for his instruction in a corrupt christian practice. With it he keeps people away from Gods times and His authority and the blessing and freedom and protection they would get by being under God’s direct leadership. The devil has placed everything that attract and tempt us in his feasts and people gather under his leadership.

In the bible we are told that it is just this that is the conflict and the challenge for God’s true people.
«And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. …   And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.» (Rev.12: 9 & 17) 
The devil is wroth with those who follow God’s authority and keep His times and laws. He views it as rebellion against him and his world dominion. The sabbath clearly stated that the earth rightfully belong to God, and it’s witness is a thorn in his side as he claim the earth is his because man has chosen obedience to him before God. It’s his teachings they keep, his feasts they gather at, him they obey. Because the world has chosen him as lawgiver he regards it as his dominion. However those faithful to God and God’s laws and sabbath are a consent reproof to his claim.
And this is why he is going to war against them. This minority ruins his plan to get the whole world to disobey and disrespect God’s authority. When the devil gives his power to the next beast, the beast that comes out of the sea, we know who his target group is from the verse before and we know his hatred for them. The devil was about to loose the battle when Christianity grew. Everyone loved Gods son who sacrificed himself to save man. The sin-corrupted pagan gods lost their appeal. People were actually willing to give up the empty hard pagan beliefs. Satan’s only way to take control over the events was to give his deception and power to a seemingly christian authority. This was a defeat, but he would turn the defeat into victory.
It says: «And they worshiped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshiped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?» (Rev 13:4)

This is the beast that we were told were to suppress God’s people for 1260 years that would also change God’s times and laws. We therefore know that it is the Devil that is behind the changing of God’s times in order to gain leadership over Christ followers. When God’s people rejected Gods times and laws, the devil knew they also partly would loose their protection and freedom. Knowing this principle from the history of God’s people, making them reject Gods times and laws were important in order for him to take control over the biggest christian society. It was the only way to get them subjected.
In 2.Thessalonians it explains that God allowed it to happened for one reason: «Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:» (2.Thess.2:9-11) The ones who claim to be followers of Christ was shown both the truth and the lie, and they chose the lie because of all the signs and lying wonders that came with it. The truth, the love for God became secondary. Their want for pleasure and to follow their own ways was bigger. Both versions gave them the promise of eternal salvation through the blood of Christ, yet one separated the gospel from God’s laws. The other unified it with the worldly pleasures. And people chose the lie, the false gospel. The verse is followed up with it’s conclusion: «That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.» (2Th 2:12) The word unrighteousness in Greek literally means to violate the law. So Paul says that they chose to reject God’s law and subject them to another leader who sat himself as judge over God’s people.
What is righteousness and what is unrighteousness according to scripture? «Thy word is true from the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments endureth for ever.» (Psalm 119:160) «Your righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, And Your law is truth.» (Psalm 119:142) Why was Christ righteous? Because He kept his fathers law. Remember? If He hadn’t He would have been a sinner and had to have died for His own sin unable to die for ours. «If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.» (John.15:10) Christ righteousness is obedience to God’s law. And the people did not want this righteousness, they had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Reforming away from the deception means to go back to God’s times and laws.
If we are to receive God’s calling to separate from the false influence we have to turn away from the changed times and laws and replace them with God’s times and laws. And the power we are taking about is the same power that is tied to the image of the beast and it’s mark spoken of in Revelation 13.. It says the hole world will follow the influence of the beast: «And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.» (Rev 13:8) 
Don’t you know that the times Rome instituted is what the whole western world follows today? When the day starts, when the year starts, when the feasts starts and their weekly resting day. Most governments close on their weekly counterfeit sabbath. Even in the US. Even Israel who keeps the original Biblical sabbath has take time off on Sunday from the stock market because nothing is happening that day.
Worship in the Bible is always tied to whom we obey. Paul ironically writes to the church in Rome and says: «Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?» (Rom 6:16)

In the old testament we see that God did not accept worship if it contained disobedience. We can’t claim to be followers of a government if we don’t obey it. We see this example when king Saul are making a worship service for God to His honor. God was not happy or honored.
«But the people took of the spoil, sheep and oxen, the chief of the things which should have been utterly destroyed, to sacrifice unto the LORD thy God in Gilgal. And Samuel said, Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.  For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee…» (1Sa 15:21-23)
God rejected Saul’s religious service for His honor because it was mixed with disobedience to God’s leadership. The Lord does not change. Jesus told us the very same thing.
He said: «Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?  And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. » (Mat 7:21-23)
Here the word translated iniquity is the same word that was translated to unrighteousness in 2.Thessalonians. A word that literally means breaking the law.
They who claim Christ name but isn’t obedient to His leadership are rejected by Him. Because the two belong together. The Greek word used literally means to be a law breaker. It is has to be about God’s law for countries have all kinds of different laws. All religious congregations have different laws and ordinances. Christ is talking about those who believe they are free to break His law. They who reject His authority.

The whole world worshiping the beast doesn’t mean that the hole world will convert to Roman Christianity. In the story of Samaria and Judah we see that they taught the pagans in their own corrupt religion. In Revelation 18 we see the harlot committing fornication with the kings of the earth. For the verse to be fulfilled only the beast ideology has to be followed in order for the beast to be worshiped in a biblical sense. Committing fornication means exchanging, making deals in order for her to have her main agenda fulfilled. Remember this is first and foremost the Devils battle against God and everyone he uses as a tool. If it’s their religious laws that are made into state laws, whether people admit to it or not, it is the churches authority that is obeyed or paid homage to.

In Revelation 14 we see the conflict reaching it’s climax which again reveals the core of the battle: «Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.» (Rev 14:12)
In this verse we discover four important facts. Saints, patience and the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus. Saints is a holy people. The saints are those who have been cleansed just like God said He would do to a people in the end time. Cleanse a people. He wanted to separate a people from unclean influence and here we see that God has succeeded. He now has a holy people. And this people is gathered with an identification, and they are identified by both being followers of Christ AND keeping the commandments of God.
This shows us that a part of the calling to God’s people to separate from unclean influence is to turn back to God’s law, and in God’s law is also His times. It says they have to be patient, it means it will be a forceful battle with a lot of temptations. They have to endure it. Just like the sacrilege of the sabbath might be a temptation when God’s people were to save their lives by fleeing Jerusalem, it will be tempting for God’s people to let go of their loyalty to God’s times in order to save their own lives in this world.
No matter what is said by the world, no matter how much they are pressured to unite with the other claimed Christian followers by traditions, feasts, food and religious practice, God’s people have to stand firm and be patient and stay true to the Lord. If the whole world claim it will help world peace and that we can meet halfway on most points, that all will agree to hold all the other God’s laws and all we have to give up is our faithfulness to God’s times, it will be tempting and we will appear unreasonable if we don’t do it. And this is what happened in the past with God’s people. And every time they made this compromise they also lost their freedom in the Lord and was subjected to suppression. Knowing this past deception, God’s people need to sit out the storm and remain faithful.


Eve and God’s end time people

It was the same temptation that lead the whole earth under the suppression of the devil. The devil chose to go undercover as a winged serpent and placed himself in the very tree that symbolized obedience to God to try and convince Eve that he only wished her well. His agenda was only to break God’s command. He convinced her that to go against God’s command wasn’t such a big deal. He promised her that good things would come out of breaking the law, that she would even become as God herself. But it was all lies. In stead of freedom and supremacy they got violence, destruction and suppression. Eve was free in the Garden of Eden, she was free under the rule of the Lord. But after she was suppressed by her own emotions and needs. Women was also suppressed in the world, in a world where the strongest made the rules. Eve was tempted to become as God, but women still live in suppression today because of what she did. Eve is a good example because in the Bible God compares His church or people with a woman. And the temptation Eve faced is the same temptation God’s people have experienced throughout time. The temptation to be Gods themselves in the sense that they makes their own laws and rules and traditions while rejecting God’s authority and law. This is what Eve did when she set aside God’s command in an attempt to become Gods equal. Meaning your own Lord. Even though she thought this would be the result, it was a deception. Instead of rising above Gods law she came under the law, for the law was accusing her. The same will happen to those churches that call themselves by Christ name but have done the same thing, they will be judged and loose their freedom in the Lord.
«… but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge.  There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?» (James 4;11-12)
The harlot did just this, she wrongfully placed herself as judge or god over God’s people.

Nationalism in Gods kingdom
Does a country feel they are suppressed by their holy days? Isn’t it these times of year that gives them their feeling of belonging, togetherness and isn’t it tied to joy in their lives? This is what God’s times were meant to do. They were to be kept with pride as people felt that their nationality was with Gods kingdom and that their citizenship was there. It was to be tied to joy. I fact God said He wanted his sabbath day to be a day of joy. The Pharisees and scribes in the time of Jesus had ruined this by making it a day of burden. That is why God had to correct their errors in His speech and with His actions.
«And they that shall be of thee shall build the old waste places: thou shalt raise up the foundations of many generations; and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach, The restorer of paths to dwell in.  If thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the LORD, honorable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words: Then shalt thou delight thyself in the LORD; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.» (Isa.58:12-14)
About one of the Lord’s feast days it says: «And ye shall take you on the first day the boughs of goodly trees, branches of palm trees, and the boughs of thick trees, and willows of the brook; and ye shall rejoice before the LORD your God seven days.» (Lev 23:40)

Gods times was tied to our freedom to worship the Lord. It was to awaken our ties to the Kingdom of God. Instead the many Christians do as the Pharisees and make the times sound like a burden and terrible command, something that we need to be freed from. They follow some of them and others they see no value in. But some do feel the joy of gathering at God’s times and look upon it as a privilege to be a part of God’s assembly in time.

In the end times we see this battle. God’s people who wants to be faithful to God’s authority on one side and the rest of the world on the other. Those who love their king will with joy receive the invitation to gather at a specific time under His rule. They worship and obey Him with pleasure. The rest of the world feel the same loyalty and joy when subjecting under their religious rulers and worldly powers and governments. They are attracted to the ways of the world that offer stimulation of the senses. God’s people will be spread all over the world in the midst of those who follow earthly spiritual leaders and who engage in spiritual superstition. God’s people will not gather physically before Christ second coming, until then the mount of gathering is where it always has been, Gods times. No matter where God’s people are, every sabbath they will be renewed when they gather with the Lord to be blessed by Him.

Not all feel a calling to keep Gods times.
Keeping Gods times outwardly is not enough. Most of God’s commandments was valid no matter what happened. God never wanted anyone to add to sin by committing another act of sin. He never said that if you have committed adultery you might as well kill. God wanted man to do as little sin as possible, He wanted to prevent the increase of evil. If man failed He didn’t want them to continue in sin. He worked to limit the damage. When it comes to the feast days we see another attitude from God. God’s unfaithful people is sometimes told to not keep the feasts. Israel wasn’t allowed to keep them in the wilderness because of the sins against God’s leadership that they committed there. Only after the rebellious generation had died out and they crossed the river Jordan were they called to again keep the feasts. Till then they had kept the feasts from Egypt and during their wandering all the way to Kadesh. But not after Kadesh. We are told the reason why:
«Wherefore (as the Holy Ghost saith, Today if ye will hear his voice, Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness: When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years.  Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do always err in their heart; and they have not known my ways.  So I sware in my wrath, They shall not enter into my rest.) (Heb.3:7-11) 
They were not permitted to take part in the feasts because they had a spirit of rebellion.
The moment Israel crossed Jordan they renewed their covenant with God, and chose to be faithful towards His govern. They were again permitted to keep God’s feasts. The weekly sabbath however had to be respected regardless. God continued to let it rain manna only six days a week. God sanctified His sabbath before the people. The sabbath was a witness that it was God who was the Creator and rightfully lawmaker and judge on the earth. This command was valid no matter what. The sabbath was also placed in the ten commandments while the other feasts was written down in a book placed by the side of the Ark of The Covenant. One is a sin unto death, the others are a privilege and invitation.
Lets look at some more scripture that tells us that Gods times is tied to a gathering in time and when God’s people are unfaithful they are told to stay away:
«Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting.» (Isa 1:13)
The Lord’s feasts and religious service cannot be mixed with iniquity. The Lord’s feasts are an invitation and privilege for Gods people that wants to take part in God’s sanctification.
«I will also cause all her mirth to cease, her feast days, her new moons, and her sabbaths, and all her solemn feasts.  And I will destroy her vines and her fig trees, whereof she hath said, These are my rewards that my lovers have given me: and I will make them a forest, and the beasts of the field shall eat them.» (Hos 2:11-12) «I hate, I despise your feast days, and I will not smell in your solemn assemblies. Though ye offer me burnt offerings and your meat offerings, I will not accept them: neither will I regard the peace offerings of your fat beasts.» (Amo 5:21-22)

But when God’s people have converted and turned away from their infidelity He calls on them to keep them again:
«Behold upon the mountains the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace! O Judah, keep thy solemn feasts, perform thy vows: for the wicked shall no more pass through thee; he is utterly cut off. » (Nah 1:15)

When it comes to His feasts He says He will cause them to cease midst them, that He doesn’t want them to be kept if they are not in harmony with His spirit. Because God is blasphemed by it. The feast days are therefore reserved to those who are in a covenant relationship with God and they are a sign of this bond. Those who keep them but have not turned away from their rebellion or sins does God injustice and defile Gods sanctuary when they keep them.
God has in the past hindered people from keeping them. God had said that His sabbaths was a sign that He was the one who sanctified us. If we bring iniquity and Gods times together we ruin this sign. We bring ungodliness into Gods congregation in time.

Those who have not reformed in the heart will often chose away God’s times because they don’t understand why it’s important nor will they be convinced by God’s spirit to keep them for the reasons just mentioned. God allowed the religious leader pretend that he had the power to change times and laws because the church had become corrupt and unclean in many ways, and because the church no longer let God sanctify them. They didn’t represent Him.
Many reject the calling to keep Gods times, they feel God can gather them at any time, and therefore it doesn’t matter. With such a belief we are our own God, our own judge. If God is our King it is His ways we follow, His ordinances we respect. If He invites is to a congregation or gathering in time and we abstain we loose the blessing that would have been given at this time. It could be increased knowledge, increased strength, and increased ability to separate holy from unholy.

Repent ye
From the verses we saw in the Old Testament we can see that many will never feel a calling to keep Gods times and laws because they have already rejected Gods leadership in other ways. They think that Christ blood separated from God’s authority can save. But it was Christ blood the sacrificial animals was a symbol of, and we can see from the verses we just mentioned that God isn’t even interested in His own sacrificial system if it’s placed together with defiance. Even Jesus makes this argument: «Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee; Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift. » (Mat 5:23-24)
The sacrificial animals pointed to Christ death for our sake. But this was abused in the time of Israel. They sacrificed and sinned and sacrificed and sinned. In the end the sacrifices was an excuse to keep sinning. If they could just sacrifice an animal to become clean again, they were free to follow their lusts. This opened up for calculated and deliberate sin. Many Christians do the same with the blood of Christ. They look on it as a crutch, something that gives them permission to keep sinning with a good conscience. A reassurance that keep them from turning away from their sin or that makes it unnecessarily to obey God. If Jesus says we have to make reconcile with even our brother before pleading with God for forgiveness how much more do we need to be willing to reconcile with God before claiming salvation through the blood of Christ? The gospel includes a calling to turn from our ways.
John the Baptist preached: «In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea» And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.» (Mat 3:1-2)

Jesus preached: «From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.» (Mat 4:17)
Even to four of the churches, God’s own churches, in Revelation. The message is the same.
To Ephesus: «Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent» (Rev 2:5) To the church in Pergamon: «Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.» (Rev 2:16)
To the church in Sardis: «Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and repent.» (Rev 3:3)
And to the church in Ladiocea: «As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.» (Rev 3:19) 
To the woman caught doing adultery Jesus said: «Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.» (Joh 8:11)
We are called to repent and turn from our ways. Christ blood isn’t to be used as an excuse to sin, but for us to repent and turn from our ways. Christ blood then will cover us and take away our sin so it will accuse us no more. But if we continue in violation and not repeat or change our ways, we step on Christ blood. That is why someone claiming Christ blood, or that they claim His name or even that they believe in honoring Gods commandments and times, is only a sign of outer affiliation. In Revelation it doesn’t speak about those who believe in the validity of God’s commandments, but those who actually keep them. It doesn’t help if we believe something is correct if we reject it with our lives. That is why Jesus said we should know them by their fruits. Not by their words, but by their fruits.

Many Christians will never feel a calling to keep Gods times because God has never invited them to His congregation or gathering in time because they refuse to turn away from their sins. They are still in rebellion against Gods and His law. And there is none entering Gods congregation without the access-card, Christ blood. Many want to be called Christians, be called by Christ name but they want to follow their own ways at the same time. A parable in the old testament fits well with this type of religious practice: «And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach.» (Isa 4:1)
Their own clothes can be symbolized by their own righteousness. Remember Christ righteousness was tied to Him being obedient to His Father and respecting His law? Bread can symbolize Gods word. They do not want to eat God’s word, but in stead they keep their own words, rules and regulations.

ARMAGEDDON
The last battle under the sixth plague, right before Christ second coming, we can see the nations gathering against God. First we saw that everyone has fornicated with the harlot, and followed the beast and it’s teachings. Now we see them again.
«And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. And they gathered them together to the place called in Hebrew, Armageddon » (Rev 16:13-16)

The unclean spirits, the beast and the false prophet. It says the dragon is part of the battle here, and we have already been told that the dragon is wroth with «remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.» and that the beast and false prophet are helping him fight against them. We have seen the battle against God in Daniel 7, with the dragon in Revelation 12 and the fallen star in Isaiah. They are at war with Gods times and laws. They gather in togetherness against God’s times, they are at war with Gods congregation or gathering in time. They are not happy, as it says in Revelation 14,12, that some choose to keep the commandments of God and follow the authority of God and have the faith of Jesus. The whole world have rejected God’s authority in these questions. Only this group remains in rebellion against the agenda of the dragon and his followers. So the dragon make war against them and what they represent. They are the last people who refuse to give up on their loyalty to Gods commandments.
Its unclean spirits that will gather people to make war against God Himself. They gather at a place that in Hebrew is derived from the word HAR-MOED. Same conflict. The law that represents Gods authority and Gods times is His ‘mount of gathering’. This is what they are at war against. You cannot make war with God and at the same time be obedient to Him. Their war is about going against Gods law.
In the ten commandment there isn’t given any reason for us to keep Gods commandments except in the fourth commandments which is the sabbath commandment. There God is, the lawgiver, identified as the Creator of Earth. And with it His area of dominion and His right to judge. In God’s times the seal of God’s authority is placed proclaiming that His law is what is to be respected before any other. It’s this authority that the Devils errand boys refuse to acknowledge. They feel they have the right to be kings on earth while willingly rebelling against Gods law. They place their law above Gods’ law. They feel their laws are better, more practical. Their times and gatherings are more highly elevated then Gods times and gatherings. While they call their own laws important and their own made up feasts and weekly day of rest a law we have to obey, they at the same time say that God’s laws are without meaning and authority. Why then are they forcing man to keep theirs? They can’t stand when their laws are broken but flatter and rejoice when God’s are broken. They have placed their throne above Gods in their mind. They have made themselves equal with God. But God tells us to keep His times because He is the Creator and owner of everything, they have no argument that can even match His. They even go so far as to deny and hinder those who wants to be faithful and follow the calling to come to Gods gathering or congregation in time. When the abomination of desolation stand in the holy place, flee and pray that your flight be not on the sabbath. History may repeat itself. When the abomination that maketh desolate step on Gods holy time, flee and continue to keep His times holy. Pray that you will be able to.
This attack on God’s authority is war against God. They have gathered the world in their own mind-set.

If you get a calling today to keep Gods times or weekly sabbath, it can be that God wants to separate you from Babylon and all the unclean churches and cleanse you and include you in His gathering or congregation in time. Don’t resist. Even though other proclaiming Christ name advice you against it, go to met the Lord on His times. Even though they want to scare you and call it dangerous, even though you are denounced and shut out of their community. Go met the Lord at His feast. Let Him gather you under His foll and leadership. Let Him sanctify you. When you make this decision you will face bitter resistance. You are going from being lead by spiritual leaders in the world to Gods’ leadership. The devil will come after you just like it says in Revelation 12. You are the one he will war against. «And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.» (Rev 12:17) 

Unclean spirits are ready to use every person they can to influence and wear you down in order to break you and make you leave your faithfulness. For your citizenship is in heaven, God is your lawgiver, His are the times you keep, you are no longer recognized in the world. You are now an outcast. You will be called fanatic, someone who will not take part in the togetherness, someone who causes separation in the family or church. You will be called extreme and what worse is. Isn’t it odd that you will be called extreme for keeping the Biblical ordained times, but normal if you keep those ordained by religious leaders who claim the Bible is the foundation of their belief? The double standard is clearly seen.
We know that in the last days God will again separate unto Himself a people. He will sanctify and cleanse a people.
He will divide a family in two, one will be saved the other lost. Our worship is not to be unified with the world if the world is in opposition with God’s authority. We need to be united and one with the Lord.
Nowhere in the Bible are a reformation or a cleansing of His people happened without His laws and times being re-instated.
Today we have the privileged to decide who our king is and where our citizenship is.
«For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; he will save us.» (Isa 33:22)
When Christ comes He will look for His people. Make sure you have your access card, Christ blood and that you follow the principles of His kingdom. If you are in opposition to His government you will not be accepted even if you claim Christ blood for yourself. For it means you haven’t repented. Rather the cross converting our souls the cross have been used as an excuse to sin and rebel. This is a false gospel.
John explains: «Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.» (1.Jhn 3:4)
«For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,  But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries. He that despised Moses’ law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?» (Heb.10:26-29)
This isn’t about making an error or failing while wanting to do the right thing, for John have said: «My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.» (1.Jhn 2:1-2) So Paul and John is not in conflict with each other. Paul is talking about if we willingly rebel against Gods govern, if we refuse to accept His authority as a lawmaker, His blood cannot save us. The same message Jesus gave when He spoke of those calling upon His name while continuing in Iniquity.
We are forgiven because we regret breaking Gods law and because we recognize Gods right to judge. When we do this we can come before the Lord in repentance and pray for forgiveness and mercy through the blood of Christ. But if we come before Him without regret and a desire to turn from our ways we step on Christ blood.
«Wherefore (as the Holy Ghost saith, To day if ye will hear his voice,  Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness» (Heb 3:7-8)

God’s law will be shown to the world, and the
world will be asked to chose sides before it’s final hour.
Armageddon described in the Bible has most likely two parallel fulfillment. One symbolic and one physical. Armies will try to make war against God at the old ‘mount of gathering’ Jerusalem. Because this is where God’s throne on earth is The Ark of The Covenant has been found and the tables of the law, along with Christ blood, will be shown to the whole world as a testimony. Man will get one last chance to chose God’s times and value it over the counterfeit. God will let the truth be known.
It’s not unlikely that the devil will make a psychical attack against Gods throne on earth and the law there at the same time as he makes war on God’s people who also carry Gods’ law in their hearts. The devil’s target is wherever Gods law and ‘assembly’ is and where his authority is, whether it’s in a golden chest or it’s inside a human chest (the heart).

by R.T

Who is the Antichrist?

1

At one point in time, most churches agreed on who the Antichrist was and interpret the prophecy the same way.

Now almost all of these churches have adopted views originated from the same organization that their church fathers warned was the Antichrist. You can ask, how is that even possible? An organization was formed from this power to destroy Protestantism. Part of the method of this organization was to undercover become part of the church leadership and slowly changing the churches understanding of prophecy and theology.

Watch the video above to see some of the many quotes from highly intelligent and educated people in the past revealing the real Antichrist.

Even US presidents tried to fight it’s devastating in infiltration influence of no use. Today the secret organization is hardly ever spoken of or mentioned yet they are one of the most influential and dangerous groups the world has ever seen.

The same organization was the one who tried to convince people that Islam was the antichrist or a Jewish group. Yet they themselves was the only one to fit all of the Bible clues as to the identity of the Antichrist. They also came up with the idea of a future unknown Antichrist ruling for 3,5 years. Most churches don’t even know where their understanding comes from or when the change took place.

Please be educated on this wolf in sheep clothing.

WOMEN IN THE BIBLE

2

When the men would not listen to the women.

Can we see God fighting for women’s rights in the Bible? Is God’s attitude towards women sometimes different from that of the patriarchs and many Christians today?

If a message is spoken by a man it’s must be important, if it’s a woman, not so much. We don’t have to receive the message if it comes from a woman but if it comes from a man we are obligated to receive it. The male speaker was firm and the message was spoken with authority, the female speaker was being hysterical. The male speaker was moved to tears, the female speaker was emotionally unstable. These are all stereotypes many Christians have unconsciously. There are plenty of stereotypes among Christians but also in the world. The subject of this article may not be something all women can relate to as not all have tried to do the work that subjects them to gender criticism. I’m aware that a lot of women don’t see the problem before they themselves have become “the problem”.

When asked to do a sermon for an online group I asked what subject they would like to hear the most. Several suggestions came, all related to important end-time issues. But then one suggested “women in the Bible”. I had never spoken about how women were treated or about women’s rights. But the moment the topic came scripture after scripture came into my head in perfect order, showing a different side to many of the Biblical stories. This had happened once before when I was wondering if I should quit the work I was doing. And now it happened again. As the sermon falls into place right then and there I decided that God must want me to speak on what I had learned.

For I have experienced a lot of female discrimination as a ministry worker yet I always thought perhaps it was how it should be. So my reaction when I suffered female discrimination while working for God was that perhaps it was even God’s will.
When the debate on female pastors reached its boiling point the strangest things were said about women in the debate. The words were downgrading and inhibitory and many women in ministry lost their courage and considered giving up their work for God. For this was no longer about ordination but a “women’s place” in a Christian society. And so the things said in the debate did not just affect female pastors but also lay workers and female evangelists. And I was one of them. Especially messianic communities have been preaching women’s rightful position and several conservative Adventist groups have joined them in the ‘shout’. I had comments directed at me saying “Don’t listen to her, being a woman she is not permitted to teach the Bible”. Or I was called an adolescent. Being over 40 it would perhaps be flattering to be called adolescent but when it’s said to reflect me as inexperienced it’s not. Women in ministry are more likely to receive personal criticism based on gender and appearance rather than having the doctrines we present debated. Women speaking on theological topics are almost always ignored.
One large advent ministry went so far as to claim that a woman, in order to receive a blessing from God, had to go to her husband and ask Him for a blessing, and then the man would bring the topic before the Lord. Women, they explained, had to have a male mediator in order to address God. This is not one individual, many have gone into this thought process that is by many considered a reformation. When a great speaker with a large following felt it was his calling to speak out against female preachers I counted as many as over 30 mistakes in his sermon yet he kept hitting his Bible and his prophet’s books saying “Evidence is here”. Yet when I looked up the scripture in their context it was really more a matter of interpretation. And some of the statements just weren’t there.
It was when my courage was about to fall to pieces that God flashed before me story after story in the Bible, details about known stories I’d never noticed before. It’s my hope that this Bible study will be an encouragement to women working for God but also can make men rethink before ignoring a female gospel worker.
I have known some great female gospel workers who gave up. Some had higher education and massive theological knowledge compared to some of their praised male counterparts. They worked and reached many, yet they were constantly ignored until they left their post exhausted and unappreciated.

The fact of the matter about women’s ministry (not health ministries) is this:
* Very few support female lay-workers. Female lay workers don’t receive much economic support, if any. This has been a problem for many, many years and is the main reason women’s ministry rarely gets a chance to grow.
* Fewer listen to and receive something that comes from a woman. Everything that has a man in front is more likely to be considered important.
* The female lay workers are facing difficulties from those outside of the church as well as inside the church.

Men that didn’t listen to the women.

As we go into this study to take a look at men who didn’t listen to the women I want to remind you that sometimes men in the Bible did listen to the women and the result was bad. But that normally has a lot of focus as most preachers are men. The focus of this study is when they should have listened to the women. This study will also reflect how God sees women.
We will also look into the extreme view some ministries present that women need to go to their husbands and pray for a blessing rather than going straight to God. I am hoping this study will inspire those women who have not followed their calling because they have been taught it is not God’s will to be encouraged to go out and serve the Lord boldly. And I’m hoping that those of you who are reading this and are men, to not underestimate or ignore women God has given a calling.

After sin:

Some ministries claim that in order for a woman to get to heaven or to prepare for heaven she must let the man rule over her here on earth.
Remember that it was after sin this started happening and part of her curse:
“Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.” (Gen 3:16:) So God clearly called it a curse, a consequence of sin, and not a divine institution.

So the question arises if gender power positions are even going to be a thing in heaven. Although Paul did not want Christians to offend the custom of their times he still claimed:
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye is all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” (Gal 3:28-29)

Neither bond nor free. Although there will be no such thing in heaven Paul still advised a slave to go back and subordinate to his master for the sake of what was the rule of the land back then. Being a slave was also the result of sin and not a divine institution. In the same way, Paul spoke to the women and told them to subordinate. But in heaven the curse on the woman will be lifted: “For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven.” (Mar 12:25)
And so for the woman to use her time learning to «know her place» will be irrelevant to her experience in heaven. The curse will be no more.
A woman at this point in time needs to learn to be obedient to God before any other. No woman must lean on her husband for either salvation or destruction.
An example is found in the story of Abigail. It says: “Now the name of the man was Nabal; and the name of his wife Abigail: and she was a woman of good understanding, and of a beautiful countenance: but the man was churlish and evil in his doings” (1Sa 25:3 )
Now this woman went against her husband’s decision and behind his back, she interfered with his wishes and she was greatly blessed for what she did. We can say with almost certainty that she was not living under her husband’s rule when she acted as she did.
The same goes today, women themselves are responsible and will be judged by their own actions.

Is it our work today to teach women to be obedient to their curse or to tell them they are free in Christ?

The curse in Eden is important when we look into the next stories in the Bible. For what if we have given the «curse» in Eden a false interpretation as to a woman’s place? Could we have given it a meaning it has not? Could it even have been understood wrongly by several of the patriarchs? The only way to find that answer is to see how God Himself approaches women and especially what God does when women have been treated wrongly because of the misconception. And this will reveal how God views a women’s place. For although men did receive a leading role in the marriage we might have put things into the role that weren’t meant to be there.

The law
Nowhere in the law does it say that women are prohibited from being leaders, prophets, teachers, or any such things. This is very important. For if God has not given a law against women holding these positions it means that women holding these positions cannot be committing a sin. “Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.” (1Jn_3:4 )
We don’t become sinners by breaking human traditions and laws but by breaking God’s laws.
We as humans, even Paul himself, cannot determine what sin is and what it isn’t. Only the law determines sin. For anyone who thinks a woman sins when preaching the word cannot prove it from the law. If a lay preacher or pastor is shouting that a woman in ministry is sinning the Bible clearly exposes them: «To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.” (Isa.8:20 ) There is no light in what they are saying.
We don’t decide what sin is, the law does. And the law does not speak against women for being women.

Sarah

We are now going to look at several Biblical characters and God’s response to them. And yes some of the ‘heroes’ might not look so heroic in this study. But remember, the male side of the story is the one most told and so this once, shows the female side of some of these stories.

Abraham was chosen and walked with the Lord. But his view on his wife had its faults. For God had also chosen Sarah to be the mother of the chosen seed. She was also chosen. But Abraham failed to see this completely. When they came to Egypt and Abraham feared for his life he was willing to sacrifice Sarah to protect himself.

“And it came to pass, when he was come near to enter into Egypt, that he said unto Sarai his wife, Behold now, I know that thou art a fair woman to look upon:
Therefore it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see thee, that they shall say, This is his wife: and they will kill me, but they will save thee alive.
Say, I pray thee, thou art my sister: that it may be well with me for thy sake; and my soul shall live because of thee.” (Gen 12:11-13)

What Abraham feared happened. They see Sarah and find her beautiful despite her age and they bring her to the palace. Abraham is given a gift in return: “And he entreated Abram well for her sake: and he had sheep, and oxen, and he asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she asses, and camels.”
It could actually be that one of these women was Hagar. Was God’s chosen man in a good position where he was sitting with all his gifts? Absolutely. His wealth had exceeded greatly. He undoubtedly loved Sarah but he chose his own life over hers in this situation. Notice who God is most concerned for when he sends plagues over pharaoh: “And the LORD plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram’s wife.” (Gen 12:16 -17)

Because of Sarah. She was in the most difficult situation facing abuse and being dishonored. In God’s eyes, Sarah could not be sacrificed for Abraham’s sake. This was not God’s will. Where was the man ready to sacrifice himself for his woman? That man was not Abraham at this point, but God was Sarah’s hero and rescuer. God protected her against abuse and made sure Pharaoh was forced to send her home. As we are to see later in the story, Sarah could not be replaced for she was chosen too. “Because of Sarah”. And please bear in mind when you read this story that Abraham was not a weak man. Not long after he went after the four kings of Mesopotamia to deliver his nephew Lot from their hands and with him the inhabitants of Sodom. Abraham could fight. But in this case and later, he did not fight for his wife.

Even Sarah loses faith that she is important to God and in this disbelief that it’s only her husband who is chosen she tells Abraham to conceive a child with her Egyptian handmaid Hagar. Sarah had lost faith that God regarded her as highly as He did and thought sincerely that perhaps it made no difference who gave birth to Abraham’s chosen child. Abraham listens to her, but he doesn’t really listen. He too thinks that the most important is him. Rather than fighting and being strong for his woman telling her of her importance, or consulting God in the matter, he agrees to go into Hagar and sleep with another woman in order to ‘fulfill God’s promise’ to him. This was a betrayal towards his wife even though she suggested it. Sarah shows later how bitter she is over how easy it was for Abraham to go to her and go along with this plan:
“And Sarah said unto Abram, My wrong be upon thee: I have given my maid into thy bosom; and when she saw that she had conceived, I was despised in her eyes: the LORD judge between me and thee.” (Gen 16:5 )
She is saying Abraham is at fault. Many who might think this is just another case of women’s hysteria and it’s her own fault alone, should think again when God has a say in it later.

Abraham receives a son that is named Ishmael. When God tells Abraham once again that the chosen son will be given through Sarah, Abraham refers God to Ishmael instead. In a way, he tells God that Sarah is not important and that it’s not necessary to give a child to her as he already has a son now. Again we see Abraham rejecting the value of Sarah in fulfilling God’s promise. As if he was the only one that really mattered.
“And God said unto Abraham, As for Sarai thy wife, thou shalt not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall her name be.“And I will bless her, and give thee a son also of her: yea, I will bless her, and she shall be a mother of nations; kings of people shall be of her. And Abraham said unto God, O that Ishmael might live before thee! And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him.” (Gen 17:15 -19)

«SHE SHALL BE A MOTHER OF NATIONS». She is chosen.
We will see in these Bible stories over and over again how God ignores the little value the patriarchs and men in the Bible have for women and elevates them instead.

God says over and over again that it is Sarah who is his wife and that she cannot be replaced. She is unique. Later in the New Testament Sarah and Hagar become the symbol of flesh and spirit. A symbol of our own works and God’s works. A symbol of freedom and slavery. Sarah and her child became the symbol of freedom. Up until this day and throughout Bible history Sarah’s descendants have been at war and troubled by Ishmael and the other of Abraham’s descendants by other wives. They became a plague to God’s chosen people.
To this very day, in the conflicts in the Middle East, we can see the result of Sarah’s importance being undermined. And the result is that Sarah had been led to believe that only her husband was important in the fulfillment of the promise.

Hagar and Sarah.

But the story of Hagar also has something to tell us. Abraham had said: «O that Ishmael might live before thee!» But God had said that the fulfillment of His promise had to be given through Sarah’s son. When a conflict arose between Ishmael and Isaac, Hagar and Sarah, God sides with Sarah.
“And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, which she had born unto Abraham, mocking. Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac. And the thing was very grievous in Abraham’s sight because of his son. And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called.” (Gen 21:9-12)

Notice that when God spoke to Abraham before he said «Sarah THY WIFE» yet now God is not acknowledging Hagar as Abraham’s wife but He calls her «thy bondwoman». In God’s eyes, Hagar was not elevated just because Abraham had slept with her and born him a son. In God’s eyes, she was a bondwoman he had a child with. Then He says «in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice». God says to the man to do what his wife tells him. He did not side with Abraham and told him to tell Sarah to subordinate herself and know her place. No, God fights for Sarah’s rights. She is in the right, she has been mistreated and humiliated by the whole arrangement and he needs to listen to her. God sides with Sarah. It says «the thing was very grievous in Abraham’s sight» yet God agreed with Sarah. Abraham’s judgment was not right. The one who would be a symbol of God’s freedom was not to be asked to suffer in silence unable to do anything about her situation. For many in those days, the firstborn would be even more important than the wife who hadn’t born him a son. The firstborn had a high status. But this tradition had to be broken in this situation, for it was the will of God. God rarely comes and speaks to the patriarchs. But in this case, God Himself interfered and had to tell Abraham that his wife and son by her, the second-born, was the firstborn in God’s eyes. Abraham had to send away his firstborn for the sake of his wife Sarah.
Later God says to Abraham about Isaac: “And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.” (Gen 21:9)

Thy ONLY son. God did not highly esteem Abraham’s infidelity to his wife and showed it in this way.

HAGAR.

Let’s go back to Hagar. Even though she had been used at a time when Abraham and Sarah lost sight of Sarah’s value in the eyes of God, Hagar also had God’s sympathy. God loves all women, also the slaves and the bondwomen, the rejected and mistreated. Now that God had done justice for Sarah and restored her in her right place He decided to take care of the rejected woman.

“And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread, and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child, and sent her away: and she departed, and wandered in the wilderness of Beersheba.
“And the water was spent in the bottle, and she cast the child under one of the shrubs. And she went, and sat her down over against him a good way off, as it were a bowshot: for she said, Let me not see the death of the child. And she sat over against him, and lift up her voice, and wept.
And God heard the voice of the lad; and the angel of God called to Hagar out of heaven, and said unto her, What aileth thee, Hagar? fear not; for God hath heard the voice of the lad where he is.
Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thine hand; for I will make him a great nation. And God opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water; and she went, and filled the bottle with water, and gave the lad drink.” (Gen 21:14-19)

God, Himself comes to speak to Hagar. The first time the Lord showed Himself to Hagar He told her to call her son Ishmael. This time He speaks directly to her. What a great honor for a bondwoman! Even though God cared about this woman’s rights it was not her right to be Abraham’s wife. Hagar had tried to take a position that wasn’t hers. She had wanted to take someone else’s place and had elevated herself in her own mind in a way that made that seem right.
But God would not help Hagar to a right that wasn’t hers. His compassion for her was to help her in her position. No mediator was needed when The Lord came to speak to Hagar. The first time He showed Himself to her He gave her a prophetic message. And we will see more of this as we continue, how God gives women prophetic messages. This was a great honor to Hagar. Even though God could not give her Sarah’s place He had other blessings to give her. The Lord shows and speaks to her twice! What did God say about the great King Solomon? He said he had shown Himself to him twice in a dream. Still, Hagar, the bondwoman got to see the Lord and hear His voice while she was awake. And Isaac? How many times do we hear God showing Himself to him? 2-3 times? Still today it’s regarded great when the Lord speaks to men, but when He speaks so directly to a woman it’s less regarded and spoken of. You know it’s true. Hagar had seen great blessings more so than many of the important men of Bible history.

“And she called the name of the LORD that spake unto her, Thou God seest me: for she said, Have I also here looked after him that seeth me?” (Gen 16:13)

ISAC AND REBEKAH

Moving on to Isaac and the prophetic message that was given to Rebekah. A message that was rejected or ignored by Isaac. Yes, many people don’t remember that Rebekah received a prophetic message from the Lord that Isaac just plainly ignored as unimportant. The consequence of his rejection of this message could however not easily be ignored as it had tragic consequences.
Many think we don’t need to receive a woman God has sent with a message, but to reject a man God has sent is wrong and a sin.

However, if the message is from God it doesn’t matter if it’s shared by a man or a woman, it’s still from God.
The first thing we need to know about Rebekah is that God chose her. She is not just a wife Isaac lusted after and took to himself. We are told God had chosen her when the one who is searching for a wife for Isaac asks God to show him who He has chosen by sending him a sign. Notice here how the woman, even though God had chosen her, would not enter into the marriage in any other form than by her free will. God does not force anyone to enter into His plans for their lives. He plans and then He offers us to willingly choose His plan for us. Women were not merchandise in God’s eyes that were to be subjected to the will of some man.
Abraham said to his servant: «And if the woman will not be willing to follow thee, then thou shalt be clear from this my oath: only bring not my son thither again.” (Gen 24:8)
So when Abraham’s servant speaks to Rebekah’s family after receiving a sign that she is the one God has chosen we see the following happening:
“And they said, We will call the damsel, and enquire at her mouth.
And they called Rebekah, and said unto her, Wilt thou go with this man? And she said, I will go.
And they sent away Rebekah their sister, and her nurse, and Abraham’s servant, and his men.” (Gen 24:57-59)

Again she is asked and her opinion is respected. It’s up to her to make the decision.
Rebecca marries Isaac and gets pregnant with twins. Notice how Rebekah asks God directly, and not through her husband, and God then answers her directly and gives her a prophetic message of the future:
“And the children struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went to enquire of the LORD.
And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger. (Gen 25:22-23)

The elder shall serve the younger. Did Isaac receive this prophetic message given directly from the Lord to his wife? No. What would Isaac have done if the prophetic message had been spoken directly to him? Had he taken it seriously? Can you picture Isaac going against a message he himself got from the Lord? But because of a downgrading view on women, the message given to Rebekah was less esteemed and even ignored. What is the result?
When Isaac is blessing his son he chooses Esau in direct opposition to the message given to his wife. And the blessing he thinks he is giving Esau is the opposite of the message God gave Rebekah. And so, in reality, Isaac was about to try and ‘force’ God to go against His own prophetic message. Isaac says with Esau in mind: «Let people serve thee, and nations bow down to thee: be lord over thy brethren, and let thy mother’s sons bow down to thee: cursed be every one that curseth thee, and blessed be he that blesseth thee. (Gen.27:29)

The prophetic message from the Lord was: «The elder shall serve the younger»
And the blessing Isaac planned to give to Esau was: «Be lord over thy brethren, and let thy mother’s sons bow down to thee”
So God says the elder shall serve the younger and Isaac said that the older should be lord over the younger.
By refusing to acknowledge the prophetic message given to Rebekah, Isaac ended up ready to defy God and teach the opposite of His will. He chose his own judgment over revelation.
Could it be it was because of the degrading view on women and because this message was given to his wife and not him that he didn’t fear to go against it? But as we know, Jacob had dressed as Esau and got the blessing by deception. After this Isaac gave in and re-confirmed this blessing to Jacob.
Rebekah knew God’s will and believed the message she had received and she was frustrated and desperate as she saw Isaac getting ready to do something she knew was not God’s will. And so she came up with this deceitful plan. Rebekah should have trusted that God’s word to her would be fulfilled no matter what Isaac said and did. But in those days a man’s word overruled a woman. She forgot perhaps that the message wasn’t hers but God’s and could not be overruled.
Because the message was ignored and rejected, Esau grew up thinking he had rights to something that really belonged to the brother. The result of everything was that Jacob had to run away from his home and all the sorrow that followed for Jacob, Esau, Rebekah who did not get to see her son again, and for Isaac who had provoked it all by his stubbornness.
Did it have consequences that the message God gave through Rebekah wasn’t received? Yes, enormously. So why did God not just give the same message to Isaac as he had given to Rebekah? Wouldn’t that have solved everything? Had God done this He would have supported the view to all generations that messages given through women are only to be taken seriously when it’s also given to a man. He would support the wrongful view many had. God’s word was good enough and if they would not receive it because it came from a woman, they lost the blessing that followed.
God’s word, no matter who it comes to or who God speaks through, whether it’s a man, female, or a donkey, is to be taken seriously. We don’t dictate who God speaks to or who Gods speak through, our responsibility is to be humble and receive it. The message God gave through Rebekah was good enough. It was the degrading view of women that was the problem in this situation. God does not make mistakes. He chose to give the message to the wife who was the one who asked Him for council, and not the man, and the man should have received the message and taught his sons their rightful roles.

JACOB
But also Jacob’s way of viewing women will have unfortunate consequences. He agrees to take more than one wife. The conflicts surrounding these wives and how they affect his children lead to him losing his beloved Joseph for many years.

At least to me, it’s obvious that God had chosen Leah to be Jacobs’s wife. But Jacob wanted Rachel. Jacob did not ask God for counsel or pray for a sign the way Abraham’s servant had done when Rebekah was chosen. Jacob wants the woman that his heart lusts after. Jacob at this time knew he was chosen as his father and grandfather and should perhaps have realized how important it was for the woman he married to be the one God had chosen for him. But it seems that this wasn’t important to him. Leah becomes his first wife by deception. Just like Jacob, in order to receive his right, tried to get it by deception, Leah had ended up in the same trap. She had been ignored for the sake of her beautiful little sister and now she had voluntarily chosen deceit in order to be Jacob’s wife. But the common story of Jacob and Leah both deceiving in order to get their rightful position seems to leave little impression on Jacob. He once craved forgiveness for his own deed but had little compassion to give Leah for making the same mistake as he did.
It says: “And when the LORD saw that Leah was hated, he opened her womb: but Rachel was barren.” (Gen 29:31)

God set an example to Jacob and blessed Leah more than her sister. And her sister was forced to humble herself. God would not have Jacob mistreat the woman God perhaps had chosen for him just because she had made herself guilty in a similar sin as the one He had forgiven Jacob of. When Rachel has been humbled for years and they had pleaded with God to let her have children as well, God hears their prayer and Rachel gives birth to Joseph. However, God does not give Rachel any more children than the bondmaids. All three get exactly two children each while the one God does regard as the real wife of Jacob is given 6 sons. So Leah gets as many sons as all the three other wives combined. And so Rachel has to live with that. Her blessing was no more than the bondmaids.
However, Jacob is still convinced that the one he himself had chosen is the one who will produce the child that would continue down the line to the Messiah. When Esau comes up against Jacob, notice what Jacob does. He fears Esau and their safety. He arranges the women. First the two bondswomen and their children and then Leah and her children and lastly Rachel and her son.
“And he put the handmaids and their children foremost, and Leah and her children after, and Rachel and Joseph hindermost.” (Gen.33:2)
This was even unheard of I think back then, that the first wife was to be placed in that order. We all know today that the son that had been chosen to be Christ’s forefather was Leah’s son Judah. Had Jacob even comprehended this and their importance Leah and Judah would not have been placed as living shields for the wife he loved the most. But God saved all of them. The point here is that women are important to God too. What do we know about the two women? Rachel took her father’s idols with her when they traveled to Canaan. This tells a lot about Rachel and who she was in her relationship with God. It was only after Rachel had humbled herself that God let her bear children, God straight out said He let her be barren because of her hate. And these idols and gods that she brought with her took place after Joseph was born. Her decision to steal them could have cost Jacob his life if not God had interfered. For her father had come to fight Jacob for the sake of them.
God chose Leah to be the woman who Christ would descend, the same woman that Jacob had rejected. The conflict between Leah and Rachel developed into a conflict between their children that had the most serious consequences. All of Leah’s children were old enough to see how they were placed and arranged as a shield before Rachel and Joseph. Being sons of the first wife and having their rights taken from them, and regarded with less value, can have played a factor in their hate towards innocent Joseph. Joseph in a sense became the sin-bearer of the entire conflict when it reached its highest peak and he was treated most terribly by his brothers.
God could have told Jacob from the start that his other sons were to blame and where he could find Joseph. But He did not say a word. Had He, it would have divided the whole family and Jacob would be sure to reject the sons that God had chosen for a special task. And so God did not tell Jacob until his sons had enough time to suffer and regret their actions so that the reveal, when it came, would not lead his sons away from the Lord. Only after Joseph had tried his brethren, and revealed himself, God spoke to Jacob about Joseph. Before then Judah had moved away from his father and then back again. Judah was at this time ready to sacrifice himself for the son of Rachel.
«And God spake unto Israel in the visions of the night, and said, Jacob, Jacob. And he said, Here am I. And he said, I am God, the God of thy father: fear not to go down into Egypt; for I will there make of thee a great nation: I will go down with thee into Egypt; and I will also surely bring thee up again: and Joseph shall put his hand upon thine eyes.” (Gen 46:2-4)

Again, God could have easily revealed where Joseph was to Jacob before. But at that time it would have caused Jacob to perhaps treat his sons in a way that made them leave the Lord. He could have easily rejected the one who was chosen for the sake of Joseph. Now they were all united and were to become one nation. For Judah was not to be rejected for Joseph’s sake, and Leah’s children not be rejected for Rachel’s children’s sake. For Leah and her seed was chosen.


TAMAR

In the next story we can see God fight for a woman’s rights, it is a woman many would look down upon. Tamar was married to Judah’s firstborn and we see from the bigger picture how God had chosen her to be the mother of the promise. Even though Judah’s line would go towards King David and Christ we see that it’s not enough to be just a man or firstborn.
“And Judah took a wife for Er his firstborn, whose name was Tamar. And Er, Judah’s firstborn, was wicked in the sight of the LORD; and the LORD slew him. And Judah said unto Onan, Go in unto thy brother’s wife, and marry her, and raise up seed to thy brother. And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in unto his brother’s wife, that he spilled it on the ground, lest that he should give seed to his brother. And the thing which he did displeased the LORD: wherefore he slew him also. Then said Judah to Tamar his daughter in law, Remain a widow at thy father’s house, till Shelah my son be grown: for he said, Lest peradventure he die also, as his brethren did. And Tamar went and dwelt in her father’s house.» (Gen.38:6-11)

Who is blamed for their death? Tamar right? Not the men’s own evil. Had Onan not let his seed be spilled on the ground, had he not rejected Tamar then God might not have rejected him. He chose to lie with her but not give her his semen. If this was the case, he should not have had intercourse with her. God did not think well of his behavior and is fully on the side of the wronged woman. When Judah doesn’t want to give his last son to her, his son is also rejected as the forefather to the promised Messiah. All of Judah’s three sons are rejected while Tamar is still chosen. Judah’s third son Sela had children too but they were not chosen to be the chosen line leading to the Messiah. Tamar was chosen and she was in this case more important than all of Judah’s three sons. Perhaps this thought would not fit with the worldview back then, but God did what He did. God has high regard for the women He chooses and for women’s rights. When Tamar’s rights were violated, God took her defense.
Tamar, desperate for a child, and knowing her rights, now goes in the footsteps of Jacob, Leah, and Rebekah. She chooses to try and get her right by deception, the very right Judah had denied her. If she had asked God for council all would have been avoided.
She then becomes pregnant after deceiving Judah to sleep with her and one of her sons becomes the next in line towards the promised Messiah.

The bottom line of the story is this: When both a man and a woman are chosen, if the man rejects the woman, God can sometimes decide to keep the woman and reject the man. As in the case of Tamar, a man can risk his own election by ignoring and rejecting a woman God has chosen. This is how high a woman’s value can be in God’s work.

Sarah was rejected, Jacob rejected, Leah rejected, and Tamar rejected, and they all had in common that they were looked down upon by those who were supposed to give them their blessing. All because they who were giving the blessing could not see or understand whom God had chosen.
All suffered especially because of a degrading view of women’s importance. Jacob suffered because his mother’s message from God was ignored, Leah because her rights were taken from her, and Tamar for the same reasons. God seems to be very zealous about women’s rights.
There is no blessing in ignoring or rejecting those women God has chosen and it has led to conflicts and divisions in families, loss of home, and loss of sons. Still, to this day, men still look down upon women God elects for assignments, but what if this mistake gives great consequences for God’s people even today? Is it really time to teach women “their place”? We will investigate further.

First, we are going to continue and now look at the law.

When rape is considered Murder.
God does not look easily at rape. In the law, it says that when a man attacks a woman and rapes her it should be judged as murder even though she doesn’t die. What happens in Western society? Many rapists only get a few years, while murderers are convicted for a long time.
“But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die: But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbour, and slayeth him, even so is this matter: For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her.” (Deu 22:25-27)
What do you think would have happened in the world today if rape was judged as murder? God doesn’t tolerate this type of violence against women. When rape happens against a woman’s will and she has done nothing to place herself in that situation and she screams and wants it to stop it’s not viewed in the law as a sexual assault, it’s not judged after the seventh commandment but after the sixths in God’s final judgment day. In this way, we know that God has acknowledged that even though the woman is still alive, the damage is so great on her heart and soul, that it should be considered murder. This shows God’s care for a victim of this type of rape and how He values her pain to a greater degree than our own society does today. God says the raped woman should not be punished because she has done nothing wrong. What happens in India and many Muslim countries today? The one who has been raped receives the punishment and the man in many cases goes free. What does God’s law say? The woman, if she truly resisted, has no guilt in what happened. The man has to take full responsibility.
Another thing that is judged by the sixth commandment as murder in God’s final judgment, is to call someone ’worthless’. Jesus Himself says this:
“Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: …and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.” (Mat 5:21-22)
The word «raca» is a Greek word that literally means «O empty one, that is, thou worthless»
This is also a treatment many women get in many places in the world today. They are told and treated as if they are worthless!

WOMEN AND INHERITANCE:

When Israel had conquered Canaan and the land was to be divided we are told of a man who didn’t have any sons but only four daughters. If this was in England in the 18th century a cousin or relative would inherit the property and not the daughters.
“Then came the daughters of Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph: and these are the names of his daughters; Mahlah, Noah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Tirzah. And they stood before Moses, and before Eleazar the priest, and before the princes and all the congregation, by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, saying, Our father died in the wilderness, and he was not in the company of them that gathered themselves together against the LORD in the company of Korah; but died in his own sin, and had no sons. Why should the name of our father be done away from among his family, because he hath no son? Give unto us therefore a possession among the brethren of our father. And Moses brought their cause before the LORD. And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, The daughters of Zelophehad speak right: thou shalt surely give them a possession of an inheritance among their father’s brethren; and thou shalt cause the inheritance of their father to pass unto them.” (Num 27:1 -7)

In this story, we can see the women themselves fighting for their rights. But the men are uncertain if women should get the same rights as a man in this case and are so unsure they dare not make a decision without asking for God’s counsel. Moses seems to be more in line with the daughters when he places the matter before the Lord, for it says that he spoke on the women’s behalf. He spoke «their cause». Moses was a humble man he did not seem to want to put these women «in their place» in order to feel like a man himself. What does God say? «The daughters of Zelophehad speak right thou shalt surely give them a possession of an inheritance among their father’s brethren; and thou shalt cause the inheritance of their father to pass unto them.»

This tells us about God’s view and how He meets them when they lay their case before Him. Their battle for their rights receives the highest approval. The Lord says: «The daughters of Zelophehad speak right.»
This shows how the woman had a right to speak their mind about this injustice and that they were correct in what they said. God agreed with them that it was unfair for them and their father’s house to be discriminated against because of their gender. Notice again that it was these men who were confused and uncertain about these women’s rights, not Moses and God. God. Many think they do God a service or that God wants them to discriminate against a woman in a certain situation, because they think their view of women is from God, yet it isn’t.

Job was an honorable man. He also knew the Lord and spoke rightly about Him. When it was time for him to let his children inherit we see him not making any hesitation in letting his daughters inherit along with his sons: “And in all the land were no women found so fair as the daughters of Job: and their father gave them inheritance among their brethren.” (Num 27:1)


RAHAB

We have to mention briefly some more women worth noticing. Rahab was a citizen of Jericho right before the city was destroyed. By her bravery and by risking her own life in faith, she saved her entire family and all her male family members. She risked her own life for she believed that the God of Israel was real. She was rewarded by God and became a part of the chosen line down to the Messiah. She was the great-great-great-grandmother of King David. She is described as someone who has been a harlot. How she ended up in that situation no one knows.
But still, it’s impossible not to notice all the key women among Christ’s ancestors had to fight for their rights amid male ignorance. Why are they a part of His family tree? Does it say something about how God views women? Again and again, we see how God fights for the oppressed women in spite of how they are treated by the men, even the men He had chosen. He does not help his chosen men oppress the women and if they do, He sides with the women. Almost all these key women in Christ’s family tree have been treated poorly and have suffered injustice yet they are brave and strong. God is not threatened by strong women that stand up for their rights and He shows us how He fights with them.

Ruth

Another strong woman in Christ’s family tree is Ruth. A descendant of Lot, Abraham’s nephew, a people who now was engaging in idol worship. She leaves her homeland and everything she has ever known to serve the God of Israel. She works to support her mother-in-law. She is actively engaged in work outside of her home. Then the shocking thing happens. She takes initiative towards Boas who later becomes her husband. Boas does not come to her and offer marriage, it’s she who encourages the

reunion between them. She lays down by his feet and asks him to be her kinsman which involves marrying her. She took initiative. I don’t think this was common practice in those days for women to do something that bold. This woman became yet another one of the strong women in Christ’s family tree. She was the great-grandmother of King David. God rewarded her courage, she was not rebuked for not following the tradition of sitting and waiting for a man to address her. God has nothing against strong women who do things outside the box that society has placed them in.

Mother of Samson

Now, this next story is one of my favorites in regard to this topic. For it says a lot about God’s view on women. I will let you read the scripture and notice the details. Notice what God does, what the man does, and what the woman does.
“And the angel of the LORD appeared unto the woman, and said unto her, Behold now, thou art barren, and bearest not: but thou shalt conceive, and bear a son.
Now therefore beware, I pray thee, and drink not wine nor strong drink, and eat not any unclean thing:  For, lo, thou shalt conceive, and bear a son; and no razor shall come on his head: for the child shall be a Nazarite unto God from the womb: and he

shall begin to deliver Israel out of the hand of the Philistines. Then the woman came and told her husband, saying, A man of God came unto me, and his countenance was like the countenance of an angel of God, very terrible: but I asked him not whence he was, neither told he me his name:
But he said unto me, Behold, thou shalt conceive, and bear a son; and now drink no wine nor strong drink, neither eat any unclean thing: for the child shall be a Nazarite to God from the womb to the day of his death.   Then Manoah intreated the LORD, and said, O my Lord, let the man of God which thou didst send come again unto us, and teach us what we shall do unto the child that shall be born.  And God hearkened to the voice of Manoah; and the angel of God came again unto the woman as she sat in the field: but Manoah her husband was not with her. And the woman made haste, and ran, and shewed her husband, and said unto him, Behold, the man hath appeared unto me, that came unto me the other day.  And Manoah arose, and went after his wife, and came to the man, and said unto him, Art thou the man that spakest unto the woman? And he said, I am.
And Manoah said, Now let thy words come to pass. How shall we order the child, and how shall we do unto him?
And the angel of the LORD said unto Manoah, Of all that I said unto the woman let her beware.
She may not eat of any thing that cometh of the vine, neither let her drink wine or strong drink, nor eat any unclean thing: all that I commanded her let her observe.” (Jdg 13:3-14) 

The Lord comes and speaks to the woman directly and not through her husband. The child was also to be the son of her husband yet God chose to talk to her. Why? Because the message was going to affect her to a greater degree. It was her womb. She tells her husband and her husband tells God to come back to tell more. God does listen to him and comes back. We later see that it is the Lord Himself that is this Angel. But who does He meet with first? Who does He approach? Does He come to the man? No, He comes to the woman for the second time. The woman first. Why? Because God does not push the woman aside to go talk to her husband instead. If he had, he would agree to the treatment that a woman’s word is not enough and that anything serious had to be discussed with the men. He comes to the woman once more, not when she is with her husband, but when she is alone. It’s the woman herself who chooses to run to her husband and bring him to the Lord. Only then does he get an answer to his prayer. So the man asks the Lord what they should do with the child. What does the Lord say? «Of all that I said unto the woman…» He is saying that He has already told it to the woman. In a very nice way, he is saying that he could have just listened to his wife. He then says the same thing to her husband that he said to her. He adds: «all that I commanded her let her observe». She was to do what he had commanded her, she was not in need of hearing it from her husband. She was to observe it because the Lord had commanded it.

When we read the Bible, is it God who is disregarding the women and discriminating against the women, or is it the men? God did not make a mistake when he chose to speak to the woman and give her a message regarding herself. And when the man wasn’t satisfied with it and asked God to come to tell him, the Lord chose to go to the woman a second time when he wasn’t around.
After they have sacrificed to the Lord notice the difference between their personalities shown by what he says and what she says. And who is the most sensible of the two:
“And Manoah said unto his wife, We shall surely die, because we have seen God.
But his wife said unto him, If the LORD were pleased to kill us, he would not have received a burnt offering and a meat offering at our hands, neither would he have shewed us all these things, nor would as at this time have told us such things as these.” (Jdg 13:22-23)

The Lord chose to show himself to this woman and came to her also the second time and the man got to take part in this blessing because she included him – yet we don’t know her name. She is just called the wife of Menoah. A woman who has seen the Angel of the Lord twice, chosen by God for a special work, yet she isn’t even mentioned by her own name. Would the same have happened if the Lord showed Himself twice to a man? No, he would have been regarded as one of the ’great patriarchs’.


Miriam

The new anti-women movement claims that women cannot hold leading positions. The first woman we see with a leading position is Miriam. But she isn’t known as a leader among the Christians. She is mostly known as the «sister of Moses».
But God Himself says about her: «For I brought thee up out of the land of Egypt, and redeemed thee out of the house of servants; and I sent before thee Moses, Aaron, and Miriam” (Mic 6:4)
Miriam was regarded as one of the leaders. Not only that but God says He «sent» her. She was chosen for this position. Miriam herself said God had spoken to her.
“And they said, Hath the LORD indeed spoken only by Moses? hath he not spoken also by us? And the LORD heard it.” (Num 12:2)
In this case, Miriam was punished because she tried to place her authority above Moses. God spoke clearly to both Miriam and Aaron that to Moses he had spoken directly face to face but to the prophets in dreams. Not once does God rebuke Miriam for being a woman. He doesn’t say she was punished for being a woman trying to take a position that wasn’t hers. He explains that Moses is to be regarded higher because He had spoken to him face to face and was more acquainted with God’s will than they were. Not once is this made into a gender topic. There was a difference in authority and Miriam was not over Moses in authority. But she was still a chosen leader, just not over Moses. In this case, God did not fight for her right as she tried to take a right that did not belong to her. However, she was a prophet: “And Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron..” (Num 12:2)

Deborah

We see another strong female leader during the time when Israel had judges instead of kings. Her name was Deborah. What did she do while she was a judge?
– Receive messages from God to give to the people
– Be a prophet
– Judge in conflicts
– Teach the people the will of God.

Today, many thousands of years after Deborah was a judge in Israel, many Christian and religious men would not even consider that God would allow a woman in such a position. But God did, AND He spoke to her and she was God’s messenger. She did teach Israel right and wrong. What more do we know about her?
“And Deborah, a prophetess, the wife of Lapidoth, she judged Israel at that time. And she dwelt under the palm tree of Deborah between Ramah and Bethel in mount Ephraim: and the children of Israel came up to her for judgment.” (Jdg 4:4-5)

She was married but she had the lead role and not the man. She was chosen before her man because she was more fit for the task.
“And she sent and called Barak the son of Abinoam out of Kedeshnaphtali, and said unto him, Hath not the LORD God of Israel commanded, saying, Go and draw toward mount Tabor, and take with thee ten thousand men of the children of Naphtali and of the children of Zebulun?
And I will draw unto thee to the river Kishon Sisera, the captain of Jabin’s army, with his chariots and his multitude; and I will deliver him into thine hand.
And Barak said unto her, If thou wilt go with me, then I will go: but if thou wilt not go with me, then I will not go.
And she said, I will surely go with thee: notwithstanding the journey that thou takest shall not be for thine honor; for the LORD shall sell Sisera into the hand of a woman. And Deborah arose, and went with Barak to Kedesh.” (Jdg 4:6-9)

Because Barak doubted God’s word given through Deborah, God would give the honor of victory to a woman. Not even this was a problem for God. Deborah is not only a prophet and leader and judge. But here we see her courage as she goes straight out to the battlefield which was uncommon for women in those days. Another brave woman is the one who God gave the courage to execute Sisera, Israel’s enemy. This is by God’s word. Here are two women partaking in the war to give glory to God. If a woman cannot have a leading position then why did God speak to Deborah and have her bring the message to a high-positioned man of the army? It is God Himself who is responsible for Deborah having this position, by using her as a mediator while she was a judge. God accepted her role.

Working women praised

Many have thought that the Christian wife is supposed to only serve the man, be a housewife, and take care of the kids. But few are aware of how a working woman is praised in the Bible. She is multi-talented and creative.
It says «The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her» Meaning she is free and not under supervision.
“She seeketh wool, and flax, and worketh willingly with her hands. She is like the merchants’ ships; she bringeth her food from afar. She riseth also while it is yet night, and giveth meat to her household, and a portion to her maidens.” (Pro 31:13-15)

But that’s not all she is also working in real estate and as a farmer:
“She considereth a field, and buyeth it: with the fruit of her hands she planteth a vineyard.»

She is strong:
“She girdeth her loins with strength, and strengtheneth her arms.” (Pro 31: 16 & 17)

She does charity work:
“She stretcheth out her hand to the poor; yea, she reacheth forth her hands to the needy.” (Pro 31:20)

She designs clothing for both herself and her family:
“She is not afraid of the snow for her household: for all her household are clothed with scarlet.
She maketh herself coverings of tapestry; her clothing is silk and purple.” (Pro 31:21 -22)

She produces and does trade:
“She maketh fine linen, and selleth it; and delivereth girdles unto the merchant.” (Pro 31:24)

She is a teacher:
“She openeth her mouth with wisdom; and in her tongue is the law of kindness.” (Pro 31:26)

She doesn’t go around and do nothing:
“She looketh well to the ways of her household, and eateth not the bread of idleness.” (Pro 31:27)

Foremost it says that she deserves praise and pay for her efforts:
“Give her of the fruit of her hands, and let her own works praise her in the gates.” (Pro 31:31)

Salomon

Let’s go back to the consequences that the Biblical men faced when they were mistreating women. Both Solomon and many of David’s problems are tied to a lack of respect for a woman’s worth. The conflicts within David’s family are strongly tied to the degrading treatment of women. Firstly David took many wives which was against God’s command. This taught his sons that women were of less worth which would later have consequences. His relationship with Bathsheba had terrible consequences. And David’s firstborn violated and raped his half-sister Tamar. This was also against God’s law. Because of David’s own sin with Bathsheba, it was hard for him to judge and sentence his son and so he did nothing. The assault on Tamar and David’s unwillingness to save her honor by punishing her abuser leads to Absalom’s anger and war against his father. Even though Absalom was not chosen by God to be king, it does not mean that God looked at the treatment of Tamar lightly. God’s law forbids a brother to lie with his half-sister and in the law, it even says that this type of sexual sin is why God removed the Canaanites from the country. David’s son’s sexual assault on his sister was not something God approved of or regarded lightly at all. God allowed David’s actions to have consequences. And, had not David let his daughter down for the sake of his son, his other son might never have declared war against him.
Both Solomon and David’s need for many wives was also what led to many of their problems. If they had valued a woman in the same way they did a man, and married the woman God had chosen for them and not all the others, then Bible history might have looked very different. The important lesson here is that there are no blessings in degrading women. They were blessed for the good they did and they got curses and serious consequences from the wrong things they did.
Had God spared them from the consequences it would have seemed as if God regarded their behavior acceptable. But allowing these curses to fall on them was God’s way of showing He didn’t approve and to help them see why their actions were wrong.
Unfortunately, Solomon’s choice to marry many foreign wives was what led Israel into idol worship for hundreds of years. The consequences of his action affected many more than himself.

The Woman in Sarepta:

Very often we see how important women in Bible history isn’t even mentioned by name. Lot’s wife is one. The mother of Samson is another. And then this next woman I am going to briefly mention.
I have actually experienced that men have said no to work with me because I am a woman and they regard it as indecent for a man to work with a woman. Sometimes that might be the case, that a man and woman should not cooperate, but not always. God knows people’s hearts and He acts according to them. He is not bound to follow our ideas. It’s not impossible for a man to be asked to cooperate with a woman. The prophet Elijah, when there was a drought in Israel, was sent to live with a widow. For many, this would have seemed indecent. But it’s God who tells Elijah to go live with her:
“Arise, get thee to Zarephath, which belongeth to Zidon, and dwell there: behold, I have commanded a widow woman there to sustain thee.” (1Ki 17:9)

God’s eyes have searched the land and He saw this woman and chose her for this assignment. Jesus said: «But I tell you of a truth, many widows were in Israel in the days of Elias, when the heaven was shut up three years and six months when great famine was throughout all the land;
But unto none of them was Elias sent, save unto Sarepta, a city of Sidon, unto a woman that was a widow.” (Luk 4:25-26)

Here we see a prophet living for a longer period of time with a widow. In this house, there was a daily miracle. They never ran out of oil or flour. But her son dies and Elijah, with God’s help, of course, wakes her son back to life.

God knew she would be hospitable with the last she had without a sign to tell her that God would actually save them from starvation if she did. She acted in faith alone. God knew her heart and therefore he sent Elijah to her so she could be saved during the crisis along with Elijah. Imagine the gossip if a man of God had done the same today.

HULDAH

In the time of King Josiah, the temple was under restoration. The High Priest then finds the Book of the Covenant also known as the Book of the Law.
“And Hilkiah the high priest said unto Shaphan the scribe, I have found the book of the law in the house of the LORD. And Hilkiah gave the book to Shaphan, and he read it.
And Shaphan the scribe came to the king, and brought the king word again, and said, Thy servants have gathered the money that was found in the house, and have delivered it into the hand of them that do the work, that have the oversight of the house of the LORD.
And Shaphan the scribe showed the king, saying, Hilkiah the priest hath delivered me a book. And Shaphan read it before the king.
And it came to pass, when the king had heard the words of the book of the law, that he rent his clothes» (2Ki 22:8-11)

The Book of the Law that was found led to a reformation in the land. But first, they were in great despair for they realized that they, as a people, had broken the covenant with God.
“And the king commanded Hilkiah the priest, and Ahikam the son of Shaphan, and Achbor the son of Michaiah, and Shaphan the scribe, and Asahiah a servant of the king’s, saying,
Go ye, enquire of the LORD for me, and for the people, and for all Judah, concerning the words of this book that is found: for great is the wrath of the LORD that is kindled against us, because our fathers have not hearkened unto the words of this book, to do according to unto all that which is written concerning us.” (2Ki 22:12-13)

Here we see the two leaders of God’s people, the king and the High Priest in need of God’s counsel. But who do they go to in order to learn what God’s will is about «this book that is found»? Cannot God speak to them directly? Does God speak to the High Priest and Levite in this case?
“So Hilkiah the priest, and Ahikam, and Achbor, and Shaphan, and Asahiah, went unto Huldah the prophetess, the wife of Shallum the son of Tikvah, the son of Harhas, keeper of the wardrobe; (now she dwelt in Jerusalem in the college;) and they communed with her.
And she said unto them, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Tell the man that sent you to me,
Thus saith the LORD, Behold, I will bring evil upon this place, and upon the inhabitants thereof, even all the words of the book which the king of Judah hath read:
…. But to the king of Judah which sent you to inquire of the LORD, thus shall ye say to him, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, As touching the words which thou hast heard;” (2Ki 22:14-16 & 18)

The prophetess Huldah, a woman, a married woman, gave the King and High Priest a message from the Lord. God chose to address the leaders of the people through this woman.
I hope this clearly shows that God’s view on women and their function in His work is not always the same as men’s view on the topic. Fortunately, in this case, the King and the High Priest were humble enough to ask for God’s council through this woman and receive it. When the book of the covenant was re-discovered, God enlightened them of His will through a woman.

WOMEN IN THE NEW TESTAMENT

Mary, mother of Jesus.

According to the law of God, a woman who is engaged to a man is seen as his wife and she belongs to him. Meaning that in the law, if you sleep with another man’s wife or another man’s fiancee you face the exact same punishment.
God, however, needed not permission from Joseph to place a life in Mary’s womb. He doesn’t go to Joseph, he goes to Mary. It’s her body and it’s her consent He wants.

When the angel Gabriel tells her God’s plan for her she answers by saying:
“And Mary said, Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word. And the angel departed from her.” (Luk 1:38)

When God gives a woman a calling he does not ask a man for permission nor does he ask a man to administrate or control her calling. Neither does she need to go to the man in order to understand her calling. God knows a woman isn’t dumber than a man. He doesn’t treat her like a child and her man as the father. When a woman receives a call, God speaks to her directly, just as we have seen several times already. What was entrusted to Mary might be the biggest assignment ever given to any man, the most precious and important mission ever was given to her. She was entrusted to be Christ’s teacher, to educate the son of God, in scripture, God’s law, and truth. In fact many pastors have been educated by their mothers.

Anna

When Joseph and Mary brought baby Jesus to Jerusalem there was a man that was filled with the holy spirit that got to see the child. But it also tells us about a prophetess, Anna. Another female prophet speaking God’s word. She also became a preacher:
«And she coming in that instant gave thanks likewise unto the Lord, and spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem.” (Luk 2:38)
Her audience was anyone who would hear, and those who would hear would hear the most wonderful news told. They would learn that the Messiah had finally come. The first assigned to preach Christ and redemption in Jerusalem was a female preacher.

Woman by the well

Many are well aware of the story where Jesus speaks to the Samaritan by the well. He revealed Himself as Christ to her, something he had hidden from many of the Jews of that time. The first to preach the coming of the Messiah to

the Samaritans was this woman, and it was through her testimony that an entire Samaritan village received Christ. This is just one of many stories that show how important a woman bearing a message can be in God’s work.
“The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things. Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am he.  And upon this came his disciples, and marvelled that he talked with the woman: yet no man said, What seekest thou? or, Why talkest thou with her?  The woman then left her waterpot, and went her way into the city, and saith to the men,  Come, see a man, which told me all things that ever I did: is not this the Christ?
Then they went out of the city, and came unto him.
… And many of the Samaritans of that city believed on him for the saying of the woman, which testified, He told me all that ever I did.   So when the Samaritans were come unto him, they besought him that he would tarry with them: and he abode there two days. And many more believed because of his own word;  And said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world.  (Joh 4:25- 30 & 39-42)

Just like a woman was first given the honor to preach the coming of the Messiah in Jerusalem another woman was the first to be entrusted with the secret of Christ’s identity and to preach the arrival of the Messiah to the Samaritans. In addition, another woman was to be honored to be the first to preach Christ risen from the dead. But we will get to that in a bit.

Wife of Pontifex Pilates

The main subject was men that didn’t listen to women. And one of those men who didn’t listen to a woman bearing an important message was Pilate.
“When he was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him.” (Mat 27:19)
I think most would agree that he should have listened to her. God warned the Roman emperor through his wife not to have any part in the execution of Jesus. He did not listen. Had he listened if he had received the dreams instead?

Mary

Most remember the story of Martha and Mary, but I want to bring focus to one special detail:
“And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus’ feet, and heard his word.
But Martha was cumbered about much serving, and came to him, and said, Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me to serve alone? bid her therefore that she help me.
And Jesus answered and said unto her, Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things:  But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her.” (Luk 10:39-42)

Mary wanted to learn as much as she could from Jesus, she wanted to understand the truth. Martha felt that it was more decent and important for her to do what was known as a woman’s traditional role, serving and doing house chores.
In this time and also later, and even today, it’s customary in many cultures for men to discuss theology and Biblical truth while the women are expected to serve the men. This is a view Jesus didn’t support in this case. It was just as important for a woman to receive a theological education. Martha said: «my sister hath left me to serve alone». Martha’s service to the Lord was the chores of the household. While Mary chose to be properly taught in God’s word. Jesus said: «Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her» Jesus here plainly says that He will not send women away from a biblical education to go and do chores in the house instead. He refused. He did not agree that Mary’s place was in the kitchen if she would rather be educated. This is in great contrast to the “send women back to the kitchen” movement among many Christians.

Mary was the first to preach Christ risen. And this is the result of a woman who chose to take the time to be taught the word of God. If a woman has received an education from the Lord He will not let this education go to waste. They are invited into the vineyard and are given assignments to preach. Not only was Mary the first to preach Christ risen, but she was also the only one who got to witness and see Christ before He had shown Himself to the Father. The disciples saw Him later. So she received a unique message to share. She is the only one who bore the witness that Christ was going to the Father to receive God’s blessing.
“And when she had thus said, she turned herself back, and saw Jesus standing, and knew not that it was Jesus. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? whom seekest thou? She, supposing him to be the gardener, saith unto him, Sir, if thou have borne him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I will take him away. Jesus saith unto her, Mary. She turned herself, and saith unto him, Rabboni; which is to say, Master. Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.” (Joh 20:14-17)

Mary is here given the assignment to bring these words to the apostles. She is given the task of bringing the Lord’s word out. She is the first to preach the gospel, yet many men today don’t think it’s a woman’s place, yet preaching the gospel of Christ’s resurrection was a woman’s place first. Christ chose a woman who left her chores serving the men in favor of a Biblical education.
“Mary Magdalene came and told the disciples that she had seen the Lord, and that he had spoken these things unto her.” (Joh 20:18)
“Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.
And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept.
And they, when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed not.
…Afterward he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen. (Mar 16: 9-11 &14) 

Isn’t it interesting how the apostle Thomas is often called “the doubter” because he would not believe before he saw Christ with his own eyes? He would not believe the apostle’s testimonies. But rarely do we hear about the disciples who refused to receive the women’s message and they too refused until they saw Christ themselves. And so they were guilty of the same as Thomas. Many Christians do not regard it the same way as it’s considered more acceptable and understandable to not listen to women than to not listen to men.
But with Christ, it was the opposite. He rebuked them, the apostles, for their disbelief, but He did not rebuke Thomas.
This is because we are used to hearing the stories in a light that degrades women and lifts men up.

But the story is even more interesting.
“It was Mary Magdalene, and Joanna, and Mary the mother of James, and other women that were with them, which told these things unto the apostles. And their words seemed to them as idle tales, and they believed them not.” (Luk 24:10-11)

«Idle tales»? Do God’s men still have such an attitude to female messengers? Are they still looked down upon? Isn’t it still unimportant to receive a female messenger but necessary to receive a male?

The Lord rebuked them for it. It was the Lord Himself who had sent Mary with a message, a joyful message. His joyful message. His gospel. And when they rejected her testimony they really rejected the Word He had sent them.
The same goes for today. If the Lord sent us a word through a woman it’s really the Lord’s words we reject when we don’t receive it. It’s Him we let down. God’s word is God’s word no matter what gender it is that presents it. God’s word is not down-rated just because it’s presented by a woman. The word in itself has the same value if it comes from the right source.

God wasn’t taken by surprise. He knows everything. It wasn’t a shock to Him that Mary and the other women’s testimony wasn’t received. He chose deliberately to show Himself to her first. It wasn’t about her being more available at the time. According to the gospel of John Mary came there first and then let everyone know He was gone. Then Peter and John ran to the grave with Mary and looked for Him. At this time Jesus stood there in hiding while Peter and the other apostles were looking for Him. Then they continued on their way and Mary was left standing there alone. That’s when He shows Himself to Mary. Peter and John had just been there right before Jesus showed Himself to Mary. And He didn’t show Himself to them, He waited until they had gone and then He showed Himself to Mary and told her to bear the message to them and the other disciples.
Why does Jesus do this? Because God also chooses to speak through women. And to show this, and demonstrate this, and to teach people this, He has to do these practical examples. He shows how important women are for Him to spread the gospel out to the world. When He rebuked the apostles, He showed how important it is to receive female messengers. He teaches them not to discriminate against the gospel workers and messengers based on gender. Still today it happens. The curse is still resting on women, but with the men who have God’s kingdom inside them, this should not be the case. They should not treat women this way. Yet today many consider a man who degrades women in the work a “good Christian”. Christ said that God’s kingdom begins within us. In God’s kingdom, Jesus said, men and women will not be wed, but be as the angels. If therefore God’s kingdom has truly begun inside us, we will not use our time on telling women to be quiet and know their place. We will see them as equals as they will be in God’s kingdom.

Jesus had to address two prejudices the disciples had and that sat deep in them. One was that they did not want to associate together with heathens or with those who were not circumcised. The other was their attitude towards women. It’s written that in those days, Jews living in the first century would not even trust women to be witnesses in a trial as they were considered untrustworthy because of their gender.
Christ making these women witnesses was, therefore, a rebuke to such a view. Peter receives a vision from the Lord that leads him to go home to Cornelius and his uncircumcised family and everyone receives the holy spirit. In the same way, they also had to learn and understand that women would also receive the holy spirit to do ministry work.

“And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions:
And also upon the servants and upon the handmaids in those days will I pour out my spirit.” (Joe 2:28-29)

Not just on women, but on handmaids. The lowest of the lowest. Their sons and daughters would speak prophetically. What are prophetic words? The meaning of the Hebrew word shows us it’s talking about ‘speaking by inspiration’. Inspired by who? The holy spirit. By the Lord of course. It’s talking about speaking the Lord’s words. Is the Bible inspired? Yes. Does God choose women to speak from the Bible and from the Spirit when He sends His Spirit? Yes. Is it just as important as when a man speaks if it’s from the Lord? Yes.

We are told:
1) Women, free or handmaids, received the Holy Spirit.
2) We learn that they received so they could speak/preach God’s word.

Peter quoted this scripture when the holy spirit was sent to them on the feast of Pentecost.
“For these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is but the third hour of the day.
But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel;
And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams:” (Acts 2:15-17)

Peter claims this prophecy was fulfilled in their time. They understood that women also had an assignment to preach the word. That they received the holy spirit just like them in order to make them fit for service. When the holy spirit was sent upon them we learn that both men and women were present:
“And when they were come in, they went up into an upper room, where abode both Peter, and James, and John, and Andrew, Philip, and Thomas, Bartholomew, and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon Zelotes, and Judas the brother of James.
These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren.” (Acts 1:13-14)


More brave women

Who was persecuted? Both men and women (Acts.8:3). When Saul was persecuting the first Christians he went inside house after house and dragged out both men and women and cast them in prison. Both men and women were preaching, filled with the holy spirit. And both suffered for Christ’s sake. To be a Christian in those days acquired bravery, but to be a preacher: even more bravery.

Philips daughters:
Paul writes: “And the next day we that were of Paul’s company departed, and came unto Caesarea: and we entered into the house of Philip the evangelist, which was one of the seven; and abode with him. And the same man had four daughters, virgins, which did prophesy.” (Act 21:8 -9)

Again the same word was used. These girls were preachers after the promise given to Joel. «and your daughters shall prophesy»
It’s evident to anyone that you cannot prophesy without opening your mouth to speak the words of inspiration.

Early church history by Eusebius tells that these women were very influential :
«Philip’s four daughters are barely mentioned in the New Testament, but they are mentioned several times in other early church writings. The fourth-century church historian Eusebius described these women as “mighty luminaries” and ranked them “among the first stage in the apostolic succession.”[7] Moreover, he regarded the ministry of Philip’s daughters as the benchmark for prophetic ministry in the early church.»

Priscilla:
“This man was instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in the spirit, he spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord, knowing only the baptism of John.
And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly.” (Acts 18:25-26)

Here we see Priscilla teaching a man in God’s way. But she was also leading a house church together with her husband: “The churches of Asia salute you. Aquila and Priscilla salute you much in the Lord, with the church that is in their house.” (1Co 16:19)

The church:
“And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.” (1Co 12:28)
Because: “That there should be no schism in the body” (1Co 12:25)

We already have seen how Jesus sent women to preach for both men and women and how many of the women were prophets. We also see women preaching and teaching. If we reject the women God has placed in the church then we create a «schism in the body» for «God hath set» them in these positions.
Would God have us not receive the hard-working gospel workers because they are female?

Phebe:

“I commend unto you Phebe our sister, which is a servant of the church which is at Cenchrea:
That ye receive her in the Lord, as becometh saints, and that ye assist her in whatsoever business she hath need of you: for she hath been a succourer of many, and of myself also.
Greet Priscilla and Aquila my helpers in Christ Jesus:
Who have for my life laid down their own necks: unto whom not only I give thanks, but also all the churches of the Gentiles.” (Rom 16:1-4)

Receive these female gospel workers «as becometh saints».

This text has been controversial for those who want to lessen women’s position in the Christian church. It says she is a servant of the church. But we know from Scripture she traveled to many places, surely not to cook for the men. The word used is diakonos a word used to describe male church leaders in other places in the New Testament. It seems the translator decided that when a woman is mentioned, the same word should be translated as “servant” and when a man is mentioned it’s translated as “church leader” or “deacon”. But no one can deny the importance this woman had to have had.
But because the reader sits with a finished prejudice and a traditional understanding of a woman’s ’place’ they read into the verse what is not there. When Paul says similar things about receiving Timothy and Epafroditus it’s clear to everyone that they are gospel workers.

JUNIA

“Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellow prisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.” (Rom 16:7)

In order to bring women “down” the controversy continues with another name, Junia. Here it’s assumed that she cannot be a woman because the word apostle is used to describe her. The name was therefore changed to Junias, a male form of the name, in translations. No Greek manuscript used the male form until the 13th century. The first to change the name to a muscular form was Aegidius in Rome (1245-1316). The biggest change from a female name to a male name was done in Paris in 1512 by Father Stepulensis. And Luther copied from his work. But all earlier manuscripts clearly showed it was speaking of a woman. Junia became a man in English translations in 1881 when the Revised Version was published. All it shows is that women were held in much higher regard in the early church than they were hundreds of years later. If we want to go back to the apostolic church it demands that we receive and support female apostles, prophets, and gospel workers.

Euodia

“I beseech Euodias, and beseech Syntyche, that they be of the same mind in the Lord.
And I intreat thee also, true yokefellow, help those women which laboured with me in the gospel, with Clement also, and with other my fellow labourers, whose names are in the book of life.” (Php 4:2 -3) 

Again here we clearly see the female gospel workers at work. He says «Help them», and recognizes them for the work they are doing. They need help. Female ministries need help also today but few dare to support them because a fear that they are in the wrong by preaching.

CONCLUSION:

Although Paul suggests women to subordinate their husbands this is not the same as claiming that God doesn’t speak directly to women, that women can’t be messengers (to also men), prophets, gospel workers, and preachers. That even a married woman can be a leader, like Deborah, without dishonoring her husband. The same with prophetess Huldah who had a husband who did needlework. One thing does not mean another. God created an order for the family to organize family responsibilities and tasks with the man in the leading role if possible. But as always God’s individual relationship with them comes first. One is bigger than the other. Therefore the law of God says nothing about set roles in the household or a ‘woman’s place’. Those few verses Paul writes about women subordinating themselves have nothing to do with women’s service to the Lord, he himself praises and works with female preachers. He also asked a slave to subordinate his master, in spite of the fact that he had uttered that there is no slave and master relationship in Christ. It was tied to respecting the rules of society, not causing unnecessary prejudice, and choosing one’s battles.
If women were forbidden to preach or teach, this would have been written in God’s law. But it’s not. And so it is not a sin for a woman to either lead or preach in God’s kingdom. The law defines what sin is and what it isn’t. Neither does the law speak against female leaders or women in other important positions. But we need to adjust to the culture we are in if we want to reach them.
Would I reach a single woman visiting a strict Islamic country if I dressed what they considered improper or even acted in a way they would consider improper? Of course not. If I did and Paul was alive he would have told me to act properly considering where I was, or the gospel would suffer. Would my husband be able to preach to them if they saw he had no control over his wife? Probably not. Adjusting to the society we are in helps us reach out with the gospel. But sin is defined by the law and not the traditions of men.
God has Himself sent women out to preach, teach, prophecy, and lead. And God does not sin. If a man sins by supporting women in these roles we are calling God a sinner too. That itself should show us we err. Are we more holy than God in this matter?

Latter rain.

God’s people are living in hope for the latter rain to help them get the last warning out to the world. And when the latter rain pores we will again see women filled with the holy spirit preaching. If we work against God’s plan to reach out with the last message by sabotaging those who are of the opposite sex, isn’t that hindering the Spirit who has called them to preach? Do we not work against God’s plan? Those who try to silence the women and hinder them from sharing the word, do they really work on God’s side in the last conflict? God needs everyone who is willing. We will expect to see female teachers, prophets, leaders, and messengers when the Spirit is given. Those who refuse to receive them or listen to them can not expect God will send them the message through a man they think is more fit. We don’t get to decide the conditions God uses to reach us. If we don’t want God to send us a woman, we might not get the message any other way and might  even be left in the dark.

One of the biggest denominations that keep the Sabbath is the Seventh-day Adventist church counting over 18 million members.
They had a female stand on the pulpit at a time when most churches believed no woman should do so.
But another messenger would bring the coming church its biggest pillars. Her name was Rachel Oakes Preston. She was a Seventh-day Baptist that preached the Sabbath to the Advent-millerites which again led to Adventists keeping the Sabbath. When she first started preaching the Sabbath to them they were so busy preparing for what they thought would be the second coming of Christ that they had no time to hear her out. However, after being disappointed they were humbled and started listening to her. But what if none of these men would have allowed her to teach them this truth?

Does God send more important truths through women today that are being ignored because it comes from a woman? Is it worth at least asking ourselves that question? If you think there is no female discrimination among us today I will ask you the following. You know names of great present preachers like Doug Bachelor, Walter Veith, Steve Wholberg, David Gates, and yes I’m sure you can list much more. But do you know the names of any great female preachers?
Even though there are many women that work and reach far they are not acknowledged in the same way as men. Nor do they receive the same support. Like so many in the Bible, they become a part of a group of nameless women. The Advent movement listened to their women in the beginning but do they now?
Although female ministries receive little support or recognition they have a major advantage.
The advantage God has in using female messengers is that they are less likely to be made into mediators. Many male preachers are looked up to and many go to them for answers as if they were closer to God than what they themselves can ever hope to be. This can lead men into the trap where they take tasks they have not been called to do. The greater the preacher, the more you can notice how they slowly make themselves judges on all Biblical topics and conflicts as if God had made them all-knowing. And too easily they start sabotaging other’s work by their ignorance. They run where others are sent while placing stumbling blocks before those God really has sent.
A female worker is more likely to lead men straight to Christ as almost none uplifts them in the same way they do male preachers. God does not want human mediators, He wants us to draw people to Christ and not to ourselves. Here women have a lot to give, because they are looked upon as «lesser workers» they can more easily direct people to the Bible and Christ without taking a mediating position. Today, when men keep creating and uplifting themselves as teachers and mediators it’s good for the Lord to sometimes pick a woman to bring the word out.

Please help stop the persecution of female ministries. And remember Onan. If God has a calling for you and you sabotage a woman’s calling, it could be that her work will remain standing and yours will be taken from you.

May God continue to bless you.

Hell

0

The word hell is often used by Catholics, Protestants and Pentecostals to explain the coming punishment and it scares a lot of people. When we open our Bibles we do find the word “hell” and therefore it is easy to assume that this concept of “hell” is biblically correct, but the common interpretation of this word is from Babylon, and not from the truth that Abraham’s children were given. The Bible teaches that “the dead know not any thing” (Ecclesiastes 9:5), and “they shall be as ashes under their feet” (Malachi 4:3) . There is a penalty for sin which is death. The Bible compares the death of the ungodly with the death of Sodom and Gomorrah (Jude 1:7). These cities were burnt by fire and brimstone from heaven. Today only the ash and the brimstone remain, but nothing is burning now. The fire has stopped. Eternal life was to be given to the faithful, but those that would not follow Christ would be sentenced to death, meaning they would not receive “eternal life” in hell, but that they would become as if they never had been. When we find the word “hell” among the words of Christ, it is worth noting that He spoke within the Jewish mindset and not the pagan. For He said,

“all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me” (Luke 24:44).

Christ came to confirm that what they had been taught through the law and the prophets was correct. The word Christ used which is translated to “hell”, is “gehenna”, which is an area outside Jerusalem’s city wall where they burnt garbage. Sometimes the fire burnt for days until there was nothing left to burn. The use of the word is often misunderstood today. A fire that cannot be extinguished until everything is burnt up, is incorrectly interpreted as a fire that will never stop burning. To be able to burn man for eternity, God has to recreate the man that is burning over and over again, or to make him inconsumable, but this is not in harmony with the word of God.The word “forever” is used in the Bible, but the Hebrew expression that it is translated from does not necessarily mean ‘a never ending period of time’. It can also mean ‘a limited period of time’. It depends in what context the word is used. In the story of the prophet Jonah who was swallowed by a great fish, it says that “her bars was about me for ever” (Jonah 2:6), but Jonah was only there 3 days and 3 nights. The last argument used to maintain the pagan interpretation of hell in the Christian faith, is that the apostles have used the Greek word, “hades”. Hades was the Greek word for the kingdom of death, where there was said to be fire and misery. After an ancient copy of the gospel of Matthew was discovered, it has been speculated that the gospels and the New Testament writings were originally written in Hebrew. The most important thing is not what word was used in the Greek, but what Christ and His apostles really believed. They were Jews not Greeks. They had a Jewish understanding of death, and not Greek. The Old Testament is clear that the loss of eternal life is final, the decision is eternal and that the dead will be burnt up. The doctrine of hell as we know it among Christians today is a myth that originates in Babylon. A myth that the Greeks and the Romans subsequently adopted into their own beliefs. Even though myths often changed or developed, the Babylonians believed in a under-world that was populated by demons. (Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia, Jeremy Black and Anthony Green, The British Museum Press, 1992, p.63).

They believed that the demons were placed there by the gods to punish the sinners. The Bible on the other hand says the Devil is in opposition to God, and not someone who works with Him. Of the Babylonian teaching it is written,

“The underworld is always described as in complete darkness, dusty and unpleasant. All the dead, without exception, wander there, thirsting for water and having only dust to eat… Apart from these spirits of the dead (gidim), the underworld is also the home of the dead gods, of some demons (who are described as the ‘offspring of arali’ and who issue from the underworld to bring tribulation to mankind…” (Ibid. p.108).

In the Sumerian poem “Gilgamesh, Enkidu and the Underworld” a conversation is described;

“between Gilgames and the ghost of his dead servant Enkidu which makes it clear that while life in the underworld is most unattractive, it can be made slightly more tolerable if surviving relatives make regular offerings to the dead of food and drink, so that it is desirable to leave as many descendants as possible. Those who have no children have a hard time indeed after death, while those who do not even receive proper burial are worst off: the person who died in a fire or whose body lies in the desert does not even have a gidim in the under-world.” (Ibid. p.181).

This Babylonian myth must have created a lot of sorrow among the poorer families and those who were dying and did not have a family. In the same way this Babylonian myth was passed down and made to fit with Christian doctrine by the Catholic Church. The doctrine of purgatory has created problems for millions of poor people and for those without families during the Middle Ages. It supposed that the families of the deceased could reduce their time in purgatory by their own good deeds, and by paying indulgences to the Church, but if they did not have Catholic family members,

“Roman Catholic theologians are not in agreement as to the nature of the suffering in purgatory. Some teach that the pain of purgatory is chiefly a sense of loss in being separated from God. Others, following Thomas Aquinas, teach that souls in purgatory suffer intense and excruciating physical pain from fire” (The Gospel According to Rome, James G. McCarthy, Harvest House Publishers, Eugene, Oregon, 1995).“Another way in which the living can help the dead is by acquiring special credits, called indulgences, that cancel out temporal punishment [1032, 1479]. Roman Catholicism teaches that the church has the power to dispense indul-gences from a vast reservoir of merit called the treasury of the Church [1476, 1477]” (Ibid p.94).

It was a tough time for those who did not get enough attention after their death or for those who did not receive a proper burial in the time of Babylon and in the Catholic Church during the Dark Ages. Christ knew of these pagan doctrines that flourished when He walked the earth. His attitude was of a different character, because He knew those things claimed by the heathen were not true. There was no reason to worry for the dead. He said, “Let the dead bury the dead” (Luke 9:60). God hid the burial place of Moses from the children of Israel in a time when they had been guilty of worshiping Baal and Peor (worshiping the dead). Therefore the tomb of Moses was hidden from them so they would not think that, even though Moses had been a godly man, they could pray to him or make his grave a place of worship. In Babylon there was a belief which had influenced everyone except the Jews. The Babylonian hell was an underworld with god’s or demons ruling in it. A teaching which today has become Christian. “The notion of an underworld peopled by terrifying demonic beings, which foreshadowed the medieval hell, seems to have been a theological invention of the first millennium B.C.” (Gods, Demons and Symbols of ancient Mesopotamia, An Illustrated Dictionary by Jeremy Black and Anthony Green, The British Museum Press, 1992, p.28).

Top: Here Satan and the demons are taking a group of people to hell (on the right side of the picture). The demons are depicted as half animal and half man with horns. No where in the Bible is the devil or his demons described as having horns or animalistic bodies. This is a Babylonian invention. The picture here is from the Catholic church of Notre Dame in Paris.

Left: Old statue from before Christ showing a mythological, demonic creature. Below Right: Asian demon mask.

What the Bible said about Hell and Sodom in the Bible, and how it reveals what “hell” is really about:

Doctrines of faith, Assumptions, Manipulation, Sectism and the True Gospel

1

How in the world can we know what we believe is actually God’s truth?

This article is meant as a friendly help to anyone struggling with all the different theological fights among Gods commandment keeping people.

By R.Tourniaire.

Yes, I know, another one wants to tell you what the truth is. Isn’t there many of us? They(We) are everywhere and none seem to agree. What a true mess. And it’s never been more clear then after we got all preachers to our homes through the internet. But bear with me a moment, because I am not going to present to you a long list of doctrines that you must receive to be saved. Did you know that some pastors and priest won’t even baptize without you signing an agreement saying you believe their list of doctrines? Yes, it has come to that. The diversity of faith is such a problem in most churches that they want to see a sign of loyalty towards their understanding before they will perform an act that isn’t even about them. A baptism is a conscious act between the one person and God: «Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so, we also should walk in newness of life.» (Rom.6:4) While the one performing the baptism is just a tool to help that person get into the water and back up.

So when the Bible so clearly says what the conditions of baptism are and what it means, how can Bible preachers still get things so wrong? Why are they suddenly baptized to a set of doctrines? I know one lady who had been baptized a full three times. For as her understanding of scripture changed, and she felt she had been asked to agree to doctrines rather be buried and resurrected with Christ, she felt the need to re-baptist into the new faith. Why could a symbol go from being about a person and God, like the Bible teaches us, to being about that person and them as a group? Can doctrines of faith sometimes be used against God’s will? It could.

Doctrines lead us to salvation, for they lead us to Christ. This is their main purpose. But when doctrines themselves becomes the goal of the faith – when doctrines are the salvation – we must be in err in some way. And it doesn’t happen overnight and most of those living this misconception doesn’t even know it. It’s like Jesus said: «Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?» (Matt.23:16-17)
The main goal of the gospel is not for man to understand every aspect of every truth or to have a long list of doctrines – but to bring man back into the loving arms of God through the atoning blood of Christ. This cannot be done if we are still in rebellion of course, and this is where obedience enters the picture. In order to understand our sin, we must first acknowledge God’s law as just. Then we can unite with God through the atoning sacrifice God made for us. Yes, His gift to save us, not our gift to satisfy His wrath.

Some say believing in hell is salvational. Some say there is no hell. But both doctrines can lead someone to the Savior. Why? Even those who don’t believe there is an everlasting hell has to admit that their forefathers or even pioneers had a relationship with God when believing it.
God works on all men, not through lies, but sometimes the lie has been excepted as truth because God has been with us and loved us spite the lie. If God had to wait with having a relationship with someone until they got everything right on all points then He would never unite with a single person on this planet. It’s just not how it works. But sometimes it’s how Christians treat each other. They target the one they are having an argument with as a deceiver and choose a distance and push each other away. The only place distance is necessary is if one party is using consistent manipulation or abuse as a tactic.
While when we ourselves have been deceived at some points, God and his angels are still there to help and work with us. The answer to prayer isn’t a sign that all our doctrines are correct and that God favors us above someone else, it’s a sign that God is love and have patience with us. But some are tempted to think: «God answered my prayer and so He approves my doctrines of faith and therefore they are the correct one».
Let’s go back to the example of hell. For someone who does not want to listen to God because he has been lead to believe God finds enjoyment in torturing people, the doctrine of the state of the dead is a useful tool in helping this person to find Christ. Doctrines help us rid of misconceptions that stand between a reunion between ourselves and God. And that is their mission and strength.

Like many others who work for Christ, I think God chose me for the work I do, but I don’t think that every idea or path that I have taken have been His will. Sometimes I have strayed. During this walk, I’ve experienced miracles. Many, many, workers for Christ have similar strong experiences. Those who dare to speak where others are quiet, or to go places no one else will go to share the gospel, will receive special help from heaven. But this does not mean I or them haven’t or can’t err and it does not mean the others who tell of great answers to prayers haven’t either. Unless we have received our whole life scripted, and all our writings dictated, there will be human fallible misunderstandings and errors. Some who hear others incredible answers to prayers might be tempted to think it’s impossible for the person who shares them to err. And thus are preacher-mediators created. But we are not to make ourselves mediators. «Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.» (Jer.17:5)

Early in my experience, I was introduced to a more conservative group of Christians. At first, my faith was nearly given up when I saw their many rules and regulations. But God picked me up and comforted me and told me to keep going. Spite the lesson learned, I unknowingly started to bring with me some inspiration from their way of thinking. There were more people who thought like this around me and before I knew it I was affected. My world started shrinking and many of my actions became more fear-based. While at the start it had been purely love-based.
Many have strayed into this path sometime during their Christian experience, and those who haven’t perhaps need to self-examine a little more. But some goes all the way. Even among God’s people, there are sectist people who are it unaware and unwilling. And let me just say, God loves everyone, liberals and conservatives alike. He also loves those who don’t fit into any group, and there are many of us. But love isn’t the same as agreeing. God does not agree with everything those He loves does.

Sects

The biggest problem with a sect is not what they believe (although that can be of great worry) it’s how they practice their belief and teach them to others. What is common for almost all small sectist groups is that they have doctrines or a ‘revelation’ that stands out from the rest of the world. This ‘revelation’ or ‘doctrine’ becomes salvational. This resembles the principle of all religions really but the moment a group has a ‘salvational’ doctrine the assumption is of course that all others will be lost if they don’t join them. The sect is established when the group itself becomes salvational. Suddenly the group members fear leaving the group as leaving the group will mean being eternally lost. Their religion is now limited and fear-based and they are no longer in a personal relationship with ‘the divine worshiped’ or Christ, but with the group. And now they will allow many sins within the group as those sins committed there are regarded more holy than the sins committed by the others. Yes, it sounds ridiculous, but once the sectist mentality hits someone, they become somewhat blind.
The leaders might even be sincere when they preach rules they themselves don’t manage to practice as they fool themselves into thinking they are at least «saving the others» by pretending and still preaching it. It’s sometimes hard to follow if there are too many unsaid and said rules and what naturally follows is a way to handle it by making exemptions or side rules to make the main rules less burden-full. This is a true sign of someone getting lost in the woods which trees they themselves have planted.
Unfortunately very often people who end up victims of sectist mentality are people who have had difficult backgrounds as they are easily suppressed or are more likely to agree to degrading treatment and loss of personal liberty. Among past abused people we usually see both victims and control freaks born, and when they find themselves together a natural abuse-abuser relationship emerges. This is also why ridiculing such people will not give any good fruit. People that are wounded need affection and healing not to be mocked or forced.
Some have noticed a lot of troubled people within churches as a bad sign however it’s all to do with how you look at it. Are the troubled people troubled because of the religious society they are in or do some congregations attract people that are already troubled because religious people are often very welcoming to those who are wounded and outcasts of society? In fact, many people who are pushed away from most society would easily be excepted into a Christian congregation.

Small sects are rarer. But the mentality of sectism is found within many large denominations and groups within the churches. Sometimes large churches have this mentality. I remember visiting a large charismatic church when I was asked if I had received the spirit they offered when I said no, they got up a left me as if I was unclean.
But also in churches that keep «the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus» this similar way of thinking can be seen. One person comes up with «a revelation» of some doctrine and first tries to convince his brethren. Usually, a smaller group will be made and as they cannot see how both groups can be saved when one resists the other, the idea that their revelation is salvational starts to emerge. If the discussion hasn’t caused division already it will the moment it is regarded salvational. That is when a split always happens. The thought is that one is lead by the spirit and the other isn’t. And although these groups are not sitting in a camp somewhere they will have the same fear-based trade-mark and attitude towards others because of a few doctrines or even one single doctrine.

The same tactics are used in the world and other religions. Even atheists use them. But in the world, it’s called ‘manipulation’. I’ve seen atheists use similar methods to prevent someone from changing views or changing traditions from theirs. Atheists are very manipulating when faced with different views but are rarely attributed the fault as it’s been politically correct to just say they justly demand rationalism and therefore justified to use manipulation, lies, and force.
Whatever word we use for this type of behavior, it in itself is why there is a war either between different religious people or between non-religious and religious people. The idea that you ‘save’ someone or something by forcing or manipulating a group or a person into a change, is seen everywhere in different degrees. And all humans are guilty of it. Usually, it’s the big group that pressures the small group, which is why minorities are often the ones to be miss-treated without them necessarily being right in their beliefs.
Followers of Christ should never use any form of manipulation to get listeners. Manipulation cannot glorify God or the truth. When manipulation and truth are used together we damage God’s reputation. As wiki says: «Psychological manipulation is a type of social influence that aims to change the perception of the behavior of others through underhanded, deceptive or abusive tactics.»
Manipulation is used by Muslims, Jews, and Christians in all different denominations in a lesser or greater degree. Yes also by Buddhists and Hindus. Why do you think so many churches are burnt down in India or Christians persecuted in Asian communistic countries? Or other communist and atheistic countries who targeted religious people by using force? You can not think differently from your group without being pressured or threatened in some way. This mentality is even seen in the classroom and in the schoolyard. If you differ or don’t follow whatever rules a group has made you are excluded or bullied, abused, or forced to submit.
Now the author of all of this is the devil. If he cannot prevent someone to come to God he can try and push them in a ditch in their understanding of God. Many who leave religious churches, all kinds, speak of the loss of freedom and manipulation of thought, with a right! It’s not unlikely they have experienced what they say, but unfortunately the doctrines are blamed rather the hands that were feeding them the doctrines. But of course, sometimes there is something wrong with the doctrines as well. But if everyone thinks carefully, this mentality is everywhere. It’s how each and every group and society protect their area or dominion. It’s not to do with the church itself, whatever church. It’s just how it goes.. if you pressure yourself into a lifestyle you don’t like you will eventually try to break free and blame the group you were in for the suppression. Or if you rebel openly trying to change the group mentality, of course, you have gone to war and will get ‘shot at’. When someone leaves a church they sometimes sing out of how sectist it all was and people shake their heads in shock while performing the same treatment to others in whatever society they themselves are in.

Why many Christians and other religious use manipulation

Many who would never have dreamed of using the same method ‘in the world’ will blindly manipulate in the name of Christ. This is the result of feeling a sense of duty and that if they don’t use a ‘fear-based gospel’ their families or friends will be lost forever. This fear of losing someone can make people have awful behavior. A mother may think that if she doesn’t try and manipulate the teenage daughter to go to church rather visit her friends, she will be lost. And so by manipulating the daughter, she thinks she saves her.
Fear and control go hand in hand. “There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.” (1.Jn 4 :18)

Love and fear will always be in conflict. Fear has no patience. It’s a bodily reaction that tells us to fight or flight. It acts in haste and irrationally, it makes enemies of friends, it creates apathy and depression where “fight or flight” is not an option. It can easily take the place of the Holy Spirit, of Jesus if we let it.
Some think their fear is the Holy Spirit and if they don’t listen to it they disobey God. This strange idea has turned many Christians into tyrants. We take control into our own hands, a control that belongs to God only. We are not allowed to control or manipulate other people’s minds, even if they are related. That is not true Christianity. Not even God tries to win people over by ‘taking over their mind’ and controlling ‘their thoughts and actions’. In the book of Revelation we read how Christ has been pushed out of His own church but pleads with members of the church: «Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come into him, and will sup with him, and he with me.» (Rev.3:20) Jesus doesn’t break an entry. He asks, He knocks but is also the great defender of our right to refuse Him or receive Him. Some tell Him «wait». Jesus is the ultimate defender of man’s freedom to choose. And man cannot choose if they are not free to do so. This is why the tree was in the garden of Eden. They could choose disobedience. The serpent in the tree had freedom of speech. Without freedom of speech, there is no freedom of choice. But having the freedom of choice is not the same as having freedom from the consequences that follow our actions. If our actions hurt others every society on earth, no matter religious or not, agree a consequence has to happen in order to stop that person.

The Jews rejected Jesus as the Messiah because they were expecting someone to come and by force rule the nations. While Jesus’ message was that His kingdom started within us. His mission was not to rule a world that was in opposition by turning it all into a society with suppression and control. Would it have lasted? Wouldn’t’ there always be people fighting against? Can any kingdom of peace be built on force? Peace and force can never be joint together. And it seems like the human race just can’t seem to grasp the impossibility of these two joint together and keep repeating the mistakes of the past and going in circles. This has been done by atheists and religious alike.

The gospel is a gift, salvation is a gift. Salvation itself cannot, therefore, be forced or manipulated upon anyone. You can force wrap a person in a poster that says «saved by Jesus» but unless the heart is moved the poster is just a liar. No one is saved by joining your group or sign their name under a list of dogmas and doctrines. Doctrines don’t save. People can even agree with doctrines and still not be saved. It’s not what’s on paper that matters, it’s what is in the heart. Only Christ blood saves. And His kingdom will not be built with people who disagree but are only there because they dared not speak against Him. It will not be built on people who’s inner heart is in an uproar. That is why if you suppress people’s right to speak differences of thought or silence people to submission, what you might do is actually hinder their salvation. It’s better their voices are heard and questions addressed, then at least you might allow them to be ready. But if you force them to hide their worries and uproar to fake-fit in then they are not ready for Christ return. Dialogue is therefore good.
If silencing people is how you lead your congregation or household, then you might discover that you work against God and the holy spirit rather than working with Him. Any religion that is not heart-based is false. It’s not the new covenant God promised through Christ. The outward follower is living in the old covenant and must not fear to go into the new covenant. For what did the Israelite say at Sinai? They all said they would keep God’s law, but right after they all broke it. It was not in their hearts. And they were not allowed to enter the promised land even though they physically carried the law of God in it’s written form during the 40 years in the wilderness. Today, many are those who physically carry the law but don’t have them in their hearts.
Right now God is trying to reach into people’s hearts to find His people who will get access to His kingdom on a new earth, with a rule that will purely be love-based.

Big preachers & independent preachers

In the past years, I saw three great preachers with large followers who have preached the truth and fought the good fight for a long time be ensnared to preach the doctrines of assumptions as facts and having a great impact. In their speeches, they hit the Bible and said: «It’s in here, it’s in here. It’s a fact» and then adding statements of ‘fear’ to everyone who didn’t see it. But looking at the verses he said was «fact» I saw his conclusion nowhere in them. But for everyone who didn’t check they only remembered the tapping on the book and the words: it’s in there.
The problem with preachers with a large fan-base is that they often are made and looked on as someone closer to God and therefore asked to give their opinion on all sorts of conflict topics. Being flattered by the request they think they have some sort of duty to use their influence by making a stand while they, in reality, haven’t properly studied the topic they are sharing or maybe even haven’t been called by God to preach it. God will never make one man the expert on all topics for that very reason. God calls different people for different tasks. When a preacher thinks he loses face by not being an expert on all biblical topics he might do the wrongful thing of speaking out where he shouldn’t.
«As men rejoice in the freedom which the truth brings them, they are inclined to extol those whom God has employed to break the chains of error and superstition. Satan seeks to divert men’s thoughts and affections from God, and to fix them upon human agencies; he leads them to honor the mere instrument and to ignore the Hand that directs all the events of providence. Too often religious leaders who are thus praised and reverenced lose sight of their dependence upon God and are led to trust in themselves. As a result, they seek to control the minds and consciences of the people, who are disposed to look to them for guidance instead of looking to the Word of God. The work of reform is often retarded because of this spirit indulged by its supporters.» GC, 170
It hurts my heart to see men I know have had great answers to prayers and done a mighty work to lower themselves in such a way that they would place themselves between God and the people and make themselves an expert on topics they are not experts, thinking they do God’s service by thinking and study on behalf of the people. They cannot be wrong and so they will not admit wrong. For if they admit wrong in anything some might think it’s evidence that they are not 100% inspired, this is a view they dare not take place, as they feel it will make them lose face with the many who look to them for guidance. All I can say is a warning, warning, get your feet back onto the ground. Not every idea and thought you have is inspired and as soon as people realize, they will thank you for your hard work, but trust in the Lord only. Which is what we want, to build a bond between Christ and the individual. And if this bond is not stronger then the bond you as a preacher has to your listener, then you have failed your mission. For we are not called to lead people to depend on us but to lead them to depend on God alone. The greatest prophet and preacher that ever lived said: «He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom’s voice: this my joy, therefore, is fulfilled. He must increase, but I must decrease. He that cometh from above is above all: he that is of the earth is earthly, and speaketh of the earth: he that cometh from heaven is above all.» (Joh.3:29-31)

These preachers that took on this topic in the year that was, building on assumptions of Scripture alone, ended up having to add the element of fear to their persuasion. This is sad to see but natural progress when one wants to convince someone of something the spirit isn’t with on. For when the spirit doesn’t work helping convincing with what we are preaching, the methods of man take the place of the spirit. These great men who for so long had given fact-based Bible studies, when they strayed, tact and logic were replaced with fear and assumptions and their listeners seemed blind having full confidence because of their previous work.

Everyone needs to self-examine repeatedly taking on any new topic, motives, method, and make sure we are called to do it. That we don’t run where we are not sent. «In the last days, you will clearly understand it. I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran: I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied.» (Jer.23:20-21)
Remember just because God sent us to one «town» doesn’t mean He has given us jurisdiction or responsibilities of all the other «towns». Make sure you are truly sent before you run, so that you don’t step on the one God really sent, to do that specific bidding on that area, on the way and on that topic.
This is very often how someone who has had a great place in God’s work can suddenly end up persecuting others God has called and caused unnecessary divisions and suspicion.

The use of assumption when interpreting scripture:

It can be a problem when the method of ‘fear’ and ‘assumption’ are added together. Sometimes when interpreting the Bible an assumption is added to a quote and then the assumption is what they build on and not the quote itself. Let’s do a silly example: Let’s say this is a verse of a religious book (it is not!): “Peter was happy that day and he went down to the store”
Now the study with the assumption could say: Peter was happy and Peter went to the store and so the conclusion is that it was BECAUSE Peter was happy he went to the store. So the assumption is made. The next step is to build the argument “When you are happy you will go to the store”. And “if you are not happy, you do not go to the store”. Then you can build on the previous assumptions and say: “Those who do not go to the store are not happy because the verse in the book says so.” And then you can start dividing and make a group: “Everyone who goes to the store is happy and they who don’t are not happy” Now was the doctrine here built on the verse itself? YES. Was the conclusion based on the verse? Yes. Was the conclusion correct? NO. Why? Because they placed the evidence of the doctrine of their assumption of what they read rather what it actually said. Not just one assumption, but several assumptions. Some Bible teachers use long lists of verses and it looks impressive, but their arguments are entirely built on assumptions of assumptions of these verses.
Now, this is the study method that I cannot recommend.

Let’s look again. The verse say : “Peter was happy that day and he went down to the store” I believe assumptions can be made: “Oh maybe he went to the store because he was happy”, but I would believe it would be wrong to conclude it or present it as a definitive truth because that is not what the verse says. Him being happy could have nothing to do with him going to the store. He might have had to do that anyway and the two might not even be connected. And so this other interpretation method will not build a doctrine based on an assumption. Instead, it will except the verse as truth itself, that Peter was happy that day. And that Peter also went to the store that day.
The other group may then come and say: “Why don’t you believe that verse? You disregard this religious book and this specific text”! But what is disregarded isn’t the text but their assumption of the meaning of the text. The problem with making an assumption ‘divine inspiration’ is that the person who studies in this way cannot often see the difference between the text itself and their own assumption. It’s like a study-blindside. When they read the verse to themselves, it actually seems to say what they assume it says. They can read it over and over again and the meaning they have created will seem as the same as the verse say. And because they cannot see the difference between an assumption and the raw fact, that they to them are the same, they call their assumption a fact and fear they reject the verse if they reject their assumption. This causes great distress. However, it’s for this reason, Peter writes: «Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.» (2.Pet.1:20)
Now I’m not the only one who sees the problem with this way of interpreting the Bible. There are many. If you study this principle and listen to a preacher you will notice immediately when the assumption is mixed with the text. Which is OK. But the moment the assumption is what is used as a base to make the next conclusion, the warning signs should go off. It might be safe, but it might also be a deception. And the preacher might even have his heart in the right place. But the Bible says: «There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof is the ways of death.» (Pro.14:12) Or as an ancient saying says: «The road to hell is paved with good intentions».

It can sometimes seem impossible to reach people who don’t see the difference between the verses themselves and the assumption they make or have been taught, they are un-moveable until they learn to separate the two. Because they want to be true to the religious verse. And so they are sincerer. It takes a whole new thinking process that has nothing to do with the topic being debated. Many conservatives are good at using fear which is why they often become sectists. And every new doctrine they find is usually salvational because if they cannot use the power of fear they will not succeed in spreading their message because it usually has burdens with it. This is why conservatives and liberals often fall for different deceptions. Conservatives fall the most for the topic presented as a salvational issue because they respond to fear and the flattery of being a ‘special’ group. While this would not work on a liberal who might not respond to fear and have no need to see themselves as elected before others. And so Satan hits them with deception tied to ‘freedom from rules’ which leads to different kinds of sins.
Every single false doctrine ever preached from the dawn of Judaism and Christianity has the assumption method that I tried to show above. It’s the same interpretation method that is used by evangelical churches and other church groups. For instance, it’s how Sunday sacredness is explained. There is not one verse in the Bible promoting Sunday sacredness. Not one verse saying the Sabbath is changed. You know how it goes: Jesus rose from the dead on the first day of the week. Assumption: “Jesus must have given this specific day honor since He rose on it. Shouldn’t we?” and then the conclusion based on the assumption: “If Christ honored Sunday, how can we honor Him if we don’t do the same?” And then you can continue: “the disciples gathered on a Sunday after the resurrection”. And “Jesus showed Himself to them on a Sunday”. With the conclusion: “So it’s biblical and in the verse that Sunday is holy.” And then making groups: “those who do not accept Sunday, don’t follow Christ and the apostles” or «those who keep the Jewish Sabbath don’t follow Christ». But the text itself never said Sunday was sanctified or purified or even a sign. It just says he rose on that day. It says the disciples gathered on that day, but it also says they gathered on other days later. And repeatedly say they gathered on the Sabbath throughout the book of Acts. It doesn’t matter how many verses are used to make an argument if the argument is based on an assumption alone. We must be sure our religion isn’t based on assumptions but on a clear «so saith the Lord». You don’t have to assume if the biblical Sabbath is chosen because God says so repeatedly and directly. There is no need to add guess-work. This is how you can distinguish a false doctrine from the truth. And the religion based on assumptions is often in need of a mediator because no one will think to follow the teaching unless someone ‘explains it to them’. During the middle ages, the Catholic church went so far as to deny people the right to read the Bible or even own one so that they had to follow the priests understanding of it alone, knowing that the moment people started reading themselves they would see different interpretations was possible and that the priest’s assumptions might even be wrong. The Catholic church was depended on the belief of holy mediators to make their doctrines make sense. And so they banned the factbook.

Basically, when you mix assumption into a verse, you can establish as many truth’s as you want and that is what has happened. That is why we have thousands of different denominations. And all claim they have built their faith on the Bible, and so it seems. But when they read a verse they read something else then what the others do. When I read Jesus rose on the first day, that is all I read. I thought: «Oh, so Christ rested on the Sabbath after saving man just like He rested after the creation. How beautiful» Or «Christ rested the sabbath and continued working on Sunday when He resurrected». So Sunday is still a workday? But when they read they see something else: “Jesus rose on the day He had chosen as a day of rest and it was to remain chosen”. Yes, it was the day He had chosen, but that one thing does not mean the other thing. But for those who read verses with assumption glasses, it’s very hard to show otherwise. Many think they let scripture and Christ down if they deny Sunday as holy for this very reason. To them, it’s biblical. They can’t read the Bible differently without feeling they betray it when really all they are betraying are their own assumption. Again, this only works for those who have a fear-based relationship to the doctrine, or who will suffer loss by disbelieving (losing family and friends) or to those who have a reward tied to believing it (job etc). They are the ones that cannot be convinced to leave their belief even if you show them quotes that clearly speak against the assumption.
Within churches I’ve gone to I have seen many teachers leading people astray with the same interpretation method. And it’s always the same. It can be a liberal teacher or a conservative, adding assumptions and concluding on the assumption itself. But how will it be viewed? Not that it was built on assumption but that it was built on scripture right? And that is the problem, that is why we have all these divisions. Not because someone rejects scripture, but because people have different assumptions when they read them. And they don’t know the difference.

The truth

People, it’s very easy to understand truth from lies if we really want to. Truth sanctifies, it changes someone’s character. No, not to become soldiers of doctrine. The truth isn’t about rolling down a long list and say you got it all right. The truth is about living the life of Christ. The truth is manifested in how we live, in our lives, not in words. Words can tell what is on someone’s inside but they can also lie. If your body and your mouth don’t speak the same language you need the new birth that Jesus spoke of to Nicodemus in John chapter 3. If your mouth and works don’t harmonize you are living the old covenant. But if they do, Your life will look like the one Jesus describes in Matthew 5-7. And if it doesn’t, fear not, it can. Being a Christian is not making a decision one day, it’s making a decision every day, to be more like Christ. To pray for guidance and help to be the best you can be. If you get something wrong, God will bear with us and help us get it right if we pray Him. God isn’t going to point at your mistake and go «ha! You are now lost», He eagerly wants to save you and help you because He views you as His child. Saving is His goal. He wants your heart and not fearful fake obedience.

Jesus said: «I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.» (Joh.14:6)

Some will say to me, oh this person says we should throw away our doctrines. No, that is not what I am saying. I’m saying the doctrines are there to help people find Jesus. But if you are not leading them to the blood of Christ but to the doctrines themselves, perhaps you should think of what is what. It’s important that doctrines don’t compete with the gospel itself. One is greater than the other.
One is a tool to help those who have been deceived to learn who God is, the other is salvation itself. If you bang doctrines in someone’s head it’s as if you meet a man with a broken foot by beating him with the crutch instead of offering him it. And if you beat him with it, surely it will defeat the whole point of the crutch. Many use doctrines in the right way, but too many are now thinking the doctrines themselves are the salvation and this causes the rapid growth of divisions.

What doctrines of faith does the Bible say His true end-time followers have? It does tell us.
And it lists four things: “Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.» (Rev.14:12)
1. Patience
2. Sanctification (saints)
3. God’s law
4. Faith of Jesus

Remember what the law of God is? «In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.» (John.1:1) Those who keep God’s word and the law will resemble Jesus, and if they don’t, well then they don’t keep it, they just say they do. They might be going around in their own wilderness carrying the law without actually having it in their hearts.

And notice the freedom Jesus had. He visited publicans, Samaritans, sinners, and priests alike. When he went home with Zaccheus He didn’t think about it hurting his reputation or that Zaccheus would corrupt him with his sinful ways, He did it to bring salvation to his house.

When Jesus spoke of the good Samaritan he provoked the priests greatly. For they asked Him about God’s law. He answers them by telling them of a man that was robbed and left on the road half dead. «And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. And likewise, a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him.» Notice that the two first were people claiming they kept God’s law and were God’s laws defenders. The Samaritan was known to break God’s law. But Jesus says: «Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbor unto him that fell among the thieves?» (Luke.10:36) What is Jesus actually saying here? That the priests boasting of having the law, broke it. And the one who is known to break it was actually the one who kept it. Not only that, but Jesus then continues to tell the jew to follow the example of the Samaritan. For living the law is greater than teaching it. He challenged people’s understanding of what it means to keep His law. He didn’t change the law but asked them if perhaps they had misunderstood its purpose and meaning. Christ’s way of living is very different than many Christians who claim to have His law today. He didn’t sin, but His life was full of compassion, patience, love, and understanding. And those He used the most time to scold, well it was those who thought they had the truth but were about to crucify the truth manifested. They had the word but they didn’t recognize the word made flesh.

The mission of the gospel is to reach the whole world. «The gospel of the kingdom». Christ Kingdom.

The devil is confusing God’s people

What is the devil doing to stop the message of salvation? Having the messengers fight over a doctrine here and another doctrine there. Many of God’s people are so busy fighting among themselves that they are forgetting that they are supposed to go out to the world with the offer of Christ salvation. Thousands upon thousands are unreached. Many think that they need to purify themselves to be ready to meet Jesus and so all their time is spent picking themselves asunder with rules and regulations, trying to understand everything perfectly so they can present themselves ‘perfect’ at Christ second coming. While their character would have been naturally cleansed by the Spirit as they took their eyes from self to reach those who were unreached. It’s like a lady going out on an anniversary date with her husband and goes to the bathroom to prepare and never finish applying makeup and fixing her hair and straightening her clothing until the night is over and they never got to leave. The point of her effort had been the date, but the date never took place because she wasn’t ready because she was too busy getting ready.

When eyes are on ‘self’ we will never improve no matter what changes we add to our lives. It’s a bottomless pit. Only when our eyes are on Jesus do we have a perfect image to change towards. When we look at ourselves, our feet stumble and we are likely to fall.
If our religion is centered on self, we need to change our view to get it right. True religion is never centered on self.

God’s people need to stop fighting, agree to disagree on some issues, and start taking care of all the spiritual wounded and share the gospel to those who haven’t heard it. If we do this, we will be ready. For we are saved by Christ’s righteousness. When you see someone in the water don’t start a fight with the other on the boat as to who is best fitted to rescue the person or what tool to use, just hurry into the water.
When you see someone in the water, throw the life jacked first, not a ‘bottle of milk’. A drowning man isn’t in a position to eat, his immediate need is being rescued.  If you see someone in the water, don’t call your pastor, you whom God placed there at the right time should go out and save him.
It’s time for God’s people to magnify Christ and His sacrifice. The rest will follow.

«He will swallow up death in victory, and the Lord GOD will wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall he take away from off all the earth: for the LORD hath spoken it. And it shall be said in that day, Lo, this is our God; we have waited for him, and he will save us: this is the LORD; we have waited for him, we will be glad and rejoice in his salvation.» (Isa.25:9)

What you can do.

I am not telling you what to do, but here is my suggestion based on my experience. If someone wants to present you with a truth or doctrine, take your time to study and allow yourself to ask questions and find answers. Consult the Father in prayer. And if anyone tries to rush you or scare you into making a decision before you feel ready, take a little step back from the group or person so you can clear your head. If someone wants to bring you the conclusion to save you from self-study, check it out yourself anyway. Remember even if someone uses wrong methods doesn’t mean what they say isn’t true and the other way around. Someone can be fairly behaved and present something false. The only way is to ask for God’s guidance and trust in His leading. And be patient and overbearing and love more. Remember everyone with obvious faults, either one way or another, are that way for a reason. One man went searching for a church where everyone behaved correctly and told another man of his restless search for this perfect church. And then the other said, «and when you find it, it will not be perfect anymore because you came into it.»
Many do wrong things sincerely. Only by dialogue and the ability to love those who believe and are different from us can we find a way into their hearts. Remember how you meet others will affect how they meet you back. Distrust will inspire distrust. Hate will inspire hate. Fear will cause the other to answer with fear. If you want a new color you can not meet them with the same color. You need to be the change. Answer evil with good, hate with love, cursing with blessings. You will feel better and be the change you want to see.
Remember to not give people what they provoke for, or ask for, but what they need. If they distrust you, give them trust in return. If they treat you unfriendly, treat them friendly in return, whether they deserved it or not. Christ gave us what He deserved not what we deserved. We should do this for each other as well. Don’t give something to someone in the hope of getting it in return. Give it because Christ gave it to you.

May the Lord bless you all and keep you safe in these confusing times.

THE SINS OF SODOM

0

By R.T

IMG 3029
Jesus and Sodom:
In the Bible we find the story where God decided to destroy the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah because of their sins. The story is dramatic and all the people in four (five) cities are eventually destroyed.
The Bible tells us that God let it rain fire and brimstone from the sky.
And I’m reading from Genesis 19:24-25: «Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven; And he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground.»
So this is a very dramatic event. Not since the great flood had God intervened in such a way.

Jesus later confirmed that this story from Genesis was true and He used it as an example on how things would end up in the world right before His second coming.
He said: «Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.» (Luk.17:28-30)

Because the story of Sodom is compared to the time we are living today it’s become very popular for Christians to try and explain the sin of Sodom. What sin did arouse God’s wrath in such a way? The most popular theory is sodomy or homosexuality. In the US there are large groups who thinks that the increase of gay people is the main reason God had to destroy the cities back then and judge the planet now. You can see them standing with posters and demonstrating many different places. Many feel that it’s their duty to warn against this specific group in order to save man from ending up in hell.
hqdefault

Some Americans have gone so far to even claim that the legislation of gay marriage was why God is allowing disasters and violence to hit the land.

I think that bringing up being gay as main sin and reason for the destruction of Sodom, is a huge mistake. And it might even prevent us from discovering the real causes and the mentality that leads to their destruction. The reason is related to all of us and is to be an example to all of us, gay or not. There is a larger picture here and the Bible is going to give us all our main clues. Jesus made Sodom an example and used the story as a warning in His speech and didn’t direct his speech to a specific group but to everyone. So if you think you are not copying the behavior of Sodom by not being gay, you can end up very mistaken.
Peter explains: «And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an example unto those that after should live ungodly; « (2.Pet.2:7)

The similarity of Sodom with our days is not the technological development. Airplanes, trains, computers, Tv etc. All the things that we have that they didn’t have. But the similarities are in the mentality and behavior. And we are going to look at several of those similarities.

GOD SAVED SODOM

But first of all; let’s talk about when God saved Sodom and Gomorrah.
Yes, he did. That’s right, a lot of people don’t know that God once saved Sodom. Not just Sodom but all the cities on the plane. He did this while it was still very much corrupt. And this is part of the larger picture. So we need to start here to find the truth of what happened to Sodom. «But the men of Sodom were wicked and sinners before the LORD exceedingly.» (Gen.13:13)
Spite of this the nephew of Abraham, Lot, settled in the city. Because of the wealth and status of Sodom, along with its unsympathetic behavior, it was the target of envy and strife. The Bible tells little about the influence of Sodom over other nations, but we do know that the other great kingdoms at that time were in Egypt and in the area of Mesopotamia. And Sodom was in the middle of these kingdoms and so it had to mean that all the cities of the plain were in the center for travelers between the great kingdoms of those days. There was a lot of trade going on between Egypt and the kingdoms of Mesopotamia. And considering the wealth of Sodom, it’s a big possibility that they had an influence on both trade and travelers. But what caused the war that came upon Sodom or what motives influenced the four kings in Mesopotamia to go to war with the five kings on the plane, I don’t know. But because they were a link between them and Egypt it’s likely the kings of these cities had greatly provoked the kings in Mesopotamia in some way.

Abraham was told prior to this great war of their wickedness. Maybe they didn’t always treat the travelers from Mesopotamia very well and the news of their behavior was taken back to the kings there. Or it could be related to them demanding money. Having unfriendly people making their trade routes unsafe or complicated would certainly be a reason to attack. I don’t think they went too far just because they were barbaric, no one does, everyone has a reason for going to war. So we are told that four kings bring their army and in a joint effort goes to war against Sodom and her neighboring cities. They win the battle and it says: «And they took all the goods of Sodom and Gomorrah, and all their victuals, and went their way.» (Gen.14:11)

Because Abraham’s nephew Lot lived in the city the war also had an effect on him and his family. It says: «And they took Lot, Abram’s brother’s son, who dwelt in Sodom, and his goods, and departed.» (Gen.14:12) When Abraham found out about this he brought 318 men and went after them. It seem like another David versus Goliath when considering how few men Abraham brought to win over the powerful kings of the east. But Abraham didn’t go without God’s help, and so spite of bad odds he gains victory in battle. Abraham knew very well who he needed to thank for the victory. We can read i Genesis that the first thing he does after the victory is to pay tithe to the priest in Jerusalem. (Gen.14:18- 20)
«And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth: And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all.»

So, God saved all of the wealth and the people of Sodom that had been taken captives. And God did this for the sake of Lot and Abraham. Meaning if Lot had not lived among them they would not have been saved. From now on the wealth and prosperity of Sodom was due to God’s faithful men living among them.
So they owed their lives, that they now weren’t going to end up as slaves, that their women and children wouldn’t be sold, their family members safety and their money, to God and his faithful servants Abraham and Lot.

This is a big similarity to the time right before Christ second coming. Many who refuse God or to live after His law are unaware that they and their possessions so far have been preserved and saved because there is a child of God among them on the plane, train, in their neighborhood or in the city. Although there are many disasters and problems there would have been even more if God’s children weren’t among them. In Revelation we learn that there is four angels holding the four winds from blowing over the earth, and we are told that these angels are placed there for the sake of God’s children. (Rev.7:1) In the Bible wind and strife or war is synonymous. That means God claim to have for a long time held back the worst problems, the biggest and worst wars that could have taken place in the past, but will eventually let go at a specific time. Just like with Sodom, there is a time when God will stop protecting good among the bad and instead separate His faithful from the ungodly and let destruction come.

fourangelsMany in the west doesn’t understand that much of the wealth we now have is the direct result of our countries once being built up by many God-fearing people who had God’s blessings. But today moral isn’t what it was, the faith is gone with the majority of the people and we are no longer any more righteous or moral then other countries who are in a worse economical state then us. God is no longer our hope or the one we give thanks to.
Because of freedom of speech and religious practice – God’s people have had a chance to grow and live happy in the west. But the moment that change and God’s people will be persecuted for worshiping God and obeying Him, God’s judgment will come as surly as it has in other nations and places where God’s people have been persecuted. The west will only stand as long as it continues protecting the rights of God’s people.
One of the big mistakes that Sodom made after being saved out of the hands of the kings of Mesopotamia was to not recognize that their wealth now was a result that a God-fearing man lived among them. Instead of thanking God for their lives having been speared and use their new opportunity to get to know their Deliverer – they became worse then before. They didn’t think their economical blessing had anything to do with God and felt no need to turn from their ways. They had gotten their life in return and they used it to do others ill. It was God who had saved them and restored their freedom and so any actions they now did could be indirectly be blamed on Gods mercy.
He was therefore in a position where He had to react.

Will the west still be in a blessed situation if they continue the path they are on today? Where the young people are spending their time with extreme violence and immorality through TV and computer games? The west is famous for their sexual immorality, just like Sodom once were. All sexual immorality, meaning trafficking, incest, sexual exploitation, sexual pressure, God’s people fornicating with non-believers etc.
Jesus explain i Luke 17 that the destruction came suddenly upon the citizen of Sodom. Here is another great lesson for us today. We must acknowledge who we can thank for our peace and prosperity and not give us selves glory for our success.

Some think the west has wealth because they are such hard workers. But many have short working days and some only work five days a week. In most countries with poorer economy, people work from morning to late evenings, six-seven days a week and still have barely enough money for food and living expenses. It’s not because the west have worked harder that we have more. It’s not because we are more efficient or smarter then people in poorer countries. We have had prosperity because God has blessed and helped those countries that have preserved His moral and principles and protected God’s people from persecution. When we give this up, then the blessing that came with it will slowly be taken away. This is how it has been in all the examples that we find in Bible history.

child slavery and chocolate the bittPerhaps just like Sodom the world in the west are doing inhumane trade. Clothing, gold, diamonds, toys, food and everything we buy cheap has it’s price. Many workers in other countries are treated poorly and used to make the rich richer. Many work for slave pay. Actually many slaves in Biblical times was certain to receive their food portion, but some of the factory workers today get such a small pay they can’t afford to buy the needed food in order to stay in health and to care for their children. Many work under difficult circumstances and their life is very reduced just in order for people in the west to get more for less money. Can this sin and the complaints from these workers reach up to God? If so, then the west will soon have to answer to it’s abuse of poor people.
Still the west is part of those countries that still offers man religious freedom and let His faithful live in peace without persecution. Like I said, when that change, the west will loose it’s protection.
God saved Sodom and the other cities on the plain once because there was one righteous family among them. But spite this family still living among them later it didn’t save them in the end. The first time all of Sodom was saved along with Lot. The next time God separates Lot from Sodom and save one and destroy the other.
So what happened between the time God saved Sodom and until He destroyed it?

This fellow came here as a foreigner, and now he wants to play the judge!

That’s the next issue of our study.
Lot still lived among the residents of Sodom. And he had a certain status in the city, after all it was his uncle who had saved the people from captivity. And we also learn that Lot sat in the gate which was common back then for important people with positions. This is also where the judges sat in the old testament times to serve as judge. (Deut.22:24; 22:15; 21:19 and so on) But it was getting more and more visible that the moral of the people and the moral of Lot was in conflict. Peter writes: «And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked: (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)» (2.Pet.2:7-8)

Times are changing. It’s no longer a good place for God’s people to live and they are suffering. Lot’s way of life had provoked the inhabitants more and more. We don’t know if Lot preached to them, but his life could have been a sermon in it’s self. Sometimes we can feel condemned just by seeing someone doing something we know we should have done ourselves. Lot worshiped the true God and sought after His ways. For the inhabitants of Sodom this was a constant rebuke to their own lives and their own unwillingness to serve the God that had redeemed them. This is how the spirit of God works. For those who receive it, it brings life and happiness. But for those who oppose it’s speech to their hearts it comes across as judgmental. The moment you resist the spirit it becomes an annoying rebuke that you want to rid yourself of.
The people of Sodom said to Lot: «This fellow came here as a foreigner, and now he wants to play the judge! » (Gen.19:9)

This mentality is so common i today’s society. If someone show God’s moral by speech or by how they live they are very soon accused of being judgmental or an accuser. For those wishing to continue on the path they have started, which might be against God’s council, it’s annoying to meet people who try to do what God has advised us. We feel rebuked just seeing their face. And even worse if that person would dare to give a warning or advice! They would be accused of being the same as Lot «You are judgmental», «you are judging me» or you are so «full of critic» or «full of prejudice».
It is true that Jesus said: «and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again» and «For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged» (Matt.7:2)
But as always, and as the trend is, Christ words are used to support the sinner and not freedom from sin. All over the Bible we see exhortations, both in the old and the new testament. The exhortations are meant to save lives and to help the sinner. And this is the big difference. If a message feels bad it could still be for our own good.
If you feel that someone living more ‘righteous’ then you are annoying, then you should perhaps stop and think and find out why. If you are never able to receive guidance or hear a council without getting angry, then you might have something in common with the inhabitants of Sodom. And this is so very much the mentality of the world today and perhaps even the social acceptable mentality. But the Biblical mentality is something completely different. And it’s this mentality we need to ask God to place inside us. A humble spirit is that which is open to the thought that we may be on a wrong course and open to admit to it and change it.
King David said: «Examine me, O LORD, and prove me; try my reins and my heart.» (Psa.26:2)
King Solomon said: «A fool despiseth his father’s instruction: but he that regardeth reproof is prudent.» (Pro.15:5) «He is in the way of life that keepeth instruction: but he that refuseth reproof erreth.» (Pro.10:17) «Correction is grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth reproof shall die.» (Pro.15:10) «He that refuseth instruction despiseth his own soul: but he that heareth reproof getteth understanding.» (Pro.15:32)
The first king of Israel, Saul, lost his right to the kingdom when he repeatedly refused reproof and council. Instead of humbling himself, he got angry at the messengers. Although the sins of King David was also very bad God saved His kingdom because he listen to reproof.

It was a great misunderstanding of the people of Sodom to think that Lot’s instruction and reproof would hinder their quality of life and happiness. The truth was, that if they had listen to his advice and turned with grief from their ways, they would have saved their lives. The people of Nineveh got their death sentence and was notified that the city was going to be destroyed. But when they regretted their ways and sought God’s mercy, God changed His plans. But the people of Sodom didn’t do this, they just got even more angry with Lot and viewed him as a killjoy that ruined their life. Their destiny was unchangeable when they decided to silence Lot by force and God had to intervene supernaturally to save him from their violent hands.

We have an additional two stories from the new testament which show us how important it is for us to have an open mind when we hear reproof, even if it makes our stomach hurt. To of the biggest speakers in those days, Peter and Stephen, was both direct in their speech about the sin of their listeners. I both stories we are told that their reproof ‘were as cuts to the heart”. In other words, it wasn’t easy for the listeners to hear about their sin and the call for repentance. Both groups was accused of having murdered Jesus. Peters listeners chose to humble themselves and repent and said: «Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?» (Act.2:37) This brought them to salvation. Stephens listeners also felt the sting in their heart but chose to call their rage divine and took Stephen out of the city and stoned him to death. This action ended up leading them to their own doom. Their probation as a people was over. «When they heard these things, they were cut to the heart, and they gnashed on him with their teeth. …Then they cried out with a loud voice, and stopped their ears, and ran upon him with one accord, And cast him out of the city, and stoned him» (Acts.7:54 & 57-58)

We see this many places in the Bible and the story of Nineveh is one of them. The city was going to be destroyed but because they listened to the reproof from God they were saved. Their evil conduct had to have been really bad at the time as God had planned to supernaturally destroy it like He had with Sodom. But once they received reproof God changed His mind. This means that if the inhabitants of Sodom, spite all their evil conduct, if they had listened to reproof, they would have been spared. And so Sodom didn’t get destroyed because of their evil conducts but because they had refused to be guided and directed by the Spirit of God. At that point there is nothing more God can do to help them. It’s the end of the path of anyone. The moment we no longer want to be guided by the Spirit or listen to reproof we place ourselves beyond saving. And this is a sin anyone can commit. The sin leads to the close of probation sometimes for a people, other times for an induvidual. Jesus confirms this when He speaks of Sodom:
«And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.» (Matt.11:23-24)
The city of Capernaum was religious and their everyday sins cannot be compared to those of Sodom except one big one. The great sin of Capernaum is that they refused to be guided and corrected by the light given to them. And then Jesus reveals that if Sodom had allowed themselves to be preached to, they would have been saved. And so again we see God would have willingly even forgiven the men of Sodom if they had only listen to reproof. And so Sodom were destroyed not because of their sin but because they would not receive Gods call for repentance and His forgiving mercy. The men of Sodom didn’t feel there was anything wrong with their conduct and didn’t seek pardon for it. And so Sodom’s greatest sin was to not listen to God’s messengers, for it was this one final sin that closed the door of probation for them forever.

The Bible tells us that the Bible is sharp: «For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.» (Heb.4:12)

It cannot be avoided to notice that God’s method in reaching people isn’t to condone their sin but to call them to repentance. Repeatedly the same message is given both in the old and the new testament: «turn ye».
“Again, when the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness that he hath committed, and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul alive.” (Eze 18:27 )
“Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel? For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn yourselves, and live ye.” (Eze 18:31 -32)

Full of grief Jesus said: «O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.» (Matt.23:37-38) Again we see the very reason Jesus said the Jewish nation would be abandoned; that they wouldn’t listen to those that was sent to them.

We cannot fail to see the seriousness in Christ message. “Your house is left unto you desolate”. In the new testament vi learn about Jesus: Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever. (Heb 13:8) God will try to reach us, to lecture us through His holy spirit or through people He has chosen. We have to expect messenges of warning and a call for repentance to sound among the children of God also today. This shows how important it is to not have the same mentality as the people of Sodom, but dare to be open and investigate if you have been deceived to think badly about the good and tempted to think good about the bad.

The desire for recognition, popularity and praise, and fear of being an outcast is what influence us to accept a path that doesn’t lead to life.

But if we ever feel a calling to reproof a sister or brother in faith we need to be aware that if we don’t have a sincere deep love for the person we are confronting, then our message will not be received. Some fearful might receive it only to leave it again later when they feel safe.
If we speak by the guidance of the holy spirit, are we sure to see results? Many preachers make the mistake of thinking that if they receive resistance or rebellion because of the message then they have done something wrong. And that could be true. But not even Jesus, love manifested in flesh, was received by everyone He preached to. Someone went as far as calling him a deceiver of Satan. Stephen was also a humble man who spoke by the Holy Ghost. But this didn’t mean he wouldn’t receive resistance.

«This fellow came here as a foreigner, and now he wants to play the judge!» the people said with contempt. First lesson for us here, is to not reject counsel and especially not in the end times. The attitude of the world is that we should be allowed to do whatever we want and not be criticized for our personal choices. This attitude is something we cannot be inspired by.

The Sin of Sodom

There are several scriptures that tells us what the sin of Sodom was.

One of their sins was to sin openly and wanting their sin to be accepted and recognized as something normal. «The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.» (Isa.3:9)
Many instantly think, gay people, and then they are happy with pointing finger on that specifically. But this sin is what many of us do. If we don’t want to give up a sin then we want it to be recognized as something else. If we call it with another word so that we don’t have to feel ashamed of continuing in it, then it’s been sort of “white-washed”. If sin isn’t regarded as sin anymore then we can keep it right? No, it’s a self deception.
This verse from Isaiah show us that the people of Sodom had fought for their right to sin. They wanted their sin to be acknowledged as something acceptable and even good.

But why would God want anyone to hide their sins? Why would it be a problem that it wasn’t hidden? Many studies show us that sin is contagious. The more recognized sinning is, the more widespread it becomes. One example of society choosing to not speak of a certain sin in order to prevent copy-cats are in cases of suicide. It has been an ethnic rule for media in many countries to not mention suicide when it has been committed. For it has been know for a long time that just mentioning and talking open about someone committing suicide makes the suicide polls rise.
A world that denies that a Biblical sin is really a sin, will want to remove the feel of ’shame’ from the conduct. This again leads to more people coming forth and being open and this again leads to masses copying the sinful behavior.
One example is the fight for LGBT rights. For most people, it was just a fight to hinder them from having to hide and feel shame because of their sexual preferences. However, the result is something completely different. Trying to make gay-lifestyle appear in harmony with the ’straight path’ have inspired a large part of heterosexuals into experimenting with bisexuality. And homosexuality is in fact increasing. Sexuality preferences are contagious because must people when presented with new graphic sexual content can feel sexual arousing which then again leads to change in sexual patterns and thinking. This has nothing to do with being born «that way». The more time you spend thinking on, reading, watching or studying a sexual act, the more it will change you. The “numbers” reveal the truth of what happens when ’shame’ is removed from this Biblical claimed sin:
«During 2001-2009, 92.1 percent of U.S. high school students said they were only sexually interested in the opposite sex. In 2015 (the last year for which we have data), 86.5 percent did, a 6 percent decrease, or 900,000 kids. Ten years ago 5.1 percent (or 800,000) said they were sexually interested in their own sex; in 2015, 1.5 million (an additional 704,000 more) said so – an increase of 84.2 percent. And where 2.6 percent of kids in the 2001-2009 survey said they were unsure of their sexual identity, 4 percent made the same report in 2015 – an increase of 53 percent. As far as what they reported doing, the same surveys found that 51.9 percent said they had only had sex with the opposite sex. In 2015, that had dropped 13 percent – to 45 percent. Before, 5.7 percent reported having had homosexual sex – by 2015 it had increased 43 percent, to 8.1 percent. Whereas teenagers who had only reported heterosexual sex outnumbered those with homosexual experience about 10:1, in 2015 they only outnumbered those with homosexual experience less than 6:1!
The same thing is happening across the West. For instance, in Great Britain in 1991, 91 percent of 18 to 24-year-olds said they were “exclusively straight” (and only 4 percent “ever had homosexual sex”); by 2015 only 46 percent said the same (and 23 percent said they had experienced gay sex).
Pre-teens and teens are the battle ground. And these current developments portend a much more homosexual future.» ( http://ktfnews.com/homosexuality-exploding-among-u-s-teens/ )

It is not just this part of sexuality that is increasing by not «hiding the sin». By making porn available for everyone 24 hours a day the majority of the people in the west are frequently violating the seventh commandment. Sex is no longer considered an act within marriage, peoples sexuality is fronted on every part of society. Most people have multiple partners before getting married. And a shocking 40 % of westerners commit adultery against their partners also after marriage. Music videos, movies, sex therapists, all telling people that to free your sexuality is good and healthy. They have all together taken part in completely turning around the morality of the western society in only 60 years.
«The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.» (Isa.3:9)
When God gives this statement it’s not because He permits sin if it’s done in hiding. It’s because if someone wants to stray away from the straight path, God don’t want them to drag everyone else with them. And so it’s beneficial with ’shame’ around sin in order to prevent a society from going out of control. When sin is openly accepted as the norm, people are on a train going towards a cliff and there is no stopping it. And so God speaks of people not hiding their sins as a great warning sign of where the nation is heading. And that is what happened to Sodom. If God had not destroyed it when He did their ways would have spread all over the world as we see it does today and all the violence that comes with it. For sexual corruption doesn’t just lead to a moment of happiness. All the advertisement media gives saying that you should go after your lust in order to be happy and to consider every sexual feeling natural, has opened up a marked for a large trafficking industry. When people met face to face with the victims their conscious are pushed aside so they can feel that moment of satisfaction. Weather its exploited people online or real encounters.
While pedophilia is still regarded as shameful in the west, many countries have removed this tabu. It works the same way. The moment it is considered acceptable it also becomes more widespread and normal and we end up with even more victims and heartbreak. All biblical sin, when committed, effects other people in a bad way. That is why God calls it a sin in the first place.
In many countries it’s now acceptable and normal for grown men to marry and rape very young girls. But just because something has been accepted by society doesn’t mean it’s acceptable to God. And so man can fight for the sexual liberation all they want but in the end God decides what is right and what is wrong. And no government or crowd can protect the proud transgressor on that day.

We know that the city of Sodom was in Canaan and they were most likely Canaanites. God reveals what many of the sexual sins of the Canaanites was and homosexuality was just one of many.
«And ye shall not walk in the manners of the nation, which I cast out before you: for they committed all these things, and therefore I abhorred them.» (Lev 20:23 )
«All these things» is mentioned in the previous verses and I will list some of the sexual sins here:
– An adulterer who has sex with someone who isn’t their spouse.
– A man who has sex with his brothers wife
– A man who has sex with his fathers wife
– A man who has sex with his uncles wife.
– A man who has sex with his aunt (Mother or fathers sister)
– A man who has sex with his sister or half-sister
– Someone who has sex with animals
– A man who has sex with both the mother and the daughter.
– A man who has sex with another man.

As we can see, it’s not just homosexuality that was a problem. Also incest and adultery.
The many gay-protesters from different churches might have missed out on that some of their own conduct is considered equal with homosexuality. Yes it’s categorized as the same sin to have sex with another of the same gender and cheating on your spouse. Being gay is not a greater sin of the two, God has made them equal in the law with the same sentence. It’s therefore unfortunate that only one of these are known as the sin of Sodom. Where are all the Christians with large signs outside the house of a man who has cheated on his wife saying God hates him and that he is going to hell? Of course this act is not the solution no matter what the sin is, the point being made is that Christians have been very unbalanced when it comes to these topics.

The sin of Sodom II

Let’s look at another scripture revealing Sodoms sins:
«I have seen also in the prophets of Jerusalem an horrible thing: they commit adultery, and walk in lies: they strengthen also the hands of evildoers, that none doth return from his wickedness: they are all of them unto me as Sodom, and the inhabitants thereof as Gomorrah.» (Jer 23:14)
Here we see again the same problem. To “strengthen also the hands of evildoers”. When we make something acceptable in order to “protect” the wrongdoer from feeling “condemned” and “shame” we in fact strengthen their influence and position. I’m sure the prophets of Jerusalem meant well when they did this, but the result was corruption. The most popular preachers today are those that instead of telling someone to turn from their “wickedness” they tell them that they can be who ever they want without being judged by God.

Notice here in the next scripture when the Lord Himself tells us the very reason why He destroyed the inhabitants of Sodom, He doesn’t focus of homosexuality but on sins even we as Christians commit today. «Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.» (Ezek.16:49-50)

So think about that «this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom». The description does fit many Christians today. And God keeps comparing Sodom to God’s people in a fallen state several times.
It’s clear from this verse that their unwillingness to show compassion for the poor and needy, the broken spirited and depressed, was something God saw as a serious crime. Usually it’s the children who have been neglected by their parents that comes back to haunt society with their problems. Everything goes in circles. In the verse we just looked at we see that they are condemned also for what they “didn’t do” as well as for the bad things they did do. For if we close our eyes and don’t help those who need us, that lack of compassion is still considered an action that actually has consequences on others and society.

HOSPITALITY

In the story of Sodom and Gomorrahs destruction there is also two stories on how important and highly God value hospitality. And then especially towards strangers. The first story is about how Abraham noticed three strangers not far away from where he lives.
«And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground, And said, My Lord, if now I have found favour in thy sight, pass not away, I pray thee, from thy servant: Let a little water, I pray you, be fetched, and wash your feet, and rest yourselves under the tree: And I will fetch a morsel of bread, and comfort ye your hearts; after that ye shall pass on: for therefore are ye come to your servant. And they said, So do, as thou hast said.» (Gen.18:3-5) Now these three turned out to be the Lord and two angels.

It doesn’t say Abraham understood who the men was when they were at a distance. But the first thought of Abraham was to invite them and give them rest and food. Because he ran to meet them Abraham received a blessing and also got the opportunity to pray on behalf of the cities that were to be destroyed shortly after.

The other story about hospitality is an even more important indication. This time we plainly see that Lot didn’t know whom he was dealing with. «And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground; And he said, Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into your servant’s house, and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye shall rise up early, and go on your ways. And they said, Nay; but we will abide in the street all night. And he pressed upon them greatly; and they turned in unto him, and entered into his house; and he made them a feast, and did bake unleavened bread, and they did eat.» (Gen.19:1-3)
Because Lot sat at the gate we can assume he also looked after other strangers who came to town knowing what the people in the city was capable of doing and that it wasn’t safe to stay in the streets. We first learn that they refused Lot’s offer. Here Lot is tested. Was his care for these strangers real or was it superficially? Did he try to do the right thing but still use the first opportunity he got to get away from his duty? If he had the angels might not have come to his home. Lot could have chosen the easiest way out and thought he was without guilt if something were to happened to them. But Lot’s love for the strangers was sincere. He could not accept or risk anything happening to them. It says «he pressed upon them greatly». Lot would not take no for an answer. In the same way as Abraham, Lot was richly blessed for his choice. Lot was saved from the mob that gathered around his house but also was saved out from the city with his wife and daughters. For when Lot hesitated with leaving it was his turn to be persuaded. The angels took them by the hands, refused to let go of them until they had taken them out of the city. «And while he lingered, the men laid hold upon his hand, and upon the hand of his wife, and upon the hand of his two daughters; the LORD being merciful unto him: and they brought him forth, and set him without the city.» (Gen.19:16)
Lot didn’t have to show the strangers that came in to the city hospitality. He could have felt it was dangerous for his daughters to take them inside the house. He could have let fear and suspiciousness stop him from showing these strangers compassion.

The state of the world before Christ second coming will be similar to the time Sodom was destroyed. We can read about unstable people hurting others. Because of this we are reluctant to invite strangers to our homes. But Lot did this at a time were wickedness was great. The worldly thought is that we are only to take care of ourselves and that it’s not sensible to bring strangers in our homes. But God showed in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah that he especially bless those who chose love even if the world is filled with hatred. That he will protect us if we do this and that it will be to our blessing. Over and over again God tells us to care for the strangers among us. The widowers, the fatherless, the poor and the strangers.

Among the first disciples to see Jesus after he was resurrected was two who walked with grief along the way from Jerusalem to Emmaus. They received two tests before they got the great blessing of seeing the resurrected savior. The first was for them to be humble enough to receive reproof and being taught by a stranger. The first thing the stranger said to them after hearing them speak of their sorrow tied to Christ crucifixion was: «Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken…» (Luke 24:25) Then it says he started to teach them from scripture: «And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.» (Luke.24:27) Most of the disciples know who each other was. And these two was undoubtedly good acquaintances with the twelve apostles whom they later went to visit. They could have thought: «Who is he, we haven’t seen him before, why should he teach us?» Instead of doing that they received what the stranger taught them and didn’t take offense of the little reproof. But Jesus but them to another test. It says: «And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went: and he made as though he would have gone further.» (Luk.24:28) Han pretended he was continuing on his way, he didn’t invite himself to their home. Neither did he give them any hint of their christian duty. But they wanted to spend more time with the stranger and also show him hospitality. They noticed that it was late and thought he needed something to eat and a place to sleep. Just like Lot persuaded the strangers, so did they: «But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent. And he went in to tarry with them. And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight.» (Luk.24:29-31) The biggest blessing came from their decision to care for the stranger, they got to see the resurrected Jesus with their own eyes. They were so happy that they couldn’t wait or rest until the next day, but ran as fast as they could back to Jerusalem to tell what they had seen.

Many of us would perhaps have been offended by receiving instruction from a stranger. Many would feel relief seeing the stranger showing sign of continuing his journey so we wouldn’t feel the burden of inviting him to our home. But we may have lost many blessings by not showing hospitality to strangers: «Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.» (Heb.13:2)

Jesus said that this hospitality wasn’t about inviting your own friends and acquaintances. It’s not this type of hospitality we are rewarded for: « For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?» (Matt.5:46-47)
And he said: «Then said he also to him that bade him, When thou makest a dinner or a supper, call not thy friends, nor thy brethren, neither thy kinsmen, nor thy rich neighbours; lest they also bid thee again, and a recompence be made thee.
But when thou makest a feast, call the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind: And thou shalt be blessed; for they cannot recompense thee: for thou shalt be recompensed at the resurrection of the just.» (Luke.14:12-14)

God wants us to show love to those we do not know and this principle is found many places in the bible. Our bad treatment of the stranger is placed in the same category as neglecting to help the fatherless and the widows. A stranger can be someone new moving into our neighborhood or who are traveling. It most certainly is fugitives and immigrants coming to our country.

In the Torah it says: «Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt. « (Exo.22:21)
«If ye oppress not the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow, and shed not innocent blood in this place, neither walk after other gods to your hurt: Then will I cause you to dwell in this place, in the land that I gave to your fathers, for ever and ever.» (Jer.7:6-7)

However it’s important that when we seek to follow God’s advice that we don’t do it with a heavy heart but out of love for the one we are helping. It’s love that will get us to «persuade» a person when he hesitate receiving our help. Only love can push away fear. «There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.» (1. Joh. 4:18)

Sodom’s hospitality

I think we can all agree that the people in Sodom didn’t know how to treat visitors with hospitality. In stead they had plans to group pressure them, to discriminate them and treat them with lesser value then themselves.

It’s hard to not think of the fugitives that comes to the different countries in the world. How do we treat the strangers that comes «within our gates»? Do we treat them poorly or with lesser value? Do we not see to their needs? Do we make them feel unwelcome and unsafe? God is not on the side of anyone hating on refugees coming to seek our help: «Also thou shalt not oppress a stranger: for ye know the heart of a stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.» (Exo.23:9)
«And if thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee; then thou shalt relieve him: yea, though he be a stranger, or a sojourner; that he may live with thee.» (Lev.25:35)
The stranger is mentioned as someone we should show kindness towards like we would a widow or a fatherless: «When thou cuttest down thine harvest in thy field, and hast forgot a sheaf in the field, thou shalt not go again to fetch it: it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow: that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all the work of thine hands.» (Deu.24:19)
In fact if they oppressed the stranger the children of Israel might loose their land: « If ye oppress not the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow, and shed not innocent blood in this place, neither walk after other gods to your hurt: Then will I cause you to dwell in this place, in the land that I gave to your fathers, for ever and ever.» (Jer.7:6-7)
He also said: «do no violence to the stranger» (Jer.22:3) And when Juda was about to loose their land God said this was indeed one of the reasons: «The people of the land have used oppression, and exercised robbery, and have vexed the poor and needy: yea, they have oppressed the stranger wrongfully.» (Eze.22:29)

How do we see the stranger that comes to our country, our cities? Do we hate them in our heart or do good to them? The Bible is clear that our own blessings depend on our willingness to love and treat them kindly. «But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.» (Lev.19:34)
But what do the people say? They say they will hurt us or try take over our land. Shall we listen to any excuses to treat those who come to us like dogs? We cannot judge the stranger beforehand just because he is a stranger. Our duties are written in God’s law and we are promised blessings if we keep them. Then that is what we need to do and if we fear, come to the Lord with these fears.

Many Christians talk about the sins of Sodom as homosexuality and hate on them while they themselves do the crimes of the citizen of Sodom. Ready to meet the stranger with anger, denying him bread and water and hating on him. Perhaps the devil have been clever to get people to think that the sin of Sodom was that the people was gay and so they miss all these other aspect of the story that actually involves our very own sins. And so we don’t turn away from them.

The citizens of Sodom did not treat the strangers among them kindly, that was one of their traits. Remember that. They wanted to force the angels disguised as travelers to join them in their lifestyle. Some think they wanted to rape them. There are many forms of violence and submission, but there are many other ways to do the same which isn’t as evident. And those ways are committed often today towards strangers. Discrimination, bullying, isolation are all ways to use psychological violence to rule over another human being.
Well you can say this isn’t the same thing, but Jesus said it was: «Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire» (Matt.5:21-22)
What does the word «raca» mean? The greek word rhaka is of caldeen origin and it means ‘worthless’ or ’empty one’. Do we treat someone like they are worthless, do we show them with our actions? Jesus says this is violence. We know many victims of bullying have their life completely ruined. They are so afflicted that they cannot live a full life.
But the law also says rape is murder. «But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die: But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbour, and slayeth him, even so is this matter…» (Deu.22:25-26) And we know, just like with bullying victims, rape victims struggle their hole life. Therefore it is great thing that the Bible in fact recognize both as ‘taking someones life’ even though they are still alive. This is a comfort for these victims, God has seen them and their struggles and He view their transgressors as killers. Therefore let us not be found to treat anyone worthless by either word or actions, even if that someone is a stranger that comes to sojourn with us.

 

Religious pressure and false prophets.

Another mentality that are revealed in the story of Sodom is their need to force their way of life and philosophy on other people.
In the Bible and the New Testament we learn that Christians can’t force their conviction on others, even though they represent the truth. Jesus explained to John and Jacob that this was not of God’s spirit: «And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did? But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.» (Luke 9:54-55)
The gospel is a message of peace that people have to receive willingly. It’s the very condition of salvation. Not one person will be found saved in heaven against their will. Unfortunately during the middle ages people were forced to convert by a large christian church. But this was never Gods attention.

For the citizen of Sodom it wasn’t enough to condemn Lot for his choices. Now they had reached a point where they were willing to force him to do what they wanted him to. The citizens wanted Lot to send out his guests so that they could do as they pleased with them. Lot could have done as they said out of fear or in order to fit in and win the respect of the people. Or to save his own life. But for Lot the principles was more important. His guests was under his protection and he would, even though it placed both him and the family in danger, not surrender the strangers into their hands. And he knew he was risking their wrath by refusing to do it. Notice how they didn’t say they would hurt Lot to begin with, they only wanted him to hand over his guests.

Group pressure is common also today. Through media, advertising and the society as a hole, we are constantly pushed away from God’s principles and towards the worlds political correctness. For many the pressure is just to big. And in fear for loss of recognition, income and becoming a reject we give up little principles day by day. Often our conscience search for a good reason to give up that one principle so we don’t so easily feel condemned by the whisper of the spirit.
Many feel they have no choice and that in some case one not only have to, but should, sacrifice biblical principles to adjust to society and to secure the future of the family.

Lot didn’t do this even in the most trying time. He chose to set both his family and hope of recognition aside in order to save his guests. I’m not going to debate weather it was right or not of him to try and sacrifice his daughters ( it wasn’t!!:) ). He should have cried for God’s help rather suggesting that. But nevertheless, God rewarded Lot’s courage and saved both him and his daughters. Because God loved the girls more then their father did.

Sometimes we will feel like David in a Goliath-looking-society and constantly feel pressure towards the worldly acceptable. This is when we need to remember that David won this battle because he fought with God, someone more powerful then any earthly system. And we can win this battle too. But first we need to dare to stand on God’s side.

The other type of pressure we are subjected to today is perhaps the most difficult to handle. The Bible call it a seduction. It’s one thing when we are subjected to group pressure and we have to resist our need to be accepted. Another situation is when the group pressure is touching a secret need or lust within us. This is when it turns into a seduction. A seduction is happening when we feel our lust tingle. When we think that something good, or a reward will come, by doing what we lust after. And we are fooled to think that if we can’t have what we lust after we can’t ever be happy. It is this deceptions the residents of Sodom followed and lived by, they felt they had to follow their lusts in order to be happy. But what for them seemed like the spark of life was really death and destruction.
This is how Eve was tricked in the garden of Eden. The fruit looked delicious and she was seduced to think eating it would give her life and joy, that she would be as great as God with everything that followed. Even though she had been warned that this wasn’t the case. The fruit looked so good that for a moment she wished that the words of the serpent was true and so she was seduced to go against her conscience. It’s important that we get to know ourselves and understand how we function and think, our emotions, so that we can see the difference between the word of God and a seduction. We need to use our heads, evaluate a situation, and not let feelings by our only guide.

When Peter writes about Sodom in his letter he also first talks about false prophets (Remember in the other verse God also compared the citizens of Sodom with the false prophets in Jerusalem) : «But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. » (2.Pet.2:1-2 Read the whole chapter if you can.)

How is it that these false doctrines are so easily brought in among us? Because we often want what sparks our lust to be good and true. In this way we can fool ourselves to think that what leads to death is going to give us life.

We can be given insight into God’s plans.

We can find another valuable lesson in the story of the angel of the LORD visiting Abraham. The Lord had already planned to destroy the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. But until now not one person knew of his plans. Abraham showed kindness and respect to the Lord. God says about Abraham: «Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.» (Gen.26:5) Abraham was a child of God. When the Lord was ready to destroy Sodom and visited Abraham He said: «And the LORD said, Shall I hide from Abraham that thing which I do»? (Gen.18:17)

Even though God ask us to have confidence in Him He also want to help us handle the difficulties that lie ahead of us by giving us a forewarning. In that way we can recognize when it happens and know that nothing has happened that God didn’t have control over and allowed and that we need not fear.
«Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.» (Amos.3:7)

This scripture show us that God want to prepare us on things that will happened in the future but also to whom He shares it with. It’s important for us to listen to the prophets he has sent in the Bible but also in more modern times.
We are told that there will be many false prophets in the end time but that doesn’t change that there will also be true God-sent ones. Just like the disciples on the road to Emmaus were willing to listen to a stranger that walked among them we must be willing to listen and evaluate a message or revelation that comes our way.

To be warned about a catastrophe and political decision that are about to happen is a blessing that will help us to cling to God when the storm comes. If God has foreseen the happening we can also know that what He tells us about the outcome is true too.

«Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: Calling a ravenous bird from the east, the man that executeth my counsel from a far country: yea, I have spoken it, I will also bring it to pass; I have purposed it, I will also do it.» (Isa.46:9-11)

The CRY

There is another phenomena we find in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah that can be compared to our time. It’s not without reason God chose to destroy the cities: «And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous; I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know.» (Gen.18:21-22)

The cry of the cities was great, that means that many have suffered because of the behavior of the inhabitants and even complained to God or cried and complained so God have heard it and taken it seriously. The Lord then says he will do a final investigation to see if the complaint against the cities are entitled. And it proved to be correct.

It’s important to understand the reason for God interference. It’s here plainly told that He doesn’t do it for just His own sake. It’s not because they have rejected Him that He wants to destroy them out of some act of revenge. But their evil conduct effects so many other people that the tears and screams have reached up to Him. People are crying for God to interfere. God would not tolerate any more viciousness from these cities. It doesn’t say who the complaints came from. Lot was one of them. But perhaps also strangers that stopped by the cities on their journey. Or the surrounding cities effected by them. Perhaps from the children or victims of abuse. The point is this: Man themselves cried for God to stop the evil. And many forget this part when they criticize God for His actions.
Since the wickedness was in the cities it’s reasonable to assume that a large part of the cry came from the city. This rise a small question. If only the lives of three people was spared then what happened to the many others who suffered the sins of Sodom in the city? Why were the others not spared? The cry was “great” and so many voices must have come with complaints.

Today there is also a large cry coming out of the earth. But often the complaints comes from people who themselves are unrighteous towards others. The children are often the most harmed in areas of conflict. It’s often the children that are suffering for the wickedness and sin of the adults. But grown-ups are also effected. No one tolerate injustice done against them selves or their family but often accept it being done to others. Many even partake in causing misfortune towards other people while they at the same time wish the best for themselves and their own family and friends. Only God knows the people involved enough to judge. It’s important to understand that unrighteous and bad people cry when evil strikes them too. They shed tears too, they feel pain and loss too. We cannot exclude that some of them who sent up this ‘cry’ from the city themselves were judged and died in the destruction.

Today critics of religion rise criticism against God. They view all the misery in the world and say: «How can there exist a good God when He allows these evil men to do all this damage». To them it is the solid evidence that there is no God or that if there was His neglect is the evidence that He isn’t good when allowing all this misery.

The same critics wants us to reject the God of the Bible because of stories like Sodom and Gomorrah and other stories that show God destroying people and cities. They claim it proves God is a tyrant and not good. Atheistic pages are full of these accusations.
This is a bit like shooting themselves in the foot. If God is evil if He does something to stop the wickedness and judge man, and also is evil if He doesn’t, then what is He supposed to do? If He judges He is painted as unfair and when He allows He is also described as unfair. But the Lord says about Himself: «And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth…» (Exo.34:6)
The Bible teaches us that God stops the wickedness when it’s gone to far. And He will probably most likely continue to interfere and allow challenges and obstacles to come in evil peoples path. But the Bible also shows us how God sometimes allow evil because He first wants to try and convert the sinners. His main goal is not to destroy but to seek and save. This reflects His great love for the sinner. He knows the background of every evil-doer and how and why they ended up the way they did. This is also how it was in the old testament. This is why Abraham wasn’t allowed to conquer Canaan for over 400 years. God wanted to do everything in His power to save them and help them turn from their ways before He allowed His people to come into the land and destroy the people living there. His first priority has always been to save first. When we see all the evil in the world today where God still haven’t interfered we can also know that those taking part or effected by the group pressure is people God is still working on trying to save or change. Often the weed is standing alongside the wheat. In a city with much evil there can be people that God can reach midst them. This is why we don’t see the same kind of destruction as the one that happened to Sodom and Gomorrah. Not because they were worse, but because good and bad are both there. But at one point in time the door of mercy will shut also for the inhabitants of the planet earth. And they who complain and cry will die side by side with those who torture them when the earth is judged.
Other times God allow evil in order to judge. If He were to stop every evil-doer before they had done something wrong no one would no or understand the consequences of sin. And when judged them He would be questioned, as only God knew the future and no one else. But when we can see with our own eyes, we and the angels, the consequences of every bad decision and action we can understand the judgment and agree with it.

The wrongly attitude can sometimes be seen among Christians as well. Sometimes it seems like we want God to judge those who do us injustice but at the same time not judge us when we commit the injustice. We want forgiveness and mercy, but have none to give others. It’s obvious that God cannot agree to these terms. Jesus asked us to forgive our transgressions the way He forgives our transgressions. And if He forgives us we should be able to forgive our neighbor.
This is something we learn from the story of Sodom. When God finally decides to judge, His judgment is righteous and based on a thural investigation. “I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know.» Before God destroy anyone He will investigate. There are many verses in the Bible that speak of God investigating before judging. By it we know that Christ cannot come back to earth and judge the inhabitants before having done a thural investigation. In the book of Daniel we learn:
“ I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him: thousand thousands ministered unto him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him: the judgment was set, and the books were opened.” (Dan 7:9-10)
Here we see not only an investigation happening, but also that thousand upon thousands of witnesses takes part. God doesn’t judge in the darkness where no one can understand any of His actions, the case of man is handled in the open.

We can also know that He has tried to reach the people first. When God waits with the judgment it’s because He stills wants to give that someone an opportunity to change. But when the cry has become to great God will stop it even if people are ready or not. This is what will happened right before Christ second coming. And although God desire was to save, He will at one point have to say: “He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still. And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. ” (Rev.22,11-12)

Peter writes that «when once the long-suffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing» (1.Pet.3:20) This means that God gave Noah an assignment that would take over a hundred years to be completed hoping that people would be forewarned and turn from their ways. The way we see God in the Bible it’s easy to believe that He did all He could to turn people around in that time. He does the same for us today.
«The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is long-suffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.» (2.Pet.3:9-10)

Lot’s wife.

When Jesus makes the parallel of the destruction of Sodom with the second coming of Christ He at the same time tells us to specifically remember one part of the story: «Remember Lot’s wife.» (Luke 17:32)
Lot’s wife was one of the four people that the angels took with them out of the city before it was destroyed. Still she ended up dying like the rest of the inhabitants of the city. It’s written about her: «But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt.» (Gen.19:26)

The image of a woman that turns her head watching with curiosity the destruction happening behind her is a standard way to depict her. Unfortunately it gives the impression that she was punished because she disobeyed and looked at the fire and brimstone, something that we will never have to be challenged with. And again we will have removed the lesson in the story away from who we are today. But we must learn from the story about her. The image of Lot’s wife just being guilty of turning her head are ruining the warning in Christ message. We need to understand what really happened in order to learn from the story. There were no destruction of Sodom going on behind Lot’s wife while she was running from the city. When talking with the angels that lead them out of the city Lot is told the following when he asks to flee to the city of Zoar: «Haste thee, escape thither; for I cannot do any thing till thou be come thither. Therefore the name of the city was called Zoar.» (19:22) We are then told the following: «The sun was risen upon the earth when Lot entered into Zoar. Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven» (19:23-24)
So the Bible actually tells us that God didn’t destroy the cities BEFORE Lot had already arrived safely to the city of Zoar. So there was no fire and brimstone raining behind them while they were fleeing. So what was it that happened to Lot’s wife? It only says about her: «But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt.»
Jesus explains in His warning: «In that day, he which shall be upon the housetop, and his stuff in the house, let him not come down to take it away: and he that is in the field, let him likewise not return back. Remember Lot’s wife.» (Luke.17:31-32)
It can seem like her sin wasn’t curiosity but longing for what she left behind. Perhaps she chose to go back to get something of value and then was going to follow her husband later? « But his wife looked back» can also be a symbolic expression which can mean several things. In Christ speech it was placed together with returning to ones home or to place material things so highly that we are blinded of the danger we are in. Lot and his family had to leave everything they had worked for, means and material goods in order to follow God’s command. Was the city really going to be destroyed? Lot hesitated when the angels told him he had to leave the city. If he left his home he might loose all his assets to the furious mob. They clearly didn’t understand the seriousness of the situation. Perhaps because there had not been any complete destruction of any city that they had ever seen or heard of in their lifetime. Would God really destroy a whole city? We don’t know what Lot’s wife was thinking when they fled, if she had just looked back or if she was actually heading back to her home. The salt didn’t come before the city had started to be destroyed and so she had to have turned into a salt after Lot and the daughters had entered Zoar and not while they were fleeing. Did she stop and stay? Did she refuse to go with them all the way? Or did she head back?
Christ warning have a direct reference to those who live when Jesus comes back. We must be prepared to leave everything we own in order to stand on God’s side. House, home and material things cannot have such a place in our hearts that when faced with a warning we choose our earthly home. Would you leave everything you owned today if God asked you? Or are your identity tied to your things and the safety of a home more then it’s tied to Christ? What would you choose in a critical situation? Would you believe God’s warning or stayed and hoped it was a false message?

In Revelation Chapter 13 and 14 we are told that those who choose to stand on God’s side in the last days will loose the right to «buy and sell». This means that not only do we loose the ability to buy what we need, but it can mean that we end up in depth and risking loosing everything we have. Do we have the guts to stand for the truth spite of this? Can we handle the loss?
Jesus said: «For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.» (Mat.6:21) And he said: «But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal» (Matt.6:20-21)

It’s important to take what Christ said seriously about both our bonds to material things and about the time for His second coming. He says: “Remember Lot’s wife.”

Paul tells us something about man in the end of time: «covetous» and «lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God» while «Having a form of godliness» (2.Tim.3:1-5)
The story about Lot’s wife can be compared to those who chose the gospel and the faith of Christ but then look back on world desires and struggle to untie the bond to them and then end up going back. Many wander on the path while their eyes and heart are left in the world. For those struggling with these kind of temptations it’s very important to pray for love for the truth and love for God. It’s love, wherever our hearts is, that will determine or lead us in either one direction or the other.

When the earth will be destroyed.

The Bible tells us how judgment one day will strike the population of the earth. «For as the lightning, that lighteneth out of the one part under heaven, shineth unto the other part under heaven; so shall also the Son of man be in his day. But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of this generation. And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.» (Luk.17:24-30)

The earth is full of lawlessness. God will not be overbearing for ever. He has set a time: « But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father.» (Mar.13:32)

We are also given the following recommendation: «Seek ye the LORD while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near» (Isaiah 55:6)

We need to daily turn to our Father in heaven and stand for that which is good and just. This is a decision we can make today. We can renew us, by God’s grace, and get help to go on the right path.

God’s promises and blessings to those who chose to follow Him is evident: «He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty. I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust. Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence. He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler. Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day; Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday. A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee. Only with thine eyes shalt thou behold and see the reward of the wicked. Because thou hast made the LORD, which is my refuge, even the most High, thy habitation; There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling. For he shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways. They shall bear thee up in their hands, lest thou dash thy foot against a stone. Thou shalt tread upon the lion and adder: the young lion and the dragon shalt thou trample under feet. Because he hath set his love upon me, therefore will I deliver him: I will set him on high, because he hath known my name. He shall call upon me, and I will answer him: I will be with him in trouble; I will deliver him, and honour him. With long life will I satisfy him, and shew him my salvation.» (Psalm.91)

We need to be awake and receive God’s messengers and show hospitality to the stranger, but the end time church have been given message from Christ Himself. Jesus is standing outside the door knocking, outside the door of His own church. We need more the ever to let Christ completely into our hearts. «And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God … Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.» (Rev.3:14 & 20-21)

For those who have had great light but still don’t let Christ into their hearts. Who like Paul says: «having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof…» Who refuse to be ‘born again’ and allow Christ to help us change so we can reflect His character. They who knew the truth but didn’t walk in it’s light. To them Jesus gives another reference to Sodom. He said: « And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.» (Matt.11:23-24)

IMG 2936
Ash remains from the city of Gomorrah, one of the cities destroyed by God. Gomorrah was a little north of Sodom while Zoar was south of Sodom.

IMG 3065
Brimstone is found all over and inside the ashen remains.

The discovery of the Ark happened on a historical date in Bible history

6

PS: The Biblical calendar and the modern calendar are two different systems. The biblical month starts in what we know as March/April, while the Roman (modern) begins in January.


———————————————————————————————————–

So, it started a few days before winter solstice. 111polarExpress2 I don’t celebrate Christmas, but it was the usual «Santa Claus is coming to town» and «jingle bells» that kept on repeating in my head after shopping groceries. Christmas-lights everywhere, no baby-Jesus in sight anywhere, only Santa Claus, elves, reindeer’s and ‘Christmas magic’, and of course plenty of Christmas trees. You know, those are not considered religious symbols, only baby-Jesus is, so they remove Him. However the same symbols that are not regarded religious now, was regarded religious in ancient Babylon, Greece and Rome. But, this isn’t really about Christmas at all. But the feeling of being an alien on this earth does come around at these times.
I had this date that kept coming to mind, the tenth day of the tenth month. I was reading about the Babylonian siege against Jerusalem. It says: «And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he, and all his host, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it; and they built forts against it round about.» (II Kings 25:1). The date is probably accidental, right? Or is it? But since this particular date kept coming back into my mind.1siege Out of curiosity, I just had to check it out. Where did the Biblical tenth day of the tenth month land on the Roman (now standard) calendar in 2015? That’s when I found that the 22nd of December proved to be that date, and it was also the date of the winter solstice. I thought this was an interesting comparison; in Ezekiel we learn how the Israelites were worshipping Babylonian gods like Tammuz, and also the queen of heaven right before the siege. But that they also knelt down towards the sun in the east while their backs were turned on God’s law and the Ark of the Covenant in the Sanctuary. At the time when God shows him these scenes, He says to Ezekiel: “Hast thou seen this, O son of man?” (Ezekiel 8:17)  «And he brought me into the inner court of the LORD’S house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of the LORD, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they worshipped the sun toward the east. Then he said unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man?» (Ezekiel 8:16). ezekiel8And then: «He said furthermore unto me, Son of man, seest thou what they do? Even the great abominations that the house of Israel committeth here, that I should go far off from my sanctuary?» (Ezekiel 8:6).

For what happened after Ezekiel had been shown these things? The next big event was that Babylon sieged Jerusalem. The very power whose gods they had worshipped, had sieged them.
This is definitely a moment similar to when the Jewish people said when rejecting Jesus: «We have no king but Caesar». (John 19:15). And who was it that destroyed their temple about 40 years later? Wasn’t it the Roman leader that they had pledged to be their king?
The same thing happened when they turned their backs on God’s earthly throne and His law to worship the Babylonian-inspired Sun-god and his laws. They chose away the true God. And thus the suppression under pagan kings started. Remember the statue that God showed Nebuchadnezzar and Daniel? daniel2The head of gold, and the kingdoms that followed it would continue to subdue God’s people? However, only until Gods own kingdom would be re-established with a people who have turned their backs on Babylon, to pledge their loyalty and worship to the King of Kings, and to go with His law. Symbolically speaking God’s people need to do the opposite of that which the corrupted leaders of Judah did.

These kingdoms were also shown to Daniel as different beasts. But they were only “beasts” when they became associated with God’s people, which is a very important point to understand. Babylon weren’t “a beast” while it was a smaller kingdom, having no relation to God’s people. Or when representatives of that country came to visit Hezekiah, and he showed them all the treasures of Judah (II Kings 20:14-15). There were Babylonian kings before Nebuchadnezzar, but he was told that: «Thou art this head of gold» (Daniel 2:38). Babylon became “a beast” the moment they sieged Jerusalem the last time, with the intention of destroying God’s people, the city, and the temple.

Could the time they besieged Jerusalem have landed on a holiday or a feast time for the winter solstice? It did this year, so why not in that year also? If so, it would indeed have had some greater meaning. Regardless, the symbolism is still there, the power they followed spiritually was the one that ended up destroying them, taking them captive and ruling over them.

And so, as I was thinking about this, the meaning of the date of the tenth day and the esken arken0001 copytenth month. If it had a deeper meaning, I felt impressed to do something I hadn’t even thought about, until the moment I actually did. Ron’s ark of the covenant discovery came to mind. I was impressed to go check the 6th of January 1982 and what biblical day and month that date landed on.
I went on Stellarium (an astronomy program) and checked an old calendar and some other sources and there it was. It looked like the day Ron Wyatt entered the chamber that contains the Ark of The 1B6373BB7B9BFCFEEF0858A37AE0BC599A91E626460E27E596pimgpsh fullsize distrCovenant, actually was the same, which means that the discovery made in the year 1982 was in fact on the biblical 10th day in the 10th month. The very date that had been circulating in my head for days. So what could the meaning of this be? Was it just coincidental that Ron Wyatt found the Ark on the exact same date or was there some deeper meaning? Did Ron even know the biblical date he ended up finding the Ark, or was it just January 6th to him?
So, imagine that an army has just besieged Jerusalem, and you realize the seriousness of the situation. If then, you were in charge of hiding the ark, if it would come to that. Would you wait a few days into the siege to find out if they were serious, or would you hurry up and get the Ark and hide it straight away? I would have done the latter. If they actually hid the Ark the same day the Babylonians sieged the city, then Ron found the Ark on the same day it was hidden.
Regardless, the biblical date could be a witness that Ron found the Ark on the date that God had chosen, and that the time he found it had nothing to do with his own cleverness. Something Ron stated himself repeatedly. If it was hid then or not, the date still mark when the beast-system started.
 Could it have some meaning? For what do we know about the end of times? Spiritual Babylon is still suppressing God’s people. His people are told to leave Babylon because He is about to punish her, and because of her crimes, He will cause her to have plagues (Rev. 18).
After God’s people have been under the influence of the powers shown in the statue of Daniel, the tables will finally turn as God prepares to destroy Babylon and her spiritual descendants. The reappearing of the Ark could be signalling just that. For if His ark was taken away and hidden after, or around the time Babylon sieged the city, it is very interesting that it would resurface right before God is about to destroy the ‘statue’, or the spiritual descendants of Babylon. The ark coming back into play seems to say that Babylon’s days are numbered, and the Arks hiding place is revealed, not to be subdued under Babylon but to conquer the enemy. And what better day for it to take place then the very day Babylon once sieged God’s people? What better day for God to siege Babylon or give the promise that the siege of Babylon will finally end?
For is this not what the Ark will testify, and already are testifying? The law of God, the foundation of God’s kingdom, is again set before man. Will we follow Babylon and her sins, or will we follow God and his ways? Will we finally turn our backs on the «sun» and all it’s symbols and bend our knees and turn our faces towards the throne of God and the law inside it? Not physically of course, but symbolically speaking. Who do we follow? Who is our King?
Remember how the Ark was taken captive by the Philistines at a time when Israel had failed God? «And the Philistines took the ark of God, and brought it from Eben–ezer unto Ashdod. When the Philistines took the ark of God, they brought it into the house dagon littleof Dagon, and set it by Dagon. And when they of Ashdod arose early on the morrow, behold, Dagon was fallen upon his face to the earth before the ark of the LORD. And they took Dagon, and set him in his place again. And when they arose early on the morrow morning, behold, Dagon was fallen upon his face to the ground before the ark of the LORD; and dagon little2the head of Dagon and both the palms of his hands were cut off upon the threshold; only the stump of Dagon was left to him.» (I Samuel 5:1-4). The Ark was taken into the temple of the god Dagon, a Babylonian priest-god, to signify that the Babylonian God had humiliated the King of the Ark. What happened at that time? Well, God turned the tables in Dagon’s own temple, the next morning they found that the statue of Dagon had fallen down in front of the Ark. They put it back up in it’s place, but the next morning the statue had fallen again, and it’s head and hands were cut off. The first time the god of Babylon is wounded and humiliated, the next time it’s decapitated and it’s hands are chopped off. Why the head and it’s hands? In Revelation 14 we learn about the Mark of the Beast that is taken on the forehead and the hand, that it represents worship. The head symbolizes thoughts and plans, and the hands represents someone’s actions. In Revelation we are clearly taught that those who partake in Babylon’s actions will also receive her punishment. It is a good time to consider if we really are following the lead of The King of Kings, or if we are following the lead of the Babylonian «priests».
The 10th day of the 10th month is only ever tied to the clash between Babylon and God’s people. And thus, if the date Ron found the Ark is not accidental, it is aimed towards Babylon or it’s a sign to God’s people.
What did I learn from this interesting revelation? It’s my firm belief that Gods kingdom is about to destroy His enemies, that Babylon will soon be destroyed. And so, with that the only thing that can be said is: «And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.» (Rev. 18:4).
God is preparing to punish Babylon and destroy it’s centre of influence.
And for those already standing before God’s throne (symbolically) with our Saviour : «And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.» (Luke 21:28) 

What do you think about the date? Coincidence or God’s plan? Comment in the comment section below and share your thoughts.

 

Article by R.T.

* * * *

There are more articles to read. Click on the menu.

– Did you know that God brought the Testimony (law) forth when Jezebel’s daughter had robbed herself a leader position over God’s people? Read more about it here: JOASH, THE HARLOT and the TESTIMONY
– Did you know God gives us three reasons to keep the Sabbath? Read more here: THE THREEFOLD MEANING OF THE SABBATH
– The Ark and the Plagues – Is there a connection? Read more here. 

The Antichrist Misunderstanding

0

A Satanic secret manipulator or a peacemaker claiming to represent Christ?

Can the history of Israel be compared to the history of the Christians? And if so, what can it tell us about the Antichrist?

I was born in the mid-70s and got to be a child in the 80s. On the weekends I started the day with watching a marathon of cartoons. And it all went down the same way. An evil and a good person, or persons, trying to save someone from the evil. The evil was always depicted as ugly and angry, something it was easy to be disgusted with or someone you were compelled to dislike. It was never hard to take sides no matter what cartoon series it was. The creators had already determined for the viewer who had the different roles. Still today many are brought up with these stereotypes that evil appears obvious, ugly and not compelling, and the protagonist is pretty. Research has even shown that you are more likely to succeed getting that really awesome job if you have the looks. Other researchers have presented many different faces to a group of people and asked them who they thought looked most trustworthy of everyone on the photos. They were amazed to see the results, the test subjects usually pointed out the people on the photos that looked most like themselves to be the most trustworthy.

This is well known for anyone who researches the origin of racism. People are generally a bit afraid of anyone who appears different, or who have a different culture, mostly because it makes them insecure and worried about what to expect. And some allow that worry to be transformed to fear and then even hate.

Marilyn_Manson_performing_Antichrist_Superstar,_SomewhatDamaged2
9164922_l

Anyone expecting the Anti-Christ to be a visibly ugly, despicable person with bad vibes might be waiting in vain. And anyone thinking the charming pastor/priest/preacher that shares your own culture and appearance are safe to follow, might one day be caught by surprise. The devil is not stupid. We are warned: «And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works. » (2. Cor.11:14-15) But what does Satan gain by pretending to represent the gospel, and even Christ? It shouldn’t be too hard to figure out. Paul comes with a suggestion: «And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage…» (Gal.2:4)

In Revelation 17 we see a woman riding a beast and on her forehead it says: «mystery Babylon the great, the mother of harlots…» (17:5) The word mystery can also be translated «secret». But why a secret?

In the Bible when God speaks of His congregation, He repeatedly uses the word ‘woman’. Of Israel and Juda, He once compared them to two women: «And it came to pass through the lightness of her whoredom, that she defiled the land, and committed adultery with stones and with stocks. And yet for all this her treacherous sister Judah hath not turned unto me with her whole heart, but feignedly, saith the LORD. And the LORD said unto me, the backsliding Israel hath justified herself more than treacherous Judah. » (Jer.3:9-11)

images

In Revelation chapter 12 we learn of a pure woman, who is persecuted by the dragon, but later in the same book we also see this other woman who have committed fornication, and she also has a name on her forehead, which is mystery. Now in the story of Juda and Israel they did fornication with idol worship, and it was because of this that they were referred to as an adulterous woman. So could the woman we see in Revelation 17 actually be an impure church with great influence? And her true identity is a mystery in how she is tied together with Babylon? Because if God’s people have been tricked into a form of ancient idolatry do they not match the corrupted church spoken of in Jeremiah? There are clues in the old testament that will help us identify and understand the meaning of the symbols in Revelation. After all there are several hundred references to the old testament in the book of Revelation. And we are not given to unlock prophecy by our own wisdom. We need to trust the revelations of the scriptures. Remember, the bible wasn’t written to the atheists but it was written to the believers.

Now how did Judah and Israel become corrupted? They had a falling away from the truth. Paul gives us this cue on how and when the Antichrist will appear: «Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. » (2. Thess.2:3-4)

He clearly states that the man of sin gets to sit, and show himself as if he is God in God’s temple after there have been a «FALLING AWAY FIRST». So the church’s spiritual fall is what leads to the rise of a power. And why the reference to God’s temple? When God dwelt in the temple He dwelt over His law revealing His right as King and revealing His jurisdiction. From here He received people’s prayers for forgiveness and He granted them. From here He ruled over His congregation.

18600523_ml

If an anti-Christ is to sit as «God sitteth in the temple», then he must be placing himself as a form of leader or a lawmaker within a back-sliding church, and give himself authority only God has as judge and lawmaker for he is «shewing himself that he is God». The Greek word for God, «theos» (Θεοσ), is also used by Jesus in John.10:34: « Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? » (John. 10:34-36). Now Jesus isn’t saying people can become God Himself. He is quoting Psalms 82:6: «I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.». You see the Hebrew word for ‘God’ wasn’t just used to describe God Himself. The word ELOHIM had a wider term and were also used on those judging over God’s people (on God’s behalf). Like in Exodus: «Then his master shall bring him unto the judges (ELOHIM); he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever. » (Exo.21:6). And here: «If the thief be not found, then the master of the house shall be brought unto the judges (ELOHIM), to see whether he have put his hand unto his neighbour’s goods. » (Exo.22:8). God Himself was the supreme judge, but in the old testament in Genesis we see elohim translated into the word ‘mighty’ about Abraham: «Hear us, my lord: thou art a mighty (ELOHIM) prince among us: in the choice of our sepulchres bury thy dead; none of us shall withhold from thee his sepulchre, but that thou mayest bury thy dead. » (Gen.23:6).

Although Paul’s letter is in Greek, Paul himself was a Jew and a Pharisee with an understanding of the words in his own culture and religion. When Paul therefore says this ‘man’ will sit as God in his temple, he means he has placed himself in a supreme judging and overseeing position among God’s children. Now God have allowed many mediators in the old testament, but in the new covenant there would be no such mediators. «For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time. » (1. Tim.2:5-6).

POPE-Francis-on-Throne

If someone is ever again to be given the task of being supreme judge over God’s congregation, surely we can expect him to follow Gods laws and not advocate his own. But of the ‘man of sin’ we learn the following: «And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. » (2. Thess 2: 10). Many think this is speaking of non-Christians, but Paul’s warning is to God’s congregation and not to atheists. It’s God’s people that are at risk of being deceived by this claimed supreme leader among them. Remember he rises after a ‘falling away’. This shows how those who were meant to follow Christ first allowed themselves to be deceived to indulge in spiritual fornication and therefore this leader was allowed to come and deceive them into thinking they were doing God’s will. Paul explains further in chapter 4 of the same letter: «For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. » (2.Ti.4:3-4). It’s the fallen church’s own sins that have caused this leader to surface, they wanted him and they accepted him when he came.

 

The seven churches

Unfortunately, many Christians seems to think everything in Revelation is tied to the future. Many don’t think that perhaps this book reveals the history of the Christian church from it was written and until Christ second coming. Many also think that it will all happen in sequence as it is written. However, a quick look at the book of Daniel reveals how God’s revelations are being repeated, but with new details added every time. For instance, the vision of the statue gives a quick look into the future of powers persecuting or subduing God’s people until Christ second coming. But in chapter 7 we are told the same again but with more details. We get some parts repeated again in chapter 8 but with even more details and the same with Daniel 9, 11 & 12. It’s full of repetition. Now, given the pattern we see in the book of Daniel, maybe we can expect the same to happen in the book of Revelation. Also, because the book of Daniel covers the time up until Christ second coming, we will most likely find John covering a timespan that is mentioned in Daniel but John having a lot more insight and detail.

timeline3

If this is the case, we can assume that perhaps the seven churches mentioned is actually in sequence, showing God’s church from John’s time and until Christ second coming. The other following visions might also be from his time and until Christ second coming and so on.

If this is the case, we can find out where God’s church went corrupt. The first church goes through a lot, still they succeeded at keeping Satan’s deceptions out of the church: «and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars: And hast borne, and hast patience, and for my name’s sake hast laboured, and hast not fainted. » (Rev.2:2-3). They are also credited for rejecting the teaching of the ‘Nicolaitans’. Remember that because we will come back to that very soon. The second church called Smyrna have its challenges themselves. Again they have to deal with false brethren: «I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. » (v.9)

We can also see how this is a church suffering great persecution: « Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. » (v.10) The church following the first apostolic church was indeed severely persecuted by the roman empire and people.

The third stage we see in the church in Pergamon. Someone within this church have re-instated the «doctrine of the Nicolaitans». Not only that but: «But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balak to cast a stumbling block before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication. »

Jesus tells them to repent. But we also see martyrs in this church. «even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you» (v.13). Now who is Antipas? Is it a person or a group of people? In the whole bible, this is the only place this word is used. The word can be split into two parts, «anti» and «pas». The first part can obviously mean instead of or against. The second part, according to Strong’s Concordance, is from ‘patēr’ (πατήρ), which is the Greek word for father. Whoever this group that was martyred was, we see that they might possibly be against (anti) a father-figure. And this father-figure is not God, because He says that they are His people. So it’s an earthly father-figure they oppose, which actually leads to them suffering martyrdom. We know that the next power to martyr Christians after pagan Rome, was papal Rome. The title ‘Pope’, of course, means ‘Father’. Could this scripture actually be speaking of the people who opposed appointing a pope to lead the church? We see the appearance of an anti-pope group emerging along with a church falling away. Could this be the very time Paul spoke of? We know from history that the papal church mixed the old roman religion into Christianity.

The next time span of the churches in Revelation, John continues to speak of the fornication of the church. This time the church is called Thyatira. But it also reveals to us that God’s church has become divided: «Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works. But unto you I say, and unto the rest in Thyatira, as many as have not this doctrine, and which have not known the depths of Satan, as they speak; I will put upon you none other burden. But that which ye have already hold fast till I come. » (2:20-25).

This church is in deep trouble. Here we see many similarities to other places in the Bible. We see Jezebel who was a pagan woman that married into Israel, and then corrupting Israel. The marriage between this pagan woman and the leader of Israel was what eventually lead to Israel’s destruction. The Christian church did the same thing when they adopted and practiced pagan rites, and also Christianized them. The woman that is mentioned in Revelation 17 has also committed fornication with kings of the world. She is described to have children both here and in chapter 18. Both places they are condemned. In Revelation 18 we learn that we must ‘leave her’ and not partake in her sins. The same message is given to this church. Here we also learn that the church will be rejected by God and He will continue with those who do not partake in the fornication. We should therefore soon see a reformed church.

The next church is Sardis. They are clearly in the aftermath of the last church. «Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die: for I have not found thy works perfect before God. Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and repent. …Thou hast a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with me in white: for they are worthy. » (Rev.3:2-4).

They have started, but have not yet reached the goal of reformation. We know that after the middle ages a reformation movement started. But many places the reformators continued to believe in many of the false teachings of the church before them, and even persecuted brethren. They had started a journey but were far from where they needed to be.

The next church is called Philadelphia. Here we see a big change. God again has a church that is faithful to Him: « I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name. » (3:8) Here Jesus repeats something similar that He told the second church, that had also been faithful: “Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. »

Remember that in the time of John there was no ‘Christian church’ but messianic Jews and pagans joining this Jewish group that believed in Jesus. Paul taught about Jesus in the synagogue and there were no Christian church buildings at this time. Jesus could therefore not use the term «Christians» as neither that was in use at that time. The word ‘Jew’ was tied to God’s people. As Paul said: «But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God. » (Rom.2:29). It is therefore not likely that the term ‘Jew’ mentioned to the second church and the sixth church is really referring to the messianic movement or the Christians. To this church, as it is reformed from corruption, Jesus continues to say: «Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. » You would think all is well now, but it is not.

The last church is Laodicea, and it has become so lukewarm that it is the only church God has nothing good to say about. It’s certainly a continuation of the previous good church, but they have backslidden into a loveless relationship with God, leaving Jesus on the outside knocking rather than dining inside. This couldn’t fit better with God’s church today. Only about a 100 years ago we find a reformed church with high morals and great zeal for the truth. Today we see Gods’ people stuck in front of the TV and computer screens rather reading the Bible. No one seems to have time for Him or His word even though it’s never been more accessible. There is no place to go, everywhere the world is flooding in on God’s people. Laodicea has fallen asleep, which actually fits the state of a TV viewer. Scientists have proven that the television leaves the viewers in an apathetic state. They think they have the truth, but they don’t live it. And if the truth is not reflected in their lives, they will be lost. Christ earnestly urges them to wake up and get aid so they can see their true situation, so that they can open the door and let Christ in. The last time God’s church had a falling away after first being pure, the man of sin was revealed. Could this last church passive and blind state cause the man of sin to perform his final deceptions? Revelation 18 tells God’s people to get out of ‘her’ before it is too late. How did they end up partaking in her sins yet again?

Israel and Judah and the history of the Christian church

I now want to compare the history of the Christian church with the history of Israel to show how the same thing have happened before. Remember what Paul wrote about, his people being broken off and the heathen being grafted in on the stem? « And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree; Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee. Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be graffed in. Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear: For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee. » (Rom.11:17:21).

How often do not Christian churches speak of how Judah and Israel failed God. We shake our heads in disbelief over their bad choices and stupidity of not recognizing their Messiah and therefore killing Him. They cast Jesus out of the city. But the last church in Revelation have cast him out of their house, and they haven’t even noticed that they have become spiritually poor.

How many years did God give Israel and Judah to get back on the right track? Well the Christian church have done everything they did and more, and even worse for an even longer time span. We ought to shake our heads in disbelief like John did when he saw the harlot in Revelation 17. It says: «when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration [wonder]. And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? » (Rev.17:6.7). We should cover ourselves in ashes and cry. For the Christians started oh, so well. They suffered greatly, but were true. But then they had a great, great falling away.

In the Bible David and Jesus is joined together with name. A messianic prophecy reads: «And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them. » (Ezek.37:24)

Gerard_van_Honthorst_-_King_David_Playing_the_Harp_-_Google_Art_Project

David represented God’s anointed. Christ means ‘the anointed’. Although David faced great resistance the first years, he was made king in Hebron and later king over both Israel and Judah joined together, and so the kingdom was united. In the same way Christ elected His disciples, and the first apostolic church was in harmony. We read from Acts about the very first congregation: «they were all with one accord in one place. » (2:1)

During David’s reign the kingdom continued to expand, but something happened. After David came Solomon, and the greatness of the kingdom was widespread. So much that even the Queen of the South came to meet and see the kingdom with her own eyes. The kingdom had peace and prospered. They were very influential and many followed their example. In the same way, the first church reached to the ends of the world with the gospel. They had great success in getting the word about Christ and the good news of His salvation out. Many church groups gathered in groups in the south, east, north and the west. Although Christianity had experienced severe persecution from the roman empire, something was about to change when emperor Constantine converted to Christianity. He started converting pagan sites into Christian sites, and started mixing the two religions. A false sense of peace and security rested over the people of God. Constantine’s conversion was most likely tied to regaining popularity, and also political reasons. The same was the case with Solomon. He started to marry pagan princesses from countries around him. Perhaps his attention was to create peace, but this was hardly the results. His wives wanted to continue their pagan practices, and after some time of persuasion he believed himself to be an open-minded peacemaker when he allowed them to worship their gods on the hills surrounding Jerusalem. Not long after, God’s own people started following their lead and indulged in pagan worship. They hadn’t rejected the temple service, or worshipping God there, they just did both and went ahead and created a mixed religion. This is exactly what happened to the Christian church. They went from pure to corrupted as they started mixing pagan customs with biblical principles. It probably created peace and acceptance from the pagans, but ultimately it was a falling away from the truth. The church and Solomon committed the same sin, and the results were very similar. But the question is, will we in both these cases of falling away see a leader figure in the midst of God’s people who lead them astray?

After Solomon his son Rehoboam became king, but Israel wouldn’t follow him, therefore the kingdom was divided. Rehoboam remained king in Juda where God’s temple was, but Jeroboam

became king over the ten other tribes. He was king of the north kingdom, and Rehoboam was king of the south kingdom.

In the same way the Pagan-Christian mixture lead to a division in God’s church. In one of these divisions a Pope rose and seized the leader position. Many don’t know about this because the catholic church has done all they can to remove information tied to an early controversy of the papal power, and that the church prior to the papacy had many divisions. This continued also after the pope emerged. The eastern church refused to accept the pope and Rome as the center of Christianity. But not only them, smaller groups of Christians where persecuted by the papal power for resisting his self-claimed right to rule over them. The pope was later granted the rights to judge heretics within the faith by the roman emperor, the red dragon, himself. This made the pope a supreme ‘judge’ within the church.

Not only that, but the pope favored an altered law of God and claimed the right to judge according to that law instead of God’s original, unaltered law. Thus the Pope also became the lawgiver of the church, as well as judge. Now, in the old testament there were judges instituted by God, but they were required to judge with God’s law as an absolute guideline. The pope, however, refused to use God’s law as the guideline and used his own version of it. In addition, along with his priests, he placed themselves in a position where they could grant people forgiveness and atonement for sins. All these three pointed to the pope as the man of sin that Paul had referred to. He came after the falling away, he sat as judge among God’s people, as a lawgiver and as the one that granted atonement/forgiveness. All these were the positions God had in His Temple. He rested above His law, He granted atonement through the sacrifices given in the temple, and He was a judge in disputes. The special change the pope made was allowing statues in worship, although the Torah clearly states that God does not want to be worshipped in this way (Deut. 12:3-4). But there were many other pagan rites included into the church service. Part of the reason for the split between the eastern and the roman church, was that the pope was changing the time of Passover. But this specially ordained time by God wasn’t the only thing he changed. The pope also determined that God’s Sabbath, as it was written in the ten commandment law were to be disregarded to make way for the newly elected Sunday-Sabbath. Daniel prophesied that the man of sin would do exactly this: «And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. » (Dan.7:25). But why does this matter so much for God, that He mentions it as if it was this huge violation? Well changing times and laws are an act reserved for God alone. Whilst taking this upon himself, the antichrist was stealing God’s people, from being loyal to God, shifting their loyalty to himself. And by doing that he is challenging God Himself.

It’s believed that part of the reason this change was made was because the church wanted to distance themselves from the Jewish roots and jews, who at that time were hated very much. Ironically God first ordained Jews to spread the gospel in order for it to be shared in the right setting. Removing this made the church loose a very important foundation. A church council at Laodicea even claimed that those who kept the true ten commandment Sabbath were Judaizers, meaning sympathizers with the Jews. So far the great witnesses to the Christians falling away from truth, was the Jews who knew the laws of God. But as we are about to see, this is just history repeating itself. The same motives and actions have all been done before. But at that time it was about the divided kingdom of Israel and Juda.

021-rehoboam-jeroboam

Jeroboam got the largest part of the tribes, with ten of them under him. But Juda still had God’s chosen dwelling place and the temple where the Ark and God’s law was located. This made Jeroboam nervous; would he lose his kingdom to Juda as time went by? «And Jeroboam said in his heart, Now shall the kingdom return to the house of David: If this people go up to do sacrifice in the house of the LORD at Jerusalem, then shall the heart of this people turn again unto their lord, even unto Rehoboam king of Judah, and they shall kill me, and go again to Rehoboam king of Judah. » (1. King.12:26-27).

002-rehoboam-jeroboam

How was Jeroboam going to be able to keep his authority over Israel? He thought he had to create a false worship that would compete with the real worship. He then sets up two calves of gold, one in Bethel (Bethel means God’s house), and the other in Dan (Dan means judge). He then said to the people: «It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem: behold thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt. » (12:28). He had placed two golden calves in ‘Gods house’ and in ‘judge’, claiming these calves also represented the same God that lead them out of Egypt. He claimed it was the same god, but the style of worship was mixed together with paganism. This is the same exact thing the pope did. Rather than keeping the Jewish roots of Christianity, he claimed that they worshiped the same Christ with him, and then he allowed them to pray in front of images, and he tried to make Rome the new Jerusalem.

But Jeroboam wasn’t done there. He had to do one more thing in order to complete to establish himself as king over them. He decided to copy God’s feasts, but also alter the times of them: «And Jeroboam ordained a feast in the eighth month, on the fifteenth day of the month, like unto the feast that is in Judah, and he offered upon the altar. So did he in Bethel, sacrificing unto the calves that he had made: and he placed in Bethel the priests of the high places which he had made. So he offered upon the altar which he had made in Bethel the fifteenth day of the eighth month, even in the month which he had devised of his own heart; and ordained a feast unto the children of Israel: and he offered upon the altar, and burnt incense. » (1. King.12:32-33)

001-rehoboam-jeroboam

Talk about history repeating itself. The pope wasn’t content with the influence over the majority of God’s church. He proclaimed his authority by changing God’s feast days and Sabbath day just like Jeroboam did. The Bible leaves us no room for doubt when clearly showing us how God feels about a ruler making such a bold move to insure his power over the people. He claimed to represent God but He didn’t represent Him at all. He represented himself under the guise of false spirituality.

While the king stood there on the day of the feast that he himself had appointed, in front of images that he claimed was God Himself, God sent a man with a message for Jeroboam. «And, behold, there came a man of God out of Judah by the word of the LORD unto Bethel: and Jeroboam stood by the altar to burn incense. And he cried against the altar in the word of the LORD, and said, O altar, altar, thus saith the LORD; Behold, a child shall be born unto the house of David, Josiah by name; and upon thee shall he offer the priests of the high places that burn incense upon thee, and men’s bones shall be burnt upon thee. And he gave a sign the same day, saying, This is the sign which the LORD hath spoken; Behold, the altar shall be rent, and the ashes that are upon it shall be poured out. » (1.Ki.1-3). God rejected him as his representative. What did Jeroboam do? Not unlike the Pope during the middle ages he decided the best possible solution was to have God’s prophet killed: «And it came to pass, when king Jeroboam heard the saying of the man of God, which had cried against the altar in Bethel, that he put forth his hand from the altar, saying, Lay hold on him. And his hand, which he put forth against him, dried up, so that he could not pull it in again to him.»

God stopped him.

Then we see a strong symbolism in the following events. God had told his prophet to not eat or drink with anyone in this land: « For so was it charged me by the word of the LORD, saying, Eat no bread, nor drink water, nor turn again by the same way that thou camest. » (13:9).

In the gospels, both bread and water are used to symbolize Jesus. He said He was the bread from heaven, He also said He was the living water. The reason God refused to allow His prophet to eat here, could have a great symbolic meaning considering that a similar situation would occur withing the Christian church. There would be multiple sides claiming to represent Christ, but they were not all telling the truth. The Christ the papal power offered to the people along with it’s spiritual fornication, was not the same Christ that we are to receive. It’s a fake Christ that cannot save anyone, as their Christ has been stripped of his power as judge, the priest now offer atonement and the high priest is the lawmaker. We are not to eat or drink their Christ.

Another meaning with the restriction could be that dining with someone in those days were considered the same as entering into an agreement or covenant with someone. But God’s man was not allowed to do this. Today the Christian churches have united together in different groups, but the Bible warns us of going into union with any group mixing paganism with the true worship of God. And if this story also gives this warning, we need to know what the outcome of it will be.

The prophet followed God’s instruction, but on his way back he was tricked: «Now there dwelt an old prophet in Bethel; and his sons came and told him all the works that the man of God had done that day in Bethel: the words which he had spoken unto the king, them they told also to their father. And their father said unto them, What way went he? For his sons had seen what way the man of God went, which came from Judah. And he said unto his sons, Saddle me the ass. So they saddled him the ass: and he rode thereon, And went after the man of God, and found him sitting under an oak: and he said unto him, Art thou the man of God that camest from Judah? And he said, I am. Then he said unto him, Come home with me, and eat bread. And he said, I may not return with thee, nor go in with thee: neither will I eat bread nor drink water with thee in this place: For it was said to me by the word of the LORD, Thou shalt eat no bread nor drink water there, nor turn again to go by the way that thou camest. He said unto him, I am a prophet also as thou art; and an angel spake unto me by the word of the LORD, saying, Bring him back with thee into thine house, that he may eat bread and drink water. But he lied unto him. So he went back with him, and did eat bread in his house, and drank water.»

What happens next is terrible. As a punishment a lion comes and kills God’s prophet that had spoken to Jeroboam, and when the lying prophet sees him dead because of his deception, he places him in his own tomb where he himself later also is buried. Thinking about this messenger of God, this seems like a harsh judgment for believing a lie. But this whole story might be one big warning to the Christian churches. Remember, in the bible the lion is also a symbol of Christ.

The old prophet appeared to be on the same side as the man of God in this conflict with Jeroboam. He then lies to him, and the man of God decides to let this man’s word take precedence before God’s word. He put him in as a mediator when God clearly had already stated His command.

There are two possible interpretations here. The first is how the Christian church, although having knowledge of Gods law, agrees to put it aside because a self-claimed mediator claims to have a revelation from heaven. Trusting this man before God’s clearly expressed word leads the man of God to a different Christ represented in the ‘bread and water’ he is being given. Or he goes into a union with him by eating in his house. This shows that perhaps both violence and deception is used to offer the false version of Christ. As Jeroboam tried violence and failed but the false prophet used deception and succeeded.

A second interpretation could be that this false prophet represents the false prophet mentioned in the book of Revelation. Here we see a deceiving power working together with the beast: «And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.» (16:13). The false prophet is one of the major deceiving powers in the end times. In Revelation 13 we learn how a second power will help the papal power to seduce God’s people: «And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. » (Rev. 13:13-15)

Now the Bible is clear that no matter who the deceiver is, if you follow them before The Lord, the result is the same. The Lion of Judah, Christ, will judge them: «And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. » (Rev. 18:4). Ironically God’s man, after dining with the false prophet, was given an animal to ride upon. He ended up riding on the beast of the false prophet. (1.King.13:23)

What did happen with the Christian church is that a reformation movement started, but they kept the times and laws changed by the papal power. Many of them also kept the images representing God and the saints. And a lot of other pagan customs. They partly reformed but not completely. They claim to represent Christ as much as the papal church does, and also that they have revelations from Christ. But we are still not to receive any man’s word, whether the pope’s or reformators, over God’s own spoken word and authority. They may claim to be on our side, or that they front the same cause, but if God is not their only law-maker and judge, they are not representing Him. God allowed the man of God to be destroyed because he believed the lie that the false prophet told him over the truth that God had told him. This is the same thing Paul speaks of when it comes to the Antichrist. They who are deceived were those who were willing to believe the lie over the truth: «Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.» (2.Thess.2:9-12)

We are the man of God who are to oppose the papal alternative worship, and him that claims his power as leader in God’s church. We are to reject his visions and those of false prophets who offer the same bread and water as he. And we must not enter into a covenant with them. Our loyalty must be to God alone. All who place themselves above Gods law are in conflict with it. Jesus never did this. He said: «I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.» (John. 15:10)

The Antichrist is someone claiming to represent Christ, who come with messages of peace and forgiveness, but at the same time is challenging the authority of God. The Antichrist is risen in a fallen church as a result of mixture of truth and lies. Antichristos means «an opponent of the Messiah».

Let’s just ask the dictionary: «someone who competes against or fights another in a contest, game, or argument; a rival or adversary.»

How did we learn that Satan tries to fool God’s people? Transforming himself into an angel of light or the workers of righteousness. What a better way to become Christ’s opponent then by just taking his place on earth, as head of the church, and then offer them a false sense of security under a false gospel? When Jeroboam wanted to strengthen his power and hinder the people from going to the true temple of God, he did it by offering an alternative worship under the guise of being true worship. For who would be your greatest enemy. One openly stating a disagreement with you, or one claiming to represent you, but lying and distorting your own words? Who would be the greatest threat to your plans and authority?

Could this man that millions of Christians world wide listen to, that dozens of kings, presidents and rulers have talked to, the one the “reformed” churches are returning to, the one that claims to speak on the behalf of Christ – could he be the real Antichrist warned about in the Bible? And if so, should we eat their bread and drink their water, or should we remain true to the word of God alone? The word of God that the pope claims cannot be trusted? Who are you going to believe? Meanwhile, God’s church is in danger whilst sleeping in the world of entertainment and amusements, waiting for some horrible looking atheistic Antichrist to surface, whilst the real one is already inside the house. For what better way for the enemy to succeed, then to make us misunderstand who the Antichrist really is. It is a secret, a corrupted idolatrous woman who have mixed Gods truth with lies and ancient pagan rites and practices. «And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication» (Rev. 17:4)

«FEAR NOT» For the NEW WORLD ORDER Or the Illuminati

4

Let me explain why…

Ever since youtube first started, conspiracy videos have surfaced, and in the last years even become a trend. Some seek out these videos because they really like everything that appear exiting, others because they have a real fear of future events, and some seek them out to mock and ridicule.

Although there are secret societies for sure, and a new world order is planned, there is great reason to worry over many of the videos (not all) that are trending. Some see an Illuminati worker in every celebrity. It is not taken into consideration that some just copy others. The seriousness of claiming someone is a devil worshiper or hired by the Illuminati without clear proof or confession, is that we risk breaking the ninth commandment. It says: «Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.» (Exo.20:16) That includes famous people! Many are going far as to look at very few symbols and by it determine what this person does behind closed doors. It’s not for us to publish guess work. It’s better to not have made the accusation, or to make a general accusation, then to end up being in conflict with the ninth commandment. It should be clear that even though someone claim to be Christian doesn’t mean they know what someone famous is thinking, feeling or doing privately. If God wants us to expose something He will make sure we are able to tell if what they have done really have taken place. Saying someone ‘sacrificed’ a family member to become famous when there is absolutely no physical evidence to support it, is placing many Christian conspiracy theorists in conflict with God’s commandments.

But there are secret societies, and that is not a secret. Obama and other state leaders have spoken of a new world order. That’s a fact. Some whistle-blowers, if they are to be trusted, say secret societies have been planning their world order for nearly 200 years. Some say even longer. It should come as no surprise to anyone that there are always some people who want to control others, that money is where the power is. And throughout time superpower after superpower, weather it’s Asia or Europe, have centralized money and power and tried to control their population by different laws constructed to fit the ideology of their time.

(Joe Biden etc talking of a new world order)

(George H.W.Bush speak of the new world order)

Germany under World War 2 is a classic example. Today many shake their heads over the German population allowing Hitler to take control. It ended in a blood bath for minorities, for handicapped, gypsies and of course for the Jews. But that was all happening for the most part, out of sight of the general public who went on with their daily lives. You see there was a lot of optimism with the socialist party and Hitler. The economy had been bad since the first world war and Hitler established an economical situation that helped lift Germany out of all their unemployment crises. It helped students get scholarships and get an education they might not have gotten otherwise. People forget that with all the control and evil, there followed also what appeared to be many good benefits for the German people. And this is the reason for the love and support for their leader at the time. Hitler also gathered people by creating a common enemy.  The same is happening today in many places. Even the States where the citizen are willing to give up on freedom as long as they get some benefits in return, or the hope of economical growth. Everyone needs to eat, and people in power can exploit this to benefit their agenda.

So if they really have been planning for 200 years should not God’s people be in utter fear and peril? Can it even be stopped?
Many are afraid when they watch videos related to the Illuminati and New World Order. But the Bible has a clear answer to give.

The book of Revelation and the book of Genesis are full of parallels. One talks of Paradise lost, the other of Paradise restored. They both speak of one worshipper killing the other worshipper. The creation and the re-creation. Because of this we get a little insight into the future. The book of Revelation talks about a power called ‘Babylon’ that are working with all the kings of the world. She sounds very powerful and is drunken of the blood of the saints.
400px-Confusion_of_TonguesThe parallel to Revelation’s Babylon is Genesis, the Tower of Babel.
And the same happens to both, God destroys them in one day (Rev.18 & Genesis 11). God is clearly comparing the two like He does other things in Genesis and Revelation. And through this we know what will become of their plans. With the story of the tower of Babel we learn something that should make any Christian fear a New World Order less.
You see, God allowed them to build the tower of Babel and the city for years. It was a great work that had taken a lot of their intellect, time and energy. They wanted to be ‘one’ and in control over the populated world. And God watched them build and build. And when they were nearly done and ready to harvest the fruit of their labour, utter global control, God hit the tower so it fell unto the ground.

Many are accusing God for not destroying Satan the moment he showed a sign of rebellion. They think that would have avoided all the evil. But He allows Satan to show his true intentions and his true face before He destroys him. Because God has allowed all men to show their true self and not always (he has sometimes) hindered them from doing evil, people will understand and agree with His judgment over them. But had He not allowed the devil and some people to show their intentions and actions, He could not have judged them and destroyed them without His righteousness being questioned for all time. To avoid sin to resurface again, people must know the consequence of sin. Or they will always wonder. Would the evil really have happened like God said it would have or was God making it all up? If He had destroyed them beforehand, they would never have known. And the uncertainty would have remained.
When the powerful men of this world have not only shown their true intentions but laid everything in place to commit the crimes and even have started to, there is no reason for God to allow it to continue for long. They can be judged. Revelation 18 does show us that the fallen church will bring unity to the kingdoms in her corrupted world, but that all their plans will come to an end whilst still doing her trading. «How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow. Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.  And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning, Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas, that great city Babylon, that mighty city! For in one hour is thy judgement come. And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more..» (18:7-11)
They had plans to prosper but all their plans went up in smoke.

Psalm 2 has a message to our world leaders: «Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision. Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure. Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion. I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel. Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth. Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.»

danielThe prophetic statue that was shown to Daniel is truthful. One day God’s kingdom will come as a rock and destroy all these other kingdoms. But notice how the world will still be divided or weak at Christ second coming. The iron and clay are still mixed making the iron weak.

We need not fear the Illuminati or the New World Order. In order to be prepared, we need to spend our time getting closer to Christ. Our faith in Him must be stronger than our belief in a world order. Our fear of Him greater than the fear of men.
As God’s messengers, we are to proclaim the coming kingdom of Christ, not the coming kingdom of the Illuminati. When Peter looked at Christ he could walk on water. When his eyes started starring at the stormy waters underneath him he started to sink. (Matt.14: 28-31) We have to look at Jesus in these times. Let’s continue to lift Christ up before the eyes of men, so they see how powerful He is, and so that the powerful men on this earth appear weak and small in comparison.
God hit the tower of Babel easily just when they were about to finish it, and He will destroy also the plans of the New World Order as soon as they have shown what they are capable of. This is illustrated by the rock hitting the feet of the Statue.

And remember: «Do not call conspiracy everything this people calls a conspiracy; do not fear what they fear, and do not dread it. It is the LORD of hosts whom you should regard as holy. And He shall be your fear, And He shall be your dread» (Isaiah 8:12-13)

Our film music !

0

We have had a lot of requests about the possibility of downloading our film-music, especially ‘Out of the Depths’ from our movie Testimony Of The Ark.

(All rights belong to us, the three first to our friends and us, please ask us before using it in any production.. thanks!)

Out Of The Depths

About the song: Out of the Depths was recorded in our little home studio. The lyrics is from the Bible and the melody composed by a friend and sung by another friend. We later did some small artistic changes in order to give it a more ‘movie’ friendly sound.
To download the song, right click ON THIS LINK and select ‘save as’ to download.

 

Out Of The Depths – humming

This version was created to create a calm mood. The lyrics are removed in order for the music to fit better in some of the scenes.
To download the song, right click ON THIS LINK and select ‘save as’ to download.

No name – humming.

Another song by same composer as behind ‘Out of the Depths’.  This humming version was also used in Testimony Of The Ark.
To download the song, right click ON THIS LINK and select ‘save as’ to download.

 

Exploring

This is another instrumental used in our travel documentary about Noah’s ark and the flood (not available in English).
To download the song, right click ON THIS LINK and select ‘save as’ to download.

 

A New Earth Instrumental

This song was used in the travel documentary about the Garden of Eden (not available in English). It has originally a vocal, but this is the instrumental version also used in the film.
To download the song, right click ON THIS LINK and select ‘save as’ to download.

 

The Wedding Feast

Song was used in the travel documentary ‘ The chosen ones’ about Abraham, Jacob etc (not available in English). It was originally written as a choir song and has lyrics but this is an instrumental version as the vocals were never recorded or used in the film.
To download the song, right click ON THIS LINK and select ‘save as’ to download.

Was the secret of Golgotha inside the Ark of the Covenant?

3

ark_and_content

Most of the time the only thing that was inside the Ark of the Covenant was the ten commandments. But for a period of time there was made an exception.

«And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all; Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein was the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant; And over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercyseat; of which we cannot now speak particularly.» (Heb.9:3-5)

But did it all have a prophetic meaning in addition to a historical one? The manna, as we know, fell from the sky and onto the ground and fed the Israelite’s in the wilderness. When the people talked about the miracle of the manna to Jesus He told them: «I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.» (John 6:51)

At one point Israel was tired of the manna and wanted meat for food instead. In the same manner Christ and His words were rejected, and the men of this world preferred. Christ clearly states that the symbol of the bread from heaven is tied to Him coming here, to our earth, as a human, Christ in the flesh. But also regarding His death: «And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.» (Luke 22:19)

The manna in the Ark could therefore very well symbolize Christ coming in flesh to die for mankind.

The second item that was placed into the Ark was Aaron’s rod. There is a story in Numbers that tells about a rebellion against Moses and Aaron.

«Speak unto the children of Israel, and take of every one of them a rod according to the house of their fathers, of all their princes according to the house of their fathers twelve rods: write thou every man’s name upon his rod. And thou shalt write Aaron’s name upon the rod of Levi: for one rod shall be for the head of the house of their fathers. And thou shalt lay them up in the tabernacle of the congregation before the testimony, where I will meet with you. And it shall come to pass, that the man’s rod, whom I shall choose, shall blossom: and I will make to cease from me the murmurings of the children of Israel, whereby they murmur against you. …..And it came to pass, that on the morrow Moses went into the tabernacle of witness; and, behold, the rod of Aaron for the house of Levi was budded, and brought forth buds, and bloomed blossoms, and yielded almonds.» (Numbers 17:2-5 & 8)

The rod was later placed into the Ark together with the manna. The rod represented God’s elected priesthood. The new testament tells us that in the new covenant there would be a new priesthood (Book of Hebrews). Christ would be our priest and high priest. (Heb.8:1, 5:10) The main mission of the High Priest was to atone for the children of Israel. To bring forth a sacrifice in place of the sinners. They transferred their sin to the sacrificial animal, and the blood was brought by the High Priest into the sanctuary before the throne of God, the Ark. «And ye shall keep the charge of the sanctuary, and the charge of the altar: that there be no wrath any more upon the children of Israel.» (Numbers 18:5)

Jesus being our High Priest had to have a sacrifice to bring in order to represent us. Christ Himself was that sacrifice, and at His death He had the role of the Priest and the sacrifice at the same time. But not only that, He also had to bring the sacrifice before the Ark and the Testimony. «And if his offering for a sacrifice of peace offering unto the LORD be of the flock; male or female, he shall offer it without blemish. If he offer a lamb for his offering, then shall he offer it before the LORD. And he shall lay his hand upon the head of his offering, and kill it before the tabernacle of the congregation: and Aaron’s sons shall sprinkle the blood thereof round about upon the altar.» (Leviticus 3:6-8). «And the priest shall dip his finger in the blood, and sprinkle of the blood seven times before the LORD, before the vail of the sanctuary.» (Leviticus 4:6)

Inside the Ark was Aaron’s rod, the sign of the priesthood. The manna illustrates Christ in flesh here on earth dying for us, and then there was the law. These three sum up Ron Wyatt’s discovery of the Ark of the Covenant in a perfect way. How all three had to be present at Christ’s death. The sacrifice, the priest, and the law. These three also sum up the new covenant which is perfect as it is called the Ark of the Covenant. But it also reveals who the throne belonged to. The two symbols of Christ along with the law, that was written by Himself, make the foundation of the throne of the King of Kings among men. Christ was also the Law or the Word in flesh.  “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.” (Joh.1:1-5)

However by the time the Ark was hidden the manna and the rod had been removed: «There was nothing in the ark save the two tables of stone, which Moses put there at Horeb, when the LORD made a covenant with the children of Israel, when they came out of the land of Egypt.» (1.King.8:9)

This could signify that the ark was going to be used not just as a symbol of the plan of salvation, but actually be a part of the new covenant. The two symbolic items tied to the sacrifice of Christ and the priesthood, were replaced as the Ark at Golgotha faced the real High Priest and the real Sacrifice. And as the blood fell on the Mercy Seat, the symbolism was fulfilled and replaced with the real event.

The Ark and The Plagues

1

Moses was asked to build the sanctuary and the items after the pattern of what was in heaven, which was shown to him on the mountain.«Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens; A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man. For every high priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices: wherefore it is of necessity that this man have somewhat also to offer. For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law: Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.» (Heb.8:1-5)

sanctuary

It shows us how Christ is ministering in the sanctuary in heaven, and by looking at the sanctuary service on earth we can understand what Christ is doing for us in heaven.

All the items were built as copies of the ones in heaven, except one that was made as an original. All the items were made by human hands after a pattern, and are therefore replicas. However the tables of stone contains the law that was written with God’s own finger. So although a copy, because it was written by the same person that wrote the one in heaven, it is still an original.

If a painter paints the exact same picture twice, they are both originals. The same goes for the law of God. This is why, although the earthly priestly system ended, the law didn’t end. It was an original and therefore it continued as an original after the earthly system was replaced by the original heavenly system.

The ark containing the law is therefore still relevant. What we can also see, is when something happens in the sanctuary in heaven, something also happens here on earth. The law on earth and the law in the ark in heaven are connected and they have the same purpose/mission, as they are identical.

ark97

We are told in the Bible that God will send plagues over the earth. «The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant. Therefore hath the curse devoured the earth, and they that dwell therein are desolate: therefore the inhabitants of the earth are burned, and few men left.» (Isa.24:5-6)
We get this reason confirmed in the New Testament.

Notice what takes place right before the plagues that are mentioned in Revelation is to come over the earth. «And I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvelous, seven angels having the seven last plagues; for in them is filled up the wrath of God. …And after that I looked, and, behold, the temple of the tabernacle of the testimony in heaven was opened: And the seven angels came out of the temple, having the seven plagues, clothed in pure and white linen, and having their breasts girded with golden girdles. And one of the four beasts gave unto the seven angels seven golden vials full of the wrath of God, who liveth for ever and ever. And the temple was filled with smoke from the glory of God, and from his power; and no man was able to enter into the temple, till the seven plagues of the seven angels were fulfilled.» (Rev.15:1 & 5-8)

The next chapter in Revelation tells us what the different plagues are. But who who are the ones that receive them?

In Revelation we are first told, in chapter 14, about an angel going to all cultures and people on earth with the message; do not worship the beast. (Because if they do) And here is the reason: «And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation…» (Rev.14:9-10)

And so when the plagues comes it’s said to be «seven angels having the seven last plagues; for in them is filled up the wrath of God», and in the first plague it says: «And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshiped his image.» (Rev. 16,2)

This means that the plagues are a punishment in the last end time scenario where man have chosen obedience to the beast power instead of heeding the warning given by God by the third angel’s message.

Before the plagues are poured out, we can see the following two things happening in the sanctuary in heaven.
1. The tabernacle of the testimony in heaven are opened. (The angels with the plagues comes from that part of the sanctuary)
2. The temple was filled with smoke from the glory of God, and no-one was able to enter into the temple, till the seven plagues of the seven angels were fulfilled.

The first thing that is worth noticing is that no-one was able to enter the temple until the plagues were fulfilled. The one who does enter the tabernacle of the testimony is the priest, which on behalf of men seek to bring atonement for us. We see that Christ is doing this: «Wherefore in all things it behooved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.» (Heb.2:17)

What does it mean that no-one is able to enter the temple during the plagues? Well, it means that there is no reconciliation.

In the book of Ezekiel, right before the destruction of Jerusalem, the temple is also filled with smoke as the Lord leaves the temple. Again, what followed was plagues and even death to the pagan inspired people who had refused to turn from their ways in spite of all the prophets that had been sent to them.

We also learn the following lesson:

  1. Since the plagues are taken from the room where the testimony is, or from the ark of the testimony, the law is what will have sentenced them to suffer the punishment that this vial represents.
  2. The persons receiving the plagues have broken God’s law.
  3. By following the beast-power they have come in conflict with the law.

So how can this affect the earthly tables of stone? If it is an original then it will cooperate with the other original.

Therefore it’s interesting to note how the discovery of the Ark of the Covenant, and the awareness of it, has taken place at the very time of the last days. As we know the ark in heaven will play a part, could this signify that the earthly ark will play a part as well?

Not only has the earthly tables of stone been made ready for an event, but the plagues mentioned in Revelation seem to come in small portions now and then, perhaps witnessing that the plagues that are coming are very much real.

For what are the chances that the reoccurring problems we are facing in the world today would match so perfectly the plagues that is mentioned coming upon the earth written about nearly 2000 years ago?

How could they know, unless by divine revelation, what type of problems would be ‘modern’ curses?

I’m not saying the plagues have already come in full force, but that perhaps we see them in small portions, as a warning, and that this might cause man to be interested in reading about the warning of the third angel, so that they can be saved.

It’s worth thinking about, since the plagues comes from the room of the Testimony, that we should not find ourselves in rebellion or in conflict with Gods law in the last days before Christ returns. When we follow a law we also show who our King is. In the Bible, worshiping and obeying is in harmony, it is the same thing.

The blood that the priest carried in to the mercy seat was only able to pardon as long as there was a mediator. The same way the blood on the mercy seat on earth witness about the salvation that God is offering to mankind for their transgressions against His law. But there is a time when the door of mercy will shut close. But that door will not close before man have been given knowledge of the offer of salvation and have rejected it.

So let’s take a look at the plagues:

1. The first one talks of a grievous sore: «And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshiped his image.»

We have already seen many plagues like this over the centuries. And the last one mentioned in this verse, will without a doubt be the worst one yet. But the one people are fearing will spread in these recent times, is the Ebola virus which is very much a grievous sore.

As the plagues seem to be a punishment directed towards the beast because of it’s actions, seen in the second vial, the sore could very well be a symbol of something they have inflicted on the innocent.

In Revelation 18, about the coming plagues, it is said: «Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double.» (Rev.18:6)

The sore might therefore be a punishment for the role they have played in destroying other peoples health or bodies.

2 & 3. «And the second angel poured out his vial upon the sea; and it became as the blood of a dead man: and every living soul died in the sea. And the third angel poured out his vial upon the rivers and fountains of waters; and they became blood. And I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be, because thou hast judged thus. For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and thou hast given them blood to drink; for they are worthy. And I heard another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous are thy judgements.»

https://youtu.be/kLtTOmvTqrk

It’s interesting how it keeps being repeated that God is righteous giving these plagues on man.

It seems that God is showing us warning signs of these plagues also, as the ocean in Australia has gotten a blood-like color. Scientists claim this is the result of natural causes, but God has used nature to create plagues in the past as well. For instance, one of the plagues that was sent over Egypt, He used frogs and other elements from nature. There is no reason to assume that he won’t do the same in the end time scenario. Fish and animal life suffers at the condition of this ‘red’ sea. So if it was spread more world wide, and if it was stronger, it would definitely have caused a problem with life in the sea. It is also worth noticing how it says also the rivers will turn red. Here God has given another example as we see one of the rivers in China going red as well.

The scientist can tell you why these waters turn red, but the scientists in the days of Noah could probably also have told how it was possible to get a world-wide flood, if they had been alive to explain it. Just because it can be explained doesn’t mean it’s not a curse.

We also see the beginning of animals dying. Every week thousands of sea-animals are washed up on shores dead or dying. The numbers are really high, and the phenomenon keeps getting worse. It is almost as the contractions of a women in labor, more and more, stronger and stronger. The amounts of sea-animals dying in 2015 are extreme. If it is compared to contractions, then the next is the plagues.

The world might not have much more time to take heed to God’s warning. The time Christ leaves the sanctuary to speak on behalf of man is almost over. We need to be in the right place with God today.

We are told that the reason why God allows these plagues, is because of the persecution of God’s people, these people even caused their deaths. Make sure that at this time in history, you are not a killer, because God will give you blood to drink. However, there is still a little time to seek God’s pardon before it is too late.

https://youtu.be/YWWvL_e_mWI

See full list of animal die off.

4. And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire. And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory.”

The sun has already proven to behave a little unusual and doesn’t always follow the scientists predictions when it comes to sun flares. This year (2015) the were almost no sun flares the first couple of months. There is little doubt that the world are facing climate change. More snow and ice, but also hotter summers. There have been droughts several places like USA, Africa and Australia.

Temperatures are said to be rising and the last decade was the warmest ever recorded.

But the sun burning in the plague could be related to warmer temperature, but it could also be related to the ozone layer. The United Nations Assembly has set September the 16th as an international day for the preservation of the ozone layer. The ozone layer absorbs over 90% of the sun’s medium-frequency light. If this was in any way weakened man would indeed be burnt.

The plague could also be a combination of the two.

This is also a plague we can see the tendency of already today and that the man writing the Book of Revelation nearly 2000 years ago could not have known would be an end time sign.
This year, summer 2015, has had several heat records all over the world and thousands have died of the heat.

5. And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the beast; and his kingdom was full of darkness; and they gnawed their tongues for pain, And blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, and repented not of their deeds.

Here we can see that those who are effected by the fifth plague is still suffering from the first showing the plagues comes over a short duration of time. Which is evident considering that making the river fountains toxic, and extreme heath, would not be survivable for long periods of time.

The darkness here explained cannot be connected to the sun disappearing for it did then we wouldn’t have extreme heat but a frozen state. But it doesn’t say it will be cold with the darkness. In addition the plague is centered around the «throne» of the beast and so it’s not world-wide, but seem to be referring to the beast’s capitol. However it could also of course reference to the kingdom.

God already did this plague to Egypt. The ninth plague was described this way: «And the LORD said unto Moses, Stretch out thine hand toward heaven, that there may be darkness over the land of Egypt, even darkness which may be felt. And Moses stretched forth his hand toward heaven; and there was a thick darkness in all the land of Egypt three days» (Exo.10:21-22)

This could very well be a supernatural darkness. But God could also be using nature elements.

Examples on darkness hitting cities today are subject to sand-storm, heavy pollution or storms. If you remove electrical lights when something like this happens you have complete darkness. But it could of course be a supernatural one. All I’m showing as this plagues are very much possible.

It’s not to be over looked how the powers of the world have continued work that have endangered the planet and left it polluted and toxic. But perhaps the sins of the ‘beast’ is more to have left the world in spiritual darkness. Their teachings have taken people from the truth, or made a confusion that have lead people from the real Christ to a false one.

Just like they got ‘blood’ to drink because of the blood they had spilled, they now get darkness as they have given darkness to those looking for a savior.

6. And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared. And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.   And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.

In this plague we see perhaps some of the results of the previous plagues. People are realizing that the ones claiming to be blessed of God, who’s council the world have followed, really was a deceiver. The darkness coming over the « seat of the beast» is a visible curse. They are also infected with sores.

In the bible the king of the east are usually connected to the Arab people, the descendants of Abraham’s sons Ishmael and Median. When the bible speaks of these groups of people as the people of the east, it did this in a time when there were great empires in also the far east.

The tension between Islam and the west have long been there. They feel the west is corrupting them with bad moral and control, while the west feel the Islamic people are a problem, uncontrollable and dangerous. When you have the Islamic people coming from one side and the beast and false prophet from the other, it is revealed that the beast and false prophet is connected to the west.

This two groups are preparing for a big war, but we don’t see the war taking place in the sixth plague, only the terror of it’s preparation. For in this plague they are gathered with the intention to fight, but we don’t actually see the fighting in the verse. But it could of course also be a fight.

Now from the beginning of the plagues until the seventh something have taken place. First it says no one was able to enter in to the temple, but in the seventh plague we see a voice coming out of the temple. God’s throne is still in the temple and it’s clear that it’s His voice speaking.

euphrates

7. And the seventh angel poured out his vial into the air; and there came a great voice out of the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying, It is done. And there were voices, and thunders, and lightnings; and there was a great earthquake, such as was not since men were upon the earth, so mighty an earthquake, and so great. And the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and great Babylon came in remembrance before God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath. And every island fled away, and the mountains were not found. And there fell upon men a great hail out of heaven, every stone about the weight of a talent: and men blasphemed God because of the plague of the hail; for the plague thereof was exceeding great.

The seventh plagues is the last one before Christ can be seen in the clouds. Here several things happens at once.

1. A big earthquake flattening mountains and moving islands

2. The big cities fall, and Babylon especially punished.

3. Great hail

Like with both global warning, massive animals die off, we can see many earthquakes. The amounts of earthquake every day are big. It’s all leading up to the final events. And the last earthquake will be the worst anyone has ever felt or ever seen.

In 2012 there was 12548 earthquakes, in 2013 there was 11341 and 2014 there was 16674. That’s a lot of earthquakes. But the number have been over 31000 a year a couple of times in the last decade.

There has this year been several hail storms in different countries that are so different and more rough then anyone is used to. These are small compared to the one spoken of in the seventh plague, but still we are able to see the massive damage the smaller one can make in these recent hail storms.

https://youtu.be/oYqUZUseDjI

Perhaps all of these symptoms is God’s warning to man to turn before there comes a time when no mediator is in the holy place of the temple to speak on our behalf.

Now is the time to turn to God and from our sinful ways. Now is the time to seek atonement for sins for we are not guaranteed tomorrow. We need to be ready to day. And if we put it off then we might put it off until it’s to late.

Christ have died for every sinner in the whole world, if the sinner are willing to give their sins to Jesus and be healed. But those who doesn’t come to Jesus will perish. Jesus said: «Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God,» and «And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.» (John.3, 3 & 15)

But many perished in those days. It’s written: «And the LORD said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live.» (Num.21:8) Those that didn’t go, wasn’t heal. Salvation is brought forth but we have to go to Him in order to receive it.

«For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.» (John.3,16)

So why are God allowing the earth and the people to be destroyed? For the same reason many atheists have said they refuse to believe in a God and by those words justifying that God will condemn them to death. There are to many people suffering, to many taking advantage over others. Nations using other nations, people using other people, religion using people for it’s own sake. Why did God destroy Sodom and Gomorrah? «And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous. I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know.» (Gen.18:20)

It’s a paradox that those refusing God say it’s because He doesn’t interfere in all the evil that is being done. And at the same time, when they read about God punishing bad people, they say He is a tyrant. And so, to many, God cannot do good whether he punishes or if He shows mercy. And for them they loose the opportunity to understand God and His mercy.

God’s final act of judgement came when the cry becomes to great. That cry sounding all over the world and is reaching God’s ears. And while the atheists claim to not believe in God because as he walk pass the street and see a helpless beggar, are questioning why God doesn’t help them. God in return are looking at men having wealth and questioning why they are not helping their fellow human being. There is enough resources on this planet for everyone to live a full and good life. The problem isn’t that God didn’t create enough resources for everyone, but that some people and even nations take more then their share. As some point finger towards God, God will hold us responsible for our actions and our greed.

The great cry from so many people and the willingness to look away from the other part, will cause God’s interference. So many children are now suffering abuse, all types of sexual violence are increasing as we speak. The numbers of workers working for little pay and under unhealthy circumstances, big companies causing small businesses to close, all the war and strife. The vanity and selfishness of the ‘modern’ civilization.

But the greatest punishment is coming to the false Christian system, that instead of bringing man the truth so they could be healed, so the world could be healed, gave them lies that lead them to be cursed.

The tables of stone that was placed in the ark are witnessing against man here on earth just like the one in heaven are witnessing against us. And both will be revealed in this time. However, we cannot look inside the temple in heaven, and so it’s reasonable to assume, it’s the earthly tables of stone that will be visible to man right before this time of trouble.

For these tables are originals like the ones i heaven and are still relevant and still have a function.

The discovery of the Ark of The Covenant, is a warning that the time of the plagues and Christ second coming is very soon.

Now we can see tendency of the plagues mentioned and we hear of the ark found; the combination of these two are a great sign. However, God never leaves man in despair or darkness if there is a chance to save. His first motive is always to save. And so with the rediscovery of the ark and the tables of stone along with signs of the plagues coming, He revealed the blood of His son that can save us until Christ leaves the Most Holy and the temple is filled with smoke.

The blood on the mercy seat shows God’s last call to the world to turn and be saved.

The blood of the sacrifice was placed three places during the day of atonement. In the most holy place before and on top of the mercy seat, one the horns of the alter of incense and the rest by the foot of the alter where the sacrifice was made. The blood at the foot of the cross is therefore biblical and the revelation of it a witness of what time in earth’s history we are in.