Home Blog Page 2

Part 1: From Victimhood to Warrior – Christian mental health after trauma.

0

Important notice: Publishing this article series will take some time and is ongoing. The first four chapters were uploaded in August 2024, and the next chapters will most likely be up sometime during September.

Article series.



Introduction:

Society loves to put people in boxes. Often, these “boxes” do not fit perfectly, or symptoms cross over between them, and so the number of new mental diagnoses is ever-growing. Society wants people to believe there is no norm or “right,” yet the many names for mental conditions suggest otherwise, implying that there is a standard. This reflects the idea that some behaviors are normal and others are considered abnormal. Strangely, it is like trying to accept something they do not actually accept. With physical cuts, you expect bleeding as a normal result. The body is designed to heal itself, but for a while, the wound will hurt and look less attractive; still, it is all “normal.” Sometimes we have to help the wound heal by cleansing it and closing it if it is too deep or wide. That is normal too. When it comes to mental health issues, this logic is, for the most part, rejected. Behavior that shows mental struggle is seen as random or abnormal, yet it is similar to the situation with a cut. Our brains and bodies react to trauma, neglect, violence, and manipulation in countless ways, and that is normal. The mind heals by respecting its natural healing processes, although it might still leave mental scars. Sometimes we have to help the mind heal because the emotional hurt is too complex. However, respecting the natural laws of the mind is not always how mental health is approached, either professionally or in broader society.
Rarely are they able to truly heal those who are struggling; most often, they can only alleviate the symptoms. Instead of challenging existing perspectives, they may label someone as incurable, suggesting the problems are beyond resolution. As a result, the only help offered is often medication to lessen symptoms.

Modern society pushes people to identify with their sins, their wounds, and their coping mechanisms during and after trauma. A mental diagnosis can give the illusion of peace by providing temporary relief when explaining one’s condition to others. The diagnosis can become an excuse for not fitting in and not mastering life as others do, feeling that their chaotic inner stress has a name and that they cannot help it. Accepting their fate and condition can help ease the struggle for acceptance. A diagnosis can therefore reduce some of the additional stress placed on those who struggle in society. Many in these situations accept medications to relieve excessive stress. A Christian who struggles with mental health issues can end up stuck between a rock and a hard place. Irreligious mental health workers often give advice that contradicts Biblical advice. The Bible speaks harsh judgment upon those who trade in “pharmacies” and drug medicines, and it urges us to stay away from stimulants that keep us from being sober and spiritually awake (Rev. 18:23; 1 Peter 5:8; 1 Thess. 5:6-8; Eph. 5:18; 1 Cor. 6:19-20; Gal. 5:20). Drugs can also affect the brain negatively, cause personality changes or misplaced indifference, and lead to addiction that is hard to escape.
Using drugs to treat mental health issues is, for many Christians, not an option. Alternative medicine is regularly rejected by mainstream society, and thus, it is hard for many Christians to know what to do. The Bible is very open and clear about human hurt, but it does not assign people specific mental diagnoses. Yet, many biblical characters suffer from what today would be called deep depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and even madness. They suffered many types of abuse. Many had their freedom taken from them and were suppressed or oppressed. Many suffered great traumatic experiences, and part of the Bible’s narrative is how they dealt with them.
The Bible may appear simplistic in explaining mental health crises and their consequences, as it does not lock people into an incurable diagnosis. Instead, it teaches that even if someone has struggled from birth or believes they are “born this way,” they can be “born again,” figuratively speaking. Where there is life, there is hope (John 3:3).
God powerfully demonstrated this when Abraham’s wife, Sarah, was too old to bear children, and her womb could no longer produce life. God waited until it was considered impossible, and then He gave Sarah her son. The son was named Isaac, which means “laughter.” Sarah went from grief and stress to laughter because of the miracle God performed within her.

For someone who does not believe in God, the idea of a higher power with the ability to help humans is nonsensical, and they will treat it as such. Those who believe and have experienced God do not have to accept that their case is lost. Many mental health issues involve sin, and Christ claims He can deliver us from our sins—that He can set us free (John 8:34–36). The Bible says there is hope for everyone, and instead of telling people to identify with their issue, it explains that we are more than what happened to us. We are not what happened to us. We are more than the sins we have committed. We are not our sins, our coping mechanisms, or our defense mechanisms. Furthermore, we are something greater; we have potential that has yet to be unraveled, and our true identity is suppressed by sin and harm. God wants to free the real us from the cobweb we are stuck in. In God’s eyes, we are an undetonated bomb of potential. He knows what we can be and become if we are not held back.
Did God do something so extraordinary that He commissioned a woman who was said to have been possessed by demons to be the first to tell people the good news about His resurrection? (Luke 8:2; Mark 16:9; Matt. 28:7). He did. What a powerful move. She, like death itself, seemed impossible to turn around—yet Christ did both. Did Jesus assign a former madman to preach the gospel to his family and town? (Luke 8:39). The last person anyone would listen to, God sent to preach to the well-functioning others.
God is not afraid of those who suffer from mental health issues; He does not hide them or tell them to be quiet. Rather, He untangles them from their mental prison and gives them trust, love, and responsibilities. God believes in us, and He asks us to believe in Him and in each other.

This book is meant to show how the Bible addresses mental health, offers the biblical solution, and explains how to practically find healing through faith. To most people in the academic world, this is a dangerous approach, as the Bible is viewed as questionable and God as non-existent. But they are wrong. God is real. Yet, the intention behind this book is not to discourage people from seeking professional help; rather, it is to serve as a supplement to help Christians navigate the many emotions they experience after mental trauma. Many Christians struggle with mental health and with understanding why God allows it and how to view it. This book may help answer some of those questions.

• What does the Bible say the way out is? Is there one?
• Is it possible to be mentally ill and a true Christian at the same time?
• Why is there so much stigma among Christians regarding mental health?
• Why do many seem to get worse when seeking help from church members?
• Why do so many feel trapped and abused all over again after joining a church?
• What are the misunderstandings many Christians often have regarding mental health?
• Are there practical ways the Bible says can help us on the path to recovery? How can we help ourselves?

These are the topics we will investigate, and hopefully they will bring hope to the wounded or to those trying to help them. The book will not focus on diagnostic terminology but will concentrate on explaining human hurt and recovery within a biblical framework. It is primarily directed at Christians struggling with childhood trauma or long-term trauma as adults. This includes those who want to help someone stuck in victimhood, those struggling with mental health and their faith, or those who wish to understand and better support people who struggle. While this book does not address every issue and problem, it does present the biblical solution for people who are hurting, regardless of the reason.

Disclaimer:
This book is not meant to compete with treatments provided by professional health workers. It is written from a biblical perspective, not from the academic viewpoint of a mental health professional. If someone is unable to manage their mental health on their own, it is strongly advised to seek help.

 

NEXT CHAPTER —-> The World Is A Battlefield

Gog and Magog Part 4

0

Magog – The provoker in the end times

See all the parts to find out who Gog and Magog are:
Part 1: Why is God targeting the sons of Japhet?
Part 2: Human development after the flood and its relevance today.
Part 3: When The World Was DividedIdentifying Magog!
Part 4: Magog – The provoker in the end times

 

Why has God waited to judge Magog?
The descendants of Japhet, in large part, received the gospel and became followers of Christ. It was also from the lands of Japhet that missionaries were sent all over the world: “And I will set a sign among them, and I will send those that escape of them unto the nations, to Tarshish, Pul, and Lud, that draw the bow, to Tubal, and Javan, to the isles afar off, that have not heard my fame, neither have seen my glory; and they shall declare my glory among the Gentiles” (Isa. 66:19). Many of ancient Israel were spread throughout these same countries and helped spread the gospel from these territories. In fact, the Bible tells us that many Israelite slaves were sold to the Greeks, and we can see genetically that many in the ancient Greek world were descendants of Israelite slaves (Joel 3:6). With population explosions, the same Israelite slaves became multitudes in Europe, and God remembered them and raised them up to preach.
When the tribes of Japhet received the gospel, they also received God’s special attention. Unfortunately, where the truth prospers, counterfeiters will also appear. Within Japhet, we therefore see both God’s people and those who falsely claim to be God’s people. This was also the case with the other powers represented in the statue in Daniel chapter 2: Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome, and divided Rome all had God’s people scattered among them. Christ gives a parable where He shows that He will not judge an area where there are both “wheat” and “tares” until the end: “But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them” (Matt. 13:29). While apostate Christians have persecuted faithful Christians in Europe, it was also the place where the gospel spread after Jerusalem. This means that these lands will receive the harshest judgment because their light and opportunity have been the greatest.
First, the Catholic Church falsely claimed the right to be Christ’s voice on earth. Then, as Protestants distanced themselves from her, they also began persecuting each other. Eventually, these lands became the center from which atheism and the theory of evolution spread, replacing belief in God as the Creator.
In Revelation 12, we see the Roman beast persecuting the woman, “the true church.” But God also makes a way for a new land where His people can practice their faith and spread the gospel in peace: “And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth” (Rev. 12:15-16).
America became a refuge for Christian pilgrims, and for a long time, the country fought for everyone’s right to practice their faith in peace. This made America the perfect place for God’s people to continue sharing the gospel with the world.

America – Japhet’s “enlarged” lands?

Noah prophesied: “God shall enlarge Japheth…” (Gen. 9:27). When all lands appeared to be overly populated or under the control of great empires and nations, Europeans migrated in large numbers to the American continent, which was largely free. Although Native Americans have not always been treated justly, it should be noted that it appears God sent the Europeans (tribes of Japhet) to this land. Europe was about to become severely overpopulated, with population growth skyrocketing, especially between 1700 and 1900.

The King of Kings moved part of Japheth to their distant brethren in America just as the population was about to exponentially increase.

God moving part of Europe’s population to America seems to have reduced the dangers that overpopulation could have caused in Europe. Given how Europe took control of lands around the world, a large population growth would have affected world peace as well, as it would have been impossible to conquer any of the European empires. America was severely underpopulated for its size at the time. Splitting up Europe and placing a sea between them slowed the rise of any world empire. Sometimes it is good to recognize what God spared the world from, rather than just question His leading. With a rebellious earth, God can only lessen damage, not remove it.
When looking at paternal genetic haplogroups, the European R gene once had a common ancestor with the Q gene, which is found in most Native Americans. Therefore, they mostly descend from the same person.
In Revelation 12, we see “the earth” rescuing the “woman/Church” from persecution in the old Roman territory. The densely populated Europe and Near East are compared to a sea: “And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues” (Rev. 17:15). The beast with the ten horns, which we have identified as the tribes of Japhet, comes up out of the sea: “And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy” (Rev. 13:1).
The second beast in Revelation does not come out of the sea but out of “the earth,” the same place that once helped the woman, or church. This refers to the enlarged area of the tribes of Japhet: “And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him” (Rev. 13:11-12).
These two beasts are the powers of Magog, Meshech, and Tubal, situated at the ends of the Atlantic Ocean, with a common goal and pursuit. The last ends up behaving as the first. For a long time, the Roman beast with the ten European tribes was the strongest, first pagan, then papal. Revelation tells us that the new land will become the strongest in the end, but it ends up behaving like the first beast.
How did the first beast in Revelation 13 behave? It claimed to represent God’s voice on earth and formed alliances to advance its goal of becoming the world’s spiritual and physical superpower. The consequence was that those God had chosen were persecuted and silenced. If all preach Christ, why does it matter? Satan has presented a false gospel to the world, and the result is that millions will be lost, thinking they are saved. The new gospel has taken the cross away from Christ, the high priest, and away from His sanctuary. Once the cross is removed from the law, there is no atonement. Once the priest is removed from the temple, there is no mediator. This is the crime of Catholics, Protestants, and Evangelicals. They “steal” God’s truth, God’s treasures, and God’s name, blending them with the unholy religious ideas of man.
When Christ came to His own, they did not receive Him; they did not even like Him. (John.1) They did not recognize their Lord because they had misrepresented and misunderstood who God was. Still, they made themselves God’s messengers. The truth was not evident until the false representation of God met Christ Himself. They sang about the Shekinah glory, they praised God’s deliverance and his law, yet strongly disliked the true manifestation of all three.
In the same way, many Christian groups have high opinions of their calling today as well. Had they met the real Christ, they would have rejected Him just as the Jewish leaders did. Heaven knows this by how Christ’s true representatives are treated by them. If they reject Christ’s messengers, they prove that they also would have rejected Christ if they had met Him.

This is why false Christianity is a serious problem. When the Jews falsely represented God and persecuted the true representation, their probation was over. The same goes for Christian churches and nations. When they think and claim to represent God to the world, God’s judgment will come as a surprise to them. For God knows that those professing to represent Him would have killed Christ again if He had come among them. He is not the Christ they wanted or imagined.

IS MAGOG RUSSIA?

Magog cannot be limited to Moscow as many evangelicals do, claiming that the war of Gog and Magog is a war between Russia and modern Israel. Although Western Russia does have descendants of Magog, that alone is not enough to call it Magog. Genetic analysis shows that Western Russia has a genetic makeup similar to that of Eastern Europe. Either Western Russia, together with Europe, is Magog, or they are not at all, for they come from the same forefathers. They cannot be Magog alone. Jews in Israel also carry Magog genes after being dispersed in Europe, but this does not make them Magog either. Evangelists have long considered Russia the enemy because of communism. However, the cradle of the spread of communism, modern atheism, and socialism was Western Europe, especially France.
The USA, Europe, and Russia have been in a cold war for a long time.

Is Magog in Armageddon?

There are two great conflicts involving Jerusalem in our day or the future. One is Armageddon, and the other is the Gog and Magog conflict. This leads many to think the two events are the same.

This leads us to examine the different timings of the two conflicts, and, as we will see, they are not the same event, even though they appear to involve the same aggressors.

Armageddon is mentioned in Revelation during the sixth plague. This is the time when “the kings of the east” are mentioned. In the Bible, the kings of the east were almost always the tribes of Shem. Notice, however, that the kings of the east are not the instigators or aggressors in the Gog and Magog war. They are only mentioned as “kings of the east” in Armageddon. The instigators in the Armageddon conflict are the “dragon, beast, and false prophet,” who are likely from Gog and the descendants of Magog.

Let us examine the verses: “And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared. And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon” (Rev 16:12-16).

The US and Europe are the leading voices uniting the world under the idea that this will bring peace and safety to everyone. But is that really the case?

The US and Europe are the leading voices uniting the world under the idea that it will bring peace and safety to everyone. But are they really doing that, or just offering the illusion of it?

In the Bible, the first destruction of Jerusalem is a type of the destruction of the world in the end times. In the years leading up to these events, the people were confronted by two conflicting messages. One was from the leaders and priests preaching “safety and peace.” They claimed Babylon would not take Jerusalem, that they were God’s people, and that God would save them. This appeared to be a god-fearing message, but they were not telling the truth.
“They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace” (Jer 6:14)
The other voice was Jeremiah, warning them that the end was coming whether they were ready or not, and so they needed to prepare:
“Then said I, Ah, Lord GOD! behold, the prophets say unto them, Ye shall not see the sword, neither shall ye have famine; but I will give you assured peace in this place. Then the LORD said unto me, The prophets prophesy lies in my name: I sent them not, neither have I commanded them, neither spake unto them: they prophesy unto you a false vision and divination, and a thing of naught, and the deceit of their heart.” (Jer.14:13-14)
In the days prior to Christ’s second coming, we will see the same deception. False Christian movements will claim God is with them when He is not.
The dragon, beast, and false prophet use their “mouth,” meaning speech, propaganda, and legislation, to unite the “kings of the earth and the whole world” in their objective, which is a war against God. This means they are defying God’s rule and decisions. The Bible even records the propaganda used to defend their legislation. In both 1 Thessalonians and Revelation 16, the same event is described with similar keywords: Christ coming as a thief and a group of deceivers spreading propaganda. Here we know what they say: “For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief” (1 Thess. 5:2-4). 

 

The Pope, the USA, and Europe have long engaged in “peace work” and “peace propaganda,” convincing the world that their solution, their wars, and their religion are the only things keeping the world from falling apart. They use “peace” and “freedom” as excuses while engaging in war and conflict. This peace is an illusion and will not save the world from the end. Instead, it will ensure people’s eternal damnation. The West has been feeding the world with immorality, satanic culture, trafficking, and unfair trade while at the same time claiming to be the voice of either reason or of God.

As a result of the gathering seen in Revelation 16, an angel is sent to “plague” this assembly and make way for the kings of the east, placing them in the path of the plans for the Middle East. Or the war could be imminent, and God has held the kings of the east back for as long as He could.

Now, as we can see from the broader context, the plagues in Revelation 16 are especially directed at the beast and its followers. This means the kings of the east are present in this conflict by God’s design.

In the battle of Armageddon, the main problem is “the beasts.” The beast represents the Pope and Europe, the dragon is pagan Rome and now pagan Europe, and the “false prophet” is apostate Protestantism, led by the United States (as Protestant nations in Europe have become atheist, new pagan, or spiritualist). Again, we see Japhet’s children in the beast, the false prophet, and even the dragon. Each of the three represents a major deception.

The plague of the king of the east is God’s plague upon them. This refers to the tribes of Shem: descendants of Ishmael, Assyrians, Arameans, Semites, and ancient Israel, now among the kings of the east, and so on. The Euphrates runs through southern Turkey (Kurdish, Semite), Syria (Assyria, Semite), and Iraq (mostly Semite). In Iran, we have both Semites in the south (Elam) and most likely Japhet (Medai) mixed with them. However, Iran is not connected to the Euphrates, the river mentioned in the sixth plague.

The “bad guys” in Armageddon are similar to those of Gog and Magog, but the time of the Armageddon battle is right before Christ’s second coming. His coming is, in part, to fight the “beast, dragon, and false prophet” and save God’s people from them, as revealed in Revelation 19. They have waged war against God, and while they are held back by the kings of the east, Christ comes to “take care of them” Himself:

“And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS. And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God; That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great. And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army. And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone” (Rev 19:11-20)

The main culprits of the Armageddon war are the ones leading the world into deception and defiance against God’s law. They, like Nimrod, are trying to control the world under one government while simultaneously claiming to be “saving the world”. They, like the Papacy, try to enforce a false gospel while discriminating and persecuting the true messengers of God. Many want God to be angry at China or some other nations. To them, they are the biggest threat. However, although their crimes are great, God’s attention is first upon those who falsely claim to speak on His behalf.

The word Armageddon comes from the Hebrew Har-mo-ade’, and refers to Jerusalem and the mountain of gathering. The Mountain of Gathering again refers to God’s times and laws, as His law and throne were there, and the gathering in Jerusalem took place at his feasts.
Naturally, the “beast,” “dragon,” and “false prophet” do not attempt to gather all kings and nations in Jerusalem. There would be no room or purpose.

What they most likely do instead is make decisions regarding the area, which they get the nations to agree upon. Or it has a symbolic value and refers to the beast’s war against God’s times as mentioned before: “And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws” (Dan 7:25).
All the apostate religions are represented in the old Jerusalem today: Catholicism, Orthodox, Protestant, Evangelical, Jewish, and Muslim. Everyone thinks they are chosen and speaks on God’s behalf, and each group represents their people in Jerusalem.
In addition, the “beast, dragon, and false prophet” will gather “them” there as well. “And they gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon” (Rev.16:16). 


Army of Magog? The map shows the NATO alliance between the children of Japhet in the West. They have one common army and one common goal and pursuit. The USA and the Roman beast with its divisions stand together as the prophecy says, but under the leadership and strength of the USA.

What side is Modern Israel on?

Although explaining the battle’s core topic is better left for another time, it is important to understand that modern Israel is in alliance with “the bad guys” of Armageddon, and not the plague (the kings of the east). This makes modern Israel subject to the plague of the king of the east.

Togarmah.
So what about Togarmah? Togarmah is not just one tribe; like all the other grandchildren of Noah, they have become a multitude of tribes. The strongest traditions are in Georgia and Armenia, which claim descent from Togarmah. They claim Togarmah’s son was called “Caucas,” and the name is said to be the origin of the “Caucasus Mountains,” just as the Bible says: “Togarmah of the north quarters.” Many of them, of course, spread into Russia, Eastern Europe, and possibly Asia. The Caucasus region in the north and northwest is today Orthodox territory, mostly populated by Orthodox Christians. How are they related to Jerusalem? The old Byzantine Empire was the forefather of Orthodoxy.

Togarmah originated in the Caucasus Mountains and spread northward from there. Togarmah was the son of Gomer.

GOG AND MAGOG – WHEN DOES IT HAPPEN?

Japhet’s children are seen in the Armageddon War and the Gog and Magog War.

There is still, however, a great difference in time, a one-thousand-year difference between the two wars.

Although Ezekiel seems to many to be talking about a war with modern Israel as the victim, the book of Revelation reveals a completely different situation. It places the war mentioned in Ezekiel a thousand years after Christ’s second coming.

“And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, and shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.” (Rev 20:7-9)

A gap of a thousand years is shown. The battle of Gog and Magog is said to happen at a resurrection for the lost, a final judgment “But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.  …And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works” (Rev 20:5 & 12-13)

Revelation clarifies what is somewhat hidden in the Old Testament regarding this war. This gathering is not of nations living in one time period, but of people raised from the dead. The nations and people that are judged are from different eras. Everyone will be judged, but the main focus is on those who have attacked God’s land in one way or another and who have persecuted God’s people.

A painting from 1904 shows “the beast” cast into the lake of fire. A beast represents a political system. It is a governmental institution that is destroyed so that it can never return.

At Christ’s second coming, we saw the beast and the false prophet cast into the lake of eternal fire. So where do the new enemies come from? If they are raised to be judged, their main crimes were already committed, so they are not “new powers.” The Gog and Magog war is just a final provocation and confrontation. They show they are willing to repeat their former sins. They are led to Jerusalem to be judged because they have come up against Jerusalem before.
From the book of Daniel, we learn that a beast represents a religious and political system. The false prophet here is also a false religious system. It is these that are cast into the lake and will not, therefore, be resurrected. The political and religious system is destroyed forever. This is what that means. You cannot burn a governmental institution in “hell.” This shows that it means God is destroying something so that it cannot ever return. At Christ’s second coming after Armageddon, we see judgment against religious institutions and governments. They lose all their power.
Notice that the third instigator mentioned in the Armageddon war is not cast in the lake of fire. About the dragon, it says: “And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season” (Rev 20:2-3)

This tells us two things. The dragon is credited as Satan’s tool to deceive the world and those who would not follow God. Secondly, he has “deceived people” and will do so once more.

Revelation 20:4 states that God is allowing those saved from Earth to participate in the judgment. They will be examining God’s judgment, which will be executed at the end of the thousand years.

Some claim that the state of Israel is a Jewish empire that will last throughout these thousand years; however, this is a falsehood and a lie. When Christ comes, everyone is either taken to heaven with Christ or left for dead. The earth is left desolate, awaiting its destruction by fire. (Isa.24) Satan can not deceive anyone because he is left alone without people to deceive.

After a thousand years, God’s people (saved from all nations and peoples) will return to earth.

We then see the lost resurrected to receive their final judgment. No one is destroyed before God’s people have had a chance to go through God’s judgments prior to this event, which is why there is a gap in time.
God is wise and intends to leave no room for doubt. The sentencing of the lost does not come immediately. He lets the multitudes show that their character and pursuits are unchanged.

The beast, the dragon, and the false prophet were a political system used by people in their war against God before the millennium. Once Christ came, they were instantly dead and their agencies destroyed. Now the great masses of people are resurrected to receive their final judgment after their cases are reviewed by the inhabitants of the New Jerusalem.

The scene where God’s people are surrounded, as we see it, is not the Jerusalem we know today. Instead, Revelation reveals that God has made Jerusalem in heaven. “And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband” (Rev 21:2) Gods people mentioned in the Gog and Magog battle are citizens and belong to a city constructed in heaven, not on earth. The new Jerusalem is therefore not an earthly construction by an earthly nation.

The devil has again people to manipulate, and he “shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them” (Rev.20:8-9)
Again, the war of Gog and Magog is not directed at Jews or the modern state of Israel, but at a city that consists of followers of Jesus, unrelated to their genetic background.

God does not sentence them at once; He waits until they surround the camp of the saints, showing the whole universe that if the lost are not sentenced, God’s people will die in this conflict. This makes the final sentencing of the lost an act of self-defense for the saved. They cannot coexist. Throughout human history, nations and people rejecting Christ have suppressed and even killed God’s people, and they are still doing so now, raised from the dead. The two cannot coexist on Earth. God is forced to choose, and He has to choose those who follow His universal standard and Him. The sentenced cannot live and exist without Him, and His preservation of nature, as they would self-destruct, and His people cannot live with the others without going extinct, because they are hated. So there is no future for both groups, only for the one that follows God.

Are only the children of Japhet resurrected? The reference to Gog and Magog, unlike the use of “beast” and “false prophet” in Revelation 16, might point to the people rather than the religious system. The deceived and deceivers are the nations. It says they come from every corner of the earth, from east, west, north, and south.

Either Magog, one son of Japhet, populated the whole world, or they deceived and influenced the whole world, meaning the people to be judged have followed and taken part in their sins. Magog and the land of Gog have been leaders in the world. In the Bible, people are often called by the name of their leader, whether or not they are related. God’s people are called by His name; the followers of the beast have his name. Those who repeat the sin and behavior of Babylon are called after Babylon. The use of the name Magog does not mean everyone is genetically from Gog or Magog.

In Ezekiel, it said: “Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him”.

If we remember the book of Jubilees, Tubal and Meshech were in the area now known as the Latin-speaking regions. Yet God says Magog has been their leader. Here it is revealed further that Gog and Magog are referring to the leaders from Magog: “And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal.” Who deceived the Latin people and led them into religious deception? None other than the Pope.

Although the beast was cast into “the lake of fire” at Christ’s second coming, the resurrection at the Gog and Magog war will also represent the resurrection of the millions of the deceived along with their deceivers throughout time. And they do come from all over the world. The Catholic Church spread to Asia, America, Africa, and Europe. They have been behind the persecution of God’s people for a long time. Claiming the rights that belong to them are theirs. They will all rise and receive their sentence, as God promised his people (Rev. 6:10-11).

Among those risen are all those who, while they were in the majority or in leading positions, have attacked God’s people.

First, God’s people were centered in the land of Judah and Israel. Before they were scattered, those who came up against Jerusalem, the nations, came up against God’s people. Most of these nations are actually from the tribes of Japhet.

Judgment day is for all those who come up against Jerusalem and God’s people, and who kept God’s people scattered. The attention is especially on Japhet’s descendants. Turks could be both Semite and Japhet, likely a combination of the two.

Media, Greece, Rome, and European tribes. When God’s people were scattered and vulnerable, Papal Rome attacked them wherever they were. Rome was part of “Magog”. The Crusaders and Britain were all likely also from the tribes of Magog.

Jerusalem was meant to belong to God’s faithful, to Christ’s followers who kept His law (not the papal and patriarchal orthodox who follow their own laws), and not to Jews who rejected Christ (reject God’s atonement). Muslims who reject Christ’s atonement and parts of His law also cannot enter. Yet God has let them protect the site from a new Jewish temple.

Every nation that has taken Jerusalem as its possession without being faithful to God has robbed God’s people of their land. Christ refused to create another kingdom here on earth while the rebellion was ongoing, saying: “My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence” (Joh.18:36)
Thus, God’s people have no kingdom here on earth until the final judgment is over. When Christ will not have a kingdom in Jerusalem until the rebellion is dealt with, neither will He tolerate a false Messiah making a kingdom on earth in His name. Jerusalem is sought after for mostly two reasons. The enemy wants to either use it as a platform to speak on God’s behalf (to deceive) or to fight and humiliate God and His truth. Both are severe crimes.

“And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem” (Zec 12:9).

Zecheriah is most likely referring to the Gog and Magog war, in which all nations that have come up against Jerusalem and will do so again will be judged.
“Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem. And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it” (Zec 12:2-3).

Judgment against Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya

Along with all of Japhet’s tribes coming against God’s people throughout time, we see God’s saving judgment for some additional nations:

“Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet” (Eze 38:5)

I can only make a suggestion from the Bible to explain the meaning.

  1. Ethiopia rarely went against God’s people alone; they usually assisted or worked with Egypt. One such example of Cushite aggression was during the time of King Asa of Judah (2Ch 12:3). Around 911-870 BC, a Cushite general led the battle at Zephath. Although they did not take Jerusalem, they still battled against God’s people. They often helped Egypt’s aggression. During the reign of Rehoboam, they helped the Egyptians loot God’s temple (2Ch 12:3). Judgment is spoken over the Cushites on many occasions in scripture, and it cannot be without reason: “Ye Ethiopians also, ye shall be slain by my sword” (Zep 2:12).
  2. 2. Persia, as we know, attempted a genocide on God’s people, barely prevented by God through Queen Esther. Jews were not treated well most of the time, and we see in Daniel chapter 10 that even an archangel, Gabriel, is fighting with the king of Persia to get him to do the right thing.

“Then said he, Knowest thou wherefore I come unto thee? and now will I return to fight with the prince of Persia: and when I am gone forth, lo, the prince of Grecia shall come. But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince” (Dan.10:20-21)

Persians have also helped attack the land through different groups during the Arab and Turkic invasions ACE.

3. The third mentioned is Libya; there is little in scripture showing them attacking either Jerusalem or God’s people in the past. It is worth noting that one of the caliphs who took Jerusalem after the Bible was written reigned from ancient Libya. Although claiming descent from Fatima and Ali, their capital was in Raqqada, Mahidia, and Al-Monsuriya, all in the territory of ancient Libya. At this point in time, the territory was inhabited by both Arabs and ancient Libyans.
The Fatimid Caliphate reigned between 909 and 973 CE and came into conflict with Jerusalem.
Going further back in time, to when Ezekiel recorded God’s word regarding them, Libya had the great coastal city of Carthage. The people also spread to the Iberian Peninsula and to other great trading cities along the Mediterranean coast.

Map of the world in the time of, and according to Herodotus.

One of the greatest acts of cruelty and attacks on God’s people in the past was not just by besieging Jerusalem or desiring Jerusalem. In Joel, we see a judgment upon the slave trade involving God’s people:
“For, behold, in those days, and in that time, when I shall bring again the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem, I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land. And they have cast lots for my people; and have given a boy for an harlot, and sold a girl for wine, that they might drink. Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Palestine? will ye render me a recompence? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompence upon your own head; Because ye have taken my silver and my gold, and have carried into your temples my goodly pleasant things: The children also of Judah and the children of Jerusalem have ye sold unto the Grecians, that ye might remove them far from their border” (Joe 3:1-5)

The ancient slave trade route was from the Phoenician (Canaanite) coastal cities in Sidon/Zidon. Among those engaged in trade were the Greeks and even the tribe of Dan. Although it is said here they were sold to the Greeks (the tribe of Japhet), the Bible tells us that the Greeks were the main instigators in buying and then displacing them and selling them to others. They were human traffickers.

“Tarshish was thy merchant by reason of the multitude of all kind of riches; with silver, iron, tin, and lead, they traded in thy fairs. Javan, Tubal, and Meshech, they were thy merchants: they traded the persons of men and vessels of brass in thy market …Dan also and Javan going to and fro occupied in thy fairs: bright iron, cassia, and calamus, were in thy market” (Eze 27:12-13 & 19).

This refers to all the coastal cities around the Mediterranean, where the trading of “persons of men” took place. The prophecy of judgment could also refer to all human traffickers who acted as the first traffickers. This is a crime punishable by death in God’s law (kidnapping and selling people).

In Ezekiel, God does not just speak against Gog and Magog; several chapters are devoted to the king and city of Tyre, one of the richest cities at that time because of trade and the human trafficking done at their harbors (Amos 1:9; Joel 4:6; Ezek 27:13).
One of these trade routes for human trafficking went through what was Libya’s coastal city, Carthage, and then to Tarshish. The Libyans were also in the armies of other nations coming against God’s people or Jerusalem.
It says: “The inhabitants of Zidon and Arvad were thy mariners: thy wise men, O Tyrus, that were in thee, were thy pilots. The ancients of Gebal and the wise men thereof were in thee thy calkers: all the ships of the sea with their mariners were in thee to occupy thy merchandise. Phut were in thine army, thy men of war: they hanged the shield and helmet in thee; they set forth thy comeliness” (Ezek.27:8-10) Phut is Libya, it is called both, and usually the bible says Phut, and then scholars translate it to Libya. Here, we learn two things about this nation. They worked with the Zidons, who handled the trade routes, and, secondly, it says they joined their armies. They were also in the army with Egypt when they raided God’s temple (2Ch 12:3)

Further in Jeremiah, we also see the Libyans join the armies of Egypt once again and are in union with both him and the Cushites against God’s people. “Egypt riseth up like a flood, and his waters are moved like the rivers; and he saith, I will go up, and will cover the earth; I will destroy the city and the inhabitants thereof. Come up, ye horses; and rage, ye chariots; and let the mighty men come forth; the Ethiopians and the Libyans, that handle the shield; and the Lydians, that handle and bend the bow” (Jer 46:8-9)

God already destroyed the city of Tyre and even demanded that the dust of that city would not remain. Because it was the main center of human trafficking, we can only cheer on God’s judgment upon that city and His future judgment upon their traders, the tribes of Japhet, and the ancient Libyans.

On the Great Judgment Day, all the bad guys attacking God’s people, whether God’s people were in the land or not at the time, will have to take their punishment in front of their victims at the Gog and Magog War. Traders and slaves will meet again.

Armageddon and Gog and Magog’s differences and similarities. Summary

Armageddon:

WHO THEY ARE:

The UN headquarters is in the US.

In the book of Daniel, the fourth kingdom, greater than the former, was Rome. Rome was divided, that is, Europe, and one of its horns was Papal Rome.

The dragon was pagan Rome, giving its power to the papal beast, while the rest of the empire was divided. Both represent both the Papal church and Europe (through the horns).

The false prophet is the apostate Protestant movement that never reformed back to God’s authority, especially the evangelical and Protestant churches of the USA, who were given the opportunity to follow God’s authority in peace and prosperity and still chose to follow church ordinances and papal holy times over God. In Europe, the former Protestant nations are now mostly atheist (in line with the dragon). Together, they are now a unified military power through different organizations like NATO, and in Europe, through the EU.

UN headquarters in Europe.

They are the instigators of the gathering of nations, such as the UN and its subgroups, having headquarters in both the US and Europe.

Celestial Sphere erected as a memorial to US president Woodrow Wilson for starting “The League of Nations” (That became the UN) Zodiac is inspired by Babylon and Assyria.

WHEN:

Right before Christ comes, they are involved in a war against God’s standards, they are influenced by “demons” and “the doctrines of demons” and Satan, “the dragon”. He uses them to further his agenda against God’s place and time of gathering. Satan uses spiritualism to speak to Christians: “And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore, it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works” (2Co 11:14-15)

THEIR ENEMIES:

  1. The Kings of the East are a plague to them and their plans.
  2. God’s people because they keep exposing them as lawbreakers and apostates.
  3. They are uniting the world under their lead, and all who oppose or rebel against their standard will be regarded as enemies.

Jesus will come in the middle of what they are doing to stop them Himself. The kings of the east will remain in conflict with them, slow them down, till He comes to save His people. Jesus second coming is also said to come from the east: “For just as the lightning comes from the east and flashes even to the west, so will the coming of the Son of Man be” (Matt. 24:27)


FIRST JUDGEMENT:

When Christ comes, the first Judgment takes place. The religious system of the beast and the false prophet is destroyed. Everyone dies at the sight of Jesus: “And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains; And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb: Rev For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?” (Rev 6:15-17)

The wheat and the tares are separated. Christ gathers His faithful, “everyone who is found written in the book of life,” and the rest perish.

 

 

GOG AND MAGOG

WHO AND WHEN:

Gog and Magog are the same as before. They are the ones misled by the tribes of Japhet or who are from the multitude of Japhet, or from the land of “Gog” (Europe). God’s people are at this time not a purely Jewish state but have a Jewish king (Jesus).

Most likely, the event described in Zechariah 12 refers to the Gog and Magog war after 1000 years.

“ The LORD also shall save the tents of Judah first, that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem do not magnify themselves against Judah” In that day shall the LORD defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and he that is feeble among them at that day shall be as David; and the house of David shall be as God, as the angel of the LORD before them.” (Zec 12:7-8)

Here, we see the faithful Jews (who have received Christ) have prominence in the city. The fact that they will all be protected and saved is evidence that it is a righteous city, as God could not defend Jerusalem when they did not keep his law. Thus this is the saved group. Notice that it says those saved from Judah and the house of David are given an important role, as they brought the gospel to the world, but there are also inhabitants of this Jerusalem who are not “Judah” and not allowed to “magnify themselves against Judah”. One is the cradle of Christianity, the other the harvest. The real branches and the grafted branches together. This is speaking of Christ’s Israel. He is the lion of Judah. It is therefore not a genetically Jewish city of our day with pagan-Christian, and Muslim inhabitants subdued under Jewish control, as it is today. This is a righteous city, saved from all groups.

Final judgment

Zechariah then says: “And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.” (Zec 12:9)

Again, this must refer to the Gog and Magog war after the thousand years, as this is the only time all nations over several generations will come together against Jerusalem.

As we have now seen, most of those nations came from or were in alliance with the children of Japheth. From the Medes to the Greeks, to the Romans, the Crusaders, the Ottomans, the English, and even the Ashkenazi Jewish groups who reject Christ. All have come up to fight against Jerusalem. None belongs there, only some from each group who have turned to God. This final event, which happens before paradise is restored, is described several times in the Old Testament.

First, organized religions and organizations, governments, are destroyed at Christ’s second coming. The second time, people will be judged one by one. Both times their aim is Jerusalem, but the first time they are stopped by Christ’s second coming. After a thousand years, they resume, along with the others throughout time, but this time God’s people are protected and not harmed by the event, and the people, instead of winning the battle, receive their sentencing.

This will be God’s final and great triumph, for after this is over, there will be no more conquests or battles. It is the final battle.

The deceptions in both wars are similar. Both have the dragon as the main deceiver.

The last battle seems to focus especially on all those who have rejected God: atheists, agnostics, evolutionists, practitioners of eastern religions, communists, socialists, and all ideologies that are at war against God. The Greeks, Romans, Medo-Persians, Babylonians, Egyptians, and others are included.
In addition, all those deceived by false Christianity, Orthodoxy, Catholicism, and Protestantism throughout time.

It is a grand confrontation, unlike any ever seen before.

Modern Israel vs Future Jerusalem

Placing the people and events in the Old and New Testaments upon the modern state of Israel is damaging to the truth for multiple reasons. False prophets say Magog is just Russia and that Torgarmah is just Turkey, and the kings of the east are God’s enemies. It fits into their narrative that Islam and Russia are the main aggressors in the end times when God points toward the West as a greater danger.

Most evangelicals no longer understand the beast or the conflict. Thus, they become the “bad guys” while thinking the real bad guys are Islam, because they are not warned that they and their nations are among those God is pointing to as the leaders of calamity and deception on earth in the last days.

Islamic nations have caused a lot of issues; they are not saints either and have persecuted God’s people as well. But they are nothing compared to the great deception and influence that is coming from the children of Japhet upon the world. Nor do they claim to represent Christ’s kingdom or speak on Christ’s behalf.

Modern-day Israel is not God’s sanctified people. They cannot be protected without Christ’s blood and Christ’s righteousness covering them, a covering they have rejected. They are not the Israel that is said to be saved, to dwell in safety while God judges those coming up against it. Instead, they are part of the problem of the end time.

I can wish to be the king of Spain all I want, I can take the throne and the crown, kill the current king, and start ruling. This does not make me the legitimate ruler of Spain.

Jews may take the land and claim to be God’s people despite their apostate state, but that does not magically turn their state into God’s Kingdom. God’s Israel and the new Jerusalem cannot be conquered or claimed. Every citizen entering its gates is invited by the King of that city, who is Christ.

If Jews do not accept Christ, they cannot enter the gates of the city. This is the city God speaks of in the Old Testament that will be surrounded by the nations, but protected.

God’s Jerusalem is not ruled by the UN or anyone else. It cannot be purchased with gold or silver. No one can enter just because they are related to Abraham: “Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham. And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: every tree therefore which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire” (Luk 3:8-9).

It’s not our genetic makeup that gives us residency, as is the case in modern Israel today. It is those who are “born again” by the Spirit. “Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.” (Joh 3:3-6)

Or as Paul, from the tribe of Benjamin, said: “For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God” (Rom 2:28-29).

Jews and Magog

JJews have high honors in the New Jerusalem, as we just saw. This is for the faithful, not for those who fight God’s atonement. For the Peters and the Pauls, the Barabases and Stephens, and all the heroes from then to now, preaching God’s gospel unfalsified while honoring God’s laws. They shine like stars, metaphorically speaking. The apostles’ names are on the foundation of the New Jerusalem (Rev 21:14).
Then there is the other group who, instead of accepting Christ as the lion and chief of Judah, has used all their energy to fight Him and His followers.

Placing Magog in Europe, with Gog as the landmass of Europe, includes the Roman Empire. Here, Jews have worked against Christ together with Rome. As they were scattered, even their descendants were mingled with the children of Japhet, with Scythians, Germans, Slavs, Greeks, Romans, Iberians, and so on. Just like anyone else, they must rely on their hearts being in the right place. If Jews do not turn to God and end their alliance with the dragon, the beast, and the false prophet, they are among those who will be judged on the great judgment day. They will be among those surrounding the camp of the righteous, attacking the inhabitants of the new Jerusalem. They will be part of the Gog and Magog war, but only on the wrong side. Many Jews ignorantly read the Old Testament and think they naturally will be the ones on the inside, trusting their “flesh” will save them, and believing those who are not Jews by the flesh will be on the outside. This is not what the Bible teaches.

The aggressors attacking God are attacking those who have “the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus,” not a specific race. (Rev.12:17; Rev.14:12) The enemies are not those attacking modern Israel, or Jews by the flesh, but those who attack God’s truth, law, and true gospel.

As long as we understand these two important points, it will be easier to understand who is who in the end conflict, genetics aside, and to know what side we should be on. Not trusting our flesh. Even if we are a Semite, it does not mean we are not part of Japhet’s group. Genetics is not an issue either way. The issue is who is telling the truth and who is lying. Who is deceived and who is not.

Satan has made Islam the scapegoat for Christians and Jews. Causing them to gather together against them, not realizing the apostate Christians themselves are the beast and the false prophet.

Satan has made Islam the scapegoat for Christians and Jews. Causing them to gather together against them, not realizing the apostate Christians themselves are the beast and the false prophet.

Satan has, for a long time, tried to confuse all the terms, situations, and people of the scripture. Now, many do not understand who the beast is, who the false prophet is, who the real Jew of God is, and who God’s people are. They do not know which Jerusalem is mentioned or when the events take place. He confuses everything so that we are unaware when we are seduced to take sides with the enemy, thinking the enemy is the hero and the hero is the enemy.

Satan has made the Islamic countries a scapegoat, taking attention off the West, which he uses to control the world. He stirs up hatred and war to make Muslims even more hated, so that Christians and Jews gather together against God.

It is nothing but a trick. Islam is not the beast of Revelation. It is not the “666.” Islam is only part of what is holding them back from rebuilding the temple in Jerusalem—plans that God will stop.

To this day, the Ark of the Covenant remains underground on the Muslim side of Jerusalem. It will not be given back to stand in a temple, or used as a weapon for the Jewish and evangelical plans for a Jewish earthly kingdom.

Gog and Magog Part 3

0

When the World Was Divided: Identifying Magog

See all the parts to find out who Gog and Magog are:
Part 1: Why is God targeting the sons of Japhet?
Part 2: Human Development After the Flood and Its Relevance Today
Part 3: When the World Was Divided: Identifying Magog
Part 4: Magog, the Provoker in the End Times


Carbon dating often overlooks the effects of environmental factors on artifacts’ apparent ages.

To understand human migrations from a Biblical perspective, we must set aside the flawed approach of evolutionists, who rely on inaccurate dates and events as their framework. They also place the origin of human migration in the Asian steppes and Africa. Furthermore, they divide human development into distinct phases, whereas in reality, people have always lived in different stages simultaneously.
According to the Biblical account, a great flood occurred. After this event, the north experienced a particularly cold climate, which evolutionists call the Ice Age, although it did not last for thousands of years as they suggest. This Ice Age was relatively recent, occurring after the flood when the climate was much colder in the north. Once the ice settled, it remained for some time. When temperatures rose, sea levels rose slightly, and coastal cities built along the shoreline ended up underwater, as seen in several places around the world. Some creationists theorize that numerous volcanoes in the north, which erupted after the flood, caused the colder climate, and that once activity calmed and eruptions became fewer, the temperature rose again.

Doggerland once connected Northern Europe.

One of the largest areas in the north to be submerged is the recently discovered Doggerland, a landmass that once connected England with Northern Europe. A human-built wall has also been found ten kilometers off the northern German coast in the Baltic Sea. Around the Mediterranean, ancient cities have been discovered underwater close to shore. The Persian Gulf, for instance, was once a river valley, and sea levels rose during the melting of glaciers. The existence of these sunken cities shows that water levels rose sometime after Babel, when people had already spread.

Before the glacier melted, the Persian Gulf was a river landscape.

The point is that for many years, the tribes of Japhet did not venture as far north as the areas inhabited today, while the glaciers were still intact. At first, after the flood, the northernmost inhabited regions were what we today call Armenia, Georgia, Crimea, Ukraine, and so on.

In addition to telling us that Japhet’s children settled in the north, the record also tells us that his sons traveled along the coast and to the islands. Japhet’s son Javan is strongly associated with what we now call Western Turkey, Northern Greece, and its islands.

The Book of Jubilee claims that Noah divided the world into three parts, one for each of his sons. Japhet went north and west, Shem went east, and Ham went south.
“10 And for Javan came forth the fourth portion every island, and the islands which are towards the border of Lud. 11 And for Tubal there came forth the fifth portion in the midst of the tongue which approaches towards the border of the portion of Lud to the second tongue, to the region beyond the second tongue unto the third tongue. 12 And for Meshech came forth the sixth portion, all the region beyond the third tongue till it approaches the east of Gadir. 13 And for Tiras there came forth the seventh portion, four great islands in the midst of the sea, which reach to the portion of Ham [and the islands of Kamaturi came out by lot for the sons of Arpachshad as his inheritance]. 14 And thus the sons of Noah divided unto their sons in the presence of Noah their father, and he bound them all by an oath, imprecating a curse on every one that sought to seize the portion which had not fallen to him by his lot. 15 And they all said, ‘So be it; so be it ‘ for themselves and their sons forever throughout their generations till the day of judgment, on which YAHWEH ALMIGHTY shall judge them with a sword and with fire for all the unclean wickedness of their errors, wherewith they have filled the earth with transgression and uncleanness and fornication and sin.”

A rough sketch of how the land was divided between the grandchildren of Noah according to the book of Jubilee. Canaan was given what we today call North-western Africa, but refused and took the land appointed to Shem instead.

According to the Book of Jubilee, Japhet’s sons ended up covering most of what we today know as Europe, Russia, and the Caucasus. From there, they spread further north, east, and west. It should therefore come as no surprise that all European languages derive from the same Proto-Indo-European language family (except Turkish). These include Latin, Armenian, Slavic, Russian, Germanic, Greek, and even Iranian. Among the first peoples to settle in southern and western Europe were the Greeks, the Gauls, the Celts, and the Italic peoples, all of whose languages come from Proto-Indo-European. Much later, Germanic tribes came to dominate central Europe. The peopling of Europe occurred through several waves of immigration, driven mostly by war, displacement, and competition for resources, pushing populations further into new lands.


Medai and Canaan did not want their lands.
The Book of Jubilee also claims that Medai traveled to his allotted land but then returned east. He did not like it and begged to be given a portion from Shem and a portion from Ham. At that time, Medai was married to Arpachshad’s sister. It says: “And Japheth and his sons went towards the sea and dwelt in the land of their portion, and Madai saw the land of the sea and it did not please him, and he begged a (portion) from Ham and Asshur and Arpachshad, his wife’s brother, and he dwelt in the land of Media, near to his wife’s brother until this day. 36 And he called his dwelling-place, and the dwelling-place of his sons, Media, after the name of their father Madai” (Jubilees 10)
The Book of Jubilee tells us that Medai, along with followers, explored the land shortly after Babel, being among the first to arrive there. How long he stayed and whether some were left behind is not known. It does seem plausible, however, that Medai came to the area while it was still very cold and the glaciers of Northern Europe were still intact. Irish traditions about a flood may offer another clue as to why he begged to remain in the east with his cousins.

Thus, the land along the North Sea and Atlantic Ocean was rejected by Medai and left largely to his siblings’ tribes. We will investigate who went there, as it is of great importance for understanding the Gog and Magog War. Traditions may confirm that it was not Medai who settled there.

Illustration: Medai rejected his portion in Europe and settled among Shem and Ham in what is today called Northern Iran. This might also explain why there is an Indo-European language there. He appears to also have received a portion from Ham around modern-day Chad.


The book of Jasher and the book of Jubilee – who tells the truth, if any?

The two books discuss which son of Noah went where. However, they suspiciously disagree on where Magog went. As previously mentioned, Satan has a motive for causing confusion on this topic. We must therefore ask: which of these books tells the truth about Magog? And do ancient historical records confirm one placement over the other?

One book, the Book of Jasher, points toward Russia as Magog. The other, the Book of Jubilee, points to the Western Christian nations as descendants of Magog.

The Book of Jasher is referenced in scripture. Both the Book of Joshua and the Book of Samuel cite the Book of Jasher, which might seem to prove its authenticity. However, the Book of Jasher was lost and was not quoted by anyone in the Bible thereafter. It did not resurface until the 16th and 17th centuries. The book had been lost for approximately 2,500 years, and no one can say for certain how it was found or why it suddenly reappeared. Was it the authentic book that was recovered, or did someone take advantage of the Bible’s mention of such a book and present a false version to push an agenda?

In contrast, the Book of Jubilees was found among the Dead Sea Scrolls and is confirmed to be an authentic ancient document. While its divine inspiration can be debated, a historical record does not require divine authorship to be considered truthful. The Jewish historian Josephus, for example, rejected Christ but still recorded history as accurately as he could, even mentioning Jesus. The Book of Jasher, on the other hand, was never found among the Dead Sea Scrolls. The pre-first-century Jews who carefully preserved Jewish texts did not possess it, nor is it referenced by early Christians or found in ancient Jewish collections. Its reappearance during the Reformation and Jesuit Counter-Reformation is mysterious, and there is currently no way to verify the authenticity of the Book of Jasher now in circulation.

The case of the Book of Jubilee is quite different. It was found among the Dead Sea Scrolls and among pre-first-century Jewish writings. It was continuously quoted after the time of Samuel, during the apostolic age, and was preserved among manuscripts of early Christian groups.

When deciding which account to trust, the Book of Jubilee prevails on all counts. The Book of Jasher presents a similar account of Magog and Gomer, but reverses their locations, placing Gomer in Western Europe and Magog in present-day Russia, whereas the Book of Jubilees places Gomer in modern Russia and Magog in Europe.

This distinction is crucial when studying the Gog and Magog War, as it alters both the interpretation of the conflict and the understanding of Magog’s transgressions.

This shift also fueled “false prophecies” identifying Russia as the main enemy in the end times. These prophecies are promoted by those whom the Book of Jubilee identifies as the real Magog.

The Book of Jubilee not only places Magog in Europe, but also situates Meshech and Tubal, the other two “bad guys,” in what is now the Latin-speaking part of Europe. The three descendants of Japhet that God is most displeased with correspond to the Roman beast and its northern divisions, or horns. Since these horns reign in the end times, Magog is found among them, not just in Europe, but also in the USA, where these tribes later migrated. This means the Biblical Magog includes both the USA and Europe. However, we must first determine whether Magog truly took over Medai’s territory in Europe.

Are the horns on the beast Magog?

Immigration and displacement – is Magog still Magog?

Evolutionists claim that Europe was inhabited by many different groups at various times. However, according to the Bible, this process happened over a short period. People first settled the area in small, isolated numbers, and then the population grew through several waves of immigration. Genealogy and language both show that the many European tribes are all related; they are different branches of the same family. Initially, there was some intermingling at Babel, after which groups became isolated, and later interbred again with neighboring tribes. All speak Indo-European languages (except Hungarian and Finnish), and similar haplogroups indicate a common ancestor. It seems that Magog took the land intended for Medai and then spread northward and westward into Europe. Historical evidence shows that those who immigrated to Western Europe came from Magog’s territory.

Evolutionists track immigration to the European continent. The third is a large part of Magog, who first settled north of the Black Sea and then headed west. There might also be traces of Medai found among the first settlers in Europe.

Where do historical traditions say they come from?

An artifact from sunken Doggerland connecting north-west Europe with England and Ireland. The sinking of the land and coastal settlements might have driven people to leave. Was it Medai who looked at the flood as a bad omen?

A Celtic historical record called the Lebor Gabála Érenn, a book of the invasions of Ireland, is considered a collection of legends and a written record of traditional oral history from prehistoric times. It tells us the following regarding some of the first people to come to Ireland: “Cesair (Cessair), a granddaughter of Noah, together with her father, Bíth, and her followers, are the first to reach Ireland but perish in the flood* shortly after. The next invasion was led by Partholon (possibly Greek), a descendant of the biblical Magog, son of Japhet. After overcoming the Fomor (Fomorii), a race of supernatural beings, Partholon’s tribe assumed control of the country for three centuries, until consumed by plague. Thirty years later, Nemed, another descendant of Magog, arrived in Ireland. Allegedly from Scythia, a tribe to the north of Greece, he and his Nemedian tribe deforested many plains in Ireland and (like Partholon) defeated the Fomor in battle.”
The flood referenced here likely refers to when water levels rose, covering Doggerland and other parts of coastal Northern Europe, rather than the flood in Noah’s days. The two events may have been conflated.
The settlement is claimed to have been first inhabited by Noah’s granddaughter, who went there with her father, “Bith.” In these ancient languages, B was pronounced as V, making it “Vith,” which is tied to Noah’s son (J)aphet. If true, Japhet came to inspect the land appointed to his descendants. His daughter died in the flood, but some must have survived, as descendants of Magog later fought with them. “Supernatural beings” may indicate they were larger and stronger. Who Japhet’s daughter’s husband was, we do not know, nor even whether she was truly his daughter. As long as she was a female descendant, she could be referred to as a daughter of Japheth. Either she was widowed, or she had a husband from another tribe.

Japhet need not have died in the flood, having only escorted his family there. This woman appears to have been a sister of Magog and Medai, or “daughter” is used to describe a prominent descendant (Women in the early period also lived several hundred years)
We might want to revisit the story from Jubilee, where Medai traveled to Western Europe and then returned “begging” for a land in the East. This might indicate something scared him off his own land. The flood there could have been the one that scared; according to the Lebor Gabala Erenn, a flood killed at least one tribe, and then Magog was the next tribe to arrive.
Magog’s journeys to Ireland on two occasions suggest they either passed through land assigned to Medai but rejected, or through their own territory north by the Baltic Sea before reaching Ireland (the Book of Jubilee states that Magog received land extending to the Baltic Sea). This demonstrates that Magog’s descendants arrived in northwestern Europe early. It also shows that Magog’s descendants reached and settled in Ireland through several waves.

Irish genealogy tells us that Magog did not remain in Eastern Europe but continued to spread westward, reaching Ireland and covering most of Europe.

Another detail from the legends recorded in this book states that other descendants of Magog lived among the Scythians or were themselves part of the Scythians. Historical records show that the Scythians also later spread inward toward Western Europe. The Jewish historian Flavius Josephus states that the Scythians were descendants of Magog and therefore a tribe of Magog. The history of the Scythians shows they moved from the north of the Black Sea (modern-day Ukraine) into Europe, both west and east, and even reached Britain.

When genealogists research Europe, we see three major haplogroups in which most descendants are linked (R1a, R1b, and I).
Other Irish sources, such as Auraicept na n-Éces, claimed to be as old as the 7th century, also state that Ireland was settled by the sons of Magog. Baath mac Magog (Boath), Jobhath, and Fathochta are said to be three sons of Magog who came to Ireland. Some dispute this, claiming he is from Gomer or even Javan, but there are more legends and stories that confirm Magog’s presence in Western Europe. The Irish legends also count among Magog’s descendants: Fenius Farsaid, Partholón, Nemed, the Fir Bolg, the Tuatha de Danann, and the Milesians. Of those who survived the disasters after Nemed, they split up and are said to have scattered: one group fled “into the north of the world,” another to Britain, and another to Greece.

Scotland is also, according to several historians, claimed to be a descendant of the Scythians:
“Scot (is) the same as Scythian in etymology; the root of both is Sct. The Greeks had no c, and would change t into th, making the root skth, and by adding a phonetic vowel, we get Skuthai (Scythians), and Skodiai (Skoths)” (Brewer E.C., enl. ed., 1894. Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, p. 1112). Brewer further explains that both the Welsh and the Saxons each changed letters, leaving us with the word “Scots” (ibid).
Keep in mind that many modern historians follow the evolutionary timeline. We know the Scythians arrived in Europe later, but the Bible says the first scattering of Magog into their lands occurred after the Tower of Babel. We will examine why.

God may give a hint that Magog doesn’t just stay in the inland territory of Europe, but rather takes over also the coastal areas: “And I will send a fire on Magog, and among them that dwell carelessly in the isles: and they shall know that I am the LORD” (Eze 39:6)

Irish chronicles say they are descendants of Magog’s sons.

The most likely reason God is angry with those “in the isles” is their relation to trade. Even Revelation 18 is largely a judgment on the men behind global trade. The coast has always been a desirable place to settle.
Baath mac Magog is described as being from Scythia and the Goths, or the Gaedil, suggesting a link between the Germanic-Slavic Goths and Britain. Other historical records show that the Goths spread to both Western and Eastern Europe, even reaching Rome and Spain. Genetically speaking, Magog appears to have mingled with Meshech, Tubal, and Javan while dominating the European continent at various periods.
The Visigoths, Vandals, Angles, Saxons, Franks, Ostrogoths, and Lombards all visited, immigrated to, or conquered Roman territory, and they appear to also be descendants of different tribes of Magog. Some, using the evolutionist model, argue that many of these groups had a greater variety of ancestry, but the Bible tells us that many groups descended from very few people. Tribes grew larger and split into new groups. One such example is the twelve tribes of Jacob and the twelve tribes of Ishmael, each descended from a single son. The same would have been true of the sons of Japhet; they were not just one tribe. Legends also hold that Magog had a grandson called Heber, whose offspring spread throughout the Mediterranean.

Scandinavia, France, and Britain

Linguistically and genetically, Northern Europe is closely connected. The Britons and Scandinavian royal houses all share the same origin names on their king lists, demonstrating their ancient relations. They all share a connection to the Celts and are among the first peoples to have settled throughout Northern Europe. The Irish legends, however, open the possibility that they came from different tribes or the sons of Magog. At one point, these early groups spoke the same language.

Although some of the lists lack names, comparing them shows they refer to the same people. Noe refers to Noah, and Sceaf was the ancient local name for Japhet. However sincere the makers of these lists were, far too few generations are listed to trace back to the time of Noah’s sons. This may indicate that many of the lists written after AD are based on legends about which son of Noah their kings descended from, rather than being a complete name record. The oldest document found remains the Book of Jubilee.


Later, another group of Magog’s descendants came to Scandinavia. “The Swedish historian Johannes Magnus (1488–1544) stated that Magog migrated to Scandinavia (via Finland) 88 years after the flood and that his five sons were Suenno (ancestor of the Swedes), Gethar (or Gog, ancestor of the Goths), Ubbo (who later ruled the Swedes and built Old Uppsala), Thor, and German. Queen Christina of Sweden reckoned herself as number 249 in a list of kings going back to Magog.” (Wikipedia) It is difficult today to verify his sources, yet the account fits with other legends, even if the names differ. Magog most likely had many sons born over several hundred years. Because all sources are relatively recent, it is difficult to prove their authenticity.
The Icelandic historian Snorri Sturluson (1179–1241) wrote about immigration to Scandinavia, drawing on the writings of earlier historians such as the priest Ari inn fróði (the Learned), son of Þorgils, son of Gellir. Like many others, he is disbelieved by evolutionists because of how the leader Odin is portrayed as having godlike powers. But this was a common way for leaders to portray themselves in ancient times. Many people in Sweden and Norway are his descendants, and the stories and places he describes are all real. He divides the land in the same way the Book of Jubilee does, with the river Tanais, which flows from the Black Sea, dividing Europe from Asia. The European side was where Magog is said to have gone.

He He does not mention Magog specifically, but describes a group settling in Sweden (not the earliest arrivals) who traveled from the Black Sea through modern Germany and Denmark before reaching Sweden. Along the way, they established settlements and named many places still in use today. He notes they ultimately left the Black Sea region and Turkland (modern Turkey) due to threats from the Romans. Since the Romans entered Scythian territory north of the Black Sea around 40 BCE, this group’s migration to Sweden happened relatively late. Most identify them as the Goths. In his work EDDA, Sturluson explains how their arrival changed the local language: they intermarried with the population, and their descendants became so numerous that a new language spread throughout Saxland and Northern Europe. The Germanic language, while related to earlier tongues, was not the region’s original language. Germanic shares features with ancient Norse, Celtic, and proto-Iranian, all of which descend from Proto-Indo-European. The arrivals from the Black Sea likely spoke a proto-Iranian dialect, and the blend with ancient European languages may have produced early Germanic. As Snorri described, the Gauls and then Germanic-speaking peoples settled what is now France, Germany, Britain, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. Genetic analysis shows that all these populations are related, despite minor differences among groups.

MAP OF THE EXPANSION OF THE POSSIBLE EUROPEAN TRIBES OF MAGOG:

Celtic expansion from 800-250 BC.
The Visigoths were the western tribes and took a large part of Spain.

The Ostrogoths went all over Eastern Europe, but also took Southern Europe.
The territory first given to Magog was in Eastern Europe. The Slavs could also be descendants of a tribe or sons of Magog. Their language also derives from Proto-Indo-European, and they share a genetic connection with the rest of Europe. Although they first expanded their territory toward Moscow, Russia was later invaded by the Mongols, leaving a genetic mark on the Russian population. The Kievan Rus are genetically connected to the Northern European tribes.

Another (of many) settlement groups of Europe: The Longobards

The Longobards: Sweden and Norway share their ancestry with the Longobards. They took a large part of Italy in the 500s ACE.
The tribes of Europe, especially the northern tribes, often moved their settlements southward. It is not known whether they, too, are descendants of Magog or of another of Japhet’s sons.
They did, however, genetically mix with what are most likely the tribes of Magog, as they have two distinctly different genetic forefathers, like many other tribes in Europe.


Scythians

Not only did old Irish chronicles connect the Scythians with Magog, but so did the famous Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who lived in the first century. He said that the Scythians were a tribe of Magog. The Scythians were infamous for their behavior, and their history goes back a long way. The Greek historian Herodotus (484 BC) wrote half a millennium earlier: “None who attacks them can escape, and none can catch them if they desire not to be found.” He also revealed something very important about this group: they were nomads who came to the Black Sea during winter and lived elsewhere during the summer. Herodotus famously admitted he knew nothing of Northern Europe at the time, though he did visit the Scythians, whom he did not like.

Herodotus world as he knew it. He traveled to the Scythians.

Herodotus may not be the most celebrated historian, and his report suggests that the “box mentality” of evolutionists today regarding human migration may have distorted their understanding of European history. He wrote: “For when men have no established cities or fortresses, but all are house-bearers and mounted archers, living not by tilling the soil but by cattle-rearing and carrying their dwellings on wagons, how should these not be invincible and unapproachable?”
Hippocrates wrote: “‘The Scyths… have no houses but live in wagons. These are very small with four wheels. Others with six wheels are covered with felt; such wagons are employed like houses, in twos or threes, and provide shelter from rain and wind … The women and children live in these wagons, but the men always remain on horseback.’
There were several different tribes called Scythians, each living separately in what is today Ukraine.
The Irish and other sources describing early Scythians coming to the Black Sea suggest that they arrived there during winter because of the harsh climate of Northern Europe. They were not just nomads; they traveled with the seasons and only lived in the north during summer. Those living in the Near East and the Mediterranean did not have these kinds of needs. Another researcher notes: “The Scandinavian peoples, the Celtic peoples, and the Scythian peoples actually had a common origin, as evidenced by the presence of Kurgan.” (Nicolini Giuseppe, Independent Researcher
Rev.3 February 2022 Acadenia.edu)

The groups emerging in Northern Europe, such as the Ostrogoths, Lombards, Vandals, Heruli, and many others, all share a common trait: they moved between the south and the north. The Lombards (Norwegians) even settled in Northern Italy for an extended period. The Visigoths settled in Spain and established their own empire there between 418 and 711 AD. The Ostrogoths spread through the Balkans and even into Rome, all moving southward and northward. The explanation for this behavior is most likely climate and trade. Observing Magog’s behavior in the common era may also reveal the situation after Babel, which was even more extreme, with glaciers and a much colder climate. They were therefore nomads, traveling with animals and tents, sometimes taking residence in the south before returning north.
The Scythians represented several of these tribes, to the annoyance of many nations, including Greece and Medo-Persia. The steppe people and the farmers were related, as were the hunter-gatherers. The first to leave for Northern Europe did so around 2,500 years before the group mentioned by Sturluson, illustrating how easily the genes of those who mostly stayed south and those who remained in the north could mutate slightly in each direction, while still being descendants of Magog. The Bible’s reference to the coasts and history’s record of Magog moving southward with their bands to Spain, France, and Italy show that Magog spread throughout Europe. And the last great group of Scythians to leave the Black Sea has, as DNA shows, spread throughout Eastern and Central Europe to the Baltic Sea, the area initially given to Magog according to the Book of Jubilee.

So far we see Magog’s sons divided and spread among the following groups: the Celts, the Scandinavians, the Germans, the Franks, the Slavs, the White Croats, the Western Scythians, the Eastern Scythians, the Kievan Rus, the Ostrogoths, the Visigoths, the Vikings, the Vandals, the Lombards, the Svea, and various other Scythian groups, also intermixing with the populations of Spain, Greece, and Italy. All are connected through genetic haplogroups and history. Part of these groups could also be from the tribe of Gomer. Some of Magog’s descendants have remained fairly isolated over time, while others have constantly been on the move between north and south, east and west. Some have permanently settled in the south, and some have remained in the north.

The often-called Phrygian cap became an emblem of freedom during the French Revolution and is also a Scythian cap. The Franks are likely descendants of Magog. During the French Revolution, they returned to their non-Christian origins.
Scythian warrior 4th-2nd BCE wearing a typical Scythian hat.



Is the Scythians Ashkenaz?

Some Jewish writings from the Middle Ages began the trend of identifying the descendants of Germany as Gomer’s son, Ashkenaz, and European Jews still call themselves Ashkenazi after this son. It might sound better than Magog Jews, but is it correct? They thought the Assyrian name Aškuzai/Iškuzai for the Scythians fitted better with Ashkenaz. The Scythians never called themselves the Scythians; the name is thought to refer to their weaponry and was used by ancient historians. They called themselves Skudat, which probably means “archers”. The Persians called them Sakâ, and the Greeks Skythes or Skythai. The Bible, together with history, might contradict the idea that the Scythians are Ashkenaz. The Bible never mentions the Scythians, but it does mention Magog and Ashkenaz on separate occasions. Ashkenaz was part of the “northern alliance” destroying Babylon: “For, lo, I will raise and cause to come up against Babylon an assembly of great nations from the north country: and they shall set themselves in array against her; from thence she shall be taken: their arrows shall be as of a mighty expert man; none shall return in vain” “Set ye up a standard in the land, blow the trumpet among the nations, prepare the nations against her, call together against her the kingdoms of Ararat, Minni, and Ashchenaz; appoint a captain against her; cause the horses to come up as the rough caterpillers. Prepare against her the nations with the kings of the Medes, the captains thereof, and all the rulers thereof, and all the land of his dominion. And the land shall tremble and sorrow: for every purpose of the LORD shall be performed against Babylon, to make the land of Babylon a desolation without an inhabitant (Jer 50:9 & Jer 51:27-29).

Darius crossing the Bosphorus.

This alliance was part of the Medo-Persian conquest of Babylon and its territory. They lived in the north, in what is today Iran, and in Urartu. The reason we know this is likely not the Scythians is that Persian and Greek history tells us the Medes were often in conflict with the Scythians, even at war with them. The Scythians had previously assisted Babylon. Darius the First led a military expedition into parts of European Scythia in 513 BC. Only a few years before Medo-Persia had attacked Babylon with its alliance, defeating the Scythians was part of their military campaigns. The Scythians had

Achaemenid soldiers fighting against what some believe are the Scythians.

invaded Media, revolted against Darius, and sabotaged trade routes in the area. The war against them took place, among other locations, in the territory now called Ukraine and the surrounding areas where they had spread. Herodotus writes about this in his book The Histories. The account tells that Darius went into Eastern Europe specifically to drive the Scythians away. Because they lived as nomads, he said, there were “no cities or fields to burn,” which made the campaign difficult to win.

What we learn from this is that the Scythians are likely not Ashkenaz, as some claim today. Germans are not Ashkenaz; their genetics are the same as the rest of Europe.

Ashkenaz lived somewhere in the Medo-Persian territory and was part of the “northern alliance” that took Babylon. Among the nations in the alliance were the territories of the Azeri, Turkmen, Armenia, the Cimmerians, and even part of what is today Georgia. Among these, modern-day Armenia (which in ancient times also included a large part of Azerbaijan) claims descent from Ashkenaz. The Bible appears to confirm that Ashkenaz was in this territory.

The territory of the Kurds, Armenians, and Azeris still has a large group of descendants of Israel. This fits the Biblical description of where the first Israel was displaced.

It does appear that Ashkenazi Jews have a connection to the areas of northern Iran, Urartu, Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan through the Roman period. It almost seems as though the strongest Jewish gene, or the true Ashkenazi gene, comes from the Ashkenazi Jewish women rather than the men. More genetic testing is needed before drawing any broad conclusions. They are, however, not Germanic.



The tribes of Gomer and Magog are being switched, and the idea that Germany is Ashkenaz is promoted by both Zionists and evangelicals. The Caucasus territory, including modern Armenia and Georgia, has traditions claiming descent from Gomer’s sons Ashkenaz and Togarmah. They are too few to represent all of Gomer’s descendants, but their ancient traditions are worth respecting, just as Magog’s traditions are in Northern Europe. The claims of the Armenians and Georgians also match the Bible verse we just examined, as well as the verse saying Togarmah is in the north. There is no evidence from the Bible that Gomer spread west. According to the Book of Jubilee, he received the land north of the Caucasus. The Armenian historian Yovhannes Drasxanakertc’i (1.15) in his book History of Armenia writes that Ashkenaz was a forefather in the Armenian land. (Gmirkin, Russell (2006). Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus: Hellenistic Histories and the Date of the Pentateuch.) A Jewish philosopher and rabbi named Saadia Gaon suggests it is the Slavic nations.

So, where does the Ashkenazi term come from, which seems to have inspired the entire Jewish and evangelical movement?
Genetics suggests that those who identify as Ashkenazi Jews originated in Italy, Greece, and southern Europe more broadly.
In the Babylonian Talmud, written between 200 CE and 500 CE, the name Gomer is rendered as Germania, which is identified as Germanikia in other rabbinical literature. Germanikia was a land in northwestern Syria (Turkish: Maraş; Armenian: Մարաշ) and Germanicea (Greek: Γερμανίκεια).
The place was once settled by Aram, son of Shem, and never by a Germanic tribe. In the 6th century, the Catholic historian Eusebius thought Ashkenaz was in Scandinavia because the name looked similar.



Make yourself feel at home?

It was not until the Early Medieval period that Jews in Europe started using the term Ashkenazi, mostly because they believed their rabbis’ suggestions, and there was no genetic testing at the time. It appears there was a custom of giving the places where Jews settled in Europe Biblical names to make themselves feel more at home. The names were mostly chosen at random. Spain was called Sefarad (Obadiah 20), France was called Tsarefat (1 Kings 17:9), and Bohemia was called the Land of Canaan. (Miller, Michael (2010). Rabbis and Revolution. Stanford University Press.) Not only did the Babylonian Talmud writers and later rabbis reject Christ, but they called the place where the Reformation would rise the “Land of Canaan.” Between the years 1000 and 1300 CE, they began referring to important Jewish settlements in Germany (Speyer, Worms, Mainz) as Ashkenaz. (Kriwaczek, Paul (2011). Yiddish Civilisation: The Rise and Fall of a Forgotten Nation; Berenbaum, Michael; Skolnik, Fred, eds. (2007). “Ashkenaz.” Encyclopaedia Judaica. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.).

Early Jewish communities arose in Greece and Italy as early as the BCE era. They were further displaced after Rome took Jerusalem in 63 BCE, when thousands of Jews were taken as war prisoners. There was also unrest that displaced them in 37 BCE and after the Jewish revolt in 53 BCE. Then, Christian Jews fled during the Jewish-Christian persecution. Finally, the larger group was displaced around the time Rome destroyed Jerusalem. For over two millennia, Jews have intermarried with local populations in the places where they settled, as reflected in their genetic makeup.

Conclusion: There is currently no evidence that Europe, and especially Germany, is Ashkenaz. There is evidence that Ashkenazi Jews do not seem to have any relation to the tribe of Ashkenaz, unless it is through their Armenian/Azeri connection rather than their Roman or German connection. Calling themselves Ashkenazi Jews is mostly an idea from the Middle Ages.
According to the Icelandic historian Snorre, a group from the Caucasus region came to Scandinavia during the Roman conquest of the Near East; however, he does not say they were Scythians or Ashkenazi. When they arrived, Scandinavia was said to already be populated. At best, Ashkenazi people could have immigrated to another territory, thereby giving rise to the rumors. Genetic research shows a close connection among the Northern European tribes, so more research from a Biblical perspective would be needed to determine whether Ashkenaz went to Scandinavia.



Answer in Genesistheory

The creationist foundation ‘Answers in Genesis’ is currently promoting the idea that Ashkenaz and Gomer populated most of Western Europe. One of their sources is a book from 1732 by someone very well known to all Freemasons, the Scottish reverend James Anderson, D.D., who, in the early lodge era of Freemasonry, compiled the celebrated Book of Constitutions. (https://www.universalfreemasonry.org/en/encyclopedia/anderson-james). In his book ‘Royal Genealogies; or, the Genealogical Tables of Emperors, Kings, and Princes, from Adam to these times,’ he claims to record a list of German kings going all the way back to Ashkenaz. (https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_royal-genealogies-or-t_anderson-james_1732/page/n545/mode/2up)
German founder Tuisco, myth, legend, or a real man? No ancient sources connect him with either Magog or Gomer.
He was said to have ruled in Germany for 176 years.


He, in turn, drew his history from Johannes Aventinus (1477–1534), who, despite living through the German Reformation and befriending reformers, remained Catholic his whole life. He was asked to write the history of Bavaria and is said to have gathered several sources for his work, yet no trace of these sources remains today, aside from his own book. He claims to have a record of the first ruler of Germany, called Tuitsch (son of the sky), who is the same figure James Anderson D.D. claims is Ashkenaz. So, although these are historical sources, there is no evidence beyond Anderson’s speculation. His ideas are repeated to this day by evangelicals and Jews.

Anderson’s writings came not long after the Book of Jasher also surfaced, and most followed the same understanding of Gomer taking Western Europe. However, among all ancient writings, most that tie Gomer to Western Europe are from the Middle Ages. The oldest book found, the Book of Jubilees, says that Magog came to northern Europe, while Gomer lived east of him. In the end, both tribes could have been mixed in that part of the land. As long as the Bible speaks not just of Magog but of the land of Gog, it references Europe either way. And when the Bible says “Gog, the land of Magog,” it means the tribe of Magog is the dominant or leading presence in that land.
Why this switching of places was done by Catholics and early Scottish Freemasons is better left to those interested in conspiracies.

 


Ezekiel and Magog

We are first introduced to bands of Magog in Ezekiel, around the same time as God’s prophetic judgment upon many nations. Most of them are known and identifiable. The mention of Israel’s enemies as Magog appears new in the context of Judah’s situation at the time. For a long time, Israel had fought against the Assyrians, the Midianites, and the Moabites, among others. They were all known enemies. Now it speaks of Magog coming up against Jerusalem.

The Scythians around the Black Sea were the ones best known in the Levant and Near East. They are easily recognized by their “gnom” or “Santa” hat, a common mythological attire in Northern Europe.


The many tribes and fighters attacking Israel in Ezekiel’s day are known. One power we know was involved appears at first glance not to be mentioned. What do other historical sources tell us that can identify a possible aggression from Magog in the time of Ezekiel, one that would make a future judgment announced to Ezekiel relevant? Ezekiel had been taken captive by Babylon, had witnessed gruesome war, and did not need to be told of another unrelated war in the distant future. This is why we need to see the connection between the future war of Magog and how the judgment over them will comfort God’s people in their day. Babylon is not Magog, because it is mentioned by name in Ezekiel (it was mostly a Semitic Chaldean people).

To better understand, we need to go back in time. Between about 626 and 607 BCE, Assyria was conquered. The Scythians were, for a while, allied with the Assyrians. However, the Scythians switched sides, supporting Cyaxares and the Medes in the war against Assyria, and later helped Babylon. In 610, the battle of Harran; in 612, the battle of Nineveh; and in 614, the battle against Assur. In all these battles, the Scythian kingdom of the Black Sea supported the Medo-Babylonian army. (Loehr, Max (1955). “The Stag Image in Scythia and the Far East”, Sulimirski, T. (1954). “Scythian Antiquities in Western Asia”, Jacobson, Esther (1995). The Art of the Scythians: The Interpenetration of Cultures at the Edge of the Hellenic World.) They were also in for the Battle of Carchemish in 605 BC. They then favored the Neo-Babylonian empire. They helped Babylon annex Judah in 557 BC (Dugaw, Lipschits & Stiebel 2020, p. 81). Jerusalem fell in 587 BC. If they helped with this, it is unknown, but it is likely the Scythians were in the Babylonian army then as well. They supported many of the other battles in Babylonia. But could the Scythians, aiding Babylon and famous for their barbaric fighting, be classified as one of the nations rising up against God’s people in Ezekiel’s days? Absolutely. Then why were they not mentioned if they were part of the Babylonian alliance? Likely, they were; only God used the name of their forefather, Magog, rather than some name they had given themselves. God’s eyes look to their origins and to what they will do in the future; hence, the prophecy of God judging them. In Ezekiel, we see God almost exclusively using the names of the forefathers of all the nations and bands, rather than what they called themselves. It is also plausible that Judah called them Magog at the time. Remember, all others have already received some judgment, but Magog’s judgment is yet to come. Why was he not judged instantly? In a way, they were, as they were later attacked by the Medes, but it could also be because their crimes had only just begun. Magog is prophesied to return to God’s land before their final judgment.

 

Conclusion: The Scythians (the Magogs) were in alliances with the Medo-Babylonian and Neo-Babylonian conquests, but were later in conflict with the Medes and not part of their northern alliance when this alliance conquered Babylon around 539 BCE. The Scythians had been seen as a problem and the Urartu and Azkenazi became part of the “Northern Alliance” with the Medes and Persians against Babylon.


So Who Is Magog Today?

Updated map if the book of Jubilee got it right, along with old historical records. The placement of Togarmah is based on their claim to be from Togarmah in the Caucasus, and the Bible says they live in the North Quarters.


Based on everything we have looked at, the tribes of Magog appear to be mostly in Europe, especially western and northern Europe, with France, Germany, and England as the largest nations. And spread to Italy, Spain, Portugal, and smaller countries in Europe as well.


The Paternal I gene (ydna) and Paternal R gene (ydna)
According to studies so far, it is assumed that the paternal I gene, which was present among early Europeans, and the R gene came from two different brothers of Noah. Because of this, some creationist genealogists think the I gene belongs to the first Europeans (Japhet) and the R gene belongs to Shem’s tribe, which came from the East.
Here, the Bible prophecy regarding the sons of Noah becomes extremely relevant. “And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem, and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem, and Canaan shall be his servant” (Gen 9:26-27). It is Japhet who would be “enlarged” and even dwell in the area given to Shem, not Shem in Japhet’s “tents.” Noah’s prophecy was fulfilled, and a large part of Japhet dwelled in Shem’s “tent” or land from the beginning until this day, just as the Book of Jubilee also claimed. Thus, we should find genetic traces of them among Elam, Asshur, Aram, and Arphaxad, which we do and which confuses some genealogists. We also find proto-European among the eastern languages of Iran and India.
The most important thing is not to draw a conclusion that goes against the Bible or other historical sources. The idea presented by some creationist genealogists is that war, famine, and immigration wiped out most of Japhet in Europe. However, the Bible tells us of a large Magog in the end days who will provoke God. Noah speaks of Japhet being “enlarged,” and nowhere does it say anything about Shem taking over Japhet’s land. We will examine why switching genes is contrary to scripture and history.


MAGOG – WORLD BULLIES OR PEACEMAKERS?


God speaks little more of Magog in the Old Testament. Since Babylon took Judah, Magog has remained present. Japhet’s sons continued their struggle against God and His land. The Medes were descendants of Japheth’s son Medai and were part of the Medo-Persian empire that conquered Judah. The Greek empire, according to the Bible, is Japhet’s son Javan (the name Javan is used in the Bible for this empire). Bible prophecy then shows a horn coming from the West, which is also Japhet, this time from Rome and Western Europe. The alliance of Mesech, Tubal, and Magog came from the West. Then the ten horns or toes again represent tribes of Magog. They are also the United States of America, which is in large part a British, Irish, French, Scandinavian, and Spanish colony. The power of these European horns will continue until Christ’s second coming, when He will put an end to the “time of the heathens.” Will Magog conquer the land of Israel, or has it already been conquered?

What we can say for sure is that both Magog and Gomer are present in Europe, and that Europe itself is the land of Gog.

 

World bullies: Magog, Mesech, and Tubal managed to conquer the world, first through colonization, then by withdrawing and continuing control through warfare, cultural influence, technology, and trade. The picture shows areas that were colonized by European tribes. American culture, which originates from European tribes, is the largest cultural export.
Ten kings or tribes of Europe will rule when Christ returns. In Daniel 2, the “rock” that strikes the statue destroys these ten kingdoms. This shows that Christ’s kingship is directed at these kings. This fits with the Gog and Magog battle, which is also Christ against multiple tribes.
Christ aims at the ten toes when He returns. When Western Rome fell, the empire was divided among ten tribes.
1.Ostrogoths, 2. Franks, 3.Suevi, 4.Angelo-Saxson, 5.Lombards, 6.Visigoths, 7.Vandals, 8.Alamanni (or the Huns, some would argue), 9.Heruli, 10.Burgundians

CONTINUE READING THE NEXT CHAPTER: GOG AND MAGOG PART FOUR

GOG AND MAGOG – Part 2

0

Human development after the flood – and its relevance today.

See all the parts to find out who Gog and Magog are:
Part 1: Why is God targeting the sons of Japhet?
Part 2:Human development after the flood – and its relevance today.
Part 3: When The World Was DividedIdentifying Magog!
Part 4: Magog – The provoker in the end times

The Bible tells us that God himself caused the descendants of Noah to spread into their appointed lands. This ultimately meant that those who traveled the furthest lived more primitively for a longer period. Their genetic haplogroups likely developed faster due to interbreeding, and a reduced quality of life led to shorter lifespans, which in turn meant women had children earlier in life. Meanwhile, nations close to each other, such as Assyria and Egypt, developed more quickly because they were larger and could learn from each other’s innovations. They also had a bigger gene pool to draw from among the largest populations. Although God wanted them to move to their lands, some did not do so immediately. God then used environmental shifts to push people further into their territories, and at times, even war and famine. The Sahara Desert is one example of how desertification has pushed people southward. The eastern Sahara was once a fertile plain, and remains of settlements have been found, showing the area was green, with large animal farms and cattle. But when the sand pushed eastward and the climate changed, these groups were forced to move southward. After the ice melted in the north, those areas became populated as well. Saudi Arabia was once a fertile land with large rivers running through it.

The ancient river systems of Saudi Arabia made it a fruitful land. Image from /www.researchgate.net

Although some always stay behind, the search for a better life elsewhere has always motivated people to migrate. People discovered living farther from ancient metropolitan territories often appear more primitive, with more genetic mutations, and are therefore mistakenly thought to represent older populations. Population density determined advancement more than the time period during which they lived. Evolutionists use, among other things, tool development to place human groups in different periods. This method of estimation is highly unreliable.

The “Stone Age” is simply mankind having to start over from scratch. They developed quickly because they were just as intelligent as we are today.

The First Semi-“Gods
The first people after the flood were able to learn for several hundred years from the very men who built the complex structure of Noah’s ark. The survivors of the flood were craftsmen working with wood and iron, skilled in architecture and mathematics, among other abilities. Noah and his sons and daughters-in-law also knew how to calculate time, as the Bible tells us that Noah used a calendar to carefully record events. They lived for approximately four hundred years after the flood and would have had ample time to pass these skills on to their children. Their greatest expertise appears to have been working with wood, and such constructions would be difficult to find remains of after fire, war, and many years of abandonment. Usually, all that remains today of ancient settlements are the foundation stones.

Osiris could very well refer to either Ham or his son, Mizraim. The Bible tells us it was Ham’s son who inhabited the area. “Epithets of Osiris label him in a variety of ways. These include Osiris the Long-Lived, Osiris the Weary-Hearted, Osiris the Drowned One, and He-who-is-in-the-box”. He was said to have been killed by his brother “Seth”, a name meaning ‘powerful’ or ‘mighty’. Osiris is the god of fertility, agriculture, the afterlife, the dead, resurrection, life, and vegetation in ancient Egyptian religion. It would have been Ham and his close descendants who taught his children how to do all these things. He survived the flood by boat, a symbol of a “new beginning” and of cheating death. This may have evolved into a mythological cult in Egypt.
The Neshmet bark was a vessel belonging to the god Nun (Noah). The ancient Egyptian deity Osiris was transported in it along the River Nile during the Osiris festival at Abydos. In Egypt, it was believed that the dead would be judged by the gods and, if found worthy, carried by boat to the netherworld with the help of “their forefather/god”.

According to the Bible, the first four generations after Noah lived for several hundred years and even outlived their children and grandchildren. Given that the forefathers possessed what appeared to be supernatural genetics and a high intelligence from “another time and civilization”, many of them were regarded as semi-gods or “sons of the gods”. They were also taller. The conflicts at the Tower of Babel involved these long-lived groups of people, giving rise to legends of semi-gods in battle. The founding fathers of the tribes were considered gods by their descendants long after their deaths. This pattern has continued, and even the Catholic Church has repeated it by making “saints” of martyrs and miracle workers. Tribes all over the world have a history of praying to their dead ancestors.
Just as the history of the last 2,000 years is commonly written by the victors of wars, the conflicts around the time of Babel would have been perceived differently by each tribe. Humans tend to always cast the others as the bad guys. Over time, mythology and embellishment have been layered onto the ancient stories. Most ancient groups include the flood story, semi-gods in conflict, and the scattering as part of their traditions, though each explains them very differently. In ancient times, as among many religions today, claiming that God is working through a leader grants that leader authority. Myths and stories of God working through these leaders were therefore important parts of historical tradition, and are the reason why so many scholars now dismiss their historical records along with the Bible stories involving miracles.

The first settlers in Europe were few, had little innovation, and lived mostly by hunting. As the population grew and trade began between groups, the genetic mixture became greater once more.

Evolutionists place the different groups of hunters and gatherers and agricultural peoples thousands of years apart. This is not the case. Right after Babel, some groups lived more primitively until they could establish a better way of life. After Babel, everyone had to start over in new places, though this time, language barriers slowed parts of the process. When we look at the world language tree, we see how God confused the languages among the sons of Noah, separating the three tribes.
The Tower of Babel was a skillful and wondrous construction, but it was intended to control the world. By confusing the languages and scattering the groups, God slowed down an early attempt at world dominion. This first attempt is only one of many, reaching its climax with the Gog and Magog War. However, stopping the plans of the men behind Babel, while protecting mankind, also came with consequences.
The first settlers moved from place to place in search of the best conditions to settle. Some groups were semi-nomadic at first, particularly the tribes of Japheth. Their temporary settlements were therefore more primitive in appearance than the places where they eventually chose to put down roots. This had nothing to do with intelligence. They were no less intelligent than the generations that followed. They simply had to start from scratch, rebuilding all knowledge and innovation after the Tower of Babel. As we will explore, certain tribes of Japheth faced particular challenges that others did not. For the most part, the descendants of Noah quickly excelled, and population growth was the primary driver of rapid development, not intelligence. One family cannot build a city, but a hundred can build a small village, and a thousand can build a small town.

Birth rate as warfare

The level of conflict after Babel created an atmosphere of competition for superiority and even survival. Whoever grew the largest first was least likely to become a servant or slave to others. Now that they were no longer one people in one city but scattered across the land, everyone understood that the family that could gain the most descendants the fastest would hold the upper hand in all respects. If a group was not numerous enough, it could not defend itself against another. The more children were born, the more a family could ensure its own safety, as well as its ability to impose its culture and way of thinking on others rather than having another group’s thinking imposed upon them. Greater numbers also meant more innovation and better living conditions. It therefore became common opinion that women without a husband should marry a man who already had a wife, so that she could help grow the tribe as quickly as possible. Women themselves wanted to secure their safety and way of life and took part in the birth rate competition. Having sons was also a woman’s “pension”, and so women desired children, even if it meant sharing a husband. Because of conflicts and tribal wars, there were often more women than men. And so came to pass what God had predicted would be the curse for women in a world of sin: “In sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee” (Gen. 3:16). After living this way for some time, women’s rights became less important, and those who did not produce children were rejected. To ensure rapid growth, rejected men and women often became servants in other tribes, and many were taken into plunder and war, made to bear children, or forced to help the conquering group grow.

Abraham did not at first take part in the birth rate competition but remained faithful to his barren wife until her faith faltered, and she asked him to fulfill God’s promise through her maid. God used Abraham as an example of faith, to show that He would guard over man and that survival would not be a matter of chance.

Abraham was born during this era and had married his half-sister, yet he wanted to remain faithful to her and treat her well. When she did not produce any children, and all other tribes grew rapidly, it seemed far-fetched that Abraham would be able to reclaim his inheritance in Canaan or become numerous enough to have any influence in the world. Despite the culture of those days, he remained faithful to his wife. God had said that his descendants would be numerous, would take the land he had promised, and would make an impact on the world. This promise seemed unlikely to most at the time. The population mathematics were not in Abraham’s favor. Abraham was not viewed as a threat even by the descendants of Canaan, and he lived in the land in peace, especially since he had only one wife, and both of them were old and had no children. His tribe appeared to be dying out. Despite all the evident circumstances speaking against God’s promise, Abraham chose to believe. Unfortunately, a moment of doubt on the part of his elderly wife led Abraham to follow the customs of other tribes and use a handmaiden to give him a son. God would not fulfill his promise through this act of disbelief, and instead gave him the promised son through his true wife at God’s appointed time. Population growth in mixed cultures has been a source of conflict throughout history. It is why the Pharaoh in Egypt killed the babies of the Israelites, and it is why many Western countries today feel outnumbered by immigrants due to their own comparatively low birth rates. It continues to give rise to racism. When the world’s population was still small and scattered in small groups, this fear diminished their faith in God’s protection, and growing numbers were, in part, an act of self-preservation. Tribes were also more vulnerable to dying out when the world population was low, and some did.
Having children was therefore the greatest blessing and most pressing need in the first centuries after Noah.

Ham’s descendants first won the birth rate war.
The Bible tells us the tribes of Ham grew quickly. His descendants were leaders in the construction of the Tower of Babel, and his son founded the first cities in Shinar. Later, in Egypt, they had the population density and the skills to build great structures, including advanced pyramids. In more distant lands with low populations, they still left their dead in natural caves and graves. The tombs in Egypt required many men of great skill. When Egypt was at its peak, the most talented people were working there, advancing rapidly in science and research. By establishing schools, they were able to distribute knowledge and continue advancing at pace. Everyone of significance went there in those early days. Even Abraham sought refuge in Egypt during a famine in Canaan, as Egypt was better equipped to handle such hardships. Famine also brings out the worst in people, and Egypt may have been a more orderly place to be at the time.
This should be fairly easy to understand. The same is true today as it was then: we have advanced metropolitan areas alongside small, isolated populations living very differently from the rest of the world. Some are still far behind in innovation.
One extreme example is the Sentinelese people, who have been isolated from the rest of the world and live on an island west of India, not to mention isolated tribes in South America. Even clusters of villages in Asia can live very differently from communities outside major cities.

 

If archaeologists were to dig up remains from our own era, they would place these human groups in entirely different time periods. One would be classified as “Stone Age,” and the other as the 21st century. Yet this is the pseudoscience created to undermine Scripture. The picture shows modern Sentinelese people.

The “Cavemen”
“Cavemen” were not an early species of mankind. The Bible tells us that in ancient times, people who had contagious diseases often lived in isolation, as did the mentally ill, those with genetic disorders, and those who, for various reasons, struggled to be part of, or were rejected by, their society. As early as the time of Abraham, we see Lot using a cave as a temporary residence after losing his home in Sodom. Obadiah used one to hide persecuted men (Mar. 5:5; Luk. 17:12, Gen. 19:30, 1 Ki. 18:13). David and his men lived in a cave as fugitives (1 Samuel 22:1). Elijah used a cave as temporary shelter while on a journey: “And he came thither unto a cave, and lodged there” (1 Ki. 19:9). Most often, caves were used to bury the dead (Genesis 23:17). When researchers today discover remains in caves, they defy all historical records and logic by creating the fanciful notion that this was simply how people lived in those days. Observable facts, however, show there are many reasons why traces of people dwelling in caves would be found. And yes, some would show signs of illness and malnutrition, just as we find in wealthy societies today, where the sick, the mentally ill, or simply the poor are found living on the streets, in tents, and even under bridges or in underground spaces. Examining these people’s health and living conditions tells us nothing about how life was for everyone in our era. Likewise, just as Lot temporarily lived in a cave after his home was destroyed, many of the first people who dispersed after Babel were forced to live simply in the early stages of their settlement. Most did not remain in those circumstances for long.

The first Europeans
Some smaller tribes that arrived in Europe may have died out due to the harsh climate and the struggle to start anew with limited resources. Among them may be the so-called Neanderthals, who were simply ordinary people. We know they were likely from the tribes of Japheth, as Europeans are genetically related to them, and Africans have no direct genetic connection. This means that the “Neanderthals” never came “out of Africa” or traveled there; rather, they shared ancestry with those who did. They did not look much different from us; the primitive appearance is the result of artists applying evolutionary assumptions when drawing them.

Remains of Neanderthals are largely found in Europe, with some in Asia. Researchers claim the female genetic line has died out, but cannot say the same about the paternal line. Europeans and some Asians share the same genetic ancestry as Neanderthals, making them their closest living relatives.

them.

Neanderthals are often depicted as savage, dirty, and unintelligent. This is because modern evolutionists want to sell the idea of human evolution. They really were just people.

Why are their skulls slightly different? Observable science today shows slight variations in people’s skulls and bone structure, as well as differences between racial groups. This means that if you were to dig up a skull from our century, you could likely determine whether the person was typically Asian, African, or Caucasian. (https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/forensic-facial-reconstruction/0/steps/25658)
This was also the case in the past. An inbred group could have a subtly distinct skull shape compared to other groups. This does not mean they were part of an evolutionary process from ape to man, nor can such a claim be made by examining the skulls of people living today. No one is “closer to ape” than another based on skull shape alone. The human skull also changes form from infancy to old age. The first generations after the flood lived far longer than the generations that followed, and their skulls at the time of death may reflect that, though we have nothing to compare them with today, as the oldest people in our time only reach around a hundred years of age. Skull differences can also be observed in various genetic conditions, such as Down syndrome. Those individuals are not closer to “apes” either; it is simply a matter of genetics.
(https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Morphometrical-characteristics-of-Down-syndrome-DS-skull-and-brain-A-lateral-views-of_fig1_26653803)
There are many observable, scientifically grounded reasons why a skull can be slightly different, beyond what the theory of evolution explains. In the case of someone with Down syndrome, for instance, their mother has a normal skull. The theory of evolution is the most racist and disrespectful approach to human origins ever constructed. Real, observable science shows that variations and changes occur within the human race, not a development from one species to another. The longer a tribe is isolated, the more distinct its features become, and the moment it begins having children with other cultures and groups, those distinct differences begin to even out again. Human traits can therefore come and go. We see this not only in humans but also in animals. Modern dog breeding is a good example of how excessive inbreeding causes a dog’s genetic traits to move in one direction. Once a female poodle is mated with a male Labrador, the offspring will have greater genetic variation to pass on to the next generation. These relate to genetic traits. Genealogy is more complex, as you can only inherit your haplogroups from your immediate parents. A man can inherit genetic traits from his grandmother, for instance, but he cannot inherit her mitochondrial DNA haplogroup. That can only come from one’s immediate mother.

Some cultures deliberately changed skull shapes. Source:
https://www.britannica.com/science/head-flattening

Genealogy shows that the “hunter and gatherer” group is less genetically diverse than the “agricultural” group that later lived in the same area, yet they are still related. This has to do with mutations. One example is a study conducted in Iceland. Both Norwegians and Icelandic people share the same forefathers. But when analyzing ancient remains in Iceland, it appeared that Norwegians were more closely related to those ancestors than the Icelanders living today. This is caused by more frequent mutations in Iceland than in Norway, giving the illusion that Norwegians are more recent relatives than they actually are. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613751/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR0_6rTN0HpNxaK2Iyz_VDp5DD-Fw2h-0PTjsGUDxJAidd1Yl2S_s35c1Zo_aem_JbDwd-U6D6730yizeeWyRA)
Such may well be the case with the first Europeans, too. The genetic distance between the first settlers and those who arrived many years later would give the illusion that they were more distant relatives than they actually were. The “hunter-gatherers” were isolated from the others and interbred among themselves, while their genetic cousins interbred with each other elsewhere, until the groups eventually united again.
We must also understand that, biblically speaking, all the first tribes were more closely related to each other than any of their distant descendants are today.
For example, the son of Japheth and the son of Shem were cousins, meaning they were genetically closer to each other than any descendant of Japheth living today is to Japheth himself. Such was the case with many ancient groups: they were all family, all distant cousins.
If you take a genetic test today, it will still struggle to determine whether you are a distant cousin or simply many generations removed within the same family. Half-siblings in the family tree complicate matters further. This is because genetics relies on similarities to determine family relations. Such was the case with the first descendants of Noah’s sons. Some cousins appeared more closely related because of similar mutations inherited from the same paternal haplogroup.

From a biblical perspective, as mentioned, the first groups were forced to live more primitively, and nomadic peoples had less innovation and fewer permanent constructions. However, innovation grew quickly, especially in the Near East, where ships and trade routes were established. Over just 500 to 1,000 years, human development changed rapidly. It peaked during the early years of Babel, then suffered a setback, before slowly rising again a few hundred years later. Around this time, the remaining tribes followed the others westward and intermingled with them. The last groups arrived as late as around 0 to 500 AD. Pioneer groups would always progress first and then inspire the broader family to follow, once good places to settle and land suitable for agriculture were found.
The USA is a great example of how growing prosperity attracted others to follow. In the US, as well as in ancient European history, the first pioneers who made their way were from Europe, as were the large groups that followed.

The world’s tallest man meets the world’s shortest woman. Although people with syndromes struggle, healthy tribes worldwide exhibit distinct differences in height as well.

At first, the idea of America seemed wild and uncivilized to a highly developed European society. It was considered risky, and many were uncertain about the possibilities of cultivating the soil and what could or could not be grown there. But after some years, as American innovation and the economy grew rapidly, it became the place everyone wanted to go. Human behavior does not change (Ecc. 3:15). The groups going to the US followed one another in fairly close succession. If, however, a full 1,000 years of isolation were to separate two European groups, it would show in their genetics and appearance. The smaller the group that interbred, the more distinct their racial traits would become, and they might even look different from the next group of immigrants from the same regions.
This is what happened after Babel. The first Europeans settled as close to the Near East as the territory appointed to them allowed, and pioneers among them set out in smaller numbers to find the best places within their given land. Some suffered, some flourished, and some families died out on either the paternal or maternal side. As innovation grew, the rest followed suit. Intelligence levels among people vary today as they always have. Not everyone in Einstein’s time was as brilliant as he was. Equally, highly intelligent people lived before him, and less intelligent people have lived after him. This is the observable reality of human intelligence and development. Today, people are at different stages, just as they always were. The same is true of appearances. Skin colors range from near white to deep bluish-black. Some Asian cultures are more petite than those of Northern Europeans. Appearance should not be used to place people in different historical periods. Some people are very hairy, while others have little body hair. Today, the world’s tallest and shortest tribes live fairly close to one another in Africa.

What evolutionists call the “Stone Age” is, at best, a faulty assumption. If the world as we know it were to become dystopian after a global nuclear war or a meteorite impact that flooded the earth, you too would have to restart life with whatever you had. Even if you are skilled with computers today, that does not mean you could instantly create another computer if everything were destroyed. You would need time and resources to locate every component that, in our time, is easily accessible through trade, all of which would have to be rediscovered. Trade routes would need to be rebuilt once resources were found. You might even be dependent on other people’s skills to attempt to reinvent what was lost, even if you knew what materials were needed and somehow obtained them. It would take time to recover what had been lost.
Such was the situation for the people after the flood and after the Tower of Babel. They had nothing left of the pre-flood technology to work with and struggled to communicate with one another. The nomads began building shelters from fabric, stones, and wood. On the journey, a cave served as shelter, and the easiest food they could access became their diet. They constantly worked to improve their way of life. Those who traveled in search of better places lived more primitively due to their constant movement. Traveling light, they made temporary tools that could be left behind, simple implements designed to provide food and basic shelter. Those who stayed in one place for longer periods developed more advanced tools. At the same time, cities with far greater innovation already existed elsewhere. Progress depended on how and where people lived and how many of them there were. The early Europeans, in particular, were far removed from the more densely populated Near East.

The “oldest” mummy found in Europe has been named Ötzi the Iceman. Because he was preserved so well, they could analyze his remains and determine what his last meal was. “He seems to have had a remarkably high proportion of fat in his diet, supplemented with fresh or dried wild meat, cereals, and traces of toxic bracken”. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065529/) This is not the meal of a savage; it’s a nutritious meal, involving grain, which comes from farming.

Evolutionists divide the migrations into Europe as “the hunter-gatherers”, “the farmers”, and then “the Steppe pastoralists”.  The Bible teaches us that farming began immediately after the flood: “And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard” (Gen. 9:20). We therefore know that everyone was taught farming from the very beginning.

And why is all of this important when studying the Gog and Magog War? Many do not understand who Magog is because evolutionists have distorted the history of certain groups, failing to understand where they came from or how they lived.

CONTINUE READING PART 3: WHEN THE WORLD WAS DIVIDED – WHERE DID MAGOG GO? ————————–>

THE GOG AND MAGOG BATTLE – Part 1

0

– Genealogy after The Flood and the Judging of the Nations –

See all the parts to find out who Gog and Magog are:
Part 1: Why is God targeting the sons of Japhet?
Part 2:Human development after the flood – and its relevance today.
Part 3: When The World Was DividedIdentifying Magog!
Part 4: Magog – The provoker in the end times

Evolutionary theory has created many false premises for understanding nature, populations, and our origins. With every new discovery, proponents force new findings into their pre-established framework. This creates a form of pseudo-science: taking evidence and drawing conclusions that the evidence simply does not support. One such example is the discovery of genealogy in our DNA. It quickly became evident that all humans alive today, everywhere on Earth, are connected by a small group of common ancestors, a fact that cannot be disputed. Then, to make it fit into evolutionary theories, they produce estimates of the timeline of genetic mutations that are not based on science but are designed to support an already existing theory of human origin.

Evolutionists interpret evidence pointing to all humans descending from a small group of ancestors who emerged from Africa, claiming that each of the many genealogical mutations took thousands of years. It has become a trend among scientists to reject any historical records of human origin on the grounds that ancient people were “religious.” When something confirms the Biblical records, they dismiss it as fiction. In this way, they freely reconstruct human history contrary to what people of the past said about their own origins. Today, we claim to know them better than they knew themselves. Finding Noah and his sons in the genealogy is not impossible, and the Bible, along with other early manuscripts, explains at least in part how they spread. We are going to honor the history in the Bible and the ancient legends to discover the truth about Magog.
Some Bible researchers confuse the tribes in an eager attempt to counter evolutionary population theory. This need not be a major issue unless we wish to better understand why God is displeased with the tribes of Japhet.


Why is God targeting the sons of Japhet in the Gog and Magog war?

It is not just evolutionists versus creationists who confuse this topic. It is also a spiritual battle between true prophets and false prophets. Among Christians are Satan’s workers, deceivers, and those who have been deceived, all trying to point to the wrong group and the wrong time for the Gog and Magog war. (2 Cor. 11:13) They too, like evolutionists, use the DNA genealogy tree to make it fit their beliefs. That is why, when studying this matter, we need not only knowledge of mitochondrial and paternal DNA, but also historical records and the Bible. The three together will reveal the truth.

Once false prophecies regarding a new Israel were established, a need arose to redefine who Gog and Magog were. This was true not just for Christians but also for Zionist Jews. It is therefore important to address this deception.

God names the forefathers of the groups in the Gog and Magog battle, so we must examine genealogy more closely to expose false prophecy.

The battle of Gog and Magog is God judging the nations that have come up against His people and His land. There are three things we need to do to get this right:

1. Understand the time of this battle
2. Understand who Gog and Magog are
3. Understand who and what they are attacking.


Investigating the beginnings of Gog and Magog

God points to the descendants of Japhet as the main culprits in this conflict:
“Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him, And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal” (Eze 38:2-4)

First, we need to note that Gog is the land of Magog, an interpretation also confirmed by the Book of Jubilees: “to the whole region of Gog” (Jubilees 8). This reveals several important things. Magog is still in the land of Gog, and if we find one, we find the other. Gog is the leader in the Magog war, representing both the land and its leaders.

Genesis 10 tells us who these three men are, and they are the very sons of Japhet, the son of Noah:
“The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras” (Gen 10:2 -3).

The book of Ezekiel continues prophesying about the Gog and Magog battle:
“And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws, and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords: Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet: Gomer, and all his bands; the house of Togarmah of the north quarters, and all his bands: and many people with thee” (Eze 38:4-6)

Here we see that Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya will be judged at the same time. The Bible explains to us why. It is important to note that they are not wearing the same armor or military garments, and so they are not different provinces of one empire. We will also see in those verses that God puts the spotlight on Japheth’s son Gomer and his son Togarmah.

The Bible reveals the ancestry of Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya:
Let’s start with the obvious nations.
Ethiopia/Kush: The Bible does not actually say Ethiopia; it is simply the English translation of the word Kush, not to be confused with the modern country of Ethiopia. They first settled in what we know today as Sudan, then spread southward and to the southwest. The original manuscripts of the Old Testament use only the name “Kush.” Kush is the son of Ham, Noah’s third son, and was also the father of Nimrod. Although Nimrod established his empire in northern Mesopotamia, after the people scattered, his father’s tribe moved south.
The Bible tells us that Kush lived in what we today call Africa, south of Egypt.
Libya is also descended from Ham and originally settled in North Africa. The Libyans are thought to be the descendants of Ham’s son Phut or Mizraim, according to the Jewish historian Josephus:

Jewish historian Josephus

“Phut also was the founder of Libya, and called the inhabitants Phutites (Phoutes), from himself: there is also a river in the country of Moors which bears that name; whence it is that we may see the greatest part of the Grecian historiographers mention that river and the adjoining country by the appellation of Phut (Phoute): but the name it has now has been by change given it from one of the sons of Mezraim [Mizraim], who was called Lybyos.” —Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, book 1:6/2

Bear in mind that North Africa, including Egypt and Libya, has been conquered several times, and a large part of the population is now Arab, with many indigenous people having converted to Islam or moved southward. Genetically, we find both Arabs and the original descendants of Phut/Mizraim.

Mizraim is known to be Egypt; it is still called Misr in Arabic. The original Biblical text calls it Mitsrayim, and it was translators who rendered it as “Egypt” after the Greeks named it Aegyptos. That is not what the Bible originally calls it; it is simply how translators have chosen to render it. The Bible calls it Mitsrayim, revealing that this was Ham’s son’s territory.
So when the translation writes “Abraham went to Egypt,” it means Abraham went to Mitsrayim. The Bible therefore places most of Ham’s sons in Africa. Regarding Persia, the Bible tells us its capital is Susa, which was named after one of Shem’s sons, Elam. The Bible also tells us that Shem’s great-grandchildren by another son went eastward as well: “And their dwelling was from Mesha, as thou goest unto Sephar a mount of the east.” (Gen. 10:30)

As we will investigate further, the Bible reveals that the descendants of Japhet went west and north. This shows that each of Noah’s sons was assigned a wind direction, with Japhet’s children receiving two. Japhet is the king of the West and North, Shem is the king of the East, and Ham is the king of the South. Some things did change over time.

Media, located in what is now northern Iran, is descended from Japhet’s son Madai. Later in this article, we will find out why he stayed with the tribes of Shem and why this is relevant to Gog and Magog.

Israel, the Six-Day War.

Many believe that the wars in modern Israel directed at Israeli Jews are somehow related to the Gog and Magog war, or will eventually lead to it. However, according to evangelical views, no “Magog” has been present in these conflicts so far.

In the Six-Day War, it was Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria that attacked modern Israel. Genealogy confirms that these nations are closely related to Jews and are most likely Arabs, with some even being descendants of ancient converted Israelites and Samaritans. The main powers in the wars in the Middle East are mostly from the tribe of Shem mixed with the tribe of Ham. It is modern Israeli Jews fighting the ancient tribes of Israel who converted to Islam, as well as other descendants of Abraham. At its core, it is a Semitic conflict.

  • In Egypt, the descendants of Ham have also mixed with Semites following early Arab invasions. Still, the country retains its original Egyptian roots.
  • In Jordan, we find descendants of Ammon and Semites, including those from the lines of Israel and Ishmael.
  • In Lebanon, we find descendants of the ancient Canaanites and Semites, including those from ancient Israel and some of Shem’s other sons.
  • In Syria, we find descendants of the Assyrians and other Semitic peoples.

    As we can see, these are not the main provocateurs God describes in the Gog and Magog war.
By killing thousands of Palestinians and taking their land, Israel is in effect attacking descendants of ancient Israel. Genetics shows they have always lived in the Levant and in the territory of ancient Israel.

Palestinians
What about the Palestinians? Many modern Israelis and Jews have long portrayed them as Arab invaders who do not belong in the area and have no right to it, claiming that Palestinians first “stole” Palestine and that Jews are now taking it back.
Genealogy researchers have long been testing hundreds of ancient burials around the world and have developed a good understanding of who is closely related to which ancient group. One such genealogy source shows that modern Palestinians are most closely related to the following ancient groups: Canaanite/Semite, Hurrian, Amorite, ancient Egyptian, and Carian. What they call Canaanite/Semite is ancient Israel. The reason ancient Israel is now labeled Canaanite/Semite is that evolutionists reject the Exodus and claim Israel were Canaanites who had always lived there. “Semite” relates to the Israelite family tree and the broader Semitic people. Palestinians are therefore made up of a mixed group drawn from several populations that have lived in the land throughout history: descendants of Ham, ancient Israel, and Arabs. This means Palestinians have always lived in the surrounding region and the Middle East, while most Ashkenazi Jewish Israelis today (including settlers taking land from Palestinians in the occupied territories) are interbred with European and other Middle Eastern genes. Those who call themselves Palestinians today have therefore always lived in the Middle East, and they are mostly not descendants of Japhet or Magog, but of Shem, Abraham, and Ham.

Most Palestinians have direct ancestry tracing back to ancient Israel and are now of the Muslim faith. This means they have told the truth about their origins, a truth dismissed by eager Christian and Zionist “prophets.” Palestinian genetics also reveal that they have always lived in the Levant for thousands of years and were not scattered throughout the rest of the world as the Jews were. The Israeli government has now banned Israeli Jews from taking genealogy tests, perhaps with good reason. If both Palestinians and modern Jews are of mixed heritage yet both descend from ancient Israel, it significantly challenges the Biblical birthright claim.

Mitochondrial DNA shows that modern Ashkenazi Jews, who were behind the great 20th-century Jewish immigration to Israel, are of mixed heritage and by no means a “pure” Jewish race. Jews claim that if your mother is Jewish, then you are Jewish, showing this is tied to religion more than genetics.
Paternal haplogroups: The variation in haplogroups shows that for most Ashkenazi Jews there is no clear male haplogroup line back to Abraham. Jewish women have married non-Jewish men, and Jewish men have married non-Jewish women (likely converts). Judaism today is not a single ethnicity. J is most likely Abraham’s haplogroup, and other J haplogroups are part of the broader Semitic family tree. Their direct ancestry traces back to all three of Noah’s sons. Testing of Sephardic Jews shows a similar result, with their genes mixed with those of the countries they lived in before coming to the modern State of Israel. Notably, even Benjamin Netanyahu has a paternal haplogroup that might indicate he is a direct descendant of Magog (though he may still be mostly a descendant of Abraham).
Palestinian paternal haplogroups indicate a greater percentage of Semitic haplogroups than those of Ashkenazi Jews.
Flag Hejaz Arab Man Waving

Photo: Who are the Palestinians? During the first diaspora, God left the poor among the Israelites behind in the land, along with some farmers, while the rest were scattered. God did not scatter everyone the first time. (Jer. 40:6) God also left a remnant behind in the land the second time. Palestinians appear to be a mixed group that includes descendants of Israelites and Judahites, as well as a remnant of those left behind. They were likely poor farmers, as was the case the first time. Neither Rome nor Babylon took the trouble of dispersing groups that showed no opposition and mostly complied with their rulers. This is evident in their choice to let Jeremiah remain in Jerusalem in peace with the others. During the Islamic invasions of the land between the 6th and 9th centuries, the remnant groups who survived the Roman conquest converted to Islam, while still claiming to be descendants of ancient Israel. They appear to be telling the truth.

Over the last 2,000 years, Palestinians have mixed with other groups in the Levant, while Jews have mixed with other religious Jews and local populations wherever they lived, creating a genetic gap between the two groups.
God’s promise to Abraham appears to have been fulfilled in those left behind: “In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates” (Gen. 15:18). It shows a God in control.

Photo: Genetic testing shows us that Jordanians are descendants of ancient Israel too. They are also close relatives of the Palestinians.

The Bible prophesied that God would give the land to a remnant of Israel.

In Zephaniah, God tells us why Israel’s genetics are found among Palestinians and Jordanians, and that it is His design.
He explains: “Woe unto the inhabitants of the sea coast, the nation of the Cherethites! the word of the LORD is against you; O Canaan, the land of the Philistines, I will even destroy thee, that there shall be no inhabitant” (Zep. 2:5). Then He says who will live there instead: “And the sea coast shall be dwellings and cottages for shepherds, and folds for flocks. And the coast shall be for the remnant of the house of Judah; they shall feed thereupon” (Zep. 2:6-7). The world, and even Jews, have been led to believe this is about the future, but genetics show that it was already fulfilled long ago, and that those today called Palestinians are a remnant whom God placed there in place of the Philistines.
A similar judgment happened in the country we now know as Jordan: “I have heard the reproach of Moab, and the revilings of the children of Ammon, whereby they have reproached my people and magnified themselves against their border. Therefore, as I live, saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, Surely Moab shall be as Sodom, and the children of Ammon as Gomorrah, even the breeding of nettles, and saltpits, and a perpetual desolation: the residue of my people shall spoil them, and the remnant of my people shall possess them” (Zep. 2:8-9).

History tells us that the Greeks dispersed the Philistines from the land long before the Jews were expelled by the Romans. Alexander the Great rearranged the region and created a Greek metropolis. The early inhabitants of Gaza who had opposed the Greeks were sold as slaves. This created a new era with a new population. So those who believe Zephaniah speaks of Jews destroying Palestine today should learn that this prophecy was already fulfilled during Alexander the Great’s era, and those living there today are not the ones the prophecy is speaking against. Rather, it is the remnant that the prophecy says took over, which is now targeted by the State of Israel.

Again, this is not about the modern state of Israel taking Jordan today. This has already happened in the past, and genetics show that the word of God was fulfilled. The remnant of Israel does, in large part, possess these lands.

ANCIENT ISRAEL IN IRAQ?
Jordanians, who are related to Palestinians, are also closely related to Samaritans from the Israelite tribes of Manasseh, Ephraim, and Levi.
Between Jordan and the River Euphrates lies part of Iraq. Do the descendants of Abraham cover the area to the river, even in Iraq? Genetics show they do:

The lower the number, the closer the relation.
Picture: Shows which ancient groups the Iraqi people are most closely related to today. The lower numbers indicate closer relations. Canaanite/Semite and Safavid show a direct ancestral combination linking to ancient Israel and ancient Persia. The Bible tells us that many from ancient Israel were relocated to these areas after the Babylonian and Medo-Persian invasions.


The war in the Middle East today is therefore not what it seems at first glance. It is mostly a religious war, with remnants of ancient Israel on both sides holding different religions. One side has the nations of the West as their support, and the other has Islamic nations as their support. We will explain this war in a later part of the Gog and Magog series, to make it all make sense from Scripture.

Where are Japhet’s sons today?

The Bible gives us clues about the direction some of Noah’s tribes went after Babel, but from there they continued to spread out across those territories, mostly in the same wind direction as populations grew, except in Asia, where they also spread northeast. Sometimes the descendants of Noah’s sons intermarried, as DNA evidence shows. That is why we need to let the Bible fill in the gaps. Noah’s sons did not remain only in the first place they went. This was God’s design. It says:
“So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. Therefore, is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.” (Gen. 11:8-9)

Did someone take Magog’s land, and can there be a new Magog?
We also see in several places in the Bible that God acts to protect tribes’ rights to the areas He has designated for them. The Book of Jubilees claims the descendants of Noah made an oath to travel only to the places assigned to them: “in the presence of the kodesh judge, and in the presence of Noah our father” (Jubilees 10). It further explains that Canaan violated this and settled in the land of Shem. There appears to have been a rift between Noah and Ham’s son Canaan, where Canaan is in part blamed and cursed for his father Ham’s disrespectful behavior (Gen. 9:25). The conflict between them is further seen when Canaan refused to settle in the area Noah had appointed to him. As Shem’s descendants were too few to immediately inhabit it themselves, Canaan took advantage of this. The book claims that both his father Ham and his brother Kush warned Canaan against it, saying: “And Ham, his father, and Cush and Mizraim his brothers said to him: ‘You have settled in a land which is not yours, and which did not fall to us by lot: do not do so; for if you do, you and your sons will fall in the land and (be) accursed through sedition; for by sedition you have settled, and by sedition will your children fall, and you shall be rooted out forever.’”
Both the Bible and the Book of Jubilees therefore tell us that God took part in dividing the land. The Lord was the one who scattered them. In other places where God scattered people, we also see Him having clear intentions in how and where they were scattered. The Bible tells us God is the King of all borders (Job 38:10). Job said: “He increaseth the nations, and destroyeth them: he enlargeth the nations, and straiteneth them again” (Job 12:23). The Bible also shows us how God preserves other peoples’ lands, not just Israel’s (Deut. 2:5, 9, 19; Gen. 15:18). Japhet and Magog receive their judgment at the Gog and Magog war at the very end of the 7,000 years, showing that their areas still belong to them until the very last. They did not die out; they remained in control of their areas. However, as we will see, they did have internal conflicts and wars, and they also committed another grievous sin regarding the holy land, a land not appointed to them.

God has control over who went where, and we need to keep that in mind as we continue. This will also help us identify Magog and expose his sin against Jerusalem and God’s people.


CONTINUE TO PART TWO —————-> Human development after the flood

 

THE ISRAEL DECEPTION INTRODUCTION

0


Introduction

200 million gifts from evangelicals to Israel every year? That is someone’s estimate, some say even more. Many churches have had offerings for Israel and spent millions on transporting Jews from all over the world to the modern state of Israel.

It might be curious as church membership or attendance is plummeting at a high rate. The Christians are losing their members to the pagan uprising in their countries, yet instead of investing money to preach the gospel or to increase their influence, millions are sent to those who reject Christ so they can have a country.

Modern-day Israel has confused many Christians because, for a long time, the understanding was that God’s people were the followers of Christ regardless of their ethical background and not Jews who rejected Christ. Now they have given up this belief and made themselves the servants of Christ-denying Jews. Yes, even those mocking Christ.

Christians are helping the Israeli army, cleaning their toilets, they are cheering and siding with Israeli wars, tolerating apartheid-like conditions for Palestinians and them being pushed out of the land.

For it is believed, prophetically, that Israel is supposed to have this land for a thousand-year reign. So they have to take it, right? And those stopping them are bad people, right?

The understanding of Israel’s mission and future is a mixture of already passed fulfilled prophecy and interpretation of future prophecy. Yet, the interpretations of modern Israel contradict all the major morals, laws, and words of Christ. Normally, if an interpretation does not harmonize with either God’s law or Jesus, it should be clear it is wrong, yet in the case of Israel, blindness seems to have swiped over the Christian churches. Being forced to choose between the written word and their understanding of prophecy and certain biblical terms, they choose their understanding and throw away every good principle in the bible for its sake. It is there for important to learn the A-B-C of the gospel once again, who Jesus and the real Israel are. The revelation from scripture to what the State of Israel really is, shocked and surprised even the writer of these articles.

A lot of what you will read will be tough reading, just as it was painful and hard to write. They are hard truths to swallow for many people. Therefore use time to pray for God to open your heart to what He wishes to tell you. No matter what it is. This study will also reveal how short the time is and how everything is set for Christ to come on very short notice.


ARTICLES:

Coming soon…

  • THE DRAGON AND THE WAR WITH THE KINGS OF THE EAST

PART 1: WHO IS JEHOVAH?

0

Article series: INTRODUCTIONWHO IS JEHOVAH?WHO IS THE REAL ISRAELTHE SCATTERINGTHE GATHERING: ONE-FOLD – ONE ISRAELTHE MODERN STATE OF ISRAEL NOT CHOSENDANIEL 9 AND THE PRE-TRIBULATION DECEPTIONJUDAISM ACE IS NOT A GODLY REPRESENTATION OF OTTHE BIRTH OF THE MODERN STATE OF ISRAELTHE DIFFERENCE (between Biblical Israel taking of Canaan and modern Israel taking of Palestine)What side should we take in the Palestinian and Israeli conflict?


PART 1: Does Modern Israel have a God?

To understand the current state of the Jewish synagogue, we must first clarify who Jehovah is and examine how belief or rejection of Jehovah shapes the definition of the real Israel.

Understanding Jehovah’s connection with Jesus is essential to knowing who the real Israel is. YHWH is the God of Israel. If you do not worship the God of Israel, you are not Israel. If you do not respect and love the God of Israel, you break God’s law, for the law’s greatest command is to love Jehovah. Therefore, no one can represent God’s law or culture, or serve as its gatekeeper, if they do not worship Him. This is also why not all of Abraham’s descendants were chosen; only the line that continued to honor Jehovah was.

If Jehovah and Jesus are the same person, it exposes post-Jesus Judaism as apostate, even bordering on pagan, for it means they rejected their God in favor of one born of their own imagination.

There have been countless debates between Trinitarians and anti-Trinitarians throughout the history of the Christian movement. Both may be partly wrong and partly right. To claim that a man can fully know and understand the secrets of God’s nature is, at best, self-deception, and a great measure of humility is needed. Such reflection should lead us to conclude that we cannot fully understand these things, and I will not claim to explain them perfectly here either.

Understanding who God is will remain complicated for humanity because God is unlike us, and His kingdom is unlike any earthly kingdom. Humans can only understand and compare things we already know and have seen. As Paul wrote of God’s kingdom: “But as it is written, what no eye has seen, no ear has heard, and no human heart has conceived” (1 Cor. 2:9).

If we traveled back in time to people living three thousand years ago and had to explain modern inventions they had never seen, we would be forced to explain them in a way they could relate to, from their own perspective, using the familiar to illuminate the unknown. If we were to describe an airplane and how it worked, we would have to point to birds and metal and try to make them picture a metal bird. Even then, the mechanism would remain beyond their grasp. Consider the word “horsepower,” still used today to describe the power an engine produces. There are no horses in an engine, nor is the energy involved anything like that produced by a horse. It simply conveys the same result: movement and power. You can explain speed. You can describe to ancient people a hollow metal cylinder in which hundreds of people could sit, powered by something far stronger than any horse or bird, kept running by a combination of liquid and oil, and capable of carrying people around the world through the air. Yet when you leave that person with all of this information, the likelihood of them building an airplane from your description is close to none. There are details they would need to understand first, and inventions that would need to be made along the way. Understanding comes in stages. At best, the person is left to fill in the gaps with assumptions, which will be deeply flawed. Now, try to explain a cellphone to that same person. You speak into a small object, press some numbers, and someone on the other side of the world can hear you instantly. They would think you were a sorcerer in league with evil spirits. To understand it properly, they would first need to learn about radio waves and grow familiar with them. There are steps that must be taken before the final invention can be understood.

In a way, this is how God must often speak to mankind. Because His kingdom is more advanced, possesses greater knowledge, and operates on a higher level than we do, He must use things we can see and observe to explain the things we cannot.

When it comes to who God is, He withholds some of the insight because we are not served by comparing Him to what we can see. Such comparisons would degrade who God is and what He can do for us. There is something about the nature of God that cannot be understood through earthly comparisons. He asks us to accept that He is a higher being and that there are things we cannot grasp with our present knowledge or imagination. Instead, He reveals who He is by letting us come to know His character. To Him, knowing who He is matters more than understanding what He is made of.

Once, it seemed unthinkable that any being could be everywhere at once, seeing and knowing everything. Now that we have the internet, through which intelligence agencies can access virtually any room and listen in, it is tempting to compare this to what God does, as if He were a machine that records everything we do and builds a profile of our personality based on what we watch, listen to, buy, and click on.
But we are still using things we see to explain something far beyond our understanding. God is not a machine, nor is He the internet.

These things are important for us to understand, both for our salvation and for our relationship with God, as God explains in the Bible. None of it is hidden.

We are told there is a Creator, a heavenly court that judges mankind, that man’s deeds are recorded, and that there is a way for us to be redeemed. God does not explain the Holy Spirit in detail; He simply tells us it exists and works to bring us to God and to sanity. Jesus compared it to the wind because the wind is invisible, yet its effects are visible. Still, the Holy Spirit is far more than the wind. Jesus called Himself the good shepherd, a door, a lamb, a vine, a farmer, a way, bread, and His blood wine, among other things. He was using familiar images to help us understand who He is and what His mission is. But these are merely illustrations, not the reality itself. It is the character of these things that can be compared to Him. We are not literally sheep and He a shepherd; rather, the relationship between sheep and shepherd is the point.

Jesus explained that He has a Father. Both Judaism and Islam claim to be monotheistic religions, so there is no room in their theology for a divine son, and believing in two Gods is considered apostasy. Having more than one god is seen as pagan, and it is partly for this reason that Jews rejected Christ, both in His time on earth and to this day.

Let’s look at some of these passages:

The Jews answered him, “It is not for a good work that we are going to stone you, but for blasphemy, because you, being a man, make yourself God.” (John 10:33)

“When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralyzed man, ‘Son, your sins are forgiven.” Now some teachers of the law were sitting there, thinking to themselves, “Why does this fellow talk like that? He’s blaspheming! Who can forgive sins but God alone?” (Mark 2:5-6)

“Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!” At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple grounds”  (John 8:58)

Something is lost in translation here, but Jesus is claiming to be the great I AM, the God of Israel, who was revealed to Moses at the burning bush, and who led Israel as a pillar of fire by night and a pillar of cloud by day. He is the one whose earthly throne was the Ark of the Covenant. That is why they tried to stone Him. Jesus was revealing to them that He was Jehovah, the very one they claimed to worship. But if Jesus was Jehovah, who was the God whom Jehovah called His Father? And did this not contradict the monotheistic Jewish belief that “God is one”?

Could God have come as a human and walked among them?

After calling Jesus a blasphemer, they encountered a man who had been blind from birth. Jesus silently took some dirt, shaped it, spat on it, and placed it on the man’s eyes, and the man received his sight. In doing so, Jesus reflected His former self. In the beginning, He had created the first man from dirt, shaped him, and with His breath gave man life:

“And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Gen. 2:7)

It is impossible to overlook Christ demonstrating His power over creation: raising the dead, controlling natural elements such as water, wind, storm, and fire, turning water into wine, and directing animals into the fishermen’s nets. Over and over again, Jesus demonstrated that He was above everything created. Even His enemies could not resist what He commanded; when He ordered demons to leave the possessed, they had to obey. When He came to His temple, His human enemies fled at the sound of His voice. Yet He did not abuse His power. He came to invite men to follow Him willingly and said He would respect their choice if they rejected Him, though they would have to answer to a heavenly court for their own sins if He were not permitted to atone for them.

So if Christ was the creator, the Jehovah, the God of Israel, who is the One He called His father and God?

I do not wish to explain what God has chosen not to reveal, but we can discuss what He did reveal.

Jews still reject Christ because they cannot accept a second God. Muslims reject Jesus as God’s son because they cannot conceive of a God with a son without also imagining a wife, and the idea of God having a wife is considered blasphemy. Therefore, they accept Jesus only as a prophet.

The Catholic Church introduced the term “the Trinity,” which is not found in the Bible. It was an attempt to explain how God can be one while Christ and the Holy Spirit also exist. The effort to define this was declared sacred, and in their presumption, they even elevated the doctrine to the level of a salvational teaching.

Anti-Trinitarians have opposed this dogma and insist there is only one God, the Father, and that Jesus, while a son of some kind, is not God. Some hold that God created Him as well, while others believe He only became a son at the moment of His incarnation as a human.

The truth may lie somewhere within or beyond all of this. The pagans, who stood in great opposition to the truth and the one true God, worshiped many gods with divine sons and wives, gods who fornicated with humans and with each other, and who warred among themselves. It was, in short, one great mess. One could pray to multiple gods and choose whichever suited their trade or circumstance. What many forget is that the origins of what eventually became paganism trace back to Noah and his three sons, who were true worshipers. Paganism is the belief in a Creator taken in a deeply erroneous direction. God asked for animal sacrifices; they sacrificed humans. God controlled the elements; they worshiped the elements as gods. The list goes on.

We cannot determine truth simply by doing the opposite of what pagans believed and practiced. Even the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi contained several of God’s Ten Commandments, yet their religion was a lie because they mixed truth with falsehood, making even their truths corrupt. Biblical truth, therefore, is not the opposite of pagan mythology by default. Truth cannot be measured that way.

So how can we understand how God is one, yet potentially be another God at the same time?

In the beginning, in Genesis, at creation, we see more than one involved.

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Here we see that the word for God, Elohim, is a plural word, identifying Him as a supreme judge. But it also suggests that there is more than one behind the creation, behind creating man “in his image.” (Gen. 1:26-27)
It is clear that God is not alone. Part of what makes God the God of this world is being its Creator. It is therefore significant that creation was not the act of just one Person.

In the creation of Adam, we are presented with the name Jehovah: “And the YEHOVAH ELOHIM formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Gen. 2:7). This indicates to many that Jehovah and Elohim are one single person. First, only Elohim, in plural, is used. Then another name is introduced and used with Elohim. This could distinguish the two, Jehovah being Jesus, and Elohim His togetherness with His Father.

And ELOHIM spake all these words, saying, I am YEHOVAH thy ELOHIM, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other ELOHIM before me” (Exo. 20:1-3).

Here, Jehovah says He brought them out of Egypt and is to be addressed as their Elohim.

So how can two talk as if they are one?

A verse Jews cling to is this: “Hear, O Israel! The Lord is our God, the Lord is one! And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might” (Deuteronomy 6:4– 5).

Let us do this verse again: Hear, O Israel! YEHOVAH ELOHIM, the YEHOVAH is one! And thou shalt love YEHOVAH ELOHIM with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.”

Rather than clinging to this as evidence that there is only ONE God, perhaps what God intended them to understand was that there was no God for them outside Jehovah, because they are in oneness. Rather than comparing God’s “one” with the many gods of the pagans, it was never meant to be explained as a contrast to their religion. It is not really that complicated. When a government makes a judgment, it does so as one institution. When it makes a law, it does so as one institution. If it creates something, it is created as an institution. God, however, has what He would refer to as a kingdom, and He is a king. Even when a royal house makes a decision, it does so as one. The oneness shows there is no dispute, no rift, no competition. Their goal and purpose are one and the same. The word used for “one” is the same as when God ordained Adam and Eve to be “one.” If you tear them apart, you sin. If you set them against each other, the house will not stand. The house is built upon unity of purpose, though they do not necessarily do the same work. A man and a woman are meant to complement each other; the differences between them create a perfect oneness.
God is not a marriage. Their oneness refers to something we cannot fully understand. They are one in nature, thought, and action; they cannot be separated or set against one another.

Toward the human family, they present themselves as one. You cannot set one against the other. Jesus explained that the relationship can be described as that of a Father and a Son, though they cannot be Father and Son in exactly the same way humans are, for God is not human.

Whether God gave birth, cloned Himself, took a part of His own nature as building material, divided Himself in two like a cell, or whether God and His Son share a Spirit and are therefore the same in spirit while manifesting as two distinct beings, all of this is human imagination attempting to grasp what we do not understand using only what we can see in our own world. We do God a disservice, and even lie, when we treat our assumptions as facts. God has chosen not to reveal how there are two, or why He says “we” when speaking of creation. What the New Testament does tell us is that the best way to describe the relationship is that of a Father and a son. A father and son, in the human sense, share the same genetics; they are the same “house.” While a human son inherits upon the father’s death, God never dies, which makes the Son co-regent with His Father. They therefore rule as a united “we,” as one entity. By speaking as an entity, it is clear that the two share the same agenda. Their unity and oneness are expressed by making all proclamations as one.
God was not created from dirt; by analogy, a father and a son share the same Y-DNA. DNA is a coded language that reveals a coder and demonstrates that humans are created. God is not created, and so His nature is fundamentally different. Human terms are therefore inadequate for describing these things. Jehovah and the Father have existed throughout what we call eternity and share power and a throne. It is presumptuous and disrespectful for anyone to attempt to explain that which God has chosen not to reveal, given our feeble understanding. We cannot do Him justice regardless of what conclusion we reach. The nature of God is, in the end, not ours to define, but how to worship Him is.

Israel was told that Jehovah was to be their God and Judge. Jehovah was the representation and likeness of His Father; when He spoke, They spoke. To worship one was to worship the other, for they are one. They are both the origin of human life, though it was Jehovah alone who formed man with His hands and breathed life into his nostrils. Jehovah is therefore the origin of life for man and is man’s God. To man, He is the Alpha and the Omega. He holds the key to their life and the key to their death. He is not Alpha in the sense that He existed before the God of the universe, but in relation to man, He is our beginning.
The apostle John describes the divinity in this way: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men.” (John 1:1-4) Jehovah is man’s life-giver, as these things speak of the things of our world and not the entire universe, of which we know little.

What John explains, then, is that Jesus was one with God, that He created the world together with God, and that He gave life to man.

Jesus said: “Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?” When Christ had risen, He did not object when Thomas declared: “My Lord and my God. Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed…” Jesus did not deny being God, nor deny being Thomas’s God (John 14:8-9; 20:28-29).
Jesus acknowledged Thomas’s proclamation of Him as God as an act of true faith.

Seeing Jesus was like seeing the Father, or the “God of Israel.” The one their forefathers had loved, and that had been with them, was actually Him.

Throughout the Bible, Jehovah Elohim is described as an entity or as the God of this world. One of the most complicated verses for non-trinitarians is this:

Ye are my witnesses, saith YEHOVAH, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no EL formed, neither shall there be after me.

I, even I, am YEHOVAH; and beside me there is no saviour (YASHA).

I have declared, and have saved, and I have shewed, when there was no strange god among you: therefore ye are my witnesses, saith YEHOVAH, that I am EL.” (Isa. 43:10-12)

Faced with such a scripture, one can do as the Jews did and eliminate Christ altogether. If Jehovah is the Father, He cannot have a divine son, and He, the Father, is the YASHA (Yeshua), not an impostor later called Yeshua. The God speaking here seems to eliminate the possibility of a Jesus, unless the passage is spoken in unity or it is Jesus Himself speaking. If it is Jesus who speaks, He appears to say there is no other God before Him. Here, the word EL is used rather than Elohim, which is plural, suggesting that only one is speaking.

And continuing: “Behold, God (EL) is my salvation (YEHUSHUA); I will trust, and not be afraid: for the LORD (YAH) JEHOVAH (YEHOVAH) is my strength and my song; he also is become my salvation (YEHUSHUA)” (Isa. 12:2).

Jesus is the Latin form of YEHUSHUA, which was His real name, the same name the angel Gabriel told Mary to give her son, and the same one who saved mankind by dying on the cross. The God speaking to Isaiah declares that YEHOVAH, YAHVE, is this same YEHUSHUA.

This is why, for Jews, Yeshua or Jesus cannot be who He claims to be. How could He leave heaven and come to earth as a man, while another God still remained in heaven?

These verses seem to indicate there can be no one before or after, and there is no room for another Yeshua taking God’s place.

Although these verses have become difficult to understand, the truth may be simpler than many think. Yehovah is not before or after; He is one with what He calls the Father. They are one entity, and both have existed throughout all of time. They represent the same reality. Jesus can speak as God because He is God, and consequently, He is this planet’s only savior and hope. He is the voice of God. Throughout the Old Testament, from the moment Yehovah first gave man life with His own breath, He has been the true God of this world. There was no one before Him here on earth, for He created everything in unity with His Father. And there is no one after Him; He will always be the ultimate ruler, EL, of this world. He is the only one who can save, YESHUAH; without Him, man is judged to death without the offer of pardon.

For if we believe in Jesus, it is Jesus speaking here and not the Father, declaring that He is man’s only God, life-giver, savior, and hope. Jesus is the one who had a throne on this earth in the form of the Ark of the Covenant. The law contained within it speaks of Him.
God, Jehovah, did not take over someone else’s rule or territory, and no one will take it from Him afterward. Nothing Jehovah does is by His own will alone, apart from the God of the Universe, but always in unity with Him. Only with this understanding does what God says in Isaiah make sense. If Yeshua was sent by God, then He is this same Jehovah who said there is no other Yeshua than Him. Why does all of this matter? Because the Jews and the anti-Trinitarians teach that the God of the Old Testament is the Father: Jews believe there can be no son, while the anti-Trinitarians believe there is a son but that He is not God. However, if the one Jews think of as God has really been Jesus all along, they have no God if they reject Jesus. He was their Alpha. This is what we will examine further.
Rejecting Christ as God is like a child rejecting their own biological parent. If Christ formed us and breathed the breath of life into us, we cannot say He is not the origin of our existence. And if He is the origin of our breathing and existence, He is our God. He is our beginning.

The Bible reveals a great change in the oneness of God. Throughout the Old Testament, Jehovah speaks as one God, in unity, togetherness, and shared nature. “Let us make humans in our likeness…” They were always one. Yet when man sinned, Jehovah was the one constantly present, representing Himself as our God. When someone had to save mankind, bear their penalty, and represent them in the courts of heaven, it “broke” something in the nature of God, severing the more physical bond of the Godhead. How this occurred, we cannot fathom with our current understanding. All we can see is the effect and change recorded in the Bible.
If one were to defend the universe against sin while another had to save and represent sinners, they had to part ways physically. For there to be a mediator between the God of the universe and mankind, one had to step down from the throne and place Himself below the one He had been equal with. In the Old Testament, we were introduced to only one entity: a perfect God, a oneness. In the New Testament, one is in heaven, and the other is in human flesh. This completely changed the setting and situation of the Godhead. How God was presented in the past and how He is presented in the New Testament is therefore shaped by this great change. Jehovah coming as a human, even as a small baby, meant that He could no longer function as God. He gave this up and placed everything in His Father’s hands. From being equal, He became subordinate. By taking on human nature, He had to relinquish His divine nature, which had made Him one with the Father. From that moment on, they were no longer one in nature or position, only in purpose and character. Although no longer holding the position of God in heaven, He was still man’s creator and therefore god in the ethical sense. Whatever authority He was to have now had to be given to Him from God in heaven.

Jehovah’s identity, a mystery we will not fully understand with our limited minds, was translated into human genetics, and He was born as a human. As prophesied: “Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel; which is, being interpreted, God with us.” (Matt. 1:23)

As a human, living under human conditions, Jesus had left behind the glory He once had. He who had been God was now a man.

“Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;
And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father” (Phil. 2:6-11)

Jesus is “KURIOS”, in Greek, which is what the Old Testament would have translated as “ELOHIM”, meaning God. That every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is ELOHIM, God.

Jehovah separated from God to become a man and is now unified with God again. To be reinstated to the position He once held, He first had to lose it or give it up. This is why in the New Testament we see Jesus addressing God, with whom He was once one, from a position of submission, with respect and obedience. From being the one who commands, Jesus learned to be the one who receives commands.
Even though Jesus was God’s Son, he learned obedience from the things he suffered” (Heb. 5:8). He did not have to learn obedience because He was not disobedient; He was always obedient to His principles. But He learned it from a different perspective, a human one. And yet, He remained obedient to the very principles He had established.

This is a strange sequence of events that we cannot fully understand or explain. I certainly cannot explain it perfectly and do God justice. Yet this is what the Bible tells us. From the moment Jesus was born, God and Jehovah no longer spoke as one. Instead, we have God and a mediator, one who humbled Himself to save the human species by becoming a human, living in obedience, and thereby inheriting everything once entrusted to mankind. The promises of God to His people could not be fulfilled while they were in rebellion and under judgment. As a human, Christ could inherit all these promises on our behalf and save the human species by dying for man and being given the power to atone, forgive, and restore. But Jehovah lost something along the way. He is no longer of the same nature as God, only in Spirit. He is now forever of the same nature as mankind, having surrendered His equality with God to save us. After taking on this risk and this loss, there is only one being in the universe who retains the nature of God. God the Father had equally lost the one who was one with Himself, and now His Son shares in nature with the very people who had rebelled against Him. Jesus said: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.” (John 3:16-17)

Although Christ was raised and restored to God’s throne with His Father, He remains a human. He will forever hold a position subordinate to His Father. They are no longer equals in nature, and this is part of the great sacrifice of Christ’s coming to earth as a man.

To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne” (Rev. 3:21).

Something is lost forever. This loss becomes evident in the transition from the Old to the New Testament. This is most likely why God is described as one in the Old Testament, yet when Christ is born, He is considered the human manifestation of God, while another God is in heaven.

When the Jews rejected Christ, they lost the understanding of what had truly happened and how great a sacrifice God had made to restore man. The one standing before them was the one they had always known as their Creator, Lawgiver, and God: Jehovah. The one they claimed to honor and follow was the very one they were ridiculing. The one they accused of blasphemy turned out to be the target of their own. Jesus was the God of Israel.

Jews have maintained this belief to this day: that the oneness described in scripture is simply a human counting system rather than an expression of the mysterious nature of divinity explained in human language.

The God who led them out of Egypt, who spoke to Moses from Mount Sinai, who told them to have no other God but Him, was Jesus. When they rejected Him, Christ said: “Behold, your house is left unto you desolate” (Matt. 23:38). Because Christ is Jehovah, rejecting Christ meant there was no other God to sit in their temple. It was He who had dwelt there. Without Him, their house was desolate, without a God. It is Jehovah or nothing. There is no other God to connect with them, for Jesus was that God, their connection. Rejecting Him meant leaving their house empty. There is not one Jehovah Elohim and one Jesus, such that rejecting Jesus still leaves Jehovah. There is only Jehovah, only one salvation, only one God for them, and if He is cast away, there is no God left offered them.
There was no God in relationship with mankind before Christ, for Christ is man’s life-giver. He is the one who gave them life; there is no one before or after Him in that role. They cannot choose the Old Testament God and reject Christ, because He is one and the same. He is the only one they ever had. This is most likely the meaning of the words Jehovah spoke in the book of Isaiah.

This is also why it was so crucial for the Jewish nation to receive Christ as their Lord. Without Him, they had no Jehovah Elohim, no God to return to, and no God to come. They cannot set Him aside and choose the Father, for the Father was manifested through and together with Jehovah to mankind throughout time. Just as Jehovah formed man from the very beginning, He will execute judgment on the final day. He is the Alpha and Omega of Earth and mankind. Jehovah is all they have. Man is nothing and has nothing without Jehovah. That is what the Bible tells us.

Compare the Old Testament prophecy and the New Testament, again speaking about the same person:
“In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS” (Jer. 23:6)

As written, so it happened. Jehovah came as a man to bring His righteousness to man:

“But by His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption” (1 Corinthians 1:30)
Jehovah is the only righteousness offered to man and Jew alike, and this righteousness is Jesus’ own. Christ is first our life-giver, “the breath of life,” then our atonement, and then our righteousness.

The angel Gabriel told Daniel that his people and Jerusalem would be given 490 years, or 70 prophetic weeks, to receive Jehovah’s atonement and righteousness.

Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy” (Dan. 9:24)

If they reject their God and leader, there is nothing God can do for them. This will end with them becoming disconnected from God and ceasing to be His people and His representation on earth.

The Jewish leadership rejected their Savior, their Jehovah Elohim, whom they had claimed to worship. The one who had once been present inside a pillar of fire by night and a pillar of cloud by day, who had rested above the Ark of the Covenant and led their way, was now crucified and hung above the very resting place of that Ark, with the sign above His head reading “King of the Jews,” for He was that same one. They rejected His blood, His sacrifice, His righteousness, and His salvation.

Therefore, we know this is Christ speaking:

Ye are my witnesses, saith YEHOVAH, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no EL formed, neither shall there be after me.

I, even I, am YEHOVAH; and beside me there is no saviour (YASHA).

I have declared, and have saved, and I have shewed, when there was no strange god among you: therefore ye are my witnesses, saith YEHOVAH, that I am EL.” (Isa. 43:10-12)

This verse does not eliminate Christ; it is Christ speaking. He is all they have if they wish to be saved.

They rejected JEHOVAH but kept His name as if they were still His people. This act is a breaking of the third commandment and a great blasphemy: “Thou shalt not take the name of YEHOVAH thy ELOHEEM in vain; for YEHOVAH will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain” (Exo. 20:7). The word translated as “vain” can also carry the meaning of “lie.”
To claim to represent Jehovah after having Him killed is blasphemy and a defaming of His name. Consider what it would mean if someone who had persecuted and rejected you then claimed to be your faithful spokesperson. That is what Jesus has had to endure. Many believe Jews are guardians of God’s law, but as we have seen, this is a lie. Jews still maintain that Christ is a deception and actively oppose anyone who attempts to convert a Jew to Christ, thereby upholding the resistance of their forefathers and joining them in blasphemy. Many orthodox Jews still claim that Christ is an antichrist. In reality, He is Jehovah, the one the law speaks of, the one you must love in order to keep the law.
God’s name is violated across the earth in every language. Christians claim to follow Jesus yet do not do what Jesus did or believe as He believed. God is misrepresented constantly by those who claim to follow Him.

Yet, the Jewish nation took it further; they wanted to keep the name of Jehovah Elohim and cast out the one whose name it is because they did not like Him, or His way of salvation. Nor did they want His righteousness. They “killed Him” and stole His name.

This left them with an empty shell, a spiritless ritualism that God was not part of and did not wish to be part of. Their religion became a mockery. What was once entrusted to them had become a theft of the truth.

Jesus drew another parallel to His pre-existence as the God of Israel. When God was rejected before the Babylonians destroyed the temple in Jerusalem, Ezekiel was shown how the presence of God, Jehovah, moved out of the temple to its entrance. Then He moved to the Mount of Olives, where He departed with the promise that He would return and seek to place His law in their hearts. Now, rejected once more, He ascends from the Mount of Olives. Jesus points to this as referring to Himself when He makes His triumphant entry into Jerusalem, descending from the Mount of Olives as His great return to the city. Not in mystic glory, but as God in flesh. Only to be rejected and crucified that same week, killed above His throne. He then resurrects and returns to the Mount of Olives, the very place He had departed from in glory, and once again ascends from there back to heaven. It is a complete repetition of the last time, only now clothed as a man rather than as a glory no one could behold. God has truly tried everything. Yet this last time, as He leaves from the Mount of Olives once again, He is followed by a remnant of Israel who did receive Him. He promises them that He will be with them through His Spirit, sending them out to share the truth with others, and that He will dwell in their hearts, as He had promised.
Jesus tries to tell them who He is in many ways, yet it is hard for them to comprehend, and often the revelation induces fear or anger in the listener.

Once, Jehovah had spoken from Mount Sinai in unity with His Father. The “Word in the flesh” had written the law with His finger upon the tables of stone; it was placed in the Ark, and He rested above it in the wilderness and later in Solomon’s temple. It represented the foundation of His kingdom and His law. It was the law that had been broken, and which He had to come as a man to take the penalty for, to restore both law and man.

Once, Moses had stood trembling on the mountain, begging to catch a glimpse of Jehovah’s glory. Now, Moses came to meet Jesus.
“And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart, And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.
And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him” (Matt. 17:1-3)

What an astonishing reversal, and what a testament to how far Jehovah had humbled Himself. Moses did not come to teach Jesus; he came to comfort Him, knowing that mankind depended on it. Yet what a strange occurrence: the one who once came down to meet Moses at the mountain, whose glory was so great that He had to shield Moses’ eyes as He passed, was now a human, and it was Moses who came down from heaven to speak with Him.

It might never be fully understood how much Jesus risked and how much He lost to do what He did.

The one who created man from the dirt became part of His own creation, and not even in the likeness of the first humans in their perfect state, but after four thousand years of degenerating descendants of that first man. Yet He still retained His identity. The human woman whom many now worship as a goddess was not a goddess. She was an ordinary woman. She was not Christ’s creator; Christ was hers. Christ’s identity was already pre-existent, and so she did not create God when she gave birth to Jesus. She is not the mother of God in the sense of being the origin of His existence; she was a vessel for God’s incarnation into human form. He already had His identity. She was a surrogate for Christ’s entry from the divine into the human. The incarnation was not to transform Mary into something divine; rather, it made Christ a human. She was not being incarnated into His nature; He was incarnated into hers, and into the genetics of all those before her: the family of David, Judah, Jacob, Isaac, Abraham, and Adam. How God accomplished this is a mystery to both humans and angels. After His incarnation, He had to live as men do, relying on God for the strength to survive on a sinful planet. His means of speaking with God were the same as ours. To receive strength and help, He had to ask for it. In enemy territory and in constant danger, He relied on God’s protection. And so we see Jesus doing all that we must do to connect with God: praying, praising, studying, and using faith and hope to strengthen Himself. He could not leave the earth to see God in heaven whenever He wished. He had to seek Him in faith, unable to see His Father with human eyes. He had to speak to Him through prayer, without beholding Him, as all humans must.

Yet, despite being born as a man in fully human flesh, Jesus’ identity did not change; His spirit remained His spirit. He was still one with God, unified in spirit, yet now not in nature but by submission. He humbled Himself so He could work as a mediator between God and man, so that He, as a human being, could enter the courts of heaven on mankind’s behalf. He gave up His position at one with God on His throne for a lower position. Before this, Jehovah had represented God to man; He was Jehovah Elohim. Now He was representing man to God. Yet God chose to allow this sacrifice, to permit Jehovah, a part of Himself and the only one like Him, to go and accomplish it.

Jesus made sure to let us know that, in His now humiliated form, He was not to work against God in any way. All He did was as planned, in harmony and oneness with God. Jesus gave them this answer: “Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does.” (John 5:19)

Does this mean Jesus had no will of His own? If He did not, He could not have sinned or even been tempted. But scripture says: “He was tempted in every way that we are, but he did not sin. Let us, then, feel very sure that we can come before God’s throne where there is grace.” (Heb. 4:15-16)

If Jesus could be tempted and even risk sinning, He has a will He can use. So why did He say He can do nothing by himself? Jesus is clearly speaking of His will being united with the Father as it ever was. That even if His appearance and nature had changed, their oneness in spirit and purpose remained. He will not do anything after His own will. Their purpose, plan, and representation to man are still one. Thus, Jesus could say to Phillip that even though Jesus was clothed in human flesh, seeing him and the Father was the same thing. For Jesus was still the God of Israel, although, in human form, He was still in oneness, just no longer in nature and position. There is no conflict or difference. Humans desire signs and wonders, but they can be deceived. Hearing God’s voice on Mount Sinai did not make Israel more obedient to that same voice. Seeing the pillar close by them did not necessarily bring them closer to God.

Man has encountered God in many shapes and forms, yet whether God veils Himself in a pillar of fire or comes as a human, it cannot change man’s heart on its own. Man must desire change in order to change. Fear cannot produce love or perfect obedience, nor is tolerance the same as repentance. Being united with God’s Spirit and law comes through understanding Him correctly and receiving His love. Yet even then, we may still not want His righteousness.

Jesus prayed: “And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are.
While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled” (John 17:11-12)

This prayer was answered when we later read on the day of Shavuot: “And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.”

It meant that they were unified in purpose, in love, in assignment, in hope, and even in material things. It says: “And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.” (Acts 2:1 and Acts 4:32)

This was the answer to Christ’s prayer; this was the oneness that resembled the one He had with His Father, even as a human here on earth. The bond of love.

Now, the details of how are not given to us, most likely because nothing we see here on earth can perfectly explain the Godhead. Sometimes the Spirit is called God’s Spirit, and at other times Jesus says it is His Spirit. Do they share a Spirit? Is it separate? We do not know how they are one, either before the incarnation or after, although we are given much more insight when they are separated, one in flesh and one in heaven. However, this does not fully explain how they spoke as one before the incarnation. I cannot explain all of this, nor can any other human.

Those who think they have it all figured out are most likely fooling themselves and others. The important thing in this study is to understand that Jehovah, the God of Israel, is Jesus. Rejecting Jesus is rejecting the God of Israel and being left with no God at all, only a name stolen from its holder, which itself is a violation of God’s law. They will not receive another God in His place, just as there was no God before Him to man. YHWH is a name said to imitate man’s breathing: YH breathing in, and VH breathing out. It refers to God as the life-giver, the breath-giver, pointing back to YEHOVAH breathing into the first man, making him a living soul. Thus, the first breath to give life was from Christ; He is the first, and He is YEHOVAH, and every breath since then, and until the very last, is still from Him.

Yet when Christ died on the cross, humans took away that breath of life from the human incarnation of Jehovah. There is poetry in how God deals with mankind and gives the message that if you attack your life-giver, you destroy your life at the same time.
Mankind cannot live without Jehovah, and only because He was raised and breathed again can man continue to live. We are connected to our creator in many ways we do not comprehend.

When the Bible says there is no other YESHUA than Jehovah, we should also notice another verse: “I am the LORD (YEHOVAH). That is my name. I will not give my glory to another; I will not let idols take the praise that should be mine” (Isa. 42:8-10)

Any statues and images of Jesus used religiously or ritualistically are not of Him at all. The commandment against making idols for worship includes idols of Jesus. Thus, the Catholic and Orthodox churches likewise blaspheme God when they claim to represent Him. Their worship is an act of rebellion and is registered as such in the courts of heaven.

When Jesus took on humanity, everything He did for man had to be done through His Father. He no longer had the same power as before, limited by the human flesh He had taken on. He had to receive in order to give. Before His incarnation, He could give by His own authority, for He was in the nature of God. Now, He did nothing except through the Father.

By taking the role of a mediator, as the one who ministers on behalf of man before God in heaven, He is required to let God make decisions He can no longer be fully part of as before. As the human representative, and since humans are under judgment, He has a biased role. We see this shift in Jehovah’s position more clearly in the book of Revelation, and also in Christ’s statement: “But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father. Take ye heed, watch and pray: for ye know not when the time is” (Mark 13:32-33)

Although God and Jesus are one, because Jesus is in a reduced position, having taken on human nature and being biased toward man’s salvation, the day and hour of judgment are not revealed to Him. God has to make this ultimate decision without Him.

In Revelation, we see judgment in the temple and at Christ’s second coming. He has to wait for permission from the temple in heaven before He can gather the people He has won and saved. We read: “And another angel came out of the temple, crying with a loud voice to him that sat on the cloud, Thrust in thy sickle, and reap: for the time is come for thee to reap; for the harvest of the earth is ripe. And he that sat on the cloud thrust in his sickle on the earth; and the earth was reaped.”
The angel says, “The time is come,” and this angel is from the temple, where God most likely sits. And so Jesus has to wait for the last moment, the proclamation of the time, from the Father, to take His people with Him. Then we read: “And another angel came out of the temple which is in heaven, he also having a sharp sickle” (Rev. 14:15-17)

This angel is to complete the judgment and punishment over those who are not saved. Again, the word commanding the work is coming from a messenger from the temple. Not Jesus, who is right there.

Jesus says that the whole judgment is given to Him, the key to life and death. Yet He has to follow the rules given to Him in how He upholds this power. And God now has the final say on the times.

If Jesus is the Jehovah of the Old Testament, why do so many think that the God of the Old Testament and Jesus in the New Testament are so different? “For I am the LORD, I change not…” (Mal. 3:6)

Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever.” (Hebrews 13:8)

Both the Old and the New Testaments speak of a merciful God and a God who judges. The same is seen with Jesus in the New Testament. Nowhere does He claim He does not operate by a law, or that mercy is granted regardless of what people do. Judgment remains; it is simply reserved for later. Jesus said: “And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell” (Matt. 10:28).

We know Christ speaks of Himself in union with the Father because later He reveals to John that He, who died and resurrected,have the keys of hell and of death” (Rev. 1:18). Jesus will execute judgment: “And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS” (Rev. 19:15-16). Jesus being King of Kings does not mean there is no Father or God, or that He is above God the Father; rather, as in the Old Testament, we see Christ represented alongside God the Father. This term includes His Father; they are one Kingdom.

Jesus said: “And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day” (Matt. 11:23).

In a parable about Himself, He said: “And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow:

Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?” (The whole parable is in Luke 19:11-27)

And on judgment day, Jesus says He will separate the sheep from the goats. (Matt. 25)

Jehovah judges as much in the Old as in the New; He shows mercy as much in the Old as in the New. Still, Jesus coming as a man rather than remaining hidden in His glory makes Him feel more approachable to the sinner. Watching Him holding God’s values and law in human settings as a Man gives man hope. Seeing His compassion in these examples makes us desire and hope for the same compassion. By coming as a man, a veil was removed, making it easier to see Jesus as He was and making Him seem less threatening to most people. Back then, they would not have dared to try to kill Jehovah when He was inside the Shekinah glory, or even approach it. But Jesus, they tried to stone and kill several times. The different way of viewing Jehovah in the Old and in the New Testament is how a man feels more emboldened when viewing God in a seemingly more pathetic state. This also exposes our hearts in another way than before. Just because He feels more “safe” to approach does not mean the conditions for our salvation have changed.

The animal sacrifices given to a veiled God awaken fear. Christ’s death in love for man awakens love.

The truth is the same, Jehovah is the same; it is how we view Him that often differs. The God of the Old Testament had to judge to preserve life; He had to go to war against His enemies so that those who wanted to follow Him could survive. To prevent the world from collapsing before its time in wars and wickedness. The very same thing Jesus will do in the end. The book of Revelation speaks of Christ’s judgment and the removal of those who cause great harm to His people.

Even in the judgment over what is called Babylon, He says: “Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her” (Rev. 18:20)

Just as God fought the enemies of Israel in the Old Testament, we see Christ eliminating His enemies in the New Testament, from one end to the other. Judgment is no less severe in the New Testament. It is because we view Jesus in human form, and because He explains God in a more practical way than the scribes and Pharisees did, that He is viewed differently. Misunderstanding God’s judgments and actions in the Old Testament is partly because man has misrepresented Him and failed to explain these events properly.

The Jewish nation long believed there was something superior about them, or that God preferred them because they were a better species, more intelligent, or more virtuous, and they expected to rule the world with Him (Deut. 9:4-7). But they misunderstood their mission, God’s law, and the purpose of their rituals, and their witness to the world made God appear angry, unreasonable, and unfair. Jesus took away this misconception, but many Jews uphold it to this day. Jesus said to them: “Did not Moses give you the law, and yet none of you keepeth the law? Why go ye about to kill me?” (John 7:19)

It was not against the law to execute a lawbreaker. It was illegal to execute someone who was righteous. By this word, Jesus explains to them that their understanding of righteousness is wrong. It means they did not understand the law.

Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?” (John 5:45-47)

The Ten Commandments, which command loving Jehovah Elohim with all their hearts, require them to love Jesus. Even the Sabbath commandment, which they claimed Jesus broke, bears witness to and celebrates Jesus. He is the Creator who formed everything and rested on the seventh day. He is to be honored as their Creator. Through the Sabbath, Christ, as a high priest, blesses and sanctifies His people, much as we see priests and rabbis bless their congregations. The Sabbath is God’s house of worship, not a building, and the blessing is from Jesus. But Christ cannot sanctify someone on the Sabbath who does not want His blessing. Thus, keeping the Sabbath without Jehovah, without Christ, is a Sabbath house left desolate, a Sabbath without a sanctifying blessing. It is also a violation of the Sabbath law:

But the seventh day is the sabbath of YEHOVAH ELOHIM: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the YEHOVAH made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the YEHOVAH blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.” (Exo. 20:10-11)
It is Christ’s Sabbath in memorial that He is our life-giver and our Alpha and Omega God. The Ten Commandments are about Jesus as the God of man.

Everything Israel has been given, feasts, holy days, rituals, God’s name, is left desolate without Jehovah. It becomes like idols of wood and stone, a representation of someone who is no longer present.

God had already warned the Jewish nation that there is no blessing in keeping His feasts if He is not part of it: “When ye come to appear before me, who hath required this at your hand, to tread my courts? Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting. Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them. And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood” (Isa. 1:12-15)

He says it is in vain: “Except the Lord build the house, they labour in vain that build it: except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain” (Ps. 127:1)

Remember, Jesus said: “Behold, your house is left unto you desolate” (Matt. 23:38), and that is precisely what it means. The discovery of an ancient Hebrew book of Matthew reveals that it reads: “Therefore you will leave your houses desolate.” By not accepting Jesus, they are left without Jehovah. They are lawbreakers because they no longer honor and respect the God of Israel.

The Jewish synagogue, the Jewish nation rejecting Christ, is a house left desolate. Jehovah is not there to sanctify them on the Sabbath, not there on their feasts, not there to receive their plea for atonement. Not until they receive Jesus will Jehovah be there: “For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.” (Matt. 23:39)

In the name of “KURIOS” again, the word Lord, which in the Old Testament would have been the word Elohim, Adonai, or Jehovah. They have to receive Christ as Jehovah, for Jehovah to return to their house, their hearts, their feasts, and their sabbaths. They have to receive Christ as the God of Israel. The Hebrew Matthew says they have to receive Him as Yeshua, which also links to the Old Testament, where He says He is the only Yeshua.

The Jewish religion after Christ is based upon a lie, a terrible lie. The modern state of “Israel” is not led by Jehovah and does not worship Jehovah, the God of their forefathers, even if they claim otherwise.

Would Jehovah give them the land back while they rejected Him? In the story of Moses, there is a prophecy that might reveal God’s mind here.

Moses was instructed to give the people water through a miracle. Instead of speaking to the rock as commanded, he struck it:

Take the rod, and gather thou the assembly together, thou, and Aaron thy brother, and speak ye unto the rock before their eyes; and it shall give forth his water, and thou shalt bring forth to them water out of the rock: so thou shalt give the congregation and their beasts drink.

And Moses and Aaron gathered the congregation together before the rock, and he said unto them, Hear now, ye rebels; must we fetch you water out of this rock?

And Moses lifted up his hand, and with his rod he smote the rock twice: and the water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their beasts also.

And the LORD spake unto Moses and Aaron, Because ye believed me not, to sanctify me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore ye shall not bring this congregation into the land which I have given them.

This is the water of Meribah; because the children of Israel strove with the LORD, and he was sanctified in them” (Num. 20:8-13)

The rock symbolizes Christ. He even compared Himself to the foundation stone that was rejected. Paul writes: “And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ” (1 Cor. 10:4)

Jesus said He would give them “the living water,” which was a symbol of life, truth, and real joy: “In the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried, saying, If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink.

He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water” (John 7:37-38)

As the rock symbolized, Moses speaking to it symbolized bringing forth water from Christ. But instead, He struck it twice, prophetically pointing to how Jehovah was rejected, so He had to leave the temple, and how, again, as Yeshua, He had to leave them once more. Twice, Yehovah Yeshua was rejected and ascended from the Mount of Olives. The first time the Jews lost their political independence and were suppressed by different heathen nations. The second, they lost their God.
Because of what Moses did, striking the rock twice, he was no longer permitted to enter the promised land. Moses was forgiven and restored, and even brought to heaven. Being denied entry into the promised land was most likely a testimony against Israel, a witness against their rebellion, more than it was a punishment for Moses.

Shall they again be given the promised land after striking Jehovah twice and leaving their house desolate twice? If the example of Moses is anything to go by, the answer is telling. God has not gathered modern Jews back to the land. And if God did not do it, who did? This is what we will examine in these articles.

Many modern Jews have yet to recognize and receive Jehovah, Yeshua, in their house. They have yet to link Jehovah with Yeshua and see that their religious observance is desolate without Him.

Sanctify the LORD of hosts (Yehovah tsebâ’âh) himself; and let him be your fear, and let him be your dread.
And he shall be for a sanctuary; but for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offense to both the houses of Israel, for a gin and for a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem.
And many among them shall stumble, and fall, and be broken, and be snared, and be taken” (Isa. 8:13-15).
Here, Jehovah Himself is said to be the stumbling stone, the rock of offense, as confirmed by Peter, who says the same is Jesus. (1. Pet. 2:6-9)

Unfortunately, messianic movements, along with other Christian groups, have moved toward harmonizing with rabbinical teachings, recasting Jehovah as God the Father and refusing to recognize Jesus. This has upheld the illusion that modern Jews are still God’s people, still representing God’s law, worshiping God, and upholding the truth. Many Christians are now taught to aid this narrative by learning their religion from Jewish scholars. Some mix their Christian faith with rabbinical Judaism. This teaching makes no room for Yeshua, as He in the New Testament is set against Himself in the Old Testament, leaving no room for the other, when they are in fact the same God.
Some even abandon Christ altogether or have become convinced that worshiping Christ as Jehovah breaks the Ten Commandments. They deny that Jesus is God. The consequence of these teachings is that modern Judaism is now considered the teacher of the Christian faith, in stark contrast to the first-century Jews who started the Christian movement after being taught by Christ. The errors Christ tried to combat in His debates with the Jewish scholars of His day are now held by both messianic Jews and many Christians, and are considered correct teachings after all. Because modern Judaism is based on the very rabbinical teachings and interpretations that Jesus debated and called out as violations of His law, those errors are now being taught by many Christians as truth.
The idea that the modern Jews’ house is not desolate but that they are the mediators of Jehovah’s will has opened the door to many Zionist ideas that are part of the end-time deception concocted by God’s enemy. This is also the reason for the warnings in these articles about where the Christian-Israel hype has already led and where it is heading.

PART 2: WHO IS THE REAL ISRAEL?

0

Article series: INTRODUCTIONWHO IS JEHOVAH?WHO IS THE REAL ISRAELTHE SCATTERINGTHE GATHERING: ONE-FOLD – ONE ISRAEL : THE MODERN STATE OF ISRAEL NOT CHOSENDANIEL 9 AND THE PRE-TRIBULATION DECEPTIONJUDAISM ACE IS NOT A GODLY REPRESENTATION OF OTTHE BIRTH OF THE MODERN STATE OF ISRAELTHE DIFFERENCE (between Biblical Israel taking of Canaan and modern Israel taking of Palestine)What side should we take in the Palestinian and Israeli conflict?

It is essential to understand who the real Israel is because God says we are blessed if we bless them and cursed if we curse them. Israel is God’s true congregation. If the name is placed upon the wrong group, it can lead to misunderstandings, deceptions, and curses. This is naturally why Satan does it: to confuse and to cause the real Israel to be persecuted as impostors.

Who is the God of Israel, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Moses? As shown in the previous chapter, Jesus is Jehovah Elohim. Where does the name Israel come from?

Jacob was named Israel after wrestling all night with a Man who turned out to be the Lord. It was Jesus he wrestled with, and to whom he said: “I will not let thee go, except thou bless me”.

Jacob was chosen by God because he clung to the Lord.

So Jacob asked for Jehovah Yeshua’s blessing. It was Christ he clung to and would not let go without a blessing.

And he said unto him, What is thy name? And he said, Jacob. And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed” (Gen 32:27-28)

Thus, the name Israel was given to Jacob because he had refused to let go of Christ.

If he had let go, he would not have been called Israel. The name Israel is therefore given to a nation that holds on to Jehovah and will not let go until He blesses them. The real Israel is not those who rejected Christ and let Him go, but those who held on. The Jews who rejected Christ did the very opposite of Jacob. As we will see, when God gives a name, it reflects a person’s character trait, and if that trait changes or they do the opposite, their name changes too.

The name Israel is an experience with God, a relationship with God rather than genetics.

The reason Jacob ended up in this situation in the first place was that his brother Esau was coming against him. Esau was Isaac’s firstborn, the one who would normally receive the blessing of being a priest in the family. He had the birthright, but because he was not faithful, God took it away and gave it to the second born. It was given to Jacob because he held on to God in the right way.

Jacob and Esau were twins. Esau had the firstborn right, but it was taken from him. This caused him to fight against his younger brother. When Jacob showed no inclination to take the physical heritage, Esau let him go.

Esau had married heathen wives and followed a religion that was part truth and part error. Although he, too, was a child of Abraham, the priestly right to be called God’s people followed the faithful brother, not the one with the rights of the flesh.

Jacob feared his brother would harm his people because he had obtained God’s blessings in the wrong way, which is why he found himself in the prayer battle that he did. In the end, he allowed Esau to keep the material inheritance of the firstborn, and Jacob relied instead on God’s promise of a future blessing. He gave up what he could see for the promise of what could not be seen.

This fits very well with what happened among the Jewish brethren in the time of Christ. They split into two groups; one remained the stronger and had the power to persecute the minority. Yet the persecuted brethren were content with inheriting the promise through Christ and let go of trying to rule over the physical Jewish inheritance, which included the land, the mountain of God, and the temple. The land was promised to the faithful, yet the unfaithful drove the faithful from it. They were forced to live among pagans and endure the trials that came with that. The same happened at the beginning with Jacob and Esau. At first, Jacob, fearing for his life, was forced to flee the land of promise, even though it would one day rightfully be his, and live abroad. Esau continued to live on the land with his family until he moved east of Canaan.

When Jacob feared Esau, he clung to God, as the first church did.

Because the first Christian-Jewish church remained faithful, and those who rejected Christ did not, they inherited the name Israel, which had always followed the faithful within the family.

But although they inherited the name, they were also given a new and more exalted name:

For Zion’s sake will I not hold my peace, and for Jerusalem’s sake I will not rest, until the righteousness thereof go forth as brightness, and the salvation thereof as a lamp that burneth. And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the LORD shall name. Thou shalt also be a crown of glory in the hand of the LORD, and a royal diadem in the hand of thy God” (Isa 62:1-3)

Zion is likewise a name that followed the faithful and was also used for Jerusalem.
God said the land would no longer be called “desolate” but Hephzibah, which means “my delight is in her”. This naturally requires that they remain faithful. Jesus may be the fulfillment of the new name prophesied in Isaiah, showing that His followers would be called by His name, Yeshua, meaning “Yehovah saves”. In Latin, this name was translated to Iesus, from which we get the name Jesus. The designation ‘Christians’ comes from the word Christ and implies following Christ, a title that means the anointed one. Christ and messiah are the same word for anointed, drawn from two different languages. A Christian, then, simply means a follower of the Messiah. We see this term used already in the New Testament: “Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian” (Acts 26:28)
Christ expressed it differently: He said they would be called by His name, gather in His name, and receive people in His name. This is consistent with the Old Testament: “If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and…turn from their wicked ways…I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.” (2 Chronicles 7:14) The name Israel also contains parts of God’s name. It literally means “God perseveres” or “God rules.” If God is denied the right to do both, the name no longer represents the group and becomes a lie unless placed upon the faithful.

First, the Christians called themselves in Hebrew Talmidim of Yeshua, which in the Bible is translated into Greek as mathētai of Jesus. It means students/learners of Jesus and is used between 200 and 300 times in the New Testament. While calling themselves students of Jesus, they also considered themselves as Israel. The name Christian is used only three times and is associated with a later period when the gospel was spread in Greek and Latin, and heathens had joined the assembly.

First-century Christians began using this term instead of Israel for two reasons. When it was first used in Antioch, the Christians were considered a sect called “the sect of the Nazarenes” (Acts 24:5). In this way, the Jewish leaders tried to separate the sect from their own religion by calling it not a Jewish sect, but a Nazarean sect. Jews still today call Christians Notzrim, referring to someone following a man from the city of Nazareth, as a protest against Jesus being the Messiah.
The Jewish leadership refused to have anything to do with their messianic brethren and did what they could to ensure that Christianity would no longer be associated with Israel. The followers of Jesus rejected this term but accepted that they had to call themselves something else for the sake of peace. The first Christians would suffer harsh persecution and be misunderstood if they continued to call themselves the children of Israel.
If the majority of the Jews had remained faithful, none of this would have been a problem or source of confusion. Because of their unfaithfulness and resistance, rather than learning the gospel from their Hebrew scholars, they had to be taught the truth through a different language, spoken by a scattered people: “For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people” (Isa. 28:11)

The unfaithful Jews tried to portray themselves as the faithful Israel and the followers of Christ as the apostates who had no right to the name.

Christians, therefore, accepted being ostracized and felt that a greater thing than being called Israel was to be called a follower of that same God.  
This change of name had been prophesied. Someone greater than Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had come, bringing a greater revelation of God’s salvation and preservation. What the name Israel had prophesied, Jesus fulfilled, and so His followers were known by His title, Christ, as the gospel was, after some time, shared in Greek rather than in Hebrew. God’s people remained the same and are always called by many names, each tied to their experiences.

The Jews who refused to believe and accept Jehovah’s salvation became like Esau. They had the flesh, the firstborn right to the promises, but they threw it away. Like Esau and Jacob, they had come from the same womb and dwelled together for a time. As their differences came to light, they parted ways, and God chose the faithful younger over the unfaithful older, who, by birth, had the firstborn right. The leadership and priesthood were taken from the Jewish nation and given to the “younger” Jewish brethren, the fishermen and ordinary Jews, who were made priests and leaders of God’s people in the place of the others. Jesus made a parable about this.
The kingdom of heaven is like unto a certain king, which made a marriage for his son, And sent forth his servants to call them that were bidden to the wedding: and they would not come. …But when the king heard thereof, he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city. Then saith he to his servants, The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy. Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage” (Matt.22:2-3; 8-9)

The “elder brother” had once again been rejected; the promises and the priesthood were no longer theirs, yet they claimed their birthright nonetheless and held on to the empty shell of a name, rituals, and a piece of land that was no longer rightfully theirs.

Rather than going into combat with them, the followers of Christ, the true Israel, did as Jacob had done. They did not fight or war with their apostate brother, but allowed them to hold on to their “empty house”.

Unfortunately, because the unfaithful kept the name and upheld the history and promise associated with it, many are now confused into thinking they are the real Israel of God.

Jews ACE do not represent Jacob, but Esau

But God now sees them as Esau, Jacob’s twin. There is a certain poetry in this as well, because the last kings of Judah, who reigned when Jesus was born and crucified, were partly descendants of Esau. King Herod and his descendants were raised Jewish but were in part Edomites. Literally, a descendant of Esau tried to kill Jesus so that Jesus would not take his throne from him. His son also killed John the Baptist, mocked Christ, and persecuted His followers. Of him and his meeting with Jesus, it is recorded: “And Herod with his men of war set him at nought, and mocked him, and arrayed him in a gorgeous robe, and sent him again to Pilate. And the same day Pilate and Herod were made friends together: for before they were at enmity between themselves” (Luk. 23:11-12)

Had Jacob let go of Jehovah during their wrestling match, he would not have been named Israel. If Israel let go of Yeshua, they no longer had the right to the name Israel. Only those who cling to Him have the right to use the name, just as many who call themselves Christians are not truly entitled to that name if they do not follow the way of Christ.

The Jews who rejected Christ clung to a name and their genetics as their salvation, deceiving themselves that they were God’s people regardless of their conduct. In reality, they were persecuting and even killing those who had continued in God’s path. Their delusion is reflected in the second temptation of Christ. Satan quoted the Bible and Psalm 91, telling Jesus to throw Himself off the elevated temple and trust that God would still protect Him. Jesus said this was the sin of “testing God”. You cannot go against God’s counsel and claim His promises at the same time. This is a deception of the devil.

Another parallel is found in the actual lives of Saul and David. Saul was elected king by God; he was chosen and given the Holy Spirit for his mission.

illustration of Saul trying to kill David (1 Samuel 19)

Yet when he was unfaithful to God, God rejected him as king, took from him the position he had been given, and decreed that his descendants would not inherit the throne. David, who is a symbol of Christ, was elected king instead. Saul then began persecuting David and tried to kill him, just as the Jews who would not receive Christ persecuted and killed those who did. As in the parable, David and Jesus gathered all those considered outcasts of society who were treated badly by their king. It did not appear that God would give David the kingdom, and Saul continued his reign even after being rejected by God. To many, this seemed a sign and confirmation that Saul was still chosen and favored by God. How could the rejected David be chosen when he was an outlaw living in the woods, in caves, and in pagan lands? Was it not natural to think God was with the one who had been publicly anointed and still held the throne? If Saul was prevailing over David, was this not a sign that God favored him? In the same way, the first followers of Christ appeared to be rejected, while God seemed to remain with the Jewish leaders. This continued for a time, until they met their demise as Saul did. Against God’s counsel, they went to war with Rome believing God would go with them, just as Saul went to war hoping God would go with him. He was wounded in battle and died by his own hand. Many Jews defeated by Rome also chose to end their own lives in the midst of their conflict with Rome.
Masada is a mountain by the Dead Sea where nearly one thousand Jews committed suicide while the Romans camped below. They had persecuted Christ and His followers, holding on to the land and their rule, until they went to war with Rome and lost, repeating the story of Saul and David.
It does not matter who rules the land today; the Bible tells us that the land will be given to His faithful followers on the day of judgment. Similarly, although outcast for a while, David did take the throne and the land at God’s appointed time.

So the Jews who reject Christ can claim what they want, but their end, if they do not convert to Christ, is the same as Saul’s. The land belongs to Christ and His followers and will one day be given to them. That Jews today are temporarily in the promised land does not change this fact. They are trespassers. 

Great confusion, therefore, arises when people today assume that the descendants of those who rejected God, and whom God rejected in return, are the ones to whom the future promises of Israel are directed. They look at the name and not the meaning behind it. They reject the true Israel that is now “called by a new name”, and they think God is speaking through and blessing those who rejected Him.

Lucifer

God does not allow anyone to legally keep a name tied to their position after they have lost it.

This is why the name Lucifer, meaning “light bearer”, was taken from him when he misrepresented God, and he was given the name “opponent” instead. The first name describes what he used to do, and the last describes what he now does. We see names change several times in the Bible to reflect a person’s new position. Examples include Abram becoming Abraham, Oshea becoming Jehoshua, and Simon being given the name Peter (which means Rock).
Satan is the first to go from an exalted position with a name reflecting that, to receiving a name that describes his conflict with God instead. However, Satan refuses the name change; he still considers himself to be the light bearer, the one in the right, and so he has kept the name Lucifer. Those who follow him still call him by this name. He does not call himself Satan, for that is a name change made by God. Just because Lucifer kept the name given to him when he was faithful does not mean he is right or that he is still a light bearer. Calling himself Lucifer does not automatically make him one. The name cannot sanctify him or confirm his position. The name he gives himself does not change who God says he is or what he has become.

Imagine if a government gave someone the title of Police Officer or Sheriff and then had to fire that person for misconduct, yet they continued to call themselves a Sheriff or police officer and portray themselves as such to others. It would be a terrible deception and a crime. This is because the title belongs to a position and not to the person. In the Bible, names and titles are often the same thing, and so names change when positions change.

Fleshly Israel did the same thing as Satan. They kept the name given in recognition of their faithfulness, but God had now given them a new name tied to their rebellion. The faithful remnant among them was the only one lawfully (by heaven’s standard) entitled to keep the place and name. Although the land now belonged to Christ’s followers, they understood that it would be seized by whoever took it by force until God one day restored the earth to them. They knew it was not something they were to fight for, as it is given to Christ to take what is His in His own time (Rev.20:7-10).

The destiny of the unfaithful part of Israel was prophesied beforehand. In the Messiah prophecy in Psalm 69, it says: “They gave me also gall for my meat; and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink.
Let their table become a snare before them: and that which should have been for their welfare, let it become a trap.
Let their eyes be darkened, that they see not; and make their loins continually to shake.
Pour out thine indignation upon them, and let thy wrathful anger take hold of them.
Let their habitation be desolate; and let none dwell in their tents.
For they persecute him whom thou hast smitten; and they talk to the grief of those whom thou hast wounded.
Add iniquity unto their iniquity: and let them not come into thy righteousness. Let them be blotted out of the book of the living, and not be written with the righteous.” (Psalm 69:20-28)
And they have rewarded me evil for good, and hatred for my love.
Set thou a wicked man over him: and let Satan stand at his right hand.
When he shall be judged, let him be condemned: and let his prayer become sin.
Let his days be few; and let another take his office”
(Psa 109:5-9).

 

When someone takes “your office,” they also take your title and job description. This is precisely what Christ says happened, in multiple ways and on multiple occasions. It is also what happened to Saul: another took his office and thereby his title as king.

This was the office of Israel: “And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel…” (Exo 19:6)

They rejected their High Priest, Christ, the heavenly sanctuary, and His teachings of the law, and so their “office” was taken from them. Who, then, was given it instead?
To the Jewish followers and those converting to the Judeo-Christian faith, it is now said: “And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,

And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.” (Rev 1:5-6)

As you can see, the “office” of Israel has followed the faithful and even those who were grafted in.

Now, because the office of royalty and priesthood is given to the followers of Christ, the title Israel follows them. However, it is not used as often as the name of Christ, which is a superior title to Israel, as Christ is greater than Jacob.

It is unfortunate that many are now fooled into thinking the Jewish congregation is still the priests and teachers of God, and so they go to Israel and to rabbis to learn how to interpret the word of God. The Bible is clear that they are no longer to mediate God’s law or word, and can only teach the true follower of Christ an apostate version of keeping the law. It is like a sheriff losing his job but continuing to impersonate one. He acts without authority and provokes the rightful leaders of the land. If we go to the one impersonating the sheriff, we betray the leadership that removed him for a reason, and we rebel against the newly appointed sheriff. Likewise, it is rebellion against Christ and the true Israel when we go to Jewish rabbis to be our priests and teachers, instead of the ones God has now chosen.

If these titles and tasks have been taken from those who originally held this office and name, it means that although they call themselves Israel, the promised seed and priests, God now calls them something else. God always replaces a title with a new one that describes the current state of its bearer.

It is a name tied to their opposition and betrayal.

Even I struggle to repeat the new names they have been given instead of Israel. It is sad and overwhelming.

Jesus gives them a new name: “the synagogue of Satan”, which means, translated, “an assembly of the accuser” (Rev 3:9; Rev.2:9). God says they are blasphemers, which means to “defame God”: to represent Him falsely or to use His name together with a lie. This new name is also seen in the prophecy in Psalm 109: “Let Satan stand at his right hand”. As we will explore further in this study, we will see how they have become Satan’s helpers to deceive and scatter.

PART 3: THE SCATTERING

0

Article series: INTRODUCTIONWHO IS JEHOVAH?WHO IS THE REAL ISRAELTHE SCATTERINGTHE GATHERING: ONE-FOLD – ONE ISRAEL: THE MODERN STATE OF ISRAEL NOT CHOSENDANIEL 9 AND THE PRE-TRIBULATION DECEPTIONJUDAISM ACE IS NOT A GODLY REPRESENTATION OF OTTHE BIRTH OF THE MODERN STATE OF ISRAELTHE DIFFERENCE (between Biblical Israel taking of Canaan and modern Israel taking of Palestine)What side should we take in the Palestinian and Israeli conflict?

One of the arguments Christians use today for why Jews by flesh are still chosen is comparing how they have been scattered throughout the world with what the Bible says. Because they are scattered, the promises of gathering are logically assumed to be about them.

So, who is the real Israel scattered and who is scattering them, according to the Bible? How does it all fit with Armageddon?

To understand the gathering of Israel, we need to first understand who Israel is and then how they were scattered. If we do not understand who was “scattered,” we do not understand who is to be “gathered.”

Throughout history, people have been displaced from their lands by war, conquest, and, at times, natural disasters. Today, we are witnessing the largest movement of people in human history.

At mid-2023 as a result of persecution, conflict, violence, human rights violations or events seriously disturbing public order” -numbers 110 Million displaced people worldwide. (https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/)


Although the numbers were historically lower, people were still constantly displaced. Babylon deliberately displaced the citizens of the northern Israelite kingdom and encouraged its own people to settle in that area instead. This was used as a tactic to prevent resistance. The more spread out a population is among other people, the less influence and power they have, and the more likely they are to adapt to their surroundings and blend in with the majority. At least, that was how it once worked. In our time, large groups of people have moved and settled close to one another, allowing their cultures to remain intact, as seen in Chinatowns in the USA, Muslim neighborhoods, Jewish communities, and so on.

The point here is that the Jewish people are not alone in being dispersed to new lands. The fact that ethnic Jews were scattered on several occasions does not automatically mean they are still the Israel to “be gathered.” Being scattered alone is not evidence of being chosen for “gathering.”

This is why it is important to understand that not all who are scattered are people God will gather. Only those who are part of His kingdom, His citizens of the New Jerusalem, a city which will be placed upon earth in the future.

In the past, Israel had been a great nation, but because of unfaithfulness, they were, as God had said in advance, to be scattered and driven from the land. Note that their first two scatterings were a judgment from God or a consequence of their unfaithfulness:

“And I will scatter you among the heathen, and will draw out a sword after you: and your land shall be desolate, and your cities waste” (Lev 26:33)

“And the LORD shall scatter you among the nations, and ye shall be left few in number among the heathen, whither the LORD shall lead you” (Deu 4:27)

“The LORD shall cause thee to be smitten before thine enemies: thou shalt go out one way against them, and flee seven ways before them: and shalt be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth,” (Deu 28:25)

“And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations whither the LORD shall lead thee. …And the LORD shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone.” (Deu 28:37 &64)


It was prophesied early on that they would not just be scattered, but would become a part of the nations they went to. Concerning Ephraim, the largest tribe forming the once Northern Israelite kingdom, it is written: “And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations.” (Gen.48:19)

Jacob says he shall become a multitude of “goy,” the expression used for any heathen nation elsewhere in the Bible. It is applied to nations other than Israel. It is clear here that the northern kingdom of Israel would later become many nations and would even forget who they once were.
(see Leviticus 26:33; Deuteronomy 4:23–27; 28:25, 37, 64). The first great scattering (also called the first diaspora) began when the Assyrians carried the ten tribes away into captivity (see 2 Kings 15:29; 17:6)

From this, it is fairly easy to understand that a part of Israel would never be gathered into one land, but would remain as these other nations. There would be no room in physical Israel to hold “a multitude of nations.” (Gen.48:19)

This makes it only possible to gather a remnant in the physical country, or the borders would have to extend over most of the Middle East, far beyond the land promised. This is what God said about the Babylonian captivity and the return: “For though thy people Israel be as the sand of the sea, yet a remnant of them shall return: the consumption decreed shall overflow with righteousness” (Isa 10:22)

Yet, behold, therein shall be left a remnant that shall be brought forth, both sons and daughters: behold, they shall come forth unto you, and ye shall see their way and their doings: and ye shall be comforted concerning the evil that I have brought upon Jerusalem, even concerning all that I have brought upon it.” (Eze 14:22)

As it was written, so it happened. After Babylon, only a remnant returned. The rest remained scattered and became a multitude, just like the tribe of Ephraim.

Why did God not include the rest of Israel when He gathered them for a second chance in the land? Because God only gathered the faithful of that time. Those who did not desire to follow the Lord, who had become one with Assyria, Babylon, and wherever else they had been driven, were not gathered and remained in their countries. Most of those scattered the first time do not even know they were once part of ancient Israel, nor do they identify with their past. They do not practice their ancestral religion and live as everyone else does in the countries they ended up in. Most modern Jews do not know who they are genetically. Their DNA is diverse and shows different genetic forefathers, indicating that even though they are of Jewish descent, both males and females in their ancestry break the lineage and are of non-Jewish descent. They are mixed with the people of the nations among whom they have lived. They are not a pure genetic race and never were.

Some Arabs have as much Jewish ancestry as Jews, because both are of mixed race. The government of Israel recently passed a law against genetic testing, most likely because it has been demonstrated that modern Jews are not a clearly defined genetic race. It is a religion first and foremost. Many Jews immigrating to Israel have less than 10% Jewish genes; the rest is mixed with European, Russian, African, and other Middle Eastern genes. Those mixed “goyim” genes are sometimes related to other Jewish mixed genes and are therefore sometimes called fully Jewish when they are not. The connection is seen because if a few families a thousand years ago married, for instance, Spanish or German husbands and wives, many of the Jews hundreds of years later will all have those Spanish and German ancestries in common.

That does not make those genes Jewish ancestry simply because many Jews have them. Those same genes do not trace back to Biblical times or to the Biblical land. Such is the case with many Ashkenazi Jews who appear as genetic cousins on genealogy sites, yet are connected through non-Jewish genes as much as Jewish ones. If a mixed gene pool intermarries, they will share a common mixed pool. So if someone receives 100% Ashkenazi on their test results, it does not mean they are 100% a descendant of Jacob. It simply means they are 100% descendants of the first mixed pool, which was scattered and intermarried across Europe.
Mostly, those returning to modern “Israel” do so because they have kept the traditions of their religion, and not because their racial lineage is pure. It is historically documented that many who emigrated from Eastern Europe and Russia were socialists and atheists who retained Jewish culture.

However, it is not to be doubted that most of the Jews returning to modern “Israel” today were part of the second scattering.

The second scattering occurred when Rome destroyed Jerusalem and Jews were forced out of the land. But are these same people to be gathered back to the land once again? For two thousand years, Jews did not have a state in the former Judean and Israelite lands. Did God gather them again one last time? Are they God’s scattered people by virtue of their descent, and if so, do the “multitude of GOYIM” who are also God’s scattered people have to return to the physical land as well? If we go by the flesh, yes. But God only gathered the faithful in the past. And if we measure by the flesh, when are you supposed to go to Israel? Is 5% genetic Jewish ancestry enough, 10%, 25%, 50%, or 100%? When we cannot even determine the correct amount of genetic makeup required, then who shall go? Because Jewish genes are diverse and diluted, the State of Israel has decided that only those who are Jewish by religion, or who have Jewish practicing parents, and in some instances practicing grandparents, can return. The rest of the Jews, for instance, those who come from a family that converted to Christianity, cannot. This means that the modern state of Israel believes that not all of Jewish ancestry is to return, only those who have rejected Christ. The State of Israel gathers the very ones whom the New Testament says have fallen away.

As we are about to see, the Jews who reject Christ are no longer God’s scattered people. A new group is, and the Jewish nations, shockingly enough, are actually the ones who scattered and displaced them. 


The scattering of God’s Israel

Jesus, Yehovah, is the King of God’s people. If someone rejects and disobeys the King, they are not His people but are regarded as rebels. Jesus said to the Jewish leaders of His day: “Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters” (Matt.12:30).

In this context, they had just called the miracles of Christ to be of Beelzebub, the prince of demons.

Jesus answered them:
Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand” (v.25).

He spoke of Satan’s kingdom, but the principle applies equally to God’s kingdom. If God’s people are against Him, the “house” will not stand, unless He continues only with those who are with Him. So Jesus said right after this that those who are not with Him scatter. The Jewish leaders who would not accept Christ as their Messiah and Lord caused the scattering of God’s people to take place. They are “the bad guys” scattering God’s true people, not the victims.

It was prophesied in Ezekiel 34:
Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel, prophesy, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD unto the shepherds; Woe be to the shepherds of Israel that do feed themselves! should not the shepherds feed the flocks?
And they were scattered, because there is no shepherd: and they became meat to all the beasts of the field, when they were scattered. My sheep wandered through all the mountains, and upon every high hill: yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did search or seek after them. For thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I, even I, will both search my sheep, and seek them out. As a shepherd seeketh out his flock in the day that he is among his sheep that are scattered; so will I seek out my sheep, and will deliver them out of all places where they have been scattered in the cloudy and dark day. I will seek that which was lost, and bring again that which was driven away, and will bind up that which was broken, and will strengthen that which was sick: but I will destroy the fat and the strong; I will feed them with judgment. And as for you, O my flock, thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I judge between cattle and cattle, between the rams and the he goats.  (Eze 34:2-5; 11-16)

Christ is the good shepherd prophesied. He also said: “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me” (Joh_10:27)

But before He spoke this, He said about the Jews that rejected Him that they are not His sheep or part of His flock:

Then came the Jews round about him, and said unto him, How long dost thou make us to doubt? If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly. Jesus answered them, I told you, and ye believed not: the works that I do in my Father’s name, they bear witness of me. But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you” (Joh 10:24-26)

Did it mean He rejected all Jews? No. It only means He rejected those who would not follow Him. He continued with a remnant, as Paul said: “I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin” (Rom 11:1)

He had not rejected Israel of the flesh; He had simply been compelled to continue with a remnant of them and let the others go, just as He once did with the northern and southern kingdoms of Israel. He let the northern kingdom go and did not gather them.

Jesus is also clear that they need to be gathered to Him, and not merely to a land. If Christ is not King of Israel, there is no Israelite kingdom, only the illusion of one. The ancient physical land of Israel was a theocracy, with God on His throne in their midst. Jesus dwelt above the Mercy Seat. Without Him, there is no truly authentic land of Israel. It is a land of man’s creation, of man’s laws and man’s rules. Modern Israel does uphold laws similar to those given by God, but it also has many that are not. The ancient kingdom of Hammurabi was similar; he, too, upheld many of God’s laws and mixed them with his own. Babylon was good at that, drinking from the cups of God’s temple while praising the gods of silver and gold. Taking something from the Bible and adding your own ways is not synonymous with honoring God, as King Saul experienced when the kingdom was taken from him and his descendants and given to David.

The story of Saul and David parallels Israel by the flesh in more ways than those previously mentioned. Like Saul, they were anointed for their position as leaders of God’s people. But Saul combined disrespecting God’s authority with performing “deeds” and “rituals” to satisfy God. “And Saul said, They have brought them from the Amalekites: for the people spared the best of the sheep and of the oxen, to sacrifice unto the LORD thy God; and the rest we have utterly destroyed” (1. Sam.15:15)
He called his disobedience a sacrifice and celebration of God, but he only fooled himself.
God could not lead through Saul, yet at the same time, it seemed Saul was faithful and honored God. The prophet Samuel called his behavior idolatry. Although there were no graven images or gods, his rebellion was considered idolatry. “And Samuel said, Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from being king” (1Sa 15:22-23)

Just because God had anointed Saul did not mean He could not reject him and anoint another. Another took “his office.”

When Saul realized he was rejected and that another had possibly been anointed in his place, he began persecuting David and all who followed him. He scattered David and his followers abroad, yet after some years, he met his end on the battlefield. Saul even killed all of God’s priests when he suspected they were loyal to David.

The same thing happened to the Judean state in the time of Jesus. When they realized Christ was God’s anointed, God’s priest and king, they became jealous and hostile. They could not control Jesus, and He called them out for their hypocrisy and trust in rituals for salvation. Christ appointed new “priests” and “leaders” and gave the Holy Spirit, just as He had done when God elected people to leading positions in the past. The past became a prophecy: just as we see Jehovah first choosing 12 brothers and then 70 elders, likewise we see Christ choosing 12 apostles and 70 new elders for the new church. (Exo 24:9; Luk.10:1; Exo.24:4; Matt.19:28).
Over and over again, Christ demonstrates how He repeats doing things similarly to before.

Not only did the Jewish leaders follow in Saul’s footsteps by refusing to obey Jesus, their Lord, while claiming to honor God through appointed rituals, but they also did as Saul did and tried to kill God’s anointed, the Messiah. In the end, they did kill Him, and then they began to persecute Christ’s followers.

Like Saul displaced and scattered David away from the land, so did the Jews do to Christ’s followers.

The Jews who did not receive Christ are therefore those who scattered the true Israel, and not themselves the scattered Israel. This is important to understand because there is a prophecy that God will punish those who scattered His true Israel in the end days.

This means modern Israel is in for a surprise if they think God is coming to defend them, when in fact, He comes to judge them.

When Jesus was taken at Gethsemane, He quoted the Bible: “And Jesus saith unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered” (Mar.14:27)

Notice especially that Christ is quoting the Old Testament and the prophet Zechariah (Ch. 13 v.7) regarding the scattering of Israel. By doing so, He shows that the prophecies of the scattering of Israel, the ones who are to be gathered, are about His sheep, His followers. By quoting this verse as He was captured to be executed, He identified Christians as the true Israel mentioned in Zechariah, and identified those doing the scattering who will be judged as the Jews who did not receive Him. If a Christian today claims that Zechariah and the gathering of Israel refer to Christians, he will be rejected by most Christians for what is popularly called “replacement theory.” But this is actually one of the last things Christ does as He is taken captive, to ensure we understand that it is His faithful followers who are the true Israel mentioned in Zechariah, whom God will finally come to defend. Not until the Jews lay hands upon Him does He identify who the Old Testament prophecies are speaking of. This is natural, because until that moment, the Jewish nations were still God’s people. Now they were divided, and the prophecies followed Christ’s followers and not the others, and so Christ made this known.
The Old Testament is now speaking of Christ’s Israel, not the Israel that rejected Him. Likewise, the prophecies and the promises of God fighting for His Israel and gathering them are about Christ’s sheep.

Christ tells us plainly that the scattering of these sheep was carried out by the Jews who rejected Him. They are the ones who “smite the Shepherd,” scattering His followers.

Just as Christ said it happened. The Jewish nation systematically chased their own brethren, by the flesh, out of the land for believing in Christ. “And Saul was consenting unto his death. And at that time there was a great persecution against the church which was at Jerusalem; and they were all scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles. And devout men carried Stephen to his burial, and made great lamentation over him” (Acts 8:1-2)

The Jews who rejected Christ “ran them out of town,” so to speak. Was it Christ who took Jerusalem from His own followers and gave it to those who rejected Him? No, it was the enemies of Christ, those who were not “for Him,” who scattered them and now make an unlawful claim to the land.

But as time shows, and as we will discuss in these articles, it will get even worse. They would drive the scattered into the arms of “the man of sin” and indirectly “cause the truth to be trodden down.” The Jews scattering Christ’s followers had great and far-reaching consequences.

The high priest who ordered Christ’s death accidentally made a prophecy as he gave the death sentence:

Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not. And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation; And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad” (Joh. 11:50-52)

Here we see that those scattered were to be gathered to Christ, not to the land. The condition for the land to continue as the capital of God’s people was their faithfulness, and they were given 70 prophetic weeks to be faithful and to receive Christ (Dan. 9). Yet when they did not, God’s people would be scattered as a result. Had they not rejected Christ, Jerusalem would have remained the center of truth throughout all ages.

As it happened to Saul, so it happened to the Jews who did not accept Christ: “But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him.(1Sa 16:14).
Saul would not give up his throne, palace, or title even though God had rejected him. Likewise, the unfaithful Jews, after chasing Christ’s followers away, sat in Jerusalem and refused to give up their titles or offices.
In the end, Saul became desperate and would rather consult his forefathers than go to the one God had chosen: David. Saul had a woman summon what appeared to be the ghost of Samuel, a dead prophet, to receive a word from him. It ended with Saul’s death. David took the throne, but he became a king over a people who were at first conflicted and confused. Similarly, the Jewish nations, upon rejecting the Spirit telling them the truth about Christ, listened to evil spirits and put their trust in the heritage of their deceased forefathers to be with them and guide them onward.

The true scattered Israel, Christ’s sheep, were not scattered because of their own unfaithfulness, but because of the Jewish leaders’ unfaithfulness. They can be compared to Ezekiel, Daniel, and his friends, who were driven out of Jerusalem even though they were faithful, because of their people’s unfaithfulness. Both the good and the bad among Judah were scattered to Babylon and the surrounding nations because of the unfaithfulness of the leaders in Jerusalem.
And just as Saul perished, those Jews who relied upon their “flesh” and their “descent” to be saved were themselves destroyed and scattered from the land.
When Saul saw he had been defeated fighting God’s enemy, he killed himself on the battlefield.
Many of the Jewish people, who had no problem driving their Christ-following Jewish brethren away from the land, ended as Saul ended. They, too, thought they fought God’s enemy when fighting Rome, and many ended up committing suicide when they realized they had lost. Today, we can still see the Jewish settlements on the top of Mount Masada, where almost a thousand Jews committed suicide once they realized they had been defeated. Thus, they ended exactly as Saul did. First anointed, then rejected, persecuting the new anointed who took their place, and then refusing to give up their land and title, fighting God’s enemies and losing, and then ending their lives rather than converting. From then on, both those who scattered Christ’s followers and the Jews who rejected Christ were scattered abroad. But one party was innocent in the scattering, and the other was the cause of it, and it is important to know the difference.

The faithful who were scattered are prophesied to bring a blessing wherever they were scattered:

And the remnant of Jacob shall be in the midst of many people as a dew from the LORD, as the showers upon the grass, that tarrieth not for man, nor waiteth for the sons of men.

And the remnant of Jacob shall be among the Gentiles in the midst of many people as a lion among the beasts of the forest, as a young lion among the flocks of sheep: who, if he go through, both treadeth down, and teareth in pieces, and none can deliver. Thine hand shall be lifted up upon thine adversaries, and all thine enemies shall be cut off” (Mic 5:7-9)

But to the unfaithful scattered, God says:

And I will scatter you among the heathen, and will draw out a sword after you: and your land shall be desolate, and your cities waste” (Lev_26:33).

I will scatter them also among the heathen, whom neither they nor their fathers have known: and I will send a sword after them, till I have consumed them” (Jer_9:16)

These are two different destinies for two different Israels. Jews who rejected Christ were harshly treated everywhere they went; “a sword was drawn after them.” They still proclaim in their museums and books that they have been treated unfairly and poorly, and they have. For almost two thousand years, they have had conflicts wherever they ended up. And although Christians were also severely persecuted, they sacrificed willingly to give a blessing of life to others. They became a “dew from the Lord.” Because of them, God blessed the West with prosperity, as long as His people were allowed to live in peace. The land that treated the true Israel of Christ rightly always prospered. In the end, this gave Protestant nations the upper hand over all other countries. When they change how they treat God’s people, they will fall one by one. And so God’s people have been the “dew” in those lands. Accidents on sea and land have been prevented because one of God’s people was among the passengers. Such has it always been since God’s people were scattered. Those around them take part in their blessings.

The Scattering of Truth

Because the Jewish leaders rejected Christ, David their king, and scattered Christ’s sheep, the truth was, as a consequence, scattered from Jerusalem as well.

Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father” (Joh 4:21)

This was not because God had rejected Jerusalem, but because Jerusalem had rejected Him. According to Daniel 9, the city would have remained forever as God’s capital of truth had the Jewish leadership and the majority of the people been faithful.

Now Paul, from the tribes of Israel by the flesh, a part of the remnant, previously a citizen of Jerusalem, understood that they were scattered from physical Jerusalem: “The high priest carries the blood of animals into the Most Holy Place as a sin offering, but the bodies are burned outside the camp. And so Jesus also suffered outside the city gate to make the people holy through his own blood. Let us, then, go to him outside the camp, bearing the disgrace he bore. For here we do not have an enduring city, but we are looking for the city that is to come” (Heb.13: 11-14)

Christ has built the New Jerusalem in heaven, prepared for the earth: “And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.”

It is to this city that Christ will gather His people:

And he that sat on the cloud thrust in his sickle on the earth; and the earth was reaped” (Rev 21:2  & Rev.14:16)

Jesus is Shiloh: “The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh comes, and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.” (Genesis 49:10)

He is the one who will gather people to Himself. Not the United Nations, not the democratic state of Israel, but Christ. The gathering of those who scattered the real Israel is not a fulfillment of this prophecy. Any “gathering” not accomplished through Christ’s second coming is a fraud, an imitation of the truth, someone imitating Christ. Thus, it can be said that the state of Israel itself is a “false Christ,” or “false Messiah.” That is how serious this is.
Jesus warned: “For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. Behold, I have told you before” ( Mat 24:24-25).

Carrying the “star of David” on their flag, symbolizing the Messiah, and “gathering” what is claimed to be His people, the State of Israel is actually playing “Christ,” making the state a false Christ. And many have fallen into the deception, even the elect.

The gathering will happen very differently when it is real. It will not happen through an earthly state, but “For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be” (Matt. 24:27)
When Christ comes to gather His people, they are not just situated in the country of Israel; they are still scattered all over the world (Because the real Israel has not been gathered yet):

And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other” (Mat 24:31)

When this gathering is done: “And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob” (Rom.11:26)

All of Israel here refers to the dew spread among the nations, a remnant of physical Israel and a remnant of converted Gentiles, representing one fold with one shepherd.

When Jesus speaks of false Christs and not being deceived about the gathering, that it will happen when He comes in the clouds and not before, He also finishes His speech by speaking of another gathering.

“For wheresoever the carcass is, there will the eagles be gathered together” (Matt.24:28). Here we see that when Christ comes, there has been a pre-gathering of those who are to be judged: the carcasses and the eagles, the deceived and the deceivers.


The False Gathering

Any physical gathering before Christ’s second coming is a false gathering orchestrated by the master of this world, the dragon. Satan’s key deception throughout time has been to imitate God. Now he is imitating Christ, and as Christ prophesied, Satan does it with signs and lying wonders. One of Christ’s greatest miracles was to gather the remnant back to Jerusalem after the Babylonian captivity.

To be a false Christ, to imitate Christ, Satan must gather a people to the land, with signs and wonders as well. He has gathered the unfaithful, rebellious Jews who rejected Christ, in the hope that they will do his bidding as they did in the past, confusing Christianity and manipulating events so that the true Israel is called impostors and the truth is scattered. Jews, too, are deceived about themselves. The sign and wonder of gathering a remnant of Jews in the physical land of Israel has the world amazed, especially the Christian world. It is considered a miracle, and a miracle is assumed to be from God, because it resembles something God has done before and which is prophesied to happen again. This makes it the perfect deception for Satan to pretend to be the God of Israel, performing these miracles.

If God gathered Jews by the flesh to the land, then to them that is evidence that they are the real Israel and the real people of God. So Christians have rejected themselves and look to the Jewish nations as the recipients of God’s promises to Israel.

The Bible prophesies that Satan would try to make such a gathering.

How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit” (Isa 14:12-15)

“I will sit upon the mount of the congregation”. Here, the Hebrew reads “har mô‛êd,” which does not refer to any ordinary congregation. It speaks of Jerusalem. It does not speak of just any gathering; it speaks of the gathering of Israel during the Lord’s feasts. These gatherings took place three times a year:

Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, Concerning the feasts of the LORD, which ye shall proclaim to be holy convocations, even these are my feasts (mô‛êd).” (Lev 23:2)

Three times in a year shall all thy males appear before the LORD thy God in the place which he shall choose; in the feast of unleavened bread, and in the feast of weeks, and in the feast of tabernacles: and they shall not appear before the LORD empty” (Deu 16:16)

This place became the mountain that God had chosen: Mount Moriah. This is where God sat in His temple, dwelt above His throne, and where Israel and Judah came at the times of gathering and gathered with Him in His dwelling.

Christ no longer dwells in Jerusalem, and so God’s people must look to the tabernacle in heaven and the throne there, to the promised Jerusalem above, and gather in spirit on the feasts, just as Jesus told the Samaritan woman.

But Satan’s dominion is here on earth. He cannot do what Christ will do, which is gather His people to the New Jerusalem in heaven. So he creates an imitation, an unholy gathering here on earth, to mimic the gathering of God, for the eagles and the carcasses. He does it to draw people’s attention away from the truth and from God’s requirements, and to make people trust in a lie.

He wishes to sit, symbolically speaking, on the mount of assembly, to gather an unholy congregation of those who have departed from the truth but still claim God’s name and God’s promises. Presently, Old Jerusalem is a confused city where all those whom Satan has deceived have gathered from the nations in the mistaken belief that they are God’s chosen people, although they have apostatized from the truth. The Orthodox Church departed from Christ’s teaching and culture, relying on the commandments of men. The Catholic Church, which claims to be Christ’s voice on earth and the means of man’s salvation, promotes falsehoods. The Protestants continue to uphold the errors of the Roman church, perpetuating apostate and pagan culture without reforming back to Christ and His kingdom. The Muslims declared Christ to be only a prophet and not Jehovah or the Son of God, and have instituted their man-made culture, following their leaders before God. And the Jews, who rejected their Messiah and their Lord, yet still claim to be His chosen people before the entire earth. The truth is still “run out of town,” and the courts of the Lord are still trampled upon by Gentiles, those who have rejected His authority.

Satan has made his unholy gathering and continues to do so. You can go to physical Jerusalem and have your pick among the unholy gatherings, whichever succeeds in deceiving you. However, his attempts will come to an end. As Revelation 16 prophesies, while Satan is busy with his unholy gathering, having a false people gathered for every main deception he ever conducted to wound Christ’s assembly, Christ “will come as a thief” and defeat them. (Rev.16:15)

The land belongs to Christ’s faithful followers, but He has asked them not to take it from either Muslims, Jews, or apostate Christians, but to wait for His intervention. This war will be fought by Jehovah, not by His people.

The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him. Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem” (Zec 12:1-2)

Remember, it is the next chapter that Christ quotes when He says His followers are Judah and Israel, the ones to be saved against the madness Satan will create. Throughout time, many have come against Jerusalem, besieged it, and taken it: Rome, the Byzantines, various Islamic groups, the Crusaders, the Ottomans, the British, and lastly the modern state of Israel, claiming to be the same Jews to whom this land was promised. None of these kingdoms did or will stand and remain. The New Jerusalem is in heaven, to be placed on earth. The Jerusalem that exists now is not the Jerusalem of the promise, as Paul said: “But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all” (Gal 4:23-26)

Physical Jerusalem was said to be in bondage when it was under Jewish control, a leadership that rejected Christ, as declared by Paul himself, an Israelite, while the Jews still held the land. The same people taking control again still represent bondage. They have no atonement for their sin without Christ and remain bound to their sins and delusions.

Christ told the Samaritan woman that the mountain in Jerusalem would no longer be used for gathering to Him. We know from the book of Daniel that this was a direct result of the Jewish nation’s rejection of Him.

When Satan has made it a place of gathering for those who listen to him but deceive in God’s name, we know it is not God’s gathering. It is not Christ’s gathering, but the one prophesied as the gathering of the dragon, the false prophet, and the beast: the carcasses and the eagles.

As modern “Israel” has taken control over this area, the two powers that Satan used to kill Jesus and scatter God’s true Israel away from Jerusalem, the Roman pontiff and the Jewish leadership, are again working against the truth. And the “real Israel” is claimed to be impostors and hated by Jews and Christians alike. For where there is a counterfeit, the original is despised.

The book of Revelation portrays what we have examined here. We see a woman, representing God’s people, clothed in the sun with the moon under her feet. The moon represents what has been. The moon has no light of its own; it simply reflects sunlight. Because God’s days begin at night, the moon is seen before the sun. In the same way, the sanctuary system given to Israel was a symbol of Christ and pointed to Him. The woman with the moon under her feet and clothed in the sun reveals that she represents faithful Israel before and after Christ, having the symbol of Christ under her feet while clothed in the truth of whom those symbols pointed.
She brought the world Christ; the Jewish nation was still God’s people until He was rejected. Then we see the woman is scattered but preserved: “And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God” (Rev.12:6)

Here Christ reveals that the woman, His people, are now translated into His followers.

We then see Satan going after her: “And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child.”

Because Christ’s followers are a continuation of Israel, they are said to have brought forth the child. To leave no room for doubt, Christ again specified:

“And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ” (Rev.12:17). The remnant of Israel (the woman with child) that gave us Christ are the followers of Christ (the remnant of her seed).

Part 4: THE GATHERING

0

One Fold – One Israel

Article series: INTRODUCTIONWHO IS JEHOVAH?WHO IS THE REAL ISRAELTHE SCATTERINGTHE GATHERING: ONE-FOLD – ONE ISRAEL: THE MODERN STATE OF ISRAEL NOT CHOSENDANIEL 9 AND THE PRE-TRIBULATION DECEPTIONJUDAISM ACE IS NOT A GODLY REPRESENTATION OF OTTHE BIRTH OF THE MODERN STATE OF ISRAELTHE DIFFERENCE (between Biblical Israel taking of Canaan and modern Israel taking of Palestine)What side should we take in the Palestinian and Israeli conflict?

Exploring Romans 11: Will Jews convert and be God’s Israel once again?

Misunderstanding Paul’s wording in Romans 11 has led many Christians to believe that Jews who rejected Christ are still God’s people and will one day return to Him. The establishment of the state of Israel is, by many, considered the fulfillment of Paul’s prophecy.

For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins” (Rom 11:25-27)

Perhaps rendering the word “until” according to its Greek meaning, “while,” would have avoided all this misunderstanding, but that was the translators’ choice. Is Paul here speaking of a mystery concerning Jewish conversion in some distant future, or has Paul’s meaning been distorted by false teachers and faulty translation?

Paul’s meaning is clear throughout the 11th chapter, and the rest of the chapter must serve to explain this one verse. Further revelations in scripture must also align with it.

Do we interpret it to mean that Jews who rejected Christ are predestined to convert, or is there a misunderstanding here? Christ has never forced anyone to follow Him.

If Paul is saying the mystery is that God will reject the Jewish people but save a remnant in the end, it would mean that God has shown no mercy to the many Jews living in the time between then and now. This is nonsensical, because God cares for all people, Jews and pagans alike. He would not prevent the conversion of Jewish people before the end simply because His plan is to win them only at that final moment. God seeks to save every individual He can, in every age.

This leaves us with two options;

1. God foresees that many Jews will convert in the end, despite generations of rejection. This is indeed wonderful and possible. As the prophet Daniel was told concerning the time of the end: “Knowledge shall increase, and many shall travel to and fro” (Dan. 12:4). An increase in knowledge naturally leads to more conversions; it is a logical sequence, but hardly a mystery. Paul describes the Jews as “natural branches” cut off from God’s tree because of unfaithfulness and, if grafted back, grafted to their own tree naturally (Rom. 11:24). What is the greater mystery: a branch grafted back to its own tree, or one that was “grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree”? Paul is clear that a Jewish conversion is not a greater mystery or achievement than a pagan conversion. A Jewish conversion, therefore, cannot be both a mystery and something natural at the same time.

If Romans 11:25-27 is meant to speak of Jews converting in the future, it still does not prophesy the State of Israel, because God does not need a “State of Israel” to save Jews. The two are not synonymous. Previously, Jews lived among Christians and had to converse and interact with them daily all over the world. This led to many Jewish conversions, which is why Jewish leaders in each place encouraged Jews to form closed communities wherever they lived, avoiding as much contact with Christians as possible. The State of Israel gathered the Jews who had been spread among Christians and secluded them in a land where they learned only from one another. The result was a stronger identity rooted in the rejection of Christ for many, while others, no longer in small communities abroad, became atheists. A study quoted in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz shows that only 30% of Israelis say they are religious. (https://www.haaretz.com/2015-04-14/ty-article/israel-china-among-least-religious-nations/0000017f-e103-d804-ad7f-f1fb55ca0000)

This indicates that since the birth of the State of Israel, many Jews have become less spiritually interested and even more ignorant of Christianity.
Paul is not prophesying the State of Israel in Romans 11, as that is not synonymous with a “state of conversion.” Those Jews who returned to the land after the Babylonian captivity had to convert before returning. It was God’s condition that their conversion take place wherever they had been scattered. Thus, the belief that God gathered modern Jews to the State of Israel in order to convert them there contradicts God’s established order and law. Returning to the land was a reward for their conversion, not the means to produce one.

“And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before thee, and thou shalt call them to mind among all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath driven thee, And shalt return unto the LORD thy God, and shalt obey his voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy children, with all thine heart, and That then the LORD thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath scattered thee” (Deu.30:1-3)

Those who claim that Jews are to return before they convert speak neither truth nor light:
“To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them” (Isa.8:20)

Solomon understood this sequence and prayed accordingly, offering a prayer that God said He would hear.

“If they sin against thee, (for there is no man that sinneth not,) and thou be angry with them, and deliver them to the enemy, so that they carry them away captives unto the land of the enemy, far or near; Yet if they shall bethink themselves in the land whither they were carried captives, and repent, and make supplication unto thee in the land of them that carried them captives, saying, We have sinned, and have done perversely, we have committed wickedness;
And so return unto thee with all their heart, and with all their soul, in the land of their enemies, which led them away captive, and pray unto thee toward their land, which thou gavest unto their fathers, the city which thou hast chosen, and the house which I have built for thy name: Then hear thou their prayer and their supplication in heaven thy dwelling place, and maintain their cause” (1. King.8:46-49)

Christ was clear that the only acceptable repentance was acknowledging Him as Lord (Mat 23:39). Jews need atonement to receive God’s approval and restoration, an atonement given only through Christ. Thus, the modern Jews who have returned to the State of Israel, by not accepting Christ and by not inviting Christian converts to join them, do not fulfill the requirements for return. Worse, they defy Christ’s own words and conditions for returning.

If Paul is prophesying the return of many spiritually blinded Jews, he is prophesying their conversion to Christ, not a return to a land.
It is a natural consequence of the world becoming more enlightened and people less isolated through the internet that many Jews will convert to Christ in the end times. However, this cannot, in my opinion, be what Paul is speaking of here. For then “the whole of Israel saved” would be ignoring the fact that Jews have been lost for 2,000 years, and only a remnant at the end would be saved, which is then called “the whole of Israel.” This makes little sense. The mystery Paul is speaking of must be something other than what some speculate.

2. The second option for understanding this verse is that a word within it should have been translated into English somewhat differently. If we compare it with the rest of the New Testament, the great secret of the gospel at the time of writing was that the invitation was extended to the Gentiles as well as to the Jews. It took a while for the apostles to understand this, and they even needed a prompt before they would preach to the Gentiles (Mat 15:23; Joh 4:9; Acts.10:45; Gal.2:12). They were greatly astonished when Christ preached to non-Jews, and they debated the matter after Christ’s departure, when Peter had witnessed pagans receiving the Holy Spirit (Acts.11). This was the great “secret”: that pagans were to become part of Christ’s Israel and be equal to the Christian Jews.

This is the secret: “the fullness of the Gentiles” has to come “in” so that “all Israel shall be saved”. This understanding fits with Christ’s own message: “I am the good shepherd; the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep. … And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd” (Joh.10:11,16)

Here Christ speaks of Israel and of people from another “fold” who must be brought in to create “one fold.” If this is what Paul meant, he is echoing Christ’s own words and not introducing a new doctrine.

Earlier in chapter 11, Paul explains that he himself is part of the remnant of Israel, those who received Christ. He is part of that remnant in his own day. He then explains that Israel is like a tree with branches, and the Gentiles are “grafted in” to this tree that is Israel, while those among “the natural branches” who reject Christ are cut off, meaning they are no longer part of Israel.

The modern State of Israel is a “cut off branch” from the real Israel and is no longer God’s Israel. As Paul states, if individual Jews convert, they are grafted back onto the tree, and so it has been throughout history.
In the Bible, the word “Jews” is used not only to describe a people but also a state of the heart: “For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God” (Rom 2:28-29). In Revelation, this notion is repeated when Christ says that some claim to be Jews but are not.

The stem of God’s tree is not a Jewish state or the state of Israel; it is Jehovah and His law and prophets.

The letter to the Romans was written by Paul while he was in Corinth. He wrote chapter 11 during this same period, when he was also mistreated by Jewish brethren, leading to this declaration: “But when they opposed Paul and became abusive, he shook out his clothes in protest and said to them, ‘Your blood be on your own heads! I am innocent of it. From now on I will go to the Gentiles.’” (Acts 18:6)

Paul understood that for Christ to return, “the other fold” had to come in, and this is why he directed his focus toward them rather than toward the “spiritually blinded” portion of the Jews.

The sequence of events is explained by Christ. He said to the disciples: “These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand” (Mat 10:5-7)

The first to be reached was genetic Israel. Once this was done, the apostles were sent to all the world with the gospel: “And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come” (Mat 24:14).

Notice that the message is the same to Israel as to “all nations”: “the kingdom of heaven” and “this gospel of the kingdom.” It is Christ’s kingdom, Christ’s domain.

This is repeated in Revelation, where an angel carries a message to worship God, their Creator, a message that is to go not just to Jews but to “every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people …Fear God, and give glory to him” (Rev.14:6-7).
The plan is explained fairly well here and elsewhere. God intended to first reach Judah, then as many of physical Israel as possible wherever they were scattered, and then extend the offer to the whole world. Once those who receive salvation have “come in,” and the fullness of all who are called has been gathered, Christ will have “one fold”: “the whole of Israel.” The “whole” does not mean everyone; if it did, then all Jews and all Gentiles would be saved. This is not the meaning of “the whole” in Paul’s letter. He means that those Jews who convert to Christ, together with those coming in from the Gentiles, will form “a whole” — a new whole, a complete “fold” as Christ described. This was the secret hidden from many: that the long-awaited Messiah of the tribe of Judah would not save His people and establish His kingdom until “the fullness of the pagans came in.” This was the entire plan from the very beginning, from when Israel was called out of Egypt to be a kingdom of priests, commissioned to bring the truth about God, His law, and His atonement to the world. But instead of fulfilling this calling, they imitated the pagans, kept their knowledge and practice to themselves, and refused to share it or draw others to it. Rather than seeing themselves as God’s ambassadors, they felt superior to others and did not proclaim their God. God’s plan did not change; instead, He commissioned the apostles, the seventy chosen, and the first Christians to do the work that Judah had been unwilling to do: to reach the rest of the world.
The secret was therefore not that Jews would convert, as they were the natural “branches,” but that pagans would be “grafted in” before Christ’s kingdom could begin. Christ is not waiting for spiritually blinded Jews to convert, but for those who have not yet had the chance to hear the gospel to hear it. Then, as Christ said, “the end shall come.”

There is no additional period of time allotted, no return to a Jewish state for another attempt. Everyone must convert first, wherever they are, and then Christ will come and gather His people. The Bible teaches that it was first the Jews, then Israel, then the pagans, and then “the end” comes.

The invitation and call to the pagans were prophesied several times in the Old Testament.
Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.  … He shall not fail nor be discouraged, till he have set judgment in the earth: and the isles shall wait for his law” (Isa.42:1.4)

While Jews hoped the Messiah had come to deliver them and rule over the world and the Gentiles with “an iron rod,” they failed to see that the Messiah’s purpose was to save the Gentiles and invite them to become part of Israel (Rev.19:15; Rom 2:10-11). The “iron rod” spoke of the final judgment upon all mankind, an idea that was strongly resisted.
“Do not let the son of the foreigner who has joined himself to the Lord speak, saying,
“The Lord has utterly separated me from His people” From Isaiah we see that God also in the Old Testament invited the stranger to come and worship and be one with His people if he wished: “ Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to serve him, and to love the name of the LORD, …Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer…mine house shall be called an house of prayer for all people. ..The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him.” (Isa.56:3-8)


The truth comes from the Jews.

So why does Paul say: “For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:

Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen” (Rom 9:3-5)

This is a valuable and powerful statement that, if understood correctly, can protect someone from deception. If the wrong meaning is drawn from it, however, it only serves to confuse. Paul sometimes explains things in a more complex way than many without formal education can follow, as Peter himself acknowledged about Paul’s writings (2.Pet.3:15-16). Paul most likely wrote in the academic style of his day because, unlike the fishermen Peter and John and others from common trades, Paul had been educated in rabbinical schools and was a Pharisee (Php.3:5, Act 22:3). This may explain why the letters of Peter, John, and James are straightforward and easy to understand even in translation, while Paul often argues back and forth before arriving at his conclusion. This is a very different approach, and it is easily misunderstood, particularly when he presents the views of others alongside his own responses, making both appear to the modern reader as his personal opinion. It was, in fact, common in the ancient Greek style of writing (Aristotelian Argument) to first introduce an issue, then present the case, then address the opposition, provide proof, and finally present a conclusion. While Paul does communicate as a learned man of his day, great confusion arises when everything he says is taken as his final conclusion. Much of Paul’s rhetorical style is lost on modern readers, as it was on some in his own day who lacked formal education. One such example is Paul’s discussion of God’s law, where he appears to dismiss it, yet concludes that the law is good and has not been abolished (Rom.3:31; 1.Tim.1:8). Many Christian doctrines are built solely upon the arguments Paul raises, rather than upon the conclusions he gives in answer to those very arguments.

So, is Paul saying in Romans 9 that God’s people are the genetic Israeli people, regardless of what they do or believe, because they were once given “the covenant” and “the promise”?
In the next verse, Paul says: “Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed” (Rom 9:6-8)

Paul explains here that just as not all of Abraham’s physical children inherited the promise given to Abraham, neither are all who are Israel by flesh inheritors of that promise.

What many think Paul is saying is that everything belongs to those of the flesh, even though he himself is explaining that his meaning is the exact opposite.

Jesus explained the same in a straightforward way in His address to the Samaritan woman: “The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet. Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews. But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him” (Joh 4:19-23)

Why did Jesus not say salvation came from Him? Why say it came from the Jews, the same Jews He knew were about to end His life? This is precisely the point that Paul also explains.

Jews needed to receive Christ as their King and Savior and had to understand that the law and the prophets spoke of Him.

But when Jesus spoke to the Samaritan woman, He made a point of helping her understand that the Messiah’s mission was rooted in the Jewish system, and not in hers or any other pagan tradition.

The truth, the promises, the culture, and the law had been entrusted to the Jews, and the gospel was to be built upon those truths rather than upon a different religious framework. It was important for her to understand that the foundation of Christ’s mission was the truth given to the Jews.

This is also Paul’s point. He is not saying that Jews who rejected Christ are still Israel of the promise and continue to have a claim on God’s promises, but rather that the pagans who have “been grafted in” to the tree need to understand that this is the tree they are grafted upon. They are partaking in the blessing given to physical Israel and the Jews, and the gospel belongs within this framework, not within a pagan or any other religious tradition.

In essence, Paul was teaching the pagans not to alter the foundation of the gospel and create a separate religion. This is remarkably fitting advice, given that the Roman church ultimately did exactly that, rejecting the Jewish roots and replacing them with pagan ones. Both Christ and Paul warn against such a move. Separating Judaism from Christianity caused division in what was meant to be united, and it was contrary to God’s will. The Jews who rejected Christ also played their part in creating this division. The Roman Church and the Jews-by-Flesh together succeeded in destroying the witness of the gospel by severing the law and the prophets from it. The Jews claimed to keep the law, and the Roman church claimed to keep the gospel. Both are now ignorant of their own impending doom, having worked together in pulling the two witnesses apart, with equal guilt.

The truth Paul explains in his letter is the same truth Jesus conveyed to the Samaritan woman: that the gospel and Christ are only understood correctly when united with “the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; Whose are the fathers…”

Yet, although given the key to unlock the mystery of redemption, only by accepting Christ would they truly be God’s “Israel”.

Paul’s explanation of the “grafting in” of the pagans is also meant to prevent the notion that Gentiles are to transform their own religion and simply call it by Christ’s name. It is also a call not to hate or reject them despite facing resistance from many Jews, but rather to feel blessed by them and by their history and experience with God, and to hope, pray, and trust that many will turn back to God and be “re-grafted.”

The first headquarters of the gospel messengers was Jerusalem, and the first preachers were Jews. However, the Roman church transferred this headquarters to Rome and changed the very foundation upon which people understand the gospel.

Thus, the letter to the Romans stands the test of time and exposes their folly.
However, this move could not have happened if the Jewish leaders had not scattered the true Israel from the land.

Jesus began by preaching to His Jewish brethren, reaching them first with the gospel. He also preached to the Samaritans, who possessed part of the truth but had been misled on several matters. He clarified to them that the Jews were on the right side of their long-standing differences. He then sent out His apostles to preach to the “lost” from the tribes of Israel. The reason they received the truth first was that they were closer to it and better equipped to preach to the pagans worldwide. They were commissioned to enlighten the world concerning His identity and purpose. And so it happened, just as God designed it. The Bible, which speaks to billions worldwide every day, was written by Jews. Christians are educated through scripture, taught once again by Jews: faithful Jews. They learn from Israel’s history, from the covenants given to them, from their relationship with God, their failures, and their prophets. And lastly, from the Lion of Judah, Christ, who was born a Jew. The whole Bible is a Jewish book. Every page of the New Testament is a gift from God through the Jews. They were entrusted with the truth, and their history forms the very foundation of the Christian faith.

All of this is the fulfillment of the promises given to physical Israel, and God kept His word. The fulfillment is not, however, attributed to the Jews who rejected their own Lord. They are no longer grafted in and are no longer part of God’s Israel, even if they call themselves Israel. They forfeited the opportunity to educate the world. Paul’s meaning is that we must recognize how everything was fulfilled through the Jewish people, and this recognition is not to be extended to the disobedient Jews of today.

Paul also calls for respect for what the Jewish people have contributed, and any persecution of Jews by Christians throughout history is not God’s design. Christians have not been called to persecute anyone, least of all their own spiritually blinded brothers. You cannot cure hardness of heart with more hardness. Only love can give birth to love. Every Christian should therefore pray for and love those who are spiritually blinded, not hate them.

But loving them does not mean giving them the false assurance that they are the “real Israel” in their spiritually blinded state. Only by converting can they be grafted back into the “real Israel,” the fold that is the remnant of Israel by flesh, those who have preached and won willing souls from among the Gentiles to the gospel. This is the real Israel. The “spiritually blinded Jews” must join this group, this tree.

Replacement theory

God’s Israel was never taken from the Jewish people and given to the Christian people. God’s Israel followed the line of the Jewish people through Christ, His disciples, the seventy chosen, and the tribes of Israel, through a Jewish book, the New Testament, and then also through the “grafted in Gentiles.” Israel was not taken from one group and given to another. Israel continued with the faithful remnant, who became the teachers and forefathers through whom Gentiles were reached and added. Thus, God’s Israel is not a replacement theory; it is a continuation through a faithful remnant and those “adopted” into the family. Those Jews who rejected a place in Christ’s leadership and kingdom were, as they chose, removed from “the tree.”

Replacement theory does not say that Gentiles are now part of Israel. The Bible says they are.
Rather, replacement theory is the lie of both the Roman church and the Jewish establishment:

1. The Roman church preaches replacement theory by removing the gospel of Christ from the God-given Jewish culture and replacing the foundation of God with the foundation of man. By dismantling the base of the gospel, the Roman church turned Christianity into a replacement religion altogether. God continued with the faithful remnant, not with the Roman church.

2. Replacement theory also takes the promises given to the faithful remnant of God, those who received Christ and preached the offer of salvation to the whole world, and reassigns those promises to the Jews who rejected God. To rob the faithful Jews, Moses and the prophets, and the true meaning of the law and the culture, and then claim that the real Israel consists of those who misunderstood and disobediently persecuted Christ and His followers, is another form of “replacement theory.” We take from those whom God has declared to be faithful Israel and claim that God’s promises belong instead to the unfaithful, broken-off branches. Peter, John, James, and all those they reached are then set aside in favor of the descendants of the Pharisees who scattered them, which is an insult to God. It is also contrary to Israel’s history as recorded in the law and the Bible. God never chose the disobedient remnant over the obedient one.

When we understand who the real Israel is, we will understand that it is blessing them that brings a blessing in return, not donating money to the modern State of Israel and its warfare.